Samsung SL620 vs Sony T900
Portability
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
Portability
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Samsung SL620 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
Samsung SL620
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced February 2009
- Alternate Name is PL65
Sony T900
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Revealed February 2009
Photography Glossary Samsung SL620 vs Sony T900 Overview
Following is a detailed analysis of the Samsung SL620 versus Sony T900, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Samsung and Sony. The sensor resolution of the SL620 (12MP) and the T900 (12MP) is pretty well matched and they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe SL620 was manufactured very close to the T900 which means that they are of a similar age. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before getting through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the SL620 scores vs the T900 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung SL620 vs Sony T900 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung SL620 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The entire galleries are available at Samsung SL620 Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Sony T900
| SL620 | T900 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Samsung SL620
| T900 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+692k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung SL620 and Sony T900
| SL620 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2009 |  | February 2009 | Similar age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Samsung SL620 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Samsung SL620 provides exterior dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Sony T900 has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Check out the Samsung SL620 versus Sony T900 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is the front view size comparison of the SL620 compared to the T900.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SL620 and T900 is 94 and 96 respectively.
Samsung SL620 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizes purely by looking at specifications. The pic here will give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the SL620 and T900.
To sum up, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same MP therefore you can expect similar quality of images however you will need to take the age of the products into consideration.
Samsung SL620 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung SL620 Portrait photography details
Sony T900 Portrait photography details
offers face detect focus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
you can focus manually
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung SL620 Street photography features
Sony T900 Street photography features
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
more heavy than average (168 grams)
has image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung SL620 Sports photography information
Sony T900 Sports photography information
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
has image stabilization (Optical)
low max shutter speed (1/1,000s)
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Samsung SL620
Travel photography with Sony T900
built-in flash
does not have Timelapse mode
more heavy than average (168 grams)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
flash built-in
lack of Time Lapse function
low resolution sensor (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung SL620 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony T900 as a Landscape photography camera
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not available
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
does not have Timelapse mode
you can focus manually
screen larger than average (3.5")
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not possible
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
lack of Time Lapse function
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung SL620 as a Vlogging camera
Sony T900 as a Vlogging camera
offers face detect focus
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have microphone socket
more heavy than average (168g)
touch screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of mic support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Samsung SL620 vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Samsung SL620 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung SL620 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Also called | PL65 | - |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2009-02-17 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 922k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 2 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.60 m | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 168 grams (0.37 pounds) | 143 grams (0.32 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $200 | $300 |