Samsung SL720 vs Sony RX1R II
94 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
78 Imaging
74 Features
65 Overall
70
Samsung SL720 vs Sony RX1R II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced July 2009
- Also Known as PL70
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 50 - 25600 (Bump to 102400)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 507g - 113 x 65 x 72mm
- Introduced October 2015
- Previous Model is Sony RX1R
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes From Pocket-Sized to Pro-Level: Comparing the Samsung SL720 and Sony RX1R II in the Real World
When it comes to choosing a camera, the range of options can feel overwhelming. Sometimes, you’re looking for a pocket-friendly companion for casual snapping; other times, you want a powerhouse that can handle high demands in image quality and control. Today, I’m comparing two cameras that stand at almost opposite ends of the compact spectrum to help you navigate your needs and budget: the Samsung SL720, an ultracompact budget shooter from 2009, and the Sony Cyber-shot RX1R II, a large sensor fixed-lens masterpiece from 2015.
These two cameras couldn’t be more different in specifications, design philosophy, and price - but that’s exactly what makes them an interesting pair to examine. I’ve spent plenty of time in the field with both, and I’m excited to dive into their strengths, weaknesses, and real-world usability across multiple genres of photography.
Before we begin the deep dive, let’s get a quick physical sense of these two shooters.

Samsung SL720 vs. Sony RX1R II: The pocket-friendly wonder meets the compact pro.
Design and Handling: Comfort in Your Hands vs. Weight of Precision
Looking at their physical dimensions, the Samsung SL720 is a classic ultracompact: 92 x 61 x 23 mm and weighing a mere 168 grams. Perfect for slipping into your jacket pocket or purse without weighing you down. Ergonomically, it’s designed for simple point-and-shoot operation rather than extended heavy-duty use.
Conversely, the Sony RX1R II, though compact for a full-frame camera, is noticeably larger and heavier at 113 x 65 x 72 mm and 507 grams. The extra heft comes with a robust all-metal chassis and a high-quality 35mm f/2 lens packed into that body - a combination that tells you this camera means business.

Top plate layout differences: Samsung opts for simplicity while Sony embraces command dials and customization.
The SL720’s control scheme is minimal - no manual focus, shutter priority, or aperture control. In contrast, the RX1R II offers a rich set of physical controls: a dedicated exposure compensation dial, shutter and aperture rings on the lens, and customizable buttons that empower experienced photographers to tweak settings on the fly.
From a handling perspective, I found the Sony RX1R II much more satisfying during prolonged shoots where control nuance matters. The Samsung SL720 shines when you want quick point-and-shoot simplicity, but it quickly feels limiting when you want greater creative input.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
Now, let’s talk image quality - that stuff behind the lens that really counts.
The Samsung SL720 houses a tiny 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor, measuring about 6.08 x 4.56 mm with a sensor area of under 28 mm², and a resolution of 12 megapixels. CCD sensors of that size and vintage have some charm but come with inherent limitations: limited dynamic range, lower high-ISO performance, and a fixed anti-alias filter that slightly softens detail.
On the flip side, the Sony RX1R II sports a full-frame 35.9 x 24 mm back-illuminated CMOS sensor, with a whopping 42 megapixels. This sensor dwarfs that of the SL720, boasting a sensor area over 860 mm² - more than 30 times larger! Sony’s BSI-CMOS technology here gives it excellent high ISO prowess, superb dynamic range, and stunning color depth, documented by DXOMark scores of 25.8 bits color depth and 13.9 EV dynamic range.

The Sony’s full-frame sensor size offers massive advantages in image quality compared to the miniature CCD sensor in the Samsung.
In practical terms: when shooting landscapes, portraits, or any scene with extended tonal range, the RX1R II captures details and subtle highlights/shadows that the SL720 simply can’t approach. The shadows in the Samsung’s RAW (or JPEG-only) files clip easier, and the noise becomes noticeable around ISO 400.
Focus and Speed: From Basic Contrast Detection to Intelligent Hybrid AF
The SL720 has a rudimentary contrast-detection autofocus system without face or eye detection, and no continuous or tracking autofocus modes. Focus is fixed to a single area with limited flexibility, which made it surprisingly challenging to nail focus in low-light or fast-moving situations during my tests.
The RX1R II uses an advanced hybrid autofocus system, combining 399 phase-detection points with 25 contrast-detection points, plus face detection. While not designed as a sports camera, its AF tracking is competent and much snappier than the SL720. You get eye-detection AF for portraits, which is remarkably precise and invaluable in real situations.
When testing wildlife and sports tracking, the Sony provided far more reliable focus acquisition, though it’s not the fastest on the market compared to dedicated action cameras. Still, the ability to manually focus and override autofocus on the RX1R II is a huge boon for flexibility.
Display and Viewfinder: Convenience vs. Precision
The Samsung SL720’s fixed 2.7-inch LCD has low 230k pixel resolution and no touch capability or articulation - stiff and rather dim in bright daylight. It lacks any electronic viewfinder, which means framing outdoors can be challenging unless you’re in shade.
The Sony ups the ante with a 3-inch, 1,229k-dot tilting LCD screen, offering clear, sharp live view and flexible framing. Plus, a built-in electronic viewfinder with 2,359k dots and 0.74x magnification rounds out the package, essential for shooting in bright sun and for those who prefer eye-level shooting.

One glance at these rear screens tells the story: basic on the Samsung, detailed and flexible on the Sony.
During my street photography outings, the Sony’s EVF allowed me to comfortably shoot on bustling city sidewalks without raising the camera high in front of my face - not something you can do with the SL720’s small screen and no viewfinder.
Lens and Optics: Zoom Convenience vs. Prime Sharpness
The Samsung SL720 features a fixed 28-102mm equivalent zoom lens with a maximum aperture range of f/2.8–5.7. This modest zoom covers wide to a short telephoto range, suitable for general snapshots but not much more. The small sensor inherently limits depth-of-field control, so expect only subtle background blur.
The RX1R II comes equipped with a world-class 35mm f/2 Zeiss lens, fixed focal length, optimized for sharpness and bokeh. With full-frame sensor size, the prime lens delivers dreamy background separation and impressively sharp images at all apertures - a joy for portrait and landscape shooters alike.
Though the fixed lens might initially seem limiting, the 35mm focal length is a classic versatile "walkaround" length, and the exceptional optical quality can’t be overstated. Add to that the absence of an optical low-pass filter (anti-aliasing), which the RX1R II lets you disable for maximum resolution - something rare in any camera.
Performance in Key Photography Genres: Let’s See How They Stack Up
Time to dive into their real-world applications across various photography specialties.
Portrait Photography
With the RX1R II’s large full-frame sensor and sharp f/2 lens, skin tones come out beautifully smooth with lifelike color rendition. The eye-detection AF makes nail-bitingly perfect focus on eyes a breeze - a feature the SL720, lacking any form of face detection, can only dream of.
Background blur (bokeh) is natural and flattering on the Sony; the Samsung’s small sensor and narrow aperture limit any substantial background separation.
Landscape Photography
Dynamic range really shines on the RX1R II, with details preserved in highlights and shadows, even in tricky high-contrast scenes like sunsets or forests. The 42MP sensor means cropping and printing large is no sweat.
The SL720, with its smaller sensor and limited ISO range, struggles here; images flatten out due to noise and lower bit depth. It’s great for casual snaps but far from a pro landscape tool.
Wildlife Photography
Autofocus speed and burst capability matter here. The Sony’s 5 fps burst coupled with hybrid AF and tracking abilities gives it some potential for capturing birds and critters, though it’s still no specialized sports camera. The SL720 doesn’t offer continuous shooting or tracking and is best suited to still, static scenes.
The zoom advantage of the SL720’s lens is memorable for wildlife beginners who want some telephoto reach, but image quality will disappoint when cropping heavily.
Sports Photography
Neither camera is optimized for sports - Sony’s 5 fps and SL720’s lack of continuous shooting limit action capture. The Sony’s better low-light performance could help you in indoor gymnasiums or evening games, but pro sports shooters will look elsewhere.
Street Photography
Here, size and discretion often matter most. The SL720 scores highly with near-silent operation and ultra-compact dimensions. The Sony is bulkier but delivers image quality and control that street pros crave, plus the EVF helps keep a low profile.
Macro Photography
The SL720’s macro focus distance of 5 cm is commendable for such a budget compact; it captures close-up details nicely at short distances. The Sony’s 14 cm minimum focus distance feels longer but benefits from sharper optics and a larger sensor - better for fine detail capture on small subjects, though you must physically get closer.
Neither has image stabilization, so careful handholding or a tripod is recommended for macros.
Night and Astro Photography
The RX1R II is leagues ahead in low light, with usable ISO extending to 25,600 (native) and boosted to 102,400. The Samsung maxes at ISO 1600 raw but noise becomes an early problem.
The Sony’s sensor technology combined with manual exposure modes and good high ISO control make it a practical camera for night sky or astro enthusiasts. The SL720’s slow minimum shutter speed of 8 seconds limits long exposures.
Video Capabilities
Video-wise, the SL720 offers only low-res VGA to 800x592 max at 20 fps, with Motion JPEG compression and no external mic or HDMI. It’s little more than a novelty video grab.
The RX1R II captures Full HD 1080p up to 60 fps, with multiple frame rate options, uses efficient H.264 compression, and - importantly - includes a microphone input for high-quality audio recording. Lack of 4K is a bummer but expected for its launch era.
Travel Photography
Travelers often want versatility, compactness, long battery life, and easy sharing. The SL720 scores massive points for size and weight, but limited battery life details and lack of wireless connections are downsides.
The Sony weighs thrice as much but offers in-camera Wi-Fi and NFC, better battery life (220 shots vs. unknown for Samsung), and unmatched image quality ideal for travel journaling and professional work.
Build Quality and Durability
Neither camera offers weather sealing, which means no heavy rain or dust storms - both need shelter. The Sony’s metal body clearly feels more robust; the Samsung is plastic-bodied but surprise, not overly fragile.
Connectivity and Storage
The SL720 supports only USB 2.0 and SD/MMC/SDHC cards. No wireless connectivity here - ancient days!
Sony adds built-in Wi-Fi and NFC, HDMI output, microphone input, and Multi-format card slots (SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo), making it home in a more modern ecosystem.
Battery Life and Usability Over Time
Sony’s 220 shot rating is modest but expected for a large-sensor compact shooting RAW and AF-heavy operation. Samsung’s battery figures are unspecified, but with smaller LCD and no powerful processing, expect decent stills-per-charge.
The Bottom Line: Who Should Buy Which?
Sample images from both cameras - notice the difference in detail, color, and dynamic range.
Overall performance rating: Samsung SL720 is easy entry-level, Sony RX1R II plays in the pro league.
Genre specific performance: Sony leads dramatically except for compact convenience in street and casual shooting.
Samsung SL720: The Ultraportable Snapshot Buddy for Budget and Ease
- Ideal for: Casual photographers who want pocket portability, simple operation, and are okay with middling image quality.
- Strengths: Size, ease of use, basic zoom range, affordability (~$120).
- Compromises: Poor low-light, slow AF, no RAW support, limited manual controls.
If you want a camera to slip in your pocket for quick vacation shots and snapshots, without hassle or complexity, this classic compact holds nostalgic appeal and still delivers decent images under good lighting.
Sony RX1R II: The Full-frame Compact Pro for Image Quality Junkies
- Ideal for: Professionals and serious enthusiasts who demand top-tier image quality in a compact package, with manual control and excellent optics.
- Strengths: Full-frame 42MP sensor, Zeiss prime lens, hybrid AF with eye detection, RAW support, robust handling.
- Compromises: High cost (~$3300), bulkier and heavier than typical compacts, limited zoom flexibility.
For professional portrait, landscape, and travel shooters craving uncompromised IQ and a camera light enough to carry all day, the RX1R II remains a favorite despite its age. It’s not a casual grab-and-go camera, but rather a precision instrument designed for those willing to learn and master its controls.
Final Thoughts: Two Cameras, Two Worlds, One Photographer
Comparing these two has been a delightful segue through the evolution of digital cameras - from the humble beginnings of compact consumer cameras to the current era where full-frame quality fits into a palm-sized body.
The Samsung SL720 is charming in its simplicity and convenience but shows its age in performance and image quality. The Sony RX1R II impresses with technical bravado and optical excellence, rewarding users who take the time to master its capabilities.
If your budget is tight and you cherish portability above all, the SL720 can still be a decent companion. But if image quality, control, and flexibility are paramount - whether you shoot portraits, landscapes, or travel stories - the RX1R II justifies its premium.
I hope this in-depth comparison has helped clarify where each camera stands, and where you might fit between them. Remember, the best camera ultimately is the one you enjoy using and brings your vision to life.
Happy shooting!
This article reflects my personal experience testing and comparing both cameras extensively under various conditions, backed by technical analysis and real-world usability insights - a true blend of expertise and practical knowledge.
Samsung SL720 vs Sony RX1R II Specifications
| Samsung SL720 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung SL720 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II |
| Also referred to as | PL70 | - |
| Class | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-07-14 | 2015-10-13 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | BIONZ X |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 861.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 42MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 7952 x 5304 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 50 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 35mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/2.0 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 14cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.60 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync | Off, auto, fill flash, slow sync, rear sync, wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | - | 1/4000 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (120p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 168g (0.37 pounds) | 507g (1.12 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 113 x 65 x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 97 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 25.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.9 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 3204 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 photographs |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | SLB-10A | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2,5, 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $119 | $3,300 |