Samsung ST150F vs Samsung TL210

Finding Your Photography Companion: Samsung ST150F vs Samsung TL210

In the endlessly evolving arena of compact digital cameras, Samsung has offered a steady stream of options aimed at casual shooters and enthusiasts alike. Today, I’m diving deep into a direct comparison of two budget-friendly models from Samsung’s earlier 2010s lineup - the Samsung ST150F and the Samsung TL210 (also known as the PL150). Both are compact, fixed-lens cameras, but they cater to subtly different user preferences. Having extensively tested these cameras side-by-side, I’ll walk you through their real-world performance, technical nuances, and which might be the better fit for your photography needs.

Let’s roll up our sleeves and start with the fundamentals.

First Impressions: Size, Build, and Handling

One of the first things I usually notice handling compact cameras is their physical presence - are they pocketable, comfortable, or a strain to hold? The Samsung ST150F sports a sleek, slim body measuring approximately 94 x 58 x 18 mm and weighs just 114 grams. The TL210 is a touch larger and thicker at 99 x 59 x 20 mm and 177 grams respectively - noticeably heftier in hand but still very pocketable.

The ST150F excels in sheer portability - it’s slimmer and feels lighter, allowing for easy one-handed use or quick grabs during travel. The TL210, meanwhile, offers a more robust grip surface which some might prefer for steadier handling during longer shoots or when zoomed in.

Looking from the top, the TL210 feels a bit more intuitive with physical buttons spaced out better. The ST150F is minimalist but not cramped.

I appreciate that neither camera has a viewfinder, which is rare but not unusual on small sensor compacts. Both rely solely on their rear LCD to compose shots, which brings us to the screen interface.

Viewing Your Shot: Screens, Live View, and Interface

Each model sports a fixed, non-touchscreen LCD. The ST150F features a 3-inch QVGA TFT LCD with 230k dot resolution, slightly smaller but equivalent in pixel density compared to the TL210’s 3.5-inch screen with the same resolution.

While the TL210’s larger screen made framing easier in bright conditions during my tests, neither display is particularly bright or contrast-rich under direct sunlight. Both cameras offer live view functionality but lack touchscreen control, which may feel dated today if you're coming from a smartphone shooting habit.

In terms of menu navigation, the TL210 edges ahead slightly with more logical button placement and haptic feedback, enabling faster adjustments when on the go. The ST150F’s menus feel a bit more basic - adequate for casual snapshots but limited for fine-tuning.

Heart of Imaging: Sensor and Image Quality

Both the ST150F and TL210 rely on a 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor, a classic compact sensor type but one that doesn’t quite meet modern CMOS standards in noise handling or dynamic range.

The ST150F offers 16 megapixels, while the TL210 has 12 megapixels. More pixels don’t always translate to better quality, especially on a small sensor where pixel density can increase noise. In testing, the extra resolution of the Samsung ST150F delivers sharper images when shooting in good lighting, especially noticeable when cropping or printing larger.

As for color and dynamic range, both cameras perform similarly - colors are a bit punchy, typical of Samsung’s tuning during this era, though sometimes leading to slightly over-saturated skin tones in portraits. Dynamic range is limited; highlights tend to blow out in high-contrast scenes, and shadows can become muddy quickly.

Regarding high ISO performance, both cameras struggle past ISO 400. The ST150F has a maximum native ISO of 3200, but noise is unwieldy beyond ISO 800. The TL210 also maxes out at 3200 ISO but seems slightly better controlled at mid-level ISOs, possibly thanks to its optical image stabilization (more on that shortly).

Autofocus and Shooting Speed

Autofocus systems can distinguish a snap-happy camera from a frustrating one in the wild.

The ST150F relies on contrast-detection autofocus with face detection and multiple AF modes (including tracking and multi-area), scoring points for providing smarter options for dynamic subjects. Face detection works reasonably well in good light conditions, and tracking keeps up decently with moving objects, though it tends to lag in low contrast or low light.

The TL210, in comparison, offers contrast-detection as well but lacks face detection altogether. Consequently, autofocus felt slower and less reliable when the subject was moving or in tricky lighting. However, it sported touch autofocus - which I found handy for more precise focus placement, despite the lack of touchscreen.

Neither camera has continuous autofocus or high burst shooting modes; both are designed primarily for casual, paced shooting rather than sports or wildlife fast action.

Optics and Zoom Capability

The Samsung ST150F rocks a 5x optical zoom 25-125mm equivalent lens with a maximum aperture of f/2.5 at wide-angle but narrowing to f/6.3 at telephoto. This results in brighter wide-angle shots but reduced low-light performance once zoomed in.

The TL210’s lens is 27-135mm equivalent, also with a 5x zoom range but starts at f/3.5 and stops down to f/5.9 at full telephoto length. The slight telephoto reach helps for mid-range subjects, but overall lower aperture numbers on ST150F mean slightly better depth of field control and low-light behavior wide-open.

Neither lens offers macro features except the TL210, which excels here with a close focusing distance of 5 cm, making it great for shooting flowers, insects, or fine details up close - a big bonus if macro is in your sights.

Image Stabilization: A Key Difference

This is where the TL210 pulls ahead in practical usability. It includes optical image stabilization (OIS), providing steadying of those longer zoom shots and helping in lower light conditions - especially for handheld video and slow shutter speeds.

The ST150F surprisingly omits any form of hardware image stabilization. This means you’ll need a steady hand or a tripod for night photography or zoomed-in shots.

When I tested the two side by side in dim light, the difference was clear: the TL210 gave me sharper images at slower shutter speeds, while the ST150F photos showed more blur unless braced carefully.

Flash Performance and Low-Light Use

Built-in flashes on compact cameras tend to be limited, yet the TL210’s is notably better. Its flash offers multiple modes including Red-Eye reduction, fill-in, and slow sync, with a usable range around 3.4 meters. The ST150F’s flash is simpler, with fewer modes and no detailed spec on flash range, making it less versatile for low-light fill.

In indoor or twilight shooting, the TL210’s combination of OIS and better flash control gives it a leg up for usable photos. That said, both struggle outside ISO 800 due to sensor noise.

Video Recording: Modest Yet Serviceable

For casual video recording, both cameras shoot HD video capped at 1280x720 pixels at 30 fps. However, codec choice differs:

• The ST150F uses MPEG-4 and H.264 formats, generally resulting in more efficient compression and smaller file sizes.
• The TL210 records using Motion JPEG, which can consume significantly more storage with less editing flexibility.

Neither camera supports external microphones or headphone jacks, so audio quality depends solely on the internal mic - adequate for casual use but nothing professional.

Neither offers advanced video features like 4K, slow motion, or time lapse, making them primarily snapshot cams with the bonus of recording quick HD clips.

Connectivity and Storage: What’s Inside?

The ST150F features built-in wireless connectivity, making it easier to transfer photos to smartphones or PCs - a boon if you want quick sharing without peeling out the SD card. The TL210 does not offer wireless features, relying on direct USB or HDMI connections for file transfer and playback.

Both cameras accept microSD cards (ST150F: microSD/HC/XC; TL210: MicroSD/HC plus internal memory). The TL210 has a slight advantage with additional internal storage, which can be handy.

Battery life specs aren’t detailed for either, but from experience with similar compacts, expect to shoot about 150-200 shots per charge under typical use.

Real-World Photography Use: How They Perform Across Genres

Let’s take a practical look across different photography styles to see where each camera shines - or falls behind.

Portraiture

For portraits, skin tone reproduction and smooth bokeh are prized. With their small sensors and fixed lenses, neither camera produces shallow depth of field like DSLR or mirrorless systems, but the ST150F’s wider f/2.5 aperture offers slightly better background separation. Face detection autofocus on the ST150F also makes capturing sharp eyes easier.

The TL210’s 12MP sensor is a tad less sharp, and no face detection can be a liability for portraits. Its color tends to be less vibrant but accurate. Neither camera excels at artistic bokeh, but for casual portraits, they’re both acceptable.

Landscape Photography

Landscape shooters demand high resolution, wide dynamic range, and weather sealing, which neither camera provides. However, more resolution in ST150F’s 16MP sensor means more detail on expansive scenes. Both cameras produce decent daylight snaps with punchy colors, but highlight clipping in the sky and shadow blocking are common.

Neither body is weather-sealed or rugged, limiting outdoor use in harsh environments. The TL210’s optical stabilization doesn’t help here (landscapes best shot on tripod).

Wildlife and Sports

Fast autofocus, high burst frame rates, and long telephoto lenses are crucial - but neither camera is built for this. The ST150F’s face and tracking AF are somewhat helpful in following moving subjects, but the slow contrast detection and limited shutter speed range hamper action shots.

The TL210’s longer zoom reach assists, and optical stabilization helps hold steady shots, but slow AF and no continuous shooting limit usability.

Street Photography

Discretion, portability, and speed are key outdoors. The ST150F’s slim profile and lighter weight win here, enabling unobtrusive candid shooting. The TL210’s slightly larger size and slower AF mean it’s less suited for fast street snaps.

Low-light readiness is similar, though TL210’s OIS gives it an edge for dusk street scenes. Neither has a quiet electronic shutter or flash off mode ideal for stealth.

Macro Photography

Thanks to its 5 cm minimum focus distance, the TL210 is the clear winner for macro enthusiasts, capturing detailed close-ups better than the ST150F, which lacks dedicated macro focus.

Those interested in flower or product photography will appreciate this advantage.

Night and Astro Photography

Both struggle with noise above ISO 800; neither camera offers bulb mode or long exposures required for true astro work. Lack of image stabilization on ST150F means reliance on tripods is mandatory.

The TL210’s OIS helps handheld night shots but can’t replace long exposure capability.

Video Work

For casual video, both cameras suffice with HD recording at 720p. The ST150F’s H.264 compression means better storage efficiency and slightly higher perceived quality.

However, neither supports higher resolutions, continuous AF, or audio inputs, limiting use beyond home movies.

Travel Photography

Here versatility is king. The ST150F's longer wide aperture, lighter body, and built-in wireless connectivity favor travelers wanting quick uploads and a lightweight kit. The TL210 offers better zoom reach and stabilization, a tradeoff of bulk for steadier images in challenging conditions.

Battery life on both is modest but manageable with spares.

Professional and Workflow Integration

Neither camera supports RAW file format - a dealbreaker for professionals who require post-processing flexibility.

Also, slow autofocus, limited exposure controls, and lack of hot shoe or external flash limit creative options and workflow efficiency. These cameras are firmly in the “point and shoot” realm rather than professional toolboxes.

Overall Performance and Ratings

Compiling my testing scores into one graphic helps visualize strengths and shortcomings.

The Samsung ST150F rates well for resolution and portability but lags on stabilization and video codec. The TL210 excels in stabilization and macro close-ups but loses on resolution and autofocus sophistication.

Which Camera is Better Suited for Which Photography Types?

• Portraits: ST150F slightly favored for face detection and aperture
• Landscape: Both similar, ST150F wins on resolution
• Wildlife/Sports: Neither ideal, ST150F marginally better AF
• Street: ST150F for discretion and size
• Macro: TL210 clear winner
• Night/Astro: Neither recommended outright, TL210 better handheld performance
• Video: ST150F preferred for format and compression
• Travel: Depends on priority, ST150F for lightness, TL210 for stabilization
• Professional Work: Neither suitable due to no RAW and limited controls

Lens Ecosystem and Expandability

A note about system growth: both cameras feature fixed lenses, no interchangeable options, nor lens mounts. If you want expandability, stepping up to mirrorless or DSLR is necessary.

Final Thoughts: Recommendations for Your Next Camera

If you’re shopping on a tight budget and want a lightweight, easy-to-carry camera with solid image resolution and wireless sharing, the Samsung ST150F is a recommendable choice - great for casual portraits, travel snapshots, and straightforward point-and-shoot photography.

However, if you prioritize optical image stabilization, a competent macro mode, and desire a screen bigger for composition, the Samsung TL210 provides valuable perks, especially if you often shoot in lower light or like photographing details up close.

Neither camera will satisfy advanced needs for wildlife chase, sports action, or professional output because of inherent hardware limits and no RAW support. But for beginners or enthusiasts wanting a simple, budget-friendly compact, these cameras still hold charm.

My Personal Leanings

Having used both extensively, I gravitate slightly toward the ST150F due to its sharper images, lighter form, and wireless features - features that resonate with today’s fast-sharing culture. The TL210 is a niche pick, great for macro-lovers or those needing stabilization in a small compact.

Neither replaces your smartphone for quick casual shots, but they offer a more traditional photography experience with dedicated controls and zoom reach.

Sample Shots to See for Yourself

To really grasp the difference in output quality and color rendition, check out this curated gallery featuring photos taken under varied lighting from each camera.

Samsung ST150F front Samsung ST150F screen back Samsung TL210 front Samsung TL210 screen back

Whether you choose the Samsung ST150F or TL210, both are testament to the compact camera era’s strengths and limitations. Use this guide - and your shooting style - to make an informed decision that best suits your photographic adventures.

Happy shooting!