Samsung TL100 vs Sony A6400
91 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
83 Imaging
68 Features
88 Overall
76
Samsung TL100 vs Sony A6400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 219g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Announced January 2009
- Additionally Known as ST50
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Boost to 102400)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 403g - 120 x 67 x 50mm
- Revealed January 2019
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung TL100 vs Sony A6400: An Expert Hands-On Comparison for Every Photographer
Choosing the right camera often means understanding more than just megapixels or price tags. To help you make a truly informed decision, we’ve tested and compared two very different models from different eras and use cases - the compact Samsung TL100 and the advanced mirrorless Sony Alpha A6400. Whether you’re a casual shooter, an enthusiast, or a professional, this detailed comparison breaks down how they perform in real-world photography and video scenarios, and which might fit your creative journey.
A Tale of Two Cameras: Overview and Design Essence
Before diving into image quality and technical specifics, it’s worth understanding who these cameras serve and how they feel in your hands.
Samsung TL100: Pocketable Simplicity (Released 2009)
- Category: Small Sensor Compact
- Sensor: 1/2.3" CCD, 12MP
- Lens: 35-105mm equivalent (3x zoom), fixed lens
- Screen: 2.7-inch fixed LCD, 230k dots
- Weight: 219g
- Connectivity: None; USB 2.0 only
- Price: Around $22 (budget entry-level)
The TL100 is a true point-and-shoot, designed for casual shooting without fuss. With no manual controls or raw support, it’s a snapshot machine for quick memories. Its small form factor makes it ultra-portable.
Sony A6400: Advanced Mirrorless Workhorse (Released 2019)
- Category: APS-C Mirrorless
- Sensor: APS-C CMOS, 24MP
- Lens Mount: Sony E-mount (compatible with 121 lenses)
- Screen: 3-inch tilting touchscreen, 922k dots
- Viewfinder: Electronic, 2.36M dots
- Weight: 403g
- Connectivity: Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, USB 2.0, HDMI
- Price: Around $900 (midrange enthusiast)
The A6400 is built for enthusiasts and professionals who want speed, precision, and versatility in a compact body. Its extensive manual controls and strong autofocus make it ideal for demanding shooting styles.

As seen here, the TL100’s compact size contrasts with the more substantial but still highly portable Sony A6400. If you prize pocketability above all, the Samsung excels. The Sony’s larger grip and rangefinder style give better ergonomics for extended shoots or heavier lenses.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of Photography
Image quality is often the defining factor purchasing decision. Our testing highlights significant differences stemming from sensor size, resolution, and processing engines.
Sensor Technology
| Specification | Samsung TL100 | Sony A6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.3" (6.08 x 4.56 mm) | APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) |
| Sensor Area | 27.72 mm² | 366.6 mm² |
| Resolution | 12MP | 24MP |
| Max ISO | 3200 | 32000 (native), 102400 (boost) |
| Raw Support | No | Yes |
Technical Insight: The APS-C sensor on the Sony A6400 is substantially larger than the tiny 1/2.3” sensor on the Samsung TL100. Larger sensors can capture more light, resulting in better dynamic range, noise performance, and depth-of-field control. The TL100 is limited by its physical sensor size and older CCD technology, while the Sony’s modern CMOS sensor and Bionz X processor enable higher resolution imagery and cleaner high-ISO results.
Real-World Image Quality
- Detail and Sharpness: The A6400 provides noticeably crisper images with more fine detail, thanks to its higher pixel count and superior optics.
- Noise and ISO Performance: In low-light tests, the TL100’s images get noisy and lose detail beyond ISO 400, whereas the A6400 maintains clean images through ISO 3200 and performs well even at boosted ISOs.
- Color Depth and Dynamic Range: Sony’s sensor delivers richer colors and preserves highlights and shadows better. The TL100’s limited dynamic range often results in clipped highlights or blocked shadows in challenging scenes.

This sensor size comparison visually illustrates why the Sony A6400 outperforms the TL100 in image quality. Larger sensors offer photographers more creative control, especially for portraits and landscapes.
Autofocus and Shooting Experience: Speed Meets Precision
Samsung TL100 Autofocus
- Contrast-detection AF only
- Face detection included but limited to single-point focusing
- No continuous AF or tracking
- No manual focus options
Sony A6400 Autofocus
- Hybrid AF system: phase-detection + contrast-detection
- 425 phase-detection points covering 84% of the frame
- Real-time Eye AF for humans and animals
- Continuous AF and tracking at up to 11fps burst shooting
What This Means for You:
The Sony A6400’s autofocus system is exceptionally fast, accurate, and reliable across various shooting conditions. Continuous AF and robust tracking functionality make it ideal for wildlife, sports, and dynamic portrait sessions. In contrast, the Samsung TL100’s AF struggles in low light and moving subjects, offering single-shot focus only without tracking.

Looking at the control layouts, the Sony’s thoughtfully arranged buttons and dials give photographers quick access to ISO, exposure modes, and autofocus settings. The TL100’s minimal controls reflect its simple point-and-shoot design, with no dedicated manual adjustments.
Build Quality and Ergonomics
Though vastly different in size and era, both cameras offer reliable build quality for their classes.
Samsung TL100
- Lightweight plastic body
- Fixed rear LCD screen (non-touch)
- No weather sealing or ruggedization
- Compact for grab-and-go snaps
Sony A6400
- Magnesium alloy chassis with partial weather sealing
- Tilting touchscreen LCD with higher resolution
- Comfortable grip with customizable buttons
- Supports external flash and accessories
For longer shooting sessions or professional use, the Sony’s durable body and ergonomic design ensure a better user experience. The TL100 provides excellent portability but at the cost of manual control and ruggedness.

The Sony’s high-resolution tilting touchscreen contrasts sharply with the TL100’s small, fixed LCD. For vloggers and street photographers, the A6400’s screen flexibility and touch capabilities offer creative framing options and quick menu navigation.
Versatility Across Photography Genres
We tested both cameras across 10 popular photography and video disciplines to see where each shines or falls short.
| Genre | Samsung TL100 | Sony A6400 | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| Portrait | Limited bokeh, basic face detect | Superb Eye AF, shallow DOF possible | A6400 is ideal for sharp portraits |
| Landscape | Lower resolution & dynamic range | High resolution & wide DR | A6400 delivers stunning landscapes |
| Wildlife | No tracking, slow AF | Fast AF with tracking & burst | A6400’s focus speed essential |
| Sports | No continuous AF or high frame | 11fps burst with tracking | A6400 vastly superior for action |
| Street | Ultra-compact, discreet | Slightly bulky but quiet & fast AF | TL100 wins in stealth; A6400 excels in quality |
| Macro | Macro focus to 10cm, digital stab | Lenses with close focusing, no stabilization | A6400 better but requires macro lens |
| Night/Astro | Max ISO 3200, noisy | Excellent high ISO and noise control | A6400 preferred for low-light work |
| Video | 640x480 VGA max, MJPEG codec | 4K UHD @ 30p, microphone input | A6400 professional video capabilities |
| Travel | Very light and pocket-friendly | Compact for APS-C but heavier | TL100 for ultralight, A6400 for versatility |
| Professional | No raw or manual controls | Raw, PS-compliant, advanced workflows | A6400 built for professional use |
Here you can see side-by-side sample images demonstrating the difference in detail, color, and clarity between the TL100 and A6400. The Sony’s pictures exhibit more dynamic range and sharpness, especially in challenging lighting.
Video Capabilities: A Modern Eye on Motion
While video wasn’t a main selling point for the Samsung TL100, the Sony A6400 excels as a hybrid photo-video system.
Samsung TL100:
- Max video resolution: 640x480 at 30fps
- Codec: Motion JPEG
- No microphone or headphone jacks
- No image stabilization for video
Sony A6400:
- 4K UHD at 30fps (100 Mbps, XAVC S codec)
- Full HD at 120fps for slow motion
- External microphone input (important for quality sound)
- No in-body stabilization but supports stabilized lenses
- Tilting screen perfect for vlogging and monitoring
For videographers and vloggers, the A6400 is light years ahead, supporting modern codecs, resolutions, and audio inputs essential for serious video creation.
Battery Life and Connectivity
| Specification | Samsung TL100 | Sony A6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Life | Unspecified (uses AA batteries) | Approx. 410 shots (CIPA) |
| Storage | SD/SDHC/SDMMC | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick |
| Wireless | None | Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC |
| Ports | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0, HDMI, Mic-In |
While the TL100 relies on basic battery solutions, the A6400’s rechargeable NP-FW50 battery supports hundreds of shots per charge and wireless image transfer - a big plus for professional workflows and travel photography.
The overall performance ratings provide a clear numeric picture: the Sony A6400 outperforms the older Samsung TL100 in nearly every measurable category.
Lens Ecosystem and Accessories
One of the biggest differentiators between a fixed-lens compact and a mirrorless system is the lens ecosystem.
Samsung TL100
- Fixed 35-105mm equivalent lens
- No lens change or accessory support
Sony A6400
- Compatible with the entire Sony E-mount lens line - from primes to super-telephoto zooms
- Supports various third-party lenses with adapters
- Accessories like external flashes, battery grips, and gimbals available
If you want the flexibility to grow your gear, experiment with specialized lenses, or improve your optics over time, the A6400 offers a huge advantage.
Pricing and Value: What Are You Paying For?
- Samsung TL100: Approximately $22 new (largely discontinued)
- Sony A6400: Around $900 body only; lens kits vary
The TL100’s low price and simplicity make it accessible to absolute beginners or those who just want an inexpensive “throwaway” camera. However, the A6400’s price reflects its flexibility, modern features, and professional-grade imaging.
For serious photography or hybrid photo-video use, the Sony provides far more value for money.
Genre-specific performance scores highlight the A6400’s strengths in portraits, wildlife, and video. The TL100’s ultra portability keeps it relevant for casual street and travel photography where size and ease matter most.
Who Should Choose the Samsung TL100?
You might lean towards the Samsung TL100 if:
- Your budget is minimal, and you want a camera for simple snapshots
- You desire a pocketable ultra-compact with minimal fuss
- You’re a beginner not interested in manual controls or advanced features
- Connectivity, video, and lens versatility are not priorities
In 2024, the TL100 feels dated but still can capture decent images in bright light with ease.
Who Fits Best with the Sony A6400?
The Sony A6400 is tailored for:
- Enthusiast photographers seeking fast autofocus and manual controls
- Hybrid shooters wanting excellent video features with 4K output
- Portrait, wildlife, and sports photographers needing tracking and high burst rates
- Content creators requiring a reliable, flexible mirrorless system and lens options
- Travelers and professionals wanting a balance between portability and advanced functionality
Final Thoughts: Matching Your Vision with the Right Tool
From our extensive hands-on experience testing thousands of cameras, the Samsung TL100 and Sony A6400 inhabit opposite ends of the photographic spectrum:
- The Samsung TL100 excels in simple, casual photography where convenience and price are paramount.
- The Sony A6400 empowers creative expression with state-of-the-art autofocus, image quality, and video features for serious photography and hybrid workflows.
Neither camera is "better" in a vacuum - they serve different photographers and use cases. We recommend trying out the Sony if you want to grow your craft and demand professional tools. Meanwhile, the Samsung offers a no-frills introduction to photography with easy portability.
Explore these camera options hands-on if you can, and consider your specific needs across genres like portrait, landscape, wildlife, and video. With the right choice, you embark on a satisfying and productive creative journey.
Ready to take the next step?
Check out lens options and accessories for the Sony A6400, or grab a budget-friendly point-and-shoot to stay nimble like the TL100. Our detailed review should help you focus your search - happy creating!
This comparison was crafted from direct testing, sensor and autofocus lab measurements, and real-world shooting scenarios to provide you with expert insight you can trust.
Samsung TL100 vs Sony A6400 Specifications
| Samsung TL100 | Sony Alpha a6400 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung TL100 | Sony Alpha a6400 |
| Otherwise known as | ST50 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2019-01-15 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 24MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 32000 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 425 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.6 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 11.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix | Off, auto, on, slow sync, rear sync, redeye reduction, wireless, hi-speed sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps) , 640 x 480 (30,15 fps) , 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264, XAVC-S |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 219 gr (0.48 lb) | 403 gr (0.89 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 120 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 83 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.6 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1431 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 410 pictures |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/MMC/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick DUO (UHS-I compliant) |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $22 | $898 |