Clicky

Samsung TL205 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill

Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
17
Overall
27
Samsung TL205 front
 
Sigma SD1 Merrill front
Portability
57
Imaging
56
Features
45
Overall
51

Samsung TL205 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs

Samsung TL205
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
  • 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
  • Revealed January 2010
  • Alternative Name is PL100
Sigma SD1 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
  • Announced April 2012
  • Superseded the Sigma SD1
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Samsung TL205 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview

Below is a extensive overview of the Samsung TL205 and Sigma SD1 Merrill, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by brands Samsung and Sigma. The image resolution of the TL205 (12MP) and the SD1 Merrill (15MP) is pretty comparable but the TL205 (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) enjoy different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The TL205 was revealed 3 years before the SD1 Merrill and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Samsung TL205 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the TL205 grades against the SD1 Merrill in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung TL205 over the Sigma SD1 Merrill

 TL205 SD1 Merrill 

Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Samsung TL205

 SD1 Merrill TL205 
AnnouncedApril 2012January 2010More recent by 27 months
Manual focus More exact focus
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Samsung TL205 and Sigma SD1 Merrill

 TL205 SD1 Merrill 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lacking Touch friendly screen

Samsung TL205 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison

If you are going to lug around your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Samsung TL205 has physical measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD1 Merrill has sizing of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") and a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).

Contrast the Samsung TL205 and Sigma SD1 Merrill in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select during that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the TL205 against the SD1 Merrill.

Samsung TL205 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the TL205 and SD1 Merrill is 94 and 57 respectively.

Samsung TL205 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill top view buttons comparison

Samsung TL205 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements merely by checking out a spec sheet. The visual underneath might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the TL205 and SD1 Merrill.

Clearly, the two cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The TL205 having a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sigma SD1 Merrill will produce extra detail because of its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The older TL205 will be behind in sensor technology.

Samsung TL205 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill sensor size comparison

Samsung TL205 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung TL205 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Samsung TL205
Portrait photography with Sigma SD1 Merrill
21
lack of manual focus
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
65
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (15 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Samsung TL205
Street photography with Sigma SD1 Merrill
47
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
more heavy than competition (177 grams)
57
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
environment proof
no moving screen
no image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Samsung TL205
Sports photography with Sigma SD1 Merrill
25
has tracking focus
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
61
decent sensor resolution (15MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
environment proof
sensor has phase detect auto focus
doesn't have liveview
no image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Samsung TL205 Travel photography features
Sigma SD1 Merrill Travel photography features
50
flash built-in
no Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition (177g)
MP count low (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
54
environment proof
decent sensor resolution (15 megapixels)
no Timelapse mode
does not have a selfie friendly screen
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Samsung TL205 Landscape photography factors
Sigma SD1 Merrill Landscape photography factors
23
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
small screen (2.7 inch)
manual mode not possible
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
no Timelapse recording
63
manual focus
swap lenses (Sigma SA mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
decent sensor resolution (15 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
environment proof
doesn't have liveview
no image stabilization
no Timelapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung TL205 as a Vlogging camera
Sigma SD1 Merrill as a Vlogging camera
22
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
no microphone jack
more heavy than competition (177g)
9
no video shooting
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Samsung TL205 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung TL205 and Sigma SD1 Merrill
 Samsung TL205Sigma SD1 Merrill
General Information
Make Samsung Sigma
Model type Samsung TL205 Sigma SD1 Merrill
Alternate name PL100 -
Class Ultracompact Advanced DSLR
Revealed 2010-01-06 2012-04-10
Physical type Ultracompact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Processor - Dual True II
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 24 x 16mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 384.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 15 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 -
Peak resolution 4000 x 3000 4800 x 3200
Highest native ISO 3200 6400
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens zoom range 35-105mm (3.0x) -
Largest aperture f/3.0-5.6 -
Macro focusing range 10cm -
Available lenses - 76
Focal length multiplier 5.9 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 96%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.64x
Features
Min shutter speed 8 seconds -
Max shutter speed 1/1500 seconds -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.40 m no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync no built-in flash
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) -
Highest video resolution 1280x720 None
Video format Motion JPEG -
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 177 gr (0.39 lb) 790 gr (1.74 lb)
Dimensions 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) Yes
Time lapse feature
Storage type MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, SD/SDHC Internal Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible)
Card slots Single Single
Launch cost $180 $2,339