Samsung TL205 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
![Samsung TL205 front Samsung TL205 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-TL205/Samsung-TL205-front.jpg)
![Sigma SD1 Merrill front Sigma SD1 Merrill front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Sigma-SD1-Merrill-ek-fs.jpg)
57 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Samsung TL205 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Alternative Name is PL100
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Announced April 2012
- Superseded the Sigma SD1
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Samsung TL205 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview
Below is a extensive overview of the Samsung TL205 and Sigma SD1 Merrill, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by brands Samsung and Sigma. The image resolution of the TL205 (12MP) and the SD1 Merrill (15MP) is pretty comparable but the TL205 (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) enjoy different sensor size.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
The TL205 was revealed 3 years before the SD1 Merrill and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Samsung TL205 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the TL205 grades against the SD1 Merrill in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Samsung TL205 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung TL205 and Sigma SD1 Merrill. The full galleries are provided at Samsung TL205 Gallery and Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung TL205 over the Sigma SD1 Merrill
TL205 | SD1 Merrill |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Samsung TL205
SD1 Merrill | TL205 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | April 2012 | ![]() | January 2010 | More recent by 27 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung TL205 and Sigma SD1 Merrill
TL205 | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Samsung TL205 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Samsung TL205 has physical measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD1 Merrill has sizing of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") and a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung TL205 and Sigma SD1 Merrill in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select during that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the TL205 against the SD1 Merrill.
![Samsung TL205 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill size comparison Samsung TL205 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-TL205-vs-Sigma-SD1-Merrill-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the TL205 and SD1 Merrill is 94 and 57 respectively.
![Samsung TL205 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill top view buttons comparison Samsung TL205 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-TL205-vs-Sigma-SD1-Merrill-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Samsung TL205 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements merely by checking out a spec sheet. The visual underneath might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the TL205 and SD1 Merrill.
Clearly, the two cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The TL205 having a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sigma SD1 Merrill will produce extra detail because of its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The older TL205 will be behind in sensor technology.
![Samsung TL205 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill sensor size comparison Samsung TL205 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Samsung-TL205-vs-Sigma-SD1-Merrill-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Samsung TL205 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
![Samsung TL205 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung TL205 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-TL205-vs-Sigma-SD1-Merrill-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Samsung TL205 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications
Samsung TL205 | Sigma SD1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Samsung | Sigma |
Model type | Samsung TL205 | Sigma SD1 Merrill |
Alternate name | PL100 | - |
Class | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2010-01-06 | 2012-04-10 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Dual True II |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4800 x 3200 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.6 | - |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.40 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 177 gr (0.39 lb) | 790 gr (1.74 lb) |
Dimensions | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, SD/SDHC Internal | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $180 | $2,339 |