Samsung TL225 vs Sony A9 II
94 Imaging
34 Features
33 Overall
33


62 Imaging
75 Features
93 Overall
82
Samsung TL225 vs Sony A9 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Announced August 2009
- Alternate Name is ST550
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Bump to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 678g - 129 x 96 x 76mm
- Revealed October 2019
- Old Model is Sony A9

From Pocket to Pro: Comparing the Samsung TL225 and Sony A9 II in Today’s Photography Landscape
When it comes to choosing your next camera, you’re faced with a broad spectrum - from the pocket-sized to the pro-grade. Today, I’m diving deep into a comparison spanning two dramatically different beasts: the Samsung TL225, an ultracompact all-rounder from 2009, and the industry-leading Sony Alpha A9 Mark II, a flagship pro mirrorless powerhouse from 2019.
Why compare these two? Because they both tell a compelling story about how camera tech and user needs evolved over the past decade. Plus, I want to help you figure out: Is the tiny, budget-friendly Samsung still relevant? Or does the Sony’s sheer performance blow it out of the water? And most importantly - what suits your photography style and budget?
Let’s unpack their strengths, limitations, and practical use cases across every major photography genre and technical aspect I’ve tested personally over thousands of hours and countless real-world sessions.
Size Matters: Ergonomics & Portability Showdown
First off, there’s no beating the Samsung TL225’s ultracompact design. Measuring a svelte 100x60x19 mm and weighing just 187 grams, it’s the kind of camera that slips effortlessly into any pocket or purse. Perfect for those moments when lugging a DSLR or mirrorless rig feels like hauling clubs for thumbs.
On the other hand, the Sony A9 II is a proper full-frame mirrorless pro body, built like a tank to survive harsh shooting conditions. At 129x96x76 mm and 678 grams, it’s hefty but still more manageable than traditional DSLRs. This body type gives better grip and balance, especially with large lenses attached.
In terms of ergonomics, the Sony earns top marks with thoughtfully placed buttons, customizable dials, and weather sealing for field reliability - traits absent in the Samsung. But if weight and portability scream priority for you, Samsung’s pocketable magic can’t be ignored.
Design Details: Controls and User Interface
Looking from the top, the Samsung opts for simplicity tailored to casual use: a few mode dials and buttons without illuminated controls. It’s quick to get started but limits customization - no manual exposure modes in sight.
The Sony A9 II, however, feels like it belongs in the hands of pros or advanced enthusiasts, with dedicated controls for shutter speed, ISO, exposure compensation, and more, plus dual card slots and GPS-less but solid wireless connectivity.
This top-deck layout translates to faster operation when chasing action, a huge plus for sports and wildlife shooters. Plus, the Sony integrates touchscreens that respond well, aiding quick AF point shifts.
Sensor Battle: Image Quality and Technology
The biggest gap between these two cameras lies in sensor size and technology.
The Samsung TL225’s tiny 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor (6.08x4.56 mm) with 12MP resolution is typical of compact cameras from its era. CCD tech yields decent color rendition than cheap CMOS chips from that time, but the small sensor struggles with noise and dynamic range.
Conversely, the Sony A9 II boasts a full-frame 35.6x23.8 mm BSI-CMOS sensor with 24MP. The sensor’s substantial area (847.28 mm²) means significantly better light-gathering ability, crucial for low-light performance, wide dynamic range, and finer detail - par for a cutting-edge pro camera.
From hands-on tests, the Sony produces images with much broader tonal latitude, cleaner high ISO shots (up to ISO 51200 native, extended to 204800), and crisp 6000x4000 resolution files that handle demanding edits. Meanwhile, the Samsung can suffice for casual daylight snaps but isn’t suited for intensive photographic tasks or serious post-processing.
Screen and Viewfinder: Displaying Your Vision
The Samsung sports a fixed 3.5-inch touchscreen with 1152-pixel resolution. It’s straightforward but not overly bright in strong sunlight, and with no viewfinder, eye-level framing isn’t an option.
Sony’s 3-inch tilting touchscreen with 1440-pixel resolution feels snappier and more flexible. Crucially, it pairs with a high-resolution electronic viewfinder (EVF) offering 3,686 pixels and 100% coverage, great for precise composition, especially under intense light where LCDs can wash out.
For street and travel shooters, having the EVF adds stability and discretion. Plus, Sony’s menu system, though layered, rewards time spent learning its depths thanks to extensive customization.
Real-World Photography Performance Across Genres
How do these cameras behave when applied to various photography styles? Here’s a detailed hands-on breakdown:
Portrait Photography
Samsung TL225:
- No face or eye detection AF, so focus is manual with a limited single-area system.
- Bokeh is faint due to small sensor and maximum aperture of F3.5-5.9. Backgrounds don’t blur smoothly.
- Skin tones come out okay in good light but get washed out or noisy in shadows.
Sony A9 II:
- Stellar eye and face detection AF (including animal eyes) with 693 focus points; responsive and accurate tracking even in challenging light.
- Wide aperture lenses in Sony’s E-mount ecosystem deliver luscious bokeh for ideal subject isolation.
- Full-frame sensor delivers natural skin tones with subtle gradations and detail.
Landscape Photography
Samsung TL225:
- Sensor limits dynamic range; highlights often clipped under harsh sun, shadows muddy.
- 4000x3000 resolution is enough for small prints or web sharing but not large heavy crops.
- No weather sealing hampers use in adverse conditions.
Sony A9 II:
- Excellent dynamic range thanks to full-frame sensor, excellent RAW support.
- 24MP files provide ample resolution for large prints and post-processing freedom.
- Durable build and weather sealing let you shoot safely in challenging outdoor environments.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
Samsung TL225:
- Single-point, contrast-detect AF too slow for fast-moving subjects.
- No burst mode to keep up with action.
- Lens zoom up to 124mm (27-124mm equivalent) tight but sluggish for distant wildlife.
Sony A9 II:
- Industry-leading 20fps blackout-free burst shooting with sophisticated AF tracking (including predictive algorithms).
- Phase-detect AF with 693 points covers most of the frame - perfect for erratic subjects.
- Compatible with an enormous lineup of professional telephoto lenses.
- Sensor-shift, 5-axis stabilization aids sharp shots even handheld with long lenses.
Street Photography
Samsung TL225:
- Ultra-compact size makes it highly discreet.
- Limited low-light capabilities but touchscreen aids quick composure changes.
- No mechanical shutter to reduce shutter sound variability, but silent shooting is not an option.
Sony A9 II:
- Bigger body and lenses make it more conspicuous, but utterly reliable AF and rapid shooting make capturing fleeting moments easier.
- Silent electronic shutter options (up to 1/32000s) help reduce noise footprint.
- Superb ISO performance lets you shoot at night or indoors without flash.
Macro and Close-up Photography
Samsung TL225:
- Macro focusing down to 5cm is decent for casual snaps.
- Optical stabilization helps steady shots at close range.
- No focus stacking or bracketing.
Sony A9 II:
- Dependence on lenses means quality of macro depends on glass, but compatibility with exotics and prosumer macro lenses is vast.
- No in-body focus bracketing, but precise AF and high-resolution files support cropping.
Night and Astro Photography
Samsung TL225:
- Small sensor struggles badly at high ISO; even ISO 800 introduces heavy noise, limiting usability.
- No special exposure modes or long-exposure support beyond 8 seconds.
Sony A9 II:
- Extends up to ISO 204800 with manageable noise at reasonable exposures.
- Shutter speed range of 30s to 1/8000s, including silent shutter down to 1/32000s.
- Long exposure noise reduction and intervalometer facilitate astrophotography and time-lapse.
Video Capabilities
Samsung TL225:
- 720p HD video at 30fps max, using Motion JPEG codec.
- No microphone input, limited manual control; basic and not ideal for anything other than casual clips.
Sony A9 II:
- Full 4K UHD recording up to 30fps, high bitrate XAVC S codec.
- Supports external mics and headphones for monitoring.
- 5-axis sensor stabilization aids smooth footage handheld.
- Advanced exposure and autofocus control during video for professionals.
Travel and Everyday Use
Samsung’s high portability and touchscreen ease make it attractive for travelers prioritizing convenience - but its dated tech limits image quality and connectivity.
Sony compensates with a robust battery lasting ~690 shots per charge, dual UHS-II SD slots, and comprehensive wireless features (WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC). The larger body with extensive lens choices can become a travel burden if packing light is key.
Build Quality and Weather Resistance
Samsung TL225 is plastic-bodied, without weather sealing - fine for light-duty use in clear weather, but you can’t trust it outdoors in harsh conditions.
Sony A9 II’s magnesium alloy shell is dust- and moisture-resistant, designed for pro reliability in rain, dust, and rough handling. This build difference alone is a deciding factor for demanding photographers.
Autofocus Systems Under the Hood
Samsung’s contrast-detection AF system with selectable AF areas gets the job done for typical snapshots but lacks speed and tracking capabilities.
Sony’s hybrid AF system combines 693 phase-detection points with contrast detection, achieving near-instant and continuous autofocus. This makes all the difference for dynamic shooting - whether wildlife, sports, or events.
Lens Ecosystem: Fixed Versus Adaptable Glass
Samsung TL225’s fixed 27-124mm F3.5-5.9 lens is convenient but locked into its zoom range and optical quality.
Sony A9 II uses the E-mount with access to over 120 lenses from primes to telephotos, macros to tilt-shifts - giving you creative flexibility for every scenario.
Battery Life and Storage Options
Samsung uses a modest proprietary battery (SLB-07A), with no published battery life stats, but expect short sessions given the small cell.
Sony’s NP-FZ100 battery delivers an impressive 690 shots per charge (CIPA standard) and offers USB charging, making longer shoots manageable. Dual SD card slots supporting UHS-II allow for extended recording and instant backups.
Connectivity and Wireless Features
Samsung TL225 lacks WiFi, Bluetooth, or NFC, limiting instant sharing or remote control.
Sony A9 II’s built-in WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, and USB 3.1 Gen 1 open doors for wireless tethering, app control, remote shooting, and rapid image transfer.
Price and Value: Is The Sony Worth 9x The Samsung’s Price?
Here comes the punchline: Samsung TL225 lists around $488, while Sony A9 II commands roughly $4,498 - a stark price gap.
Is the difference justified? Absolutely, if you demand pro-level image quality, autofocus performance, video capability, and ruggedness. The Sony is tailored for serious pros or enthusiasts requiring the best tools.
But if you want an easy-to-use, pocketable, budget-level camera for casual snaps and light travel photography, the Samsung still merits some attention despite its age.
That said, today’s market has numerous newer compacts and entry-level mirrorless models that outperform the TL225 while closing the price gap.
How They Stack Up: Performance Ratings and Genre Scores
To illustrate their build and tech disparities clearly, take a look at the overall and genre-specific performance assessments from my extended testing sessions:
Sony A9 II dominates across the board, with outstanding marks in autofocus, image quality, handling, and video, while the Samsung lags except for portability.
Sample Images: Visual Proof Is in the Pixels
Examining images from both cameras side by side paints a clear reality of their differing capabilities.
The Samsung does well in daylight with moderate detail, but the full-frame Sony produces far richer dynamic range, cleaner shadows, sharper details, and better color accuracy, especially in challenging lighting.
Final Thoughts and Recommendations
Samsung TL225
Pros:
- Ultra-compact, highly portable, easy to operate
- Decent daylight image quality for casual use
- Optical image stabilization helps in low light
- Affordable, good entry-level option
Cons:
- Small sensor, low dynamic range, limited high ISO performance
- No RAW support; limited manual controls
- Fixed zoom lens with narrow aperture range
- Lacks wireless connectivity and weather sealing
- Video capability is basic and dated
Best for: Beginners, casual shooters, travelers valuing absolute portability and simplicity over technical excellence or professional capability.
Sony A9 II
Pros:
- Full-frame sensor with stellar image quality and dynamic range
- Industry-leading autofocus with eye and animal AF tracking
- Fast 20fps burst rate with blackout-free viewfinder
- Pro-level 4K video with advanced audio support
- Weather-sealed robust body with dual card slots
- Extensive lens and accessory ecosystem
- Excellent battery life and connectivity
Cons:
- Heavy and large body less suited for casual carry
- Expensive, demanding higher lens investment
- Complex menu system requires time to master
Best for: Professional photographers and advanced enthusiasts specializing in sports, wildlife, events, portraits, video production, or demanding commercial work.
So, Which One Should You Pick?
If budget and stealth matter more than top-tier performance - say, quick family shots or wanderlust travel - Samsung TL225 remains a small but competent companion, although dated. Even so, I suggest looking at newer compacts for better value today.
For those who want to invest in a tool that elevates every aspect of photography and videography, Sony A9 Mark II is one of the very best options out there. It rewards your skill and intent with pro-grade versatility.
This has been a sprawling journey through past and present camera tech meaty enough for gear geeks and practical photographers alike. Regardless of which side you fall on, understanding these tradeoffs and performance realities empowers you to bring images to life in your way.
Happy shooting!
- Your seasoned gear tester and photo enthusiast
Samsung TL225 vs Sony A9 II Specifications
Samsung TL225 | Sony Alpha A9 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung TL225 | Sony Alpha A9 Mark II |
Also called | ST550 | - |
Category | Ultracompact | Pro Mirrorless |
Announced | 2009-08-13 | 2019-10-03 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 35.6 x 23.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 847.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 51200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 204800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 693 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 27-124mm (4.6x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3.5" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,152 thousand dots | 1,440 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 3,686 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 20.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.40 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync., Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 187g (0.41 lb) | 678g (1.49 lb) |
Dimensions | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") | 129 x 96 x 76mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 690 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | SLB-07A | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs + continuous, 3 or 5 frames) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II compatible) |
Card slots | Single | Dual |
Pricing at release | $488 | $4,498 |