Samsung WB30F vs Sony HX400V
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
62 Imaging
44 Features
60 Overall
50
Samsung WB30F vs Sony HX400V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 660g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
- Announced February 2014
- Superseded the Sony HX300
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Samsung WB30F vs. Sony HX400V: An Expert Hands-On Comparison for Enthusiasts and Pros
Choosing the right camera isn’t just about specs on a page or flashy marketing buzzwords. Over 15 years of testing cameras from the ground up - in the studio, on remote hikes, crowded sports matches, and starry nights - I’ve learned to zoom past headline numbers and dig into what really matters: real-world performance and usability. Today, we’re pitting two very different but popular bridge-style cameras against each other: the budget-friendly Samsung WB30F and the feature-packed Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V. Both come from respected manufacturers but cater to divergent audiences and purposes.
If you’re considering either, or devices in their league, this detailed, no-nonsense comparison will help you understand their strengths, weaknesses, and overall value so you can make the best choice for your photography needs.
Meet the Contenders: Who Are Samsung WB30F and Sony HX400V?
Right off the bat, it’s important to acknowledge these cameras aren’t exactly twins separated at birth. The Samsung WB30F, announced back in early 2013, aims at casual enthusiasts who want an all-in-one travel buddy without breaking the bank. It’s a petite point-and-shoot with a 24-240mm equivalent zoom and basic connectivity features.
The Sony HX400V, unveiled a year later in 2014, is a bona fide bridge camera with a massive 50x zoom range, more manual controls, and pro-inspired features like an electronic viewfinder. It slots in well for hobbyists looking to step up their game and for those craving impressive reach without the bulk of interchangeable lenses.
Here’s how they stack up physically:

As you can see, the WB30F is small, slim, and pocket-friendly, weighing just 128 grams and measuring roughly 98x58x17 mm. The HX400V, a much more substantial beast, weighs 660 grams with a chunky grip and SLR-style body at 130x93x103 mm. If portability and stealth are priorities (think street shooting or spontaneous travel), WB30F is the clear winner here - but more on that later.
Design, Controls, and Usability: The Feel of Each Camera in Your Hands
Size isn’t the only factor affecting how a camera feels day-to-day. Control layout, button feedback, and viewfinder presence shape your shooting experience majorly.
Take a stroll through their top plates and button clusters:

The Samsung’s minimalistic design compliments its compact body but doesn’t offer much in the way of manual adjustment controls. You get intuitive auto modes, some scene presets, and simple menus, but there’s no aperture or shutter priority, no dedicated dials - it’s aimed squarely at those who want to “point and shoot.” The lens barrel zoom ring is motorized and not manual, meaning zoom speed is electronically controlled.
Contrast that with Sony’s HX400V, decked out with dedicated mode dials, control rings on the lens for aperture or zoom, and a fully tiltable rear LCD. The ergonomics borrow heavily from classic DSLR layouts, with ample buttons arranged to fall naturally under your fingers and clubs for your thumbs. The presence of an electronic viewfinder, often missing from budget compacts like the Samsung, makes a big difference in bright sunlight - more on the screen battle shortly.
Both cameras rely on LCD screens for composition, but the Panasonic’s screen is a fixed TFT panel with a mere 230k-dot resolution, very basic by today’s standards and tough to see in direct sunlight. The HX400V steps up with a 3-inch, 921k-dot tilting screen that gives you flexibility for high and low angles.

This difference alone makes the Sony much more suited for deliberate photography, while the Samsung encourages quick snapshots.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
Underneath the hood, both cameras use the ubiquitous 1/2.3” sensor size typical of superzooms and compact cameras, so don’t expect DSLR-level image quality here - that’s simply impossible given the physical constraints. However, sensor and processor choices can push image quality in different directions.
| Feature | Samsung WB30F | Sony HX400V |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.3" (6.17x4.55 mm) | 1/2.3" (6.17x4.55 mm) |
| Megapixels | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| Max ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Max Resolution | 4608x3456 | 5184x3888 |
| Raw Format Support | No | No |

CCD sensors like Samsung’s WB30F tend to deliver decent color depth in good light but struggle when ISO goes higher, resulting in noisier images beyond ISO 800 or 1600. Sony’s Backside Illuminated (BSI) CMOS sensor excels by collecting more light more efficiently, pushing usable ISO further and enabling finer detail retention, especially in shadows and low-light.
I performed side-by-side comparisons shooting test charts and real-world scenes at various ISOs. The Sony’s images showcased greater dynamic range - think punchier details in both highlights and shadows - and less color noise in dim settings. The Samsung, by comparison, provided decent daylight snaps but began falling apart as the light dwindled.
Autofocus System and Speed: Capturing the Moment Reliably
In any mirrorless or compact system, autofocus (AF) performance is key. None of us want photos of blurry wildlife or missed decisive moments in sports.
Both cameras employ contrast-detection AF, but with different complexities:
- Samsung WB30F: Basic AF with face detection, single-shot focusing only; no continuous AF or manual focusing.
- Sony HX400V: 9 AF points, face detection, AF tracking, and manual focus available; faster focus acquisition.
In my field tests, the Sony HX400V’s AF was noticeably quicker to lock onto subjects, including in low light or when shooting moving objects. Meanwhile, Samsung’s AF lagged slightly and struggled to maintain focus with erratic motion or in dim conditions.
For wildlife or sports photography, burst and AF tracking can make or break your shoot. The Sony hits a respectable 10 frames per second continuous shooting and AF tracking (albeit with some limitations at full zoom and low light). The Samsung, without continuous AF or significant burst shooting options, is ill-suited for such applications.
Zoom Range and Lens Quality: Versatility on Demand
Zoom capability is a big selling point for bridge-type cameras. The Samsung WB30F offers a 10x optical zoom from 24mm wide to 240mm telephoto equivalent, f/3.1-6.3 aperture range. It’s sufficient for everyday photo needs, portraits, landscapes, and modest telephoto.
The Sony HX400V blows that out of the water with a 50x zoom reaching 1200mm (in 35mm terms), f/2.8-6.3 aperture. This range caters well to wildlife, sports, and travel photographers craving reach without lugging a bag of glass.
Keep in mind, however, the aperture narrows considerably as you zoom. Both cameras close down to around f/6.3 at full telephoto, which calls for steady hands or image stabilization to avoid shake.
Both models include optical image stabilization:
- Samsung WB30F with optical stabilization helps mitigate shake but is basic.
- Sony HX400V’s advanced Optical SteadyShot system, combined with intelligent mode, delivers better results at extreme zoom lengths.
Build Quality & Weather Resistance: Can They Take a Beating?
Neither camera sports professional-grade weather sealing, shockproofing, or waterproofing. Both are targeted toward general consumers who shoot mostly in controlled environments.
That said, Sony’s HX400V feels more robust in hand, thanks to its sizable body, better grips, and distributed weight. The Samsung’s plastic chassis and compact design make it portable but arguably less rugged.
If you plan to shoot outdoors regularly, in dust, drizzle, or harsher conditions, I recommend investing in a separate protective case or looking elsewhere for a weather-sealed option.
Screen and Viewfinder Battles: The LCD and EVF Experience
We touched on the rear screen briefly earlier, so let’s drill deeper.
Samsung’s 3” fixed LCD with low 230k-dot resolution is serviceable for simple framing and playback but often frustrating in daylight. The lack of touchscreen or articulation means you can’t flip it around for selfies or shoot at unusual angles easily.
Sony’s tiltable 3” 921k-dot LCD is brighter, sharper, and more versatile for composing in tricky scenarios.
More importantly, the HX400V includes a built-in electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 100% coverage. For anyone shooting in bright environments or wanting steady framing stability, the EVF is a huge boon. Samsung WB30F lacks any viewfinder, forcing reliance solely on the LCD.
Battery Life and Storage Considerations
Samsung WB30F specs are silent on battery life specifics but given the low-power CCD sensor and modest features, expect around 200-250 shots per charge, which is typical for compacts of this class.
The Sony HX400V, powered by an NP-BX1 lithium-ion battery, rates for approximately 300 shots per charge - a solid number for extended outings but demanding spare batteries for serious sessions.
Both cameras accept a single SD/SDHC/SDXC card slot with no dual card redundancy - standard for budget and enthusiasts units alike.
Connectivity and Extras: Sharing and GPS
The Samsung WB30F offers built-in Wi-Fi, allowing for simple image transfer to smartphones and social sharing on the go, no cables required. This suits casual users fond of quick internet-ready snaps.
Sony’s HX400V bundles built-in Wi-Fi and NFC capabilities for fast pairing and remote control via smartphone apps but goes one step further by including integrated GPS for geotagging - a great tool for travel and landscape shooters wanting to map their photo journeys automatically.
Both cameras connect with USB 2.0 for file transfers; however, only Sony supports HDMI output for directly viewing images or videos on HD TVs.
Real-World Photography Across Disciplines: Practical Field Insights
Let me break down how each model performs across common genres - I’ve personally shot them side by side in these contexts.
Portrait Photography
- Samsung WB30F: Skin tones appear slightly muted but fairly natural under good light. Bokeh is weak due to small sensor and slower apertures; portraits look flat in low light. The autofocus face detection is basic but serviceable.
- Sony HX400V: Better color reproduction with more pleasing skin tones, and marginally better background blur at wider apertures. Face detection is more reliable, allowing confident focusing on eyes and faces.
Landscape Photography
- Samsung WB30F: Decent sharpness across wide angles but limited dynamic range leads to blown highlights on sunny days.
- Sony HX400V: Offers richer tonal gradations and crisper details thanks to higher-res sensor and better processing. Plus, versatility of zoom aids compositions.
Wildlife Photography
- Samsung WB30F: Falls short due to limited zoom and sluggish AF.
- Sony HX400V: Strong contender with 1200mm reach, faster AF, and 10fps burst. Not quite a professional wildlife rig but impressive for a bridge camera at this price.
Sports Photography
- Samsung WB30F: No continuous AF or fast shutter modes limit usefulness.
- Sony HX400V: 10fps burst with AF tracking decent for casual sports; struggles under dim gym lighting due to small sensor.
Street Photography
- Samsung WB30F: Small size and discreet style fit street shooting well but limited manual controls may frustrate enthusiasts.
- Sony HX400V: Large and conspicuous; less ideal for candid shots but manual controls are handy in challenging light.
Macro Photography
- Samsung WB30F: No true macro focus range specified.
- Sony HX400V: Can focus as close as 1cm, enabling impressive macro shots.
Night / Astro Photography
- Samsung WB30F: High noise at ISO above 800 limits night use.
- Sony HX400V: Higher max ISO (12800) and better noise control make it more usable at night, though small sensor still imposes limits.
Video Capabilities
- Samsung WB30F: Limited HD (720p) video recording at 30fps; basic codecs.
- Sony HX400V: Full HD (1080p) at up to 60fps; microphone port supports external mics, more video flexibility.
Travel Photography
- Samsung WB30F: Lightweight, fits in pockets, Wi-Fi sharing - ideal for casual travelers.
- Sony HX400V: Bulkier but high zoom, GPS, and wider feature set make it versatile travel tool if size isn’t a concern.
Professional Work
Neither camera supports RAW shooting, a significant limitation for pros and serious amateurs who want fuller post-processing flexibility. Sony offers manual exposure modes while Samsung does not, giving HX400V a clear edge. Still, both cameras are more aimed at hobbyists.
Scoring the Cameras: An Objective Overview
Here are the overall and genre-specific ratings based on my evaluations:
In summary,
- The Sony HX400V consistently outperforms the Samsung WB30F in almost every technical and artistic metric.
- Samsung WB30F holds its own as a simple, pocketable option for casual shooting and social sharing.
What About Price and Value?
The Samsung WB30F typically retails near $180, putting it squarely in budget-friendly territory. It’s great for those who want decent image quality, convenience, and a simple user experience without breaking the bank.
The Sony HX400V retails at around $450. This is a healthy mid-range price, reflecting its far more advanced zoom, manual controls, video features, and physical heft. You’re paying for versatility, better image quality, and future-proofing your shooting skillset.
For cheapskates who prioritize pocketability and simplicity over features, Samsung WB30F is a steal. For generalists and more serious enthusiasts wanting to grow, Sony HX400V offers substantial bang for your buck.
Final Pros and Cons
Samsung WB30F
Pros:
- Compact, lightweight design perfect for on-the-go casual shooting
- Simple, easy-to-use auto modes for beginners
- Built-in Wi-Fi for effortless image sharing
- Decent daytime image quality for the price
- Affordable - great entry point
Cons:
- Small low-res screen with no articulation
- Weak zoom (10x) and slow lens
- No manual exposure controls or RAW shooting
- Basic autofocus with no continuous or manual focusing
- Mediocre low-light and video capabilities
- No viewfinder at all
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V
Pros:
- Massive 50x zoom lens (24-1200mm equivalent)
- Manual exposure modes and manual focus
- Electronic viewfinder with 100% coverage
- 3” tilting, high-res LCD screen
- Faster autofocus with 9 AF points and tracking
- Full HD video (1080p) with external mic input
- Built-in GPS and NFC connectivity
- Decent battery life for its class
Cons:
- Bulky and heavy - less pocketable, more conspicuous
- No RAW shooting limits post-processing
- No weather sealing
- Pricier - may outprice some casual buyers
Who Should Pick Which?
-
Get the Samsung WB30F if...
You want a lightweight, budget compact that fits easily in a jacket pocket or purse and your main goal is casual travel photography or family snapshots with straightforward controls and wireless sharing. You’re not looking to grow beyond simple point-and-shoot. -
Get the Sony HX400V if...
You want a capable all-around bridge superzoom to cover wildlife, travel, sports, landscape, and video in one device. You appreciate manual control, a substantial zoom range, and image quality that can punch well above typical compacts - even if it means carrying a bulkier camera and spending more.
Wrapping Up: The Lessons From Testing These Two
After shooting, scrutinizing, and side-by-side comparing the Samsung WB30F and Sony HX400V in many environments, the takeaway is clear: technology gaps and target audiences separate these cameras more than just specs.
The WB30F is a friendly, affordable companion perfect for casual memories and simple shared shoots. The HX400V demands more commitment and budget but has the firepower and tools to satisfy many enthusiast photographers without the complexity and cost of interchangeable lens systems.
If you want advice on finding cameras that balance size, zoom, and performance differently, or which compact superzoom might be right for your specialty, feel free to reach out. My years of testing and field trips can help map your perfect camera-fit.
Happy shooting!
Samsung WB30F vs Sony HX400V Specifications
| Samsung WB30F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung WB30F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2013-01-07 | 2014-02-12 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-6.3 | f/2.8-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | QVGA TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 8.50 m (ISO Auto) |
| Flash options | - | Flash Off / Autoflash / Fill-flash / Slow Sync. / Advanced Flash / Rear Sync. / Wireless (with optional compliant flash) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 128 grams (0.28 lbs) | 660 grams (1.46 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $180 | $448 |