Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX100 VA
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38

/Sony-RX100-VA-front.jpg)
89 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62
Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX100 VA Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Released January 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
- 299g - 102 x 58 x 41mm
- Launched July 2018

Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX100 VA Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Samsung WB50F versus Sony RX100 VA, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Samsung and Sony. The image resolution of the WB50F (16MP) and the RX100 VA (20MP) is fairly well matched but the WB50F (1/2.3") and RX100 VA (1") boast different sensor sizing.

The WB50F was announced 5 years earlier than the RX100 VA which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera and the Sony RX100 VA being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick view of how the WB50F matches up vs the RX100 VA with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX100 VA Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung WB50F and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A). The whole galleries are provided at Samsung WB50F Gallery and Sony RX100 VA Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Sony RX100 VA
WB50F | RX100 VA |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 VA over the Samsung WB50F
RX100 VA | WB50F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2018 | ![]() | January 2014 | Newer by 54 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+769k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Samsung WB50F and Sony RX100 VA
WB50F | RX100 VA | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurement |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX100 VA Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB50F enjoys outer measurements of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs) and the Sony RX100 VA has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs).
See the Samsung WB50F versus Sony RX100 VA in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at the time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the WB50F versus the RX100 VA.
-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WB50F and RX100 VA is 92 and 89 respectively.
-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX100 VA Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to picture the difference between sensor dimensions simply by looking at a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the WB50F and RX100 VA.
As you can see, both of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The WB50F having a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Sony RX100 VA will give you more detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged WB50F is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX100 VA Screen and ViewFinder
-screen-back-comparison.jpg)

Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX100 VA Specifications
Samsung WB50F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A) | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung WB50F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A) |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2014-01-07 | 2018-07-13 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 315 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-288mm (12.0x) | 24-70mm (2.9x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.1-6.3 | f/1.8-2.8 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.59x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | - | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/2000 secs |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 24.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 10.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | - | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Rear Sync, Flash Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/2000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | NP-BX1 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 207 gr (0.46 lb) | 299 gr (0.66 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 102 x 58 x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 shots |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BP70A | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $180 | $998 |