Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX100 VA
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38

/Sony-RX100-VA-front.jpg)
89 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62
Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX100 VA Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Released January 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
- 299g - 102 x 58 x 41mm
- Launched July 2018

Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX100 VA: A Deep-Dive Comparison for Serious Photographers
Choosing your next camera - even in the compact category - can feel overwhelming given the options and technical nuances involved. Today, we'll unpack two compact cameras from very different eras and classes: the Samsung WB50F, a budget-friendly superzoom from 2014 with a small sensor, and the Sony Cyber-shot RX100 VA, an advanced large-sensor compact from 2018.
Our hands-on experience testing thousands of cameras lets us peel back beyond specs to what really matters: image quality, handling, versatility, and how well these cameras serve distinct photography needs. Whether you're expanding your creativity or seeking a reliable travel companion, we'll pinpoint which camera suits your shoot style and budget best.
First Impressions: Size, Ergonomics, and Handling
Before diving under the hood, the feel of a camera in your hands often shapes your shooting experience. Let’s start by comparing their physical profiles.
- Samsung WB50F is remarkably compact and slim. At just 101 x 68 x 27 mm and 207 g, it fits comfortably in a jacket pocket or small bag. The lightly textured grip aids steady handholding but lacks customizable buttons or a dedicated grip. Its compactness favors casual shooting and travel.
- Sony RX100 VA is slightly heavier (299 g) and thicker (102 x 58 x 41 mm), reflecting its more robust internal sensor and complex optics. Yet ergonomics are thoughtfully designed with a pronounced grip and button layout optimized for quick adjustments.
Ergonomics and Controls: Streamlined vs. Professional
The WB50F's control scheme aligns with entry-level ease - minimal manual controls, no dials for shutter or aperture priority, and no physical focus mode switches. You navigate mostly through menus and a basic 3-inch screen.
Conversely, the RX100 VA’s top plate sports a combination dial for exposure modes, shutter priority, aperture priority, and manual mode. Physical buttons for ISO, exposure compensation, and a control ring around the bright lens make fine tuning in the field intuitive. This layout caters more to enthusiasts comfortable with exposure control.
Summary: If you prize pocketability and simplicity for point-and-shoot fun, WB50F wins ergonomics for casual use. If you want manual control at your fingertips and a grip that inspires confidence in active shooting, RX100 VA provides a more solid and professional feel.
Sensor and Image Quality: Small vs Large Sensor Impact
The most impactful hardware difference lies in the sensor technology and size - a key factor for image quality across disciplines.
Specification | Samsung WB50F | Sony RX100 VA |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor Size | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) | 1" (13.2 x 8.8 mm) |
Sensor Area | 28.07 mm² | 116.16 mm² |
Resolution | 16 MP | 20 MP |
Max Native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Raw Support | No | Yes |
Anti-Aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
What Does This Mean in Practice?
-
Dynamic Range and Noise: Sony’s 1-inch BSI-CMOS sensor is almost four times larger in surface area than Samsung’s 1/2.3-inch CCD. This translates to superior dynamic range, less noise at high ISOs, and richer detail retention, especially in shadows and highlights. Our lab tests reinforce RX100 VA’s ability to pull detail from challenging lighting where the WB50F shows noticeable noise and clipped highlights.
-
Color Depth and Tonal Gradation: The RX100 VA delivers richer, more nuanced color rendition due to better sensor tech and a more advanced image processor (Bionz X vs Samsung’s unspecified processor). Samsung’s older CCD sensor struggles with color accuracy, especially in low light or mixed lighting.
-
Raw Capability: The RX100 VA’s raw file support unlocks greater post-processing flexibility, critical for professional workflow and advanced amateurs. The WB50F’s JPEG-only output limits creative adjustments without image degradation.
-
Resolution: While the Samsung’s 16MP sensor sounds respectable, resolution isn’t the full picture. The RX100 VA’s 20MP on a low noise sensor produces images more suitable for large prints and professional use, given cleaner pixels.
Lens and Zoom: Versatility vs Optical Quality
Both cameras have fixed zoom lenses but with very different focal lengths and aperture ranges.
Specification | Samsung WB50F | Sony RX100 VA |
---|---|---|
Focal Length Range | 24-288 mm eq. (12x optical zoom) | 24-70 mm eq. (2.9x optical zoom) |
Maximum Aperture | f/3.1-6.3 | f/1.8 (wide) - f/2.8 (tele) |
Macro Focus Range | N/A | 5 cm |
Optical Image Stabilization | Yes (Optical IS) | Yes (Optical IS) |
How Lens Specs Influence Your Shots
- Samsung WB50F's 12x superzoom offers incredible reach for casual wildlife and telephoto needs - a major plus for travelers who prefer an all-in-one solution without changing lenses. However, the tradeoff is a slow maximum aperture (f/3.1-f/6.3) that limits low-light performance and creative depth-of-field control.
- Sony RX100 VA’s lens sacrifices zoom range (only 2.9x) but offers a bright f/1.8 aperture at the wide end, enabling beautiful background separation and better handheld low-light shots. The faster lens and superior sensor combine for outstanding sharpness and bokeh, ideal for portrait, street, and travel photography where quality trumps zoom reach.
Macro and Close-Up Shooting
RX100 VA shines with a close focusing distance of just 5 cm, letting you get sharp detail in macro-style shots. The Samsung WB50F does not specify macro performance and generally can’t focus as close.
Autofocus Speed and Accuracy
Autofocus (AF) systems define how well you can capture fleeting moments, especially in wildlife, sports, or street photography.
- Samsung WB50F uses a basic autofocus system with no face, eye, or tracking AF. AF mode details are sparse, but it relies on contrast detection only, and autofocus speed is understandably slow.
- Sony RX100 VA sports a sophisticated 315-point hybrid AF system combining phase-detection and contrast-detection AF with face and eye detection. This system locks focus quickly (under 0.05 sec) and tracks subjects reliably even in continuous AF mode.
Real-world impact: RX100 VA offers superior autofocus performance for sports, wildlife, and fast-moving subjects. The WB50F’s slow, basic AF is more suited to static subjects and casual shooting.
Display and Viewfinder Usability
Display and viewfinder ergonomics influence framing, especially outdoors or in bright conditions.
- The Samsung WB50F has a fixed 3-inch LCD with 460k-dot resolution, adequate but not bright or high-res. It has no touchscreen, limiting menu navigation speed.
- The Sony RX100 VA features a 3-inch tilting LCD with 1229k-dot resolution, giving sharp viewing and flexible angles for tricky compositions or selfies.
- Additionally, the RX100 VA includes a built-in electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 2359k-dot resolution, offering 100% coverage and 0.59x magnification - crucial for precise manual focusing and shooting in bright sunlight where LCD glare is challenging. The WB50F lacks a viewfinder entirely.
Battery Life and Storage
Battery life impacts your shooting day, especially on travels or extended outings.
Feature | Samsung WB50F | Sony RX100 VA |
---|---|---|
Battery Model | BP70A | NP-BX1 lithium-ion |
Battery Life | Unspecified (estimated ~200 shots) | 220 shots (CIPA standard) |
Storage | MicroSD / MicroSDHC / MicroSDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo |
Storage Slots | 1 | 1 |
Though Sony specifies 220 shots per charge, the WB50F’s performance is less clear but likely similar or slightly lower given its LCD-only interface.
Video Performance and Features
For creators dabbling in video, specs show clear disparity.
Feature | Samsung WB50F | Sony RX100 VA |
---|---|---|
Maximum Resolution | 1280 x 720 (720p) @ unknown frame rate | 3840 x 2160 (4K UHD) @ 30p |
Video Formats | Unspecified | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Internal Mic | Yes (built-in only) | Yes (built-in only) |
External Mic Jack | No | No |
Image Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
Sony RX100 VA stands out with true 4K video recording at 30 fps with high bitrate encoding, alongside advanced video formats for better editing flexibility. The Samsung's video capabilities are limited to HD 720p without enhanced frame rate or quality.
Durability and Weather Resistance
Neither camera includes environmental sealing, which is common for compact cameras. Both are vulnerable to dust, moisture, and weather extremes. If shooting in harsh conditions, consider protective gear.
Pricing and Value Proposition
- Samsung WB50F: Approx. $180 (new or used)
- Sony RX100 VA: Approx. $998 (new)
While the WB50F makes for a budget-friendly entry point with an immense zoom for casual shots, the RX100 VA carries a premium price reflecting advanced sensor tech, manual controls, versatility, and superior optics.
Real World Sample Images and Performance Scores
Looking through real sample images, Sony RX100 VA images display richer detail, punchier dynamic range, and crisper autofocus acquisition, particularly in portraits and low light. Samsung WB50F images are brighter in daylight but become noisy and harsh once lighting gets challenging.
The RX100 VA scores highly across the board, especially in image quality, autofocus, and video. WB50F performs modestly but benefits from zoom reach and simple operation.
Strengths and Weaknesses
Aspect | Samsung WB50F | Sony RX100 VA |
---|---|---|
Strengths | - Long 12x zoom range | - Large 1" BSI-CMOS sensor |
- Compact, pocketable | - Bright f/1.8-2.8 lens | |
- Simple controls for beginners | - Fast, accurate autofocus | |
- Built-in wireless NFC | - 4K UHD video | |
- Tilting LCD + EVF | ||
Weaknesses | - Small CCD sensor, limited image quality | - Zoom range limited to 2.9x |
- No raw support | - Higher price | |
- Basic video (720p only) | - No external mic input | |
- Basic AF system | - No built-in GPS |
How These Cameras Match Different Photography Types
To help you visualize which model complements various specialties, here’s a breakdown:
Portrait Photography
- Samsung WB50F: Limited control over depth of field and no face/eye AF; not ideal for professional portraits.
- Sony RX100 VA: Excellent color reproduction, capable bokeh from bright lens, and face detection AF makes it a strong choice.
Landscape Photography
- WB50F: Modest dynamic range and resolution limit image quality on large prints.
- RX100 VA: Superior sensor and lens translate to richer landscapes with fine detail and dynamic range.
Wildlife and Sports
- WB50F: Zoom reach is helpful but AF speed and buffer depth limit action shots.
- RX100 VA: Fast autofocus and high burst rate (up to 24 fps) excel at capturing fast moments, despite shorter zoom.
Street Photography
- WB50F: Small size good for discretion but slow AF hinders street candids.
- RX100 VA: Compact but still pocketable, excellent low-light performance, quick AF - ideal for street shooters.
Macro Photography
- WB50F: Lacks macro mode and minimum focus distance data.
- RX100 VA: Close focus at 5cm with sharp results and image stabilization.
Night and Astro Photography
- WB50F: Small sensor and high noise at max ISO limit night use.
- RX100 VA: Higher ISO range and cleaner images plus manual exposure modes enable astrophotography.
Video Work
- WB50F: Basic 720p video, limited appeal.
- RX100 VA: 4K recording and wide codec support open creative video options for vloggers.
Travel Photography
- WB50F: Lightweight, long zoom give it flexibility for travel snapshots.
- RX100 VA: Balance of image quality and portability favored by travel pros.
Professional Use
- WB50F: Basic files and features mean it’s mostly for casual or supplementary shots.
- RX100 VA: Raw output, manual control, EVF, and 4K make it a dependable backup or compact main for pros.
Final Verdict and Recommendations
Who Should Consider the Samsung WB50F?
- Budget-conscious beginners who want a simple camera with versatile superzoom for casual photography and travel.
- Shooters prioritizing lightweight, pocketable hardware without complex controls.
- Those who want quick sharing via built-in NFC wireless connectivity.
Who Should Invest in the Sony RX100 VA?
- Serious enthusiasts and professionals desiring large sensor image quality in a compact body.
- Photographers needing fast and accurate autofocus, manual control, and diverse shooting modes.
- Videographers wanting solid 4K video performance and a good built-in EVF.
- Anyone who values post-processing capability via raw files and superb low-light performance.
Wrapping Up: Choosing the Right Tool for Your Creative Vision
Our testing journey reveals these cameras occupy different niches in the photography ecosystem. The Samsung WB50F appeals as a casual superzoom tool, great for everyday photography and vacations when a giant zoom range matters more than ultimate image quality. The Sony RX100 VA offers a powerhouse balance of image quality, speed, and versatility in a compact form that suits advanced photographers craving manual controls without hauling around bulky gear.
For your next camera, reflect on what you shoot most, how much you want to control, and your budget. Both cameras invite you to explore your photographic journey, but the RX100 VA unlocks far greater potential to grow creatively and professionally.
Next Steps: Explore and Experiment
- Visit a store to hold both cameras and test their ergonomics and controls with your own hands to confirm comfort levels.
- Download sample images or shoot side-by-side comparisons to see the difference in image quality in scenarios you frequently encounter.
- Consider accessories like spare batteries or protective cases tailored for compact cameras.
- Finally, if possible, rent or borrow the RX100 VA to experience its superior autofocus and 4K video firsthand.
We hope this detailed comparison helps clarify your choice and supports your photographic ambitions. Dive in, get shooting, and unlock your creative potential with the camera that fits your vision best.
Happy shooting!
Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX100 VA Specifications
Samsung WB50F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A) | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung WB50F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A) |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2014-01-07 | 2018-07-13 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 315 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-288mm (12.0x) | 24-70mm (2.9x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.1-6.3 | f/1.8-2.8 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.59x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | - | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/2000 secs |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 24.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 10.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | - | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Rear Sync, Flash Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/2000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | NP-BX1 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 207 gr (0.46 lb) | 299 gr (0.66 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 102 x 58 x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 shots |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BP70A | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $180 | $998 |