Samsung WB800F vs Sony A7 II
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
69 Imaging
71 Features
84 Overall
76
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A7 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Bump to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 599g - 127 x 96 x 60mm
- Released November 2014
- Superseded the Sony A7
- Replacement is Sony A7 III
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A7 II Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Samsung WB800F versus Sony A7 II, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by rivals Samsung and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the WB800F (16MP) and A7 II (24MP) and the WB800F (1/2.3") and A7 II (Full frame) posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WB800F was revealed 22 months prior to the A7 II which makes them a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sony A7 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the WB800F matches up against the A7 II in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A7 II Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung WB800F & Sony Alpha A7 II. The full galleries are provided at Samsung WB800F Gallery & Sony A7 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony A7 II
WB800F | A7 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A7 II over the Samsung WB800F
A7 II | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | November 2014 | January 2013 | Newer by 22 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 460k | Crisper screen (+770k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony A7 II
WB800F | A7 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A7 II Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Samsung WB800F has got physical measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Sony A7 II has measurements of 127mm x 96mm x 60mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.4") accompanied by a weight of 599 grams (1.32 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung WB800F versus Sony A7 II in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the WB800F compared to the A7 II.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the WB800F and A7 II is 92 and 69 respectively.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A7 II Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions merely by checking specs. The pic here might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the WB800F and A7 II.
All in all, both of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The WB800F having a tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sony A7 II will give you extra detail because of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged WB800F is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A7 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung WB800F vs Sony A7 II Specifications
Samsung WB800F | Sony Alpha A7 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung WB800F | Sony Alpha A7 II |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Pro Mirrorless |
Announced | 2013-01-07 | 2014-11-20 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.8 x 23.9mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 855.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 51200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 117 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | - |
Available lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.71x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 16 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | - | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 218g (0.48 pounds) | 599g (1.32 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 127 x 96 x 60mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 90 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.9 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 2449 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 shots |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures)) |
Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $300 | $1,456 |