Samsung WB800F vs Sony H200
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
![Samsung WB800F front Samsung WB800F front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Samsung-WB800F.jpg)
![Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H200/Sony-H200-front.jpg)
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Samsung WB800F vs Sony H200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Revealed January 2013
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Samsung WB800F vs Sony H200 Overview
Below is a extended analysis of the Samsung WB800F versus Sony H200, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. The resolution of the WB800F (16MP) and the H200 (20MP) is pretty comparable and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
The WB800F was manufactured around the same time to the H200 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going through a full comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the WB800F grades vs the H200 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Samsung WB800F vs Sony H200 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung WB800F & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung WB800F Gallery & Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Sony H200
WB800F | H200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Samsung WB800F
H200 | WB800F |
---|
Common features in the Samsung WB800F and Sony H200
WB800F | H200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2013 | Same age |
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Samsung WB800F vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Samsung WB800F comes with outer measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Sony H200 has proportions of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") with a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
Take a look at the Samsung WB800F versus Sony H200 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the WB800F and the H200.
![Samsung WB800F vs Sony H200 size comparison Samsung WB800F vs Sony H200 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-WB800F-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H200-size-comparison.jpg)
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WB800F and H200 is 92 and 67 respectively.
![Samsung WB800F vs Sony H200 top view buttons comparison Samsung WB800F vs Sony H200 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-WB800F-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H200-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Samsung WB800F vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to see the gap in sensor measurements just by going through technical specs. The graphic here will give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the WB800F and H200.
As you can tell, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Sony H200 to show greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively.
![Samsung WB800F vs Sony H200 sensor size comparison Samsung WB800F vs Sony H200 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Samsung-WB800F-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H200-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Samsung WB800F vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
![Samsung WB800F vs Sony H200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung WB800F vs Sony H200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-WB800F-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H200-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Samsung WB800F vs Sony H200 Specifications
Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung WB800F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2013-01-07 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 2920 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/3.1-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 20cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | ClearPhoto LCD display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 16s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 8.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 6.80 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 218 gr (0.48 pounds) | 530 gr (1.17 pounds) |
Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 photos |
Type of battery | - | AA |
Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $300 | $250 |