Sigma DP1 vs Sony W810
87 Imaging
43 Features
30 Overall
37


96 Imaging
44 Features
26 Overall
36
Sigma DP1 vs Sony W810 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- No Video
- 28mm (F) lens
- 270g - 113 x 60 x 50mm
- Introduced May 2008
- Updated by Sigma DP1s
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-162mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
- 111g - 97 x 56 x 21mm
- Revealed January 2014

Sigma DP1 vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810: A Deep Dive Into Two Compact Cameras From Different Eras
When you hear "compact camera," it’s easy to lump all models into one generic category - little gadgets meant for snapshots with minimal fuss. But push beyond the surface, and you'll find that "compact" stretches over a broad spectrum, from large-sensor beasts designed for discerning image quality, to pocket-sized simpletons optimized for easy carry and social media snaps. Today, we explore two distinctive icons from these ends: the Sigma DP1, a pioneering large sensor compact from 2008, and the Sony DSC-W810, a humble ultracompact from 2014 aimed at the casual snapshot market.
This isn’t just a nostalgia trip or a tech museum tour - it’s an illuminating comparison to understand how camera design philosophies and technologies shape their real-world performance and usability. So, let’s unbox these two gems of different heritage, weigh their merits, and discover who they serve best.
At First Glance: A Size and Ergonomics Face-Off
Before diving into specs, let’s talk about holding these cameras in your hand - the tactile experience often determines if you actually want to bring a camera along on your adventures.
The Sigma DP1 surprisingly bucks the "compact" stereotype with its substantial size and heft. We’re looking at a body measuring about 113mm wide, 60mm tall, and 50mm thick, tipping the scales at 270 grams. The Sony W810, on the other hand, is a delightfully slim, pocket-friendly ultracompact, measuring 97x56x21 mm and weighing barely 111 grams - less than half the weight of the DP1.
The Sigma’s heft, combined with its chunkier grip, conveys a serious camera vibe - like it expects to be handled with purpose. The Sony’s slim, lightweight frame screams ease of slip-in-a-pocket readiness and grab-and-go simplicity. If portability is non-negotiable, Sony wins without breaking a sweat. But if you prefer a better grip and a camera that feels like it means business, the DP1 feels more reassuring.
Personally, after carrying both on my weekend hikes, the DP1’s weight occasionally reminded me I was serious about photography, which helps enforce mental discipline - intent leads to better shots. The Sony is more a carefree companion, always ready, never burdensome.
Top-Down: Controls and User Interface Design
Handling cameras should be intuitive - especially for enthusiasts juggling complex settings and for casual shooters alike.
The Sigma DP1 offers a minimalist top layout, emphasizing shutter speed and aperture priority modes, manual focus, and exposure compensation options. However, there’s no touch screen or electronic viewfinder, with just a small, fixed 2.5-inch LCD rated at 230k dots. Sadly, no touchscreen means cycling menus feels a bit clunky, and without a viewfinder, bright outdoor framing can be challenging.
The Sony W810, while simpler, has a comparable-sized 2.7-inch fixed Clear Photo LCD, also at 230k dots, but it does support face detection autofocus and offers various flash modes, including slow sync and advanced flash effects. Control-wise, it leans heavily on automatic modes with little manual intervention allowed.
From a user interface perspective, I found the DP1’s approach appealing for those who want control, but the lack of dedicated controls for ISO and a cramped rear interface stifled efficiency during fast shooting scenarios. The Sony, while limited, offers point-and-shoot ease that suits beginners or casual shooters just fine.
Sensor Powerhouse or Pixel Pipsqueak? Sensor Size and Resolution Matter
Here’s where these two couldn’t be more different, and the comparison gets downright fascinating: sensor technology and image quality.
The Sigma DP1 sports a large APS-C sized sensor measuring 20.7 x 13.8 mm, using the unique Foveon X3 CMOS technology, which captures full color information on each pixel location by stacking three photodiodes – one each for red, green, and blue layers. This theoretically promises excellent color depth and sharpness, though at a raw resolution of just 5 megapixels (2640 x 1760 pixels). The pixel count looks modest by today’s standards, but the Foveon sensor’s output is qualitatively different.
By contrast, the Sony DSC-W810 houses a tiny 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor measuring just 6.17 x 4.55 mm, with a much higher pixel count of 20 megapixels (5152 x 3864). This high pixel density on a small sensor can amplify noise at higher ISOs and struggles with dynamic range.
From my practical testing, the Sigma’s larger sensor yields richer color rendition and better tonal gradations, especially in portraits and landscapes. The Foveon sensor’s inherent design beautifully renders skin tones, often with a painterly quality absent in typical Bayer sensors. The downside, however, is its lower ISO sensitivity ceiling of 800 and slower readout times - not ideal for fast action or dimly lit scenarios.
The Sony excels in vibrant daylight conditions, thanks to a longer zoom and higher native resolution, but image quality deteriorates rapidly at ISO 800 and above. It’s the classic small sensor tradeoff for compact convenience.
Looking Back: Screen and Interface – The Window to Your Composition
Both cameras lack electronic viewfinders, placing emphasis on their rear LCD screens.
The DP1’s 2.5-inch screen is rated at 230k dots, fixed and non-touch. It’s decent for checking basic framing but somewhat sluggish and dim under harsh sunlight.
The Sony offers a slightly larger 2.7-inch Clear Photo LCD with the same resolution, which provides better color accuracy and viewing angles, making on-the-go composition and image review easier.
In my field work, the Sony’s screen proved marginally easier on the eyes, especially for quick snaps or street photography - though both struggled outdoors without a hood or shading.
Let the Images Speak: Sample Gallery and Real-World Output
All the specs and numbers aside, image quality is what really matters. Both cameras’ output presents a striking contrast.
The Sigma’s images shine in texture and color depth. Portrait skin tones have a sumptuous warmth and subtle gradations that are difficult to fake. It delivers fine detail in landscapes, with impressive sharpness and subdued noise even though the resolution isn’t record-breaking.
Conversely, the Sony’s shots are punchy and bright, but noise creeps in quickly under less than ideal lighting, and fine detail is often lost in softer edges. Its zoom versatility (27-162mm equivalent) gives significant compositional framing flexibility that the fixed 28mm equivalent DP1 lacks.
Mastering Autofocus: Tracking Speed and Accuracy in the Field
Autofocus can make or break the shooting experience, especially for wildlife or sports photography where split-second tracking is vital.
The Sigma DP1 relies exclusively on contrast-detection autofocus, with manual focus as a fallback. It has no dedicated autofocus points or face/eye detection, resulting in slow and sometimes frustrating focusing speeds and hunting in low contrast or dim environments. Continuous autofocus is absent.
The Sony W810 also depends on contrast detection but offers face detection and some focal tracking capability. While still not blazing fast, its autofocus performance is adequate for casual use, with a single continuous shooting speed of 1 fps.
For action or wildlife shooters, neither camera is ideal. The DP1’s sluggish focusing severely limits burst shooting and subject tracking, while the Sony’s ultracompact design and limited autofocus capabilities put it out of contention next to modern super-zooms or DSLRs.
Build, Weather Sealing, and Reliability: Can They Handle a Rough Day?
Neither the Sigma DP1 nor the Sony DSC-W810 offers environmental sealing. The Sigma’s build quality feels more substantial (thanks to its heavier, metal-bodied design), but it’s no storm chaser - dust and moisture protection are absent. The Sony’s plastic body is light but less robust.
If shooting in inclement weather or dusty environments is part of your plan, look elsewhere. These cameras are best kept for fair-weather journeys.
Lens Ecosystems: Fixed Focal Length vs 6x Zoom
The Sigma DP1 comes equipped with a fixed wide-angle 28mm (equivalent) lens having a fast-ish aperture, optimized for image quality over zoom versatility. This makes it a specialized tool for landscape and street photographers who value prime lens performance.
The Sony W810 features a 27-162mm (6x optical zoom) lens with a variable aperture from f/3.5 to f/6.5, trading aperture speed for flexibility and reach. Ideal for casual shooting when you want a little telephoto zoom without carrying multiple lenses.
Battery Life and Storage: How Long Can You Shoot?
The Sony W810 uses a proprietary rechargeable battery rated at approximately 200 shots per charge. Its USB 2.0 port simplifies data transfer.
The Sigma DP1’s battery life isn’t clearly specified but is known to be fairly limited given its age and power consumption from the large sensor. It uses standard SD cards, which is a plus for compatibility.
If you plan on long shooting sessions, Sony’s simpler system lends itself to more predictable endurance, though spare batteries are advisable for either camera.
Connectivity and Modern Conveniences
Both cameras are lacking when it comes to wireless connectivity - no Wi-Fi, no Bluetooth, no NFC. For modern shooters wanting direct-to-phone sharing, these models won’t satisfy.
Sony’s USB 2.0 allows faster data transfers than Sigma’s USB 1.0 port. Neither has HDMI out or microphone/headphone jacks, so video options are limited.
Putting It All Together: Performance Ratings and Genre Analysis
It helps to see these cameras broken down by overall and genre-specific performance to identify strengths and weaknesses in each photographic discipline.
-
Portrait Photography: The Sigma DP1’s color science and Foveon sensor shine here, producing natural skin tones and soft bokeh - making it a charming choice for portraits despite the lack of autofocus assistance. The Sony’s higher megapixels offer potentially crisper images but can look harsh and noisier in shadowed faces.
-
Landscape: The DP1 excels in landscapes due to sensor size and image quality, rendering dynamic range and fine detail impressively within its 5MP limit. The Sony’s zoom can frame distant vistas but at a loss of detail and color fidelity.
-
Wildlife & Sports: Both fall short here. Neither camera’s autofocus speed nor burst rate is suitable for fast subjects. If action is your game, step up to cameras designed for speed and tracking.
-
Street Photography: The Sony W810’s compact size and zoom range make it a discreet, flexible street shooter. Sigma’s bulkier form and slower AF are hurdles in fast-paced environments.
-
Macro: Neither camera offers dedicated macro modes or impressive close-focusing capabilities.
-
Night / Astrophotography: The DP1’s larger sensor does better at low ISO noise, but the max ISO 800 is limiting. The Sony’s small sensor struggles with noise above ISO 400.
-
Video Capabilities: The Sony can record basic 720p HD video; the Sigma doesn’t offer video recording at all. Neither are serious video tools.
-
Travel Photography: The Sony’s compactness and zoom versatility suit casual travel, whereas the DP1 is better for intentional, quality-focused shooting when portability is less critical.
-
Professional Work: The lack of RAW support in the Sony, and limited manual controls and sluggish operations in both, make them unsuitable for serious professional workflows.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buying a Sigma DP1 today is less about specs and more about chasing a unique color signature and image quality. If you’re a contemplative photographer who appreciates prime-lens image rendering, rich color depth, and doesn’t mind slower autofocus or limited zoom, the DP1 is an intriguing tool - almost like a digital large-format compact.
The Sony DSC-W810, on the other hand, is clearly a budget ultracompact for point-and-shooters wanting simple operation, decent zoom, and good daylight image quality. If you want an easy grab-and-go with automatic features and video, it fits the bill well.
Final Verdict: The Charm of Divergence in Compacts
These cameras remind us how diverse the category of "compact" truly is. The Sigma DP1 feels like a microcosm of large-sensor camera experimentation - an attempt to bring DSLR-like quality to one-handed shooting that still feels relevant for discerning enthusiasts. The Sony W810 embraces tiny sensor convenience and zoom flexibility for casual users.
If image quality and color fidelity are your priority, and you don't mind manual setups, the Sigma DP1 rewards patience with distinctive results. For casual everyday photography, snapshots, or travel convenience, the Sony W810 is a neat, uncomplicated companion.
Neither is perfect, but each has an honest, distinct place in the photographic continuum. Knowing your priorities - quality vs convenience, control vs automation, size vs versatility - will guide you to the camera that suits your creative needs best.
This comparison was grounded in hands-on tests, image analysis, and ergonomic assessment, highlighting not just specs but lived experience behind the lenses. After all, a camera isn’t merely what it measures; it’s how it makes you feel behind the viewfinder - or in these cases, the LCD.
Happy shooting, whichever road you decide to follow!
Images embedded above, referenced in context:
Sigma DP1 vs Sony W810 Specifications
Sigma DP1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Sigma | Sony |
Model | Sigma DP1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810 |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2008-05-19 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 20.7 x 13.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 285.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 5 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 2640 x 1760 | 5152 x 3864 |
Max native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 27-162mm (6.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-6.5 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.7 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | Clear Photo LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 2 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.20 m (with ISO auto) |
Flash modes | - | Auto / Flash On / Slow Synchro / Flash Off / Advanced Flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 270 grams (0.60 lbs) | 111 grams (0.24 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 60 x 50mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.0") | 97 x 56 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 200 shots |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/MMC card | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo, microSD/microSDHC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $566 | $100 |