Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sony T900
83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 50mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Revealed February 2012
- Previous Model is Sigma DP1 Merrill
- Later Model is Sigma DP3 Merrill
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Released February 2009
Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sony T900 Overview
The following is a extended analysis of the Sigma DP2 Merrill and Sony T900, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Sigma and Sony. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the DP2 Merrill (15MP) and T900 (12MP) and the DP2 Merrill (APS-C) and T900 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe DP2 Merrill was revealed 3 years after the T900 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the DP2 Merrill matches up against the T900 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sony T900 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Sigma DP2 Merrill and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The full galleries are available at Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery and Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Sony T900
DP2 Merrill | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2012 | February 2009 | Newer by 37 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Sigma DP2 Merrill
T900 | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 920k | Clearer screen (+2k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Sigma DP2 Merrill and Sony T900
DP2 Merrill | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Sigma DP2 Merrill provides external dimensions of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") accompanied by a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs) while the Sony T900 has proportions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Contrast the Sigma DP2 Merrill and Sony T900 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the DP2 Merrill vs the T900.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the DP2 Merrill and T900 is 83 and 96 respectively.
Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to see the difference in sensor dimensions purely by checking out specifications. The pic here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the DP2 Merrill and T900.
Plainly, both of those cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The DP2 Merrill with its bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Sigma DP2 Merrill will produce greater detail because of its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots far more aggressively. The fresher DP2 Merrill will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sigma DP2 Merrill vs Sony T900 Specifications
Sigma DP2 Merrill | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Sigma | Sony |
Model | Sigma DP2 Merrill | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2012-02-08 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Dual TRUE II engine | - |
Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 24 x 16mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 384.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 15 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4704 x 3136 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 50mm (1x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5-10.0 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
Display resolution | 920k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | - | 2 secs |
Max shutter speed | - | 1/1000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640x480 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 330 gr (0.73 lb) | 143 gr (0.32 lb) |
Dimensions | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | - | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $931 | $300 |