Clicky

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony A300

Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front
Portability
64
Imaging
49
Features
45
Overall
47

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony A300 Key Specs

Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Introduced February 2014
Sony A300
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Introduced January 2008
  • New Model is Sony A330
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony A300 Overview

On this page, we will be looking at the Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sony A300, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Sigma and Sony. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the DP2 Quattro (20MP) and A300 (10MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (APS-C).

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The DP2 Quattro was released 6 years after the A300 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before getting into a full comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the DP2 Quattro grades vs the A300 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Sony A300

 DP2 Quattro A300 
IntroducedFebruary 2014January 2008Newer by 74 months
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kSharper screen (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 A300 DP2 Quattro 
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Common features in the Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sony A300

 DP2 Quattro A300 
Focus manually Dial precise focusing
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch screen Neither contains Touch screen

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Sigma DP2 Quattro has got physical dimensions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") with a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs) whilst the Sony A300 has sizing of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") along with a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).

Contrast the Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sony A300 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the DP2 Quattro versus the A300.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony A300 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the DP2 Quattro and A300 is 70 and 64 respectively.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it's tough to see the gap in sensor dimensions purely by viewing specifications. The picture underneath may give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the DP2 Quattro and A300.

Plainly, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Sigma DP2 Quattro to provide you with more detail as a result of its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more modern DP2 Quattro will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Portrait photography factors
Sony A300 Portrait photography factors
77
has manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
includes face detect autofocus
saves RAW formats
59
manual focus
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
low MP (10 megapixels)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Street photography info
Sony A300 Street photography info
61
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
no moving screen
no image stabilization
74
screen tilts
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Sports photography details
Sony A300 Sports photography details
48
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (45mm)
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
lacks phase detect autofocus
54
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
comes with phase detect AF
low fps (3.0 frames per second)
low MP (10 megapixels)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Travel photography info
Sony A300 Travel photography info
53
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.8)
45
has built in flash
doesn't have Timelapse function
low MP (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Landscape photography camera
Sony A300 as a Landscape photography camera
59
has manual focus
screen size is decent (3")
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (45mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
57
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
small screen (2.7 inches)
low MP (10MP)
doesn't have Timelapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Vlogging features
Sony A300 Vlogging features
9
can't record video
9
no video shooting
Photography Glossary

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony A300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sony A300
 Sigma DP2 QuattroSony Alpha DSLR-A300
General Information
Company Sigma Sony
Model type Sigma DP2 Quattro Sony Alpha DSLR-A300
Type Large Sensor Compact Entry-Level DSLR
Introduced 2014-02-13 2008-01-30
Physical type Large Sensor Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TRUE III engine -
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) CCD
Sensor size APS-C APS-C
Sensor measurements 23.5 x 15.7mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor surface area 369.0mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest Possible resolution 5424 x 3616 3872 x 2592
Maximum native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens zoom range 45mm (1x) -
Maximal aperture f/2.8 -
Total lenses - 143
Focal length multiplier 1.5 1.5
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display size 3" 2.7"
Resolution of display 920k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display tech TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Min shutter speed 30s 30s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings no built-in flash Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Maximum video resolution None None
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 395 gr (0.87 lb) 632 gr (1.39 lb)
Physical dimensions 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 64
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.5
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.4
DXO Low light rating not tested 538
Other
Battery ID BP-51 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type - Compact Flash
Card slots One One
Pricing at release $931 $0