Clicky

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony S2000

Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 front
Portability
93
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony S2000 Key Specs

Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Released February 2014
Sony S2000
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
  • Launched January 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony S2000 Overview

Here is a thorough comparison of the Sigma DP2 Quattro versus Sony S2000, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Sigma and Sony. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the DP2 Quattro (20MP) and S2000 (10MP) and the DP2 Quattro (APS-C) and S2000 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The DP2 Quattro was unveiled 4 years later than the S2000 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony S2000 being a Compact camera.

Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise view of how the DP2 Quattro grades against the S2000 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Sony S2000

 DP2 Quattro S2000 
LaunchedFebruary 2014January 2010Fresher by 50 months
Manual focus Very accurate focus
Display resolution920k230kSharper display (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 S2000 DP2 Quattro 

Common features in the Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sony S2000

 DP2 Quattro S2000 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display measurement
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch display Neither comes with Touch display

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison

If you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and size. The Sigma DP2 Quattro comes with outside dimensions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs) whilst the Sony S2000 has specifications of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).

Analyze the Sigma DP2 Quattro versus Sony S2000 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the DP2 Quattro against the S2000.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony S2000 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the DP2 Quattro and S2000 is 70 and 93 respectively.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony S2000 top view buttons comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is very hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizing purely by checking specifications. The visual underneath should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the DP2 Quattro and S2000.

Plainly, each of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The DP2 Quattro with its larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will resolve extra detail having an extra 10MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more modern DP2 Quattro is going to have an edge in sensor tech.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony S2000 sensor size comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony S2000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Portrait photography highlights
Sony S2000 Portrait photography highlights
77
you can focus manually
MP count good (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports face detection focus
saves RAW formats
19
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
Street photography with Sony S2000
61
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
46
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Sports photography advice
Sony S2000 Sports photography advice
48
MP count good (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (45mm)
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
does not have phase detect auto focus
16
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,200s)
low fps (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Travel photography camera
Sony S2000 as a Travel photography camera
53
MP count good (20MP)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
50
built-in flash
lack of Time Lapse mode
resolution not great (10MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
wide angle not great (33mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Landscape photography details
Sony S2000 Landscape photography details
59
you can focus manually
good sized screen (3 inch)
MP count good (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (45mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not have image stabilization
27
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
lack of manual focus
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (33mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
no manual mode
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
lack of Time Lapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Vlogging camera
Sony S2000 as a Vlogging camera
9
no video recording
21
wide angle not great (33mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of external mic port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony S2000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sony S2000
 Sigma DP2 QuattroSony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000
General Information
Company Sigma Sony
Model Sigma DP2 Quattro Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000
Category Large Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Released 2014-02-13 2010-01-07
Body design Large Sensor Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TRUE III engine Bionz
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.5 x 15.7mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 369.0mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 5424 x 3616 3456 x 2592
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 45mm (1x) 33-105mm (3.2x)
Largest aperture f/2.8 f/3.1-5.6
Macro focus range - 5cm
Crop factor 1.5 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 920 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30s 1s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1200s
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per second 1.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash 3.30 m
Flash settings no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 640x480
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 395 grams (0.87 lb) 167 grams (0.37 lb)
Physical dimensions 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model BP-51 2 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage - Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Retail price $931 $225