Clicky

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Zeiss ZX1

Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
 
Zeiss ZX1 front
Portability
67
Imaging
78
Features
62
Overall
71

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Zeiss ZX1 Key Specs

Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Released February 2014
Zeiss ZX1
(Full Review)
  • 37MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 4.34" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 80 - 51200
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 35mm (F2-22) lens
  • 800g - 142 x 93 x 46mm
  • Announced September 2018
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Zeiss ZX1 Overview

The following is a complete comparison of the Sigma DP2 Quattro versus Zeiss ZX1, both Large Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Sigma and Zeiss. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the DP2 Quattro (20MP) and ZX1 (37MP) and the DP2 Quattro (APS-C) and ZX1 (Full frame) boast different sensor dimensions.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The DP2 Quattro was announced 5 years prior to the ZX1 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Large Sensor Compact).

Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise view of how the DP2 Quattro grades versus the ZX1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Zeiss ZX1

 DP2 Quattro ZX1 

Reasons to pick Zeiss ZX1 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 ZX1 DP2 Quattro 
AnnouncedSeptember 2018February 2014Newer by 56 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display dimensions4.34"3"Larger display (+1.34")
Display resolution2765k920kCrisper display (+1845k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Sigma DP2 Quattro and Zeiss ZX1

 DP2 Quattro ZX1 
Manually focus Very accurate focus
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Zeiss ZX1 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Sigma DP2 Quattro offers physical measurements of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs) and the Zeiss ZX1 has proportions of 142mm x 93mm x 46mm (5.6" x 3.7" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs).

Take a look at the Sigma DP2 Quattro versus Zeiss ZX1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the DP2 Quattro vs the ZX1.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Zeiss ZX1 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the DP2 Quattro and ZX1 is 70 and 67 respectively.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Zeiss ZX1 top view buttons comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Zeiss ZX1 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing technical specs. The image underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the DP2 Quattro and ZX1.

As you have seen, the 2 cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The DP2 Quattro with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Zeiss ZX1 will offer greater detail with its extra 17 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged DP2 Quattro is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Zeiss ZX1 sensor size comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Zeiss ZX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Zeiss ZX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Portrait photography advice
Zeiss ZX1 Portrait photography advice
77
manual focus
decent MP (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
includes face detection focusing
exports RAW formats
86
has manual focus
excellent MP (37 megapixels)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
provides face detect autofocus
exports RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Street photography camera
Zeiss ZX1 as a Street photography camera
61
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
70
screen articulates
sensor size is large (Full frame)
exports RAW files
boasts focus via touch
above average ISO range (51,200)
lack of image stabilization
more heavy than others in class (800 grams)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
Sports photography with Zeiss ZX1
48
decent MP (20MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (45mm)
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
does not have phase detect AF
64
great max shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
excellent MP (37MP)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
provides tracking focus
focal length is fixed (35mm)
low frames per second (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
has no phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Travel photography factors
Zeiss ZX1 Travel photography factors
53
decent MP (20 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
65
has bluetooth
boasts focus via touch
excellent MP (37 megapixels)
fast max aperture (f2)
missing Timelapse recording
more heavy than others in class (800g)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Landscape photography features
Zeiss ZX1 Landscape photography features
59
manual focus
screen size is decent (3 inch)
decent MP (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (45mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
69
has manual focus
fast max aperture (f2)
lovely big screen (4.34 inch)
excellent MP (37 megapixels)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
above average ISO range (51,200)
exports RAW files
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (35mm)
lack of image stabilization
missing Timelapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Vlogging camera
Zeiss ZX1 as a Vlogging camera
9
no video recording
31
fast max aperture (f2)
touchscreen enabled
provides face detect autofocus
great video quality (3840 x 2160 pxls)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
missing microphone socket
more heavy than others in class (800 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Zeiss ZX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma DP2 Quattro and Zeiss ZX1
 Sigma DP2 QuattroZeiss ZX1
General Information
Company Sigma Zeiss
Model Sigma DP2 Quattro Zeiss ZX1
Class Large Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Released 2014-02-13 2018-09-27
Physical type Large Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TRUE III engine -
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) CMOS
Sensor size APS-C Full frame
Sensor measurements 23.5 x 15.7mm 36 x 24mm
Sensor surface area 369.0mm² 864.0mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 37 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2
Full resolution 5424 x 3616 7488 x 4992
Max native ISO 6400 51200
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 9 255
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 45mm (1x) 35mm (1x)
Max aperture f/2.8 f/2-22
Crop factor 1.5 1
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Display sizing 3 inches 4.34 inches
Display resolution 920 thousand dots 2,765 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display tech TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 6,221 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/8000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash settings no built-in flash no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Max video resolution None 3840x2160
Video data format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 395g (0.87 lb) 800g (1.76 lb)
Physical dimensions 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") 142 x 93 x 46mm (5.6" x 3.7" x 1.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model BP-51 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage - 512GB internal
Card slots One One
Pricing at launch $931 -