Sigma Quattro vs Sony A7c
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
78 Imaging
76 Features
88 Overall
80
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A7c Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Launched February 2016
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Boost to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 509g - 124 x 71 x 60mm
- Announced September 2020
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Sigma Quattro vs Sony A7c Overview
Here is a in depth overview of the Sigma Quattro versus Sony A7c, both Advanced Mirrorless digital cameras by companies Sigma and Sony. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and A7c (24MP) and the Quattro (APS-C) and A7c (Full frame) boast totally different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Quattro was introduced 5 years prior to the A7c and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the Quattro grades vs the A7c in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Sigma Quattro vs Sony A7c Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Sigma sd Quattro & Sony Alpha A7c. The whole galleries are provided at Sigma Quattro Gallery & Sony A7c Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony A7c
| Quattro | A7c | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1620k |  | 922k | Crisper screen (+698k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A7c over the Sigma Quattro
| A7c | Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2020 |  | February 2016 | Fresher by 55 months |
| Screen type | Fully articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony A7c
| Quattro | A7c | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurement |
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A7c Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Sigma Quattro enjoys external measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Sony A7c has sizing of 124mm x 71mm x 60mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 2.4") having a weight of 509 grams (1.12 lbs).
Compare the Sigma Quattro versus Sony A7c in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the Quattro versus the A7c.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Quattro and A7c is 63 and 78 respectively.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A7c Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to see the difference between sensor sizing only by going over a spec sheet. The graphic below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the Quattro and A7c.
As you can see, both of those cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Quattro having a tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh trickier and the Sigma Quattro will deliver more detail using its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The older Quattro is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A7c Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A7c Specifications
| Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Alpha A7c | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Sigma | Sony |
| Model type | Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Alpha A7c |
| Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2016-02-23 | 2020-09-14 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Dual TRUE III | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Full frame |
| Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm |
| Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 852.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 29MP | 24MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 5424 x 3616 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 51200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 204800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 50 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 693 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Sigma SA | Sony E |
| Number of lenses | 76 | 122 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully articulated |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,620k dot | 922k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | 2,360k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | 0.59x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/8000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.8 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | - | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, XAVC S, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 625 gr (1.38 lb) | 509 gr (1.12 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 124 x 71 x 60mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 2.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 740 shots |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BP-61 | NP-FZ100 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures)) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $738 | $1,800 |