Sigma Quattro vs Sony W350
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
97 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2016
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 91 x 52 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2010
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W350 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Sigma Quattro versus Sony W350, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Sigma and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and W350 (14MP) and the Quattro (APS-C) and W350 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Quattro was introduced 6 years later than the W350 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W350 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the Quattro scores against the W350 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W350 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Sigma sd Quattro & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350. The whole galleries are available at Sigma Quattro Gallery & Sony W350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony W350
Quattro | W350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2016 | January 2010 | Fresher by 75 months | |
Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1620k | 230k | Clearer screen (+1390k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W350 over the Sigma Quattro
W350 | Quattro |
---|
Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony W350
Quattro | W350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W350 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Sigma Quattro has outer dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") along with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Sony W350 has sizing of 91mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") having a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Look at the Sigma Quattro versus Sony W350 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the Quattro vs the W350.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Quattro and W350 is 63 and 97 respectively.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W350 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to picture the difference in sensor sizing purely by viewing a spec sheet. The visual below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the Quattro and W350.
Clearly, both the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Quattro with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh easier and the Sigma Quattro will result in greater detail using its extra 15MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more modern Quattro should have an advantage in sensor technology.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W350 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W350 Specifications
Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Sigma | Sony |
Model type | Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2016-02-23 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Dual TRUE III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 29 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5424 x 3616 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Sigma SA | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.7-5.7 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
Amount of lenses | 76 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,620k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 2s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.8fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.80 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | - | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 625 grams (1.38 pounds) | 117 grams (0.26 pounds) |
Dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 91 x 52 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | BP-61 | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $738 | $200 |