Sony A9 vs Sony NEX-5T
65 Imaging
72 Features
93 Overall
80


89 Imaging
57 Features
79 Overall
65
Sony A9 vs Sony NEX-5T Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Expand to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 673g - 127 x 96 x 63mm
- Introduced April 2017
- Updated by Sony A9 II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 276g - 111 x 59 x 39mm
- Launched August 2013
- Superseded the Sony NEX-5R

Sony A9 vs Sony NEX-5T: A Deep Dive Into Two Generations of Mirrorless Excellence
As someone who has spent over 15 years testing and working with digital cameras - from entry-level compacts to top-tier professional bodies - it's rare that two cameras of the same brand diverge so dramatically in purpose and design as the Sony Alpha A9 and the Sony NEX-5T. These cameras bookend major leaps in sensor technology, autofocus sophistication, and ergonomics. While they share the Sony E-mount and a mirrorless DNA, their target audiences, image quality, and performance profiles could hardly be more different.
In this article, I’ll take you through a comprehensive, hands-on comparison of these two cameras. Drawing from real-world shooting experience, studio tests, and a technical analysis grounded in over a thousand data points, I’ll help you understand where the Sony A9 justifies its status as a professional flagship in 2017 - and where the NEX-5T still holds its own as a compact, user-friendly camera from the earlier mirrorless wave of 2013.
The First Impressions: Size, Build, and Handling
Right out of the box, the difference in physicality between the Sony A9 and the NEX-5T is stark. The A9 feels like a true pro-level tool - robust, grippy, and designed to integrate seamlessly with demanding photographic workflows. Weighing in at 673 grams and measuring 127x96x63mm, the body is a solid SLR-style mirrorless, built with magnesium alloy and comprehensive weather sealing. This means it is ready for tough outdoor work - think landscape shoots in misty conditions or marathon sports events under variable weather.
In contrast, the NEX-5T is a compact, lightweight rangefinder-style mirrorless camera weighing just 276 grams with dimensions of 111x59x39mm. Its plastic construction feels less substantial but is much more travel-friendly and discreet for street photography or casual snaps.
Handling-wise, the A9’s body layout offers a wealth of physical controls: dedicated dials for ISO, exposure compensation, and customizable buttons all within quick reach. The NEX-5T trades most direct controls for simplicity - a tilting touchscreen and intuitive menus geared toward beginners and casual shooters.
My takeaway: If you prioritize tactile control and durability for professional or heavy use, the A9 is in a league of its own. If portability and easy operation matter more, the NEX-5T remains a compact contender despite its age.
Sensor and Image Quality: Technology Leap Across Time
The sensor is where these cameras diverge fundamentally in technology and output quality.
The Sony A9 is equipped with a 24.2-megapixel full-frame stacked BSI CMOS sensor - a cutting-edge design at the time that radically improves readout speed and noise performance. It delivers 6000x4000 resolution images with excellent dynamic range (measured at 13.3 EV by DxO) and a color depth of 24.9 bits, translating to nuanced skin tones, rich landscapes, and vibrant wildlife shots.
Meanwhile, the NEX-5T features a 16MP APS-C CMOS sensor (4912x3264 pixels), which was excellent for its era but naturally smaller, with a more limited sensor area of 365 mm² compared to the A9’s impressive 847 mm². Its dynamic range (about 13 EV) and color bit depth (23.6 bits) are decent, but you will notice more noise creeping in at higher ISO values than on the A9, partly due to the older sensor tech.
The APS-C format on the NEX-5T implies a 1.5x crop factor, influencing lens choices and framing - important considerations for telephoto or wide-angle work.
In real shooting, I consistently found the A9 shines brightest in challenging lighting - deep shadows or bright highlights retain detail gracefully, a must for professional landscapes and portraiture. The A9’s low-light ISO performance (DxO low light ISO rating ~3517) far exceeds the NEX-5T’s (1015), allowing cleaner pushes into dim conditions with less need for noise reduction.
Unique insight: The anti-aliasing filter on both sensors softens fine detail but helps reduce moiré in intricate patterns - a tradeoff photographers appreciate can vary in importance by genre.
The Autofocus War: Speed, Accuracy, and Next-Level AI
Here the Sony A9 absolutely dominates. It sports a revolutionary hybrid autofocus system boasting 693 phase-detect points spread densely across the full frame, combined with fast contrast detection to deliver perfect focus within milliseconds.
I put this to the test shooting fast-moving runners and birds in flight. The A9 tracked subjects impeccably without hunting or delays, maintaining lock even in low contrast or low light. It also features advanced Face and Eye AF, extending to animal eye detection - a tremendous boon for portrait and wildlife photographers alike.
The NEX-5T offers a respectable 99 phase-detect points and 25 cross-type sensors for its time, but its system is more susceptible to focus hunting and slower acquisition, particularly at telephoto focal lengths or moving subjects. It does include face detection, but eye AF and animal detection are absent, limiting its usability for dynamic portraits or pets.
Continuous autofocus in video and burst shooting mode also favors the A9’s technology tailored to professional action sequences.
Ergonomics and Interface: Touchscreens, Viewfinders, and Usability
Both cameras provide a 3-inch tilting rear screen, useful for composing awkward angles or selfies. But the A9 screen is a higher resolution (1440k dots) compared to the NEX-5T’s 922k dots LCD. The A9’s touchscreen is responsive and coupled with a high-resolution 3.68M-dot EVF covering 100% frame at 0.78x magnification - critical for precise manual focus or reviewing image details in bright daylight.
The NEX-5T lacks a built-in viewfinder entirely but offers electronic viewfinders as optional accessories. Its tilting TFT LCD rotates 180 degrees upward, ideal for selfie framing, a helpful addition for casual social shooters.
Sony equips the A9 with extensive customizable physical controls and menus aimed at workflow efficiency. The NEX-5T’s simpler interface and fewer buttons are meant to keep things approachable but can frustrate experienced users seeking quick access to settings.
If you often shoot in bright outdoor environments or need quick manual adjustments during a session, the A9’s superior viewfinder and versatile controls provide clear advantages.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility
Both cameras utilize the Sony E-mount system with identical flange distance, meaning lens compatibility overlaps greatly. Sony’s lineup has grown exponentially since the NEX-5T was announced in 2013 - the A9 benefits from access to the latest G Master primes, high-performance zooms, and specialized lenses optimized for full-frame coverage.
The 121 lenses count is identical in official specs, but many recent models are tailored to full-frame, offering superior optics and build quality. Using some APS-C-specific lenses on the A9 will incur cropping or vignetting.
Choosing lenses carefully can help define your shooting style:
- For portraits: fast aperture primes like the Sony FE 85mm f/1.4 GM are stellar on the A9.
- For wildlife and sports: telezooms like the Sony FE 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 GM OSS pair nicely.
- On the NEX-5T, APS-C-focused primes and budgets zooms cover casual shooting but less suited to demanding pro work.
Burst Shooting, Buffer, and Storage: Speed Matters in Action
Where the cameras differ in continuous shooting capability is eye-opening - the A9 excels with a blistering 20 fps burst rate using its silent electronic shutter and a deep buffer that supports hundreds of RAW frames before slowing.
I’ve used the A9 extensively for fast-paced sports and wildlife, letting me capture peak moments effortlessly. Its dual UHS-II card slots allow simultaneous recording or overflow - a professional feature ensuring file safety during critical jobs.
The NEX-5T offers a respectable 10 fps burst but with a shallower buffer that fills quickly, limiting sustained action shooting. Its single SD slot supports UHS-I speeds primarily.
Video Capabilities: Professional-Grade vs. Consumer Entry
Video is an area where the A9 sets a higher benchmark with 4K UHD recording capability (3840x2160) using full sensor readout, along with headphone and microphone ports for professional audio capture. SteadyShot 5-axis in-body stabilization helps handheld footage appear smooth.
The NEX-5T maxes out at 1080p Full HD video at up to 60p, sufficient for casual video but lacking advanced features or 4K. It also lacks dedicated audio input jack - a limitation for serious videographers.
If video matters to your workflow alongside stills, the A9 is the clear professional choice.
Battery Life and Connectivity: Staying Powered and Connected
The A9’s NP-FZ100 battery delivers a solid 650-shot rating per charge, which I found realistic in everyday shooting - even when using EVF and flash. The battery life, combined with dual card slots, makes it suitable for long assignments or travel.
The NEX-5T’s smaller NP-FW50 battery results in about 330 shots per charge, noticeably less for extended sessions. It has a single card slot again limiting redundancy.
In wireless connectivity, both cameras support Wi-Fi and NFC for quick pairing with smartphones or tablets. However, the A9 adds Bluetooth for constant low-power connections and faster image transfer workflows.
Letting the Images Speak: Sample Gallery Review
To illustrate the practical differences, I compiled side-by-side images shot in varied settings - portraits, landscapes, wildlife, and low-light street scenes.
The A9 exhibits clean, crisp details and smooth tonal gradations, especially evident in shadow areas of portraits and fine textures of foliage. Skin tones render naturally thanks to a wider color gamut supported by the sensor. The bokeh from fast lenses on A9 feels creamy yet subject-isolating.
The NEX-5T’s files are still quite pleasing but show grain and lower resolution on 100% cropping. Colors appear slightly more muted, and dynamic range compression is sometimes visible in high contrast scenes.
Scoring It Overall: Performance Snapshot
Sony’s marketing and specs can only tell so much - to summarize how these cameras perform under real-world conditions, I turned to benchmark scoring to quantify capability across key parameters.
The A9’s scores reflect a professional-grade package excelling in speed, image quality, and reliability. The NEX-5T scores well for entry-level users but lag behind due to older sensor tech, lesser autofocus system, and lighter build.
Which Camera Excels in Different Photography Styles?
Breaking down the strengths and weaknesses through typical photography disciplines adds clarity.
-
Portrait photography: The A9’s color depth, eye AF, and fast prime lenses provide unmatched skin tone reproduction and bokeh control. The NEX-5T handles casual portraits adequately but with less precision.
-
Landscape: Dynamic range and resolution favored the A9 for fine details and even exposure. Weather sealing adds confidence in field conditions.
-
Wildlife & Sports: A9’s autofocus coverage and 20 fps speed are essential for capturing fleeting action. NEX-5T falls short for serious fast-motion work.
-
Street & Travel: NEX-5T’s small size and quiet shutter favor street photography and portability. A9’s bulk and louder operation are tradeoffs.
-
Macro: Neither camera specializes in macro but the A9’s better stabilization and resolution leverage macro lenses more effectively.
-
Night/Astro: High ISO performance and sensor sensitivity make A9 superior for low light and astrophotography.
-
Video: A9 supports professional 4K workflows, while NEX-5T limits to HD with fewer interfaces.
-
Professional Use: Reliability, build, dual storage, and workflow features put the A9 firmly in professional hands.
Final Thoughts: Who Should Choose Which?
Having tested both extensively, here are my distilled recommendations based on your potential needs and budget.
Choose the Sony Alpha A9 if:
- You are a professional or serious enthusiast needing flagship autofocus speed and tracking for sports, wildlife, or events.
- You want best-in-class image quality and low-light capability for portraits and landscapes.
- You require robust build quality with comprehensive weather sealing for demanding environments.
- You shoot video at 4K with professional audio and stabilization needs.
- You need dual card slots and long battery life for reliability.
- Budget allows investing in a high-end system including newer lenses.
Choose the Sony NEX-5T if:
- You are a beginner or casual shooter wanting small, lightweight gear for travel, street photography, and social use.
- Your budget is limited - the NEX-5T remains an inexpensive entry into Sony’s E-mount ecosystem with access to many lenses.
- You prioritize simplicity and ease of use over speed or advanced controls.
- You mostly capture standard JPEGs and occasional HD video.
- You want a compact camera with selfie-friendly tilting screen.
My Testing Methodology and Perspective
Throughout this comparison, my assessments relied on in-field experiences encompassing portraits in natural light, wildlife tracking during early morning hikes, sports events under artificial floodlights, and twilight street photography in the city. Multiple lenses were switched in real scenarios to gauge autofocus and image quality impact.
Benchmarks referenced include standardized DxO Mark telemetry and frame rate tests conducted in controlled environments to ensure repeatability.
Disclosures: I have no affiliate partnerships influencing this review; all opinions are based on objective testing and end-user utility. Both cameras were tested with latest firmware updates.
In Summary
The Sony Alpha A9 represents a quantum leap in mirrorless camera technology, designed as an uncompromising tool for professionals. The NEX-5T, on the other hand, embodies an accessible, user-friendly entry point into mirrorless photography from an earlier generation. The gulf in sensor technology, autofocus, build, and features reflects the advances Sony made in less than five years.
Your choice hinges on balancing budget, use case, and desire for performance. For serious photographers, the A9 is a worthy investment that continues to deliver years of reliability and image quality. For hobbyists or casual photographers, the NEX-5T remains a capable and nimble companion still relevant for everyday shooting - especially if cost and portability are priorities.
Whichever you pick, both cameras showcase Sony’s pioneering spirit in mirrorless innovation and open doors to an inspiring photography experience.
Thank you for reading this in-depth comparison. I encourage questions or experiences about these cameras in the comments below - let’s keep the conversation about photographic tools lively and helpful!
Sony A9 vs Sony NEX-5T Specifications
Sony Alpha A9 | Sony Alpha NEX-5T | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Sony | Sony |
Model type | Sony Alpha A9 | Sony Alpha NEX-5T |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2017-04-19 | 2013-08-27 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | BIONZ X | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 35.6 x 23.8mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 847.3mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4912 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 51200 | 25600 |
Max enhanced ISO | 204800 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 50 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 693 | 99 |
Cross type focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Sony E | Sony E |
Total lenses | 121 | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,440 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | Tilt Up 180° Down 50° TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,686 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.78x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 20.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.00 m (ISO100) |
Flash settings | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync., Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x1080 (60p/60i/24p) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 673g (1.48 pounds) | 276g (0.61 pounds) |
Dimensions | 127 x 96 x 63mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.5") | 111 x 59 x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 92 | 78 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 24.9 | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.3 | 13.0 |
DXO Low light rating | 3517 | 1015 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 shots | 330 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-FZ100 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs + continuous) | Yes ((10/2 sec. delay), Self-timer (Cont.) (with 10 sec. delay; 3/5 exposures)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II compatible) | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Two | Single |
Retail cost | $4,498 | $400 |