Sony A200 vs Sony NEX-6
66 Imaging
50 Features
38 Overall
45
85 Imaging
58 Features
76 Overall
65
Sony A200 vs Sony NEX-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Released July 2008
- Newer Model is Sony A230
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 345g - 120 x 67 x 43mm
- Introduced March 2013
- Renewed by Sony A6000
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Sony A200 vs Sony NEX-6 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Sony A200 vs Sony NEX-6, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless and they are both manufactured by Sony. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the A200 (10MP) and NEX-6 (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (APS-C).
Photography GlossaryThe A200 was announced 5 years earlier than the NEX-6 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony NEX-6 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a concise summation of how the A200 grades against the NEX-6 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Sony A200 vs Sony NEX-6 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 & Sony Alpha NEX-6. The whole galleries are viewable at Sony A200 Gallery & Sony NEX-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Sony NEX-6
| A200 | NEX-6 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-6 over the Sony A200
| NEX-6 | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2013 |  | July 2008 | More recent by 57 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Sony A200 and Sony NEX-6
| A200 | NEX-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Sony A200 vs Sony NEX-6 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Sony A200 has outside dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs) and the Sony NEX-6 has measurements of 120mm x 67mm x 43mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 345 grams (0.76 lbs).
Analyze the Sony A200 vs Sony NEX-6 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the A200 compared to the NEX-6.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the A200 and NEX-6 is 66 and 85 respectively.
Sony A200 vs Sony NEX-6 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements merely by going through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath may give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the A200 and NEX-6.
Clearly, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Sony NEX-6 to produce greater detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The older A200 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Sony A200 vs Sony NEX-6 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Sony A200 vs Sony NEX-6 Specifications
| Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | Sony Alpha NEX-6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Sony | Sony |
| Model type | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | Sony Alpha NEX-6 |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Released | 2008-07-17 | 2013-03-25 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.8mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 372.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3872 x 2592 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 99 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Sony/Minolta Alpha | Sony E |
| Number of lenses | 143 | 121 |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | - | Xtra Fine LCD with Tilt Up 90� and Down 45� |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.55x | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 572 grams (1.26 pounds) | 345 grams (0.76 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 120 x 67 x 43mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 63 | 78 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 22.3 | 23.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | 13.1 |
| DXO Low light rating | 521 | 1018 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 360 shots |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
| Time lapse feature | With downloadable app | |
| Type of storage | Compact Flash | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $100 | $365 |
