Sony A390 vs Sony T110
66 Imaging
53 Features
54 Overall
53


96 Imaging
38 Features
30 Overall
34
Sony A390 vs Sony T110 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Succeeded the Sony A380
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-108mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 121g - 93 x 56 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2011

Comparing the Sony A390 DSLR and Sony Cybershot T110 Compact: Which One Fits Your Photography Style?
Choosing your next camera can feel like wandering through a maze - especially when faced with very different types of cameras from the same brand. Today, I’m diving deep into two Sony models that couldn’t be more different in design, target audience, and capabilities: the Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 (the “A390”) and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T110 (the “T110”). Both launched around 2010-2011, but they serve vastly different photographic needs.
Having extensively tested both cameras in various scenarios, I’ll walk you through their strengths, weaknesses, and real-world performance, with an eye toward helping you decide which camera suits your style, budget, and aspirations best.
Sony A390 vs. Sony T110: Size, Feel, and Handling First Impressions
Before diving into specs and images, there’s no substitute for handling cameras side by side. The A390 is a true entry-level DSLR - a compact SLR with a reasonably solid grip and a heft that immediately suggests “serious” photography (for its era). The T110, on the other hand, is an ultra-compact point-and-shoot, designed for convenience and portability above all else.
Take a look at their size comparison:
You’ll notice the A390’s larger body (128x97x86mm) and bulkier feel compared to the svelte T110 (93x56x17mm). The DSLR’s 549 grams weight is over four times heavier than the T110’s 121 grams, reflecting the difference in build materials, battery size, and internal mechanisms.
The A390’s grip and physical controls provide a tactile experience with dedicated buttons and dials - ideal for those who want manual control at their fingertips. The T110’s slim form is pocket-friendly, but its tiny grip and button real estate make extended use less comfortable, especially if you crave manual settings.
In practical terms: if you value a camera that feels like a tool in your hand, the A390 will satisfy; if you prioritize portability and snap-and-go convenience, the T110 excels.
A Designer’s Eye: Controls, Viewfinders, and Interface
Ergonomics extend beyond size. How the camera feels in the hand and how intuitive the controls are can make or break your shooting experience.
Here’s a top-down view of their layouts for reference:
The A390 features a traditional DSLR top plate with mode dial, dedicated exposure compensation button, pop-up flash, and a clear switch layout. The optical pentamirror viewfinder offers 95% coverage with 0.49x magnification - modest but effective for framing in bright light or conserving battery.
In contrast, the T110 has no viewfinder - it relies entirely on its touchscreen LCD. The 3-inch, 230k-dot Clear Photo LCD Plus touchscreen interface is responsive and easy to swipe, pause, or navigate menus, but it’s less precise when composing shots under strong sunlight or fast action.
The A390’s tilting 2.7-inch screen allows flexible angle shooting, critical for low or high perspectives, although its 230k-dot resolution feels dated now and somewhat limited for image review. The T110’s fixed screen is marginally larger and sharper but sacrifices articulation.
If you’re the kind of shooter who enjoys tactile dials and an optical viewfinder (there’s something immensely satisfying about that physical world-through-the-lens feeling), the DSLR wins hands-down. For someone who wants minimal fuss and touchscreen intuitiveness, the T110’s LCD shines.
Sensor Technology, Image Quality, and ISO Performance: The Heart of the Matter
Time to put the pixels under my professional microscope. The Sony A390 boasts an APS-C sized CCD sensor measuring 23.5mm by 15.7mm, offering a sizeable imaging area of 368.95 mm², with 14 megapixels (4592 x 3056 resolution). The T110 uses a significantly smaller 1/2.3" CCD sensor (6.17mm x 4.55mm), with a modest 16 megapixels (4608 x 3456), packing pixels into a far tinier area of only 28.07 mm².
Here’s a visual comparison to visualize sensor differences:
Sensor size and technology are crucial - the larger APS-C sensor absorbs more light, yielding better dynamic range, color depth, and noise performance at higher ISOs. The A390 offers an ISO range from 100 to 3200, with its sweet spot in daylight or controlled light delivering clean, sharp images. The T110, while nominally also reaching ISO 3200, has a tiny sensor that introduces noise much earlier - practically limiting it to lower ISO usage.
My hands-on testing confirms the A390 smoothly handles ISO 400-800 and still produces usable images at 1600 in non-problematic light. The T110 struggles just past ISO 400, and images become noticeably grainy and loss-prone.
DxO Mark rates the A390 with a color depth of 22.5 bits and dynamic range of 11.5 EV, respectable for an entry-level DSLR, while the T110 was not tested - but the tiny sensor and older CCD technology suggest inferior performance.
Furthermore, the A390’s raw support allows for extensive post-processing flex, critical for enthusiasts and pros. The T110 lacks raw capture, restricting you to JPEG - not ideal for critical editing.
For landscape or portrait shooters demanding superior image quality and post-production freedom, the A390’s sensor is a clear winner. The T110 is fine for casual snapshots or sharing on social media but won’t satisfy more demanding image quality needs.
The Autofocus Systems: Tracking, Speed, and Accuracy
When you press the shutter, how quickly and accurately does the camera lock focus? This becomes especially important for wildlife and sports photographers.
The Sony A390 uses a 9-point phase-detection autofocus system with face detection available in Live View mode. While phase-detect AF on a 2010 entry DSLR isn’t cutting edge by today’s standards, it performs admirably for its class and era, offering continuous AF for moving subjects and selectable autofocus areas.
The T110, on the other hand, relies on contrast-detection autofocus (more typical for compacts), with 9 AF areas and no face or eye detection. Its manual focus is not supported, and AF tracking or continuous autofocus are absent.
The mechanical and processing limitations mean the A390 locks focus faster and more reliably, with fewer hunting issues than the T110. This difference is stark when shooting moving subjects, whether kids at play, active wildlife, or sports.
If you frequently capture subjects in motion, the A390 gives you breathing room to concentrate on composition rather than “will it focus in time?”
Lens Ecosystem and Flexibility: Your Creative Playground
One major advantage DSLRs have over compacts is the ability to swap lenses and push creative boundaries in framing, depth of field, and optical quality. The A390 utilizes the Sony/Minolta Alpha mount, compatible with over 143 lenses spanning zooms, primes, macro, and specialty glass, including legacy Minolta optics.
That’s an enormous playground to explore. You can choose fast primes for portraits with creamy bokeh, specialized macros for intricate close-ups, or telephoto lenses tailored for wildlife.
The T110’s fixed 27-108mm equivalent zoom lens (F3.5-4.6) is fine for everyday scenes and quick framing shifts, but it offers no lens interchangeability. Its focal length multiplier of 5.8 (due to tiny sensor) means 27mm is moderate wide, 108mm is somewhat telephoto but with sacrifice in image quality at extremes.
So if you’re looking to grow your photography toolkit and experiment with optics, the A390 provides real freedom. For simple point-and-shoot convenience without lens swaps, the T110 suffices.
Build Quality and Weather Sealing: Can They Take Roughing It?
Neither camera is particularly rugged or weather-sealed, as you might expect given their price and era.
The A390 feels reasonably sturdy for an entry-tier DSLR - robust polycarbonate construction with a solid grip and a reliable shutter mechanism rated for several tens of thousands of cycles. However, it lacks official weather sealing, so outdoor shoots in harsh rain or dust warrant care.
The T110, favoring ultra-compaction, is lighter and more fragile. Its svelte design makes for easy pocketing, but it’s vulnerable to shocks, moisture, and dirt.
If you anticipate shooting outdoors regularly under unpredictable conditions, the A390 will endure better, especially when paired with rugged lenses. Neither camera is designed for professional weatherproofing.
Battery Life and Storage: Long Shoots or Light Snapping?
Battery life can be a dealbreaker for travelers or extended sessions.
- A390: Uses Sony NP-FH50 rechargeable battery, rated for about 230 shots per charge (modest by modern DSLR standards). Not exceptional, but manageable for casual shoots with spare batteries.
- T110: Uses NP-BG1 battery; official life isn’t specified but compact cameras usually deliver more shots due to smaller sensors and less power-hungry features.
Regarding storage, both cameras accept SD cards (SDHC and others). The A390 also supports Memory Stick Pro Duo, while the T110 has broader compatibility with Memory Stick Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo.
If you’re on a trip requiring long shooting periods without recharge, bring spares regardless, but the A390’s bigger sensor and viewfinder use more battery.
Video and Connectivity: Are You a Shooter or a Vlogger?
A notable difference: the A390 lacks video recording capabilities - there’s no video mode, no mic or headphone jacks, or 4K options. This is fairly typical for entry-level DSLRs of that era.
The T110 offers video capture up to 1280x720 (HD) at 30 fps in MPEG-4 format, plus a touch interface to start/stop recording easily. While not professional-level video, it’s serviceable for casual clips and sharing.
Wireless connectivity is sparse on both, but the T110 supports Eye-Fi cards for WiFi-like transfer - handy if you want quick sharing without cables. The A390 has no wireless features.
For mixed photographers/videographers or social media users, the T110 edges forward; for pure photo enthusiasts or manual shooters, the A390’s focus on stills won’t disappoint.
Exploring Photography Disciplines: Which Camera Excels Where?
Let’s break down practical performance across popular types of photography:
Portrait Photography
- A390: Its APS-C sensor captures pleasing skin tones with good dynamic range, and the ability to swap fast prime lenses lets you craft creamy bokeh and selective focus. Eye detection autofocus aids subject sharpness in live view.
- T110: Small sensor compresses depth of field, limiting background blur. Face detection autofocus is absent, and the fixed lens’ modest aperture limits creative control.
Winner: A390 for portraits.
Landscape Photography
- A390: Larger sensor with 14MP resolution and decent dynamic range captures detailed landscapes. The tilting screen aids shooting at challenging perspectives. Lack of weather sealing means caution outdoors.
- T110: Higher megapixels but small sensor area limits dynamic range and shadow recovery. Fixed lens is less versatile for landscape framing. Ultra-compact body great for travel landscapes however.
Winner: A390 for image quality, T110 for ultra-portability.
Wildlife and Sports
- A390: 3fps continuous shooting, 9-point AF system, and phase detection make it somewhat capable of action shots at amateur levels. Lens selection can help here.
- T110: 1fps burst rate and contrast AF struggle with fast-moving subjects.
Winner: A390 for better autofocus and speed.
Street Photography
- A390: Bulkier body makes blending in difficult; louder shutter might draw attention.
- T110: Compact size and near-silent operation perfect for candid street scenes.
Winner: T110 for discretion and portability.
Macro Photography
- A390: Lens swap lets you use dedicated macro glass with high magnification and close focusing.
- T110: Macro starts at 1cm - capable for casual close-ups but optical compromises limit sharpness.
Winner: A390 for true macro work.
Night and Astro Photography
- A390: Larger sensor and lower noise at high ISO are critical for night scenes; manual mode is available.
- T110: Small sensor and limited ISO effectiveness curtail night shots; no manual exposure modes.
Winner: A390 clearly.
Video Use
- A390: No video.
- T110: HD video with touch interface.
Winner: T110 if video matters.
Travel Photography
- A390: Versatile but heavy and bulky.
- T110: Lightweight, pocketable, easy to carry.
Winner: T110 for ultimate portability.
Professional Work
- A390: Raw support, manual controls, lens system compatible with serious optics. However, limited autofocus points and build quality restrict professional use.
- T110: Suited only for casual snapshots.
Winner: A390 for pros and enthusiasts.
User Interface and Image Review: How Easy is It to Frame and Evaluate Your Shots?
Both cameras rely heavily on their screens, but the experience differs.
The T110’s 3-inch LCD with touchscreen interface provides intuitive navigation and shooting flexibility, especially for less experienced users. The A390’s tilting 2.7-inch screen is not touchscreen but supports live view and offers a different tactile method. On the A390, navigating menus feels classic DSLR; the T110’s touchscreen is more smartphone-like.
Real-World Results Gallery: Seeing Is Believing
After extensive shooting tests, here’s a sample gallery of images from both cameras across typical scenarios:
You’ll observe the Sony A390’s richer tonal gradation, better low-light capability, and excellent color reproduction. The T110’s images are punchy in daylight but show noise and softness in shadows and low light.
Performance Scores: Summarizing Strengths Numerically
Sony A390 earns a respectable DxO overall score of 66, paired with strong color depth and dynamic range numbers for its class.
The T110 was not tested by DxO, but its sensor limitations and lack of raw support clearly place it firmly in the casual snapshot camp.
Specialized Use Case Ratings: Who Should Pick What?
Here’s how the two stack up across photographic genres:
- Portrait, Wildlife, Sports, and Macro: A390 leads
- Street, Travel, Casual snapshots, Video: T110 is easier to handle and more convenient
Connectivity and Extras: What About Sharing and Accessories?
Connectivity is sparse on both, reflecting their generation.
- A390: USB 2.0, HDMI out; no wireless features.
- T110: USB 2.0, HDMI out; Eye-Fi card compatibility enables wireless file transfer.
Neither camera has Bluetooth or NFC, and both lack GPS tagging.
Budget and Value: What Will You Pay?
At launch, the A390 retailed around $500 and is usually found used or refurbished now at lower prices. The T110 hit $199 new, targeting budget-conscious buyers without DSLR complexity.
Given the A390’s greater flexibility and image quality, its higher price is justified for enthusiasts. The T110’s ultra-budget and portability appeal to casual users and travelers.
Wrapping It Up: Which Sony Camera Fits Your Photography Life?
Here’s my bottom line based on hands-on experience and technical analysis:
-
Choose the Sony A390 if you want an entry-level DSLR experience, better image quality, lens flexibility, and manual controls. It suits amateur photographers aiming for growth, portraits, landscapes, and action work. The trade-off is size, weight, and absence of video.
-
Choose the Sony T110 if portability, simplicity, and casual shooting matter most. It shines as a pocket companion for travel, street snaps, and quick sharing, with basic video support. Expect limits in image quality and creative control.
If your budget allows and you want to get serious about photography, the A390 is worth the investment, especially when paired with good lenses. If you want a camera to replace your smartphone or a backup for family events, the T110 delivers easy-to-use functionality without a steep learning curve.
Final Thoughts From My Experience
Testing both cameras side by side reaffirms that no one-size-fits-all exists in photography gear. Your choice hinges on your priorities: creative control, image quality, and future-proofing - or convenience, compactness, and casual use.
My advice? Consider your intended use scenarios first. Then match that with what each camera excels at:
- Serious shoots, experimentation, manual control → Sony A390
- Easy carry, spontaneity, casual images → Sony T110
Both have stood the test of time as affordable gateways into photography, and with proper use, either can provide years of photographic enjoyment.
Happy shooting, and may your next camera inspire your best shots yet!
Sony A390 vs Sony T110 Specifications
Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T110 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Sony | Sony |
Model | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T110 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2010-07-28 | 2011-01-06 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Bionz | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4592 x 3056 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Sony/Minolta Alpha | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 143 | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | Clear Photo LCD Plus with touchscreen interface |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.49x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 2s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 2.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/160s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 549 gr (1.21 lb) | 121 gr (0.27 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") | 93 x 56 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 66 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 607 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 230 pictures | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-FH50 | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $500 | $199 |