Sony A390 vs Sony A65
66 Imaging
54 Features
54 Overall
54
64 Imaging
63 Features
85 Overall
71
Sony A390 vs Sony A65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Launched July 2010
- Earlier Model is Sony A380
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 622g - 132 x 97 x 81mm
- Launched November 2011
- New Model is Sony A68
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Sony A390 vs Sony A65 Overview
The following is a detailed analysis of the Sony A390 vs Sony A65, both Entry-Level DSLR cameras and both of them are produced by Sony. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the A390 (14MP) and A65 (24MP) but they possess the same exact sensor measurements (APS-C).
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe A390 was announced 15 months earlier than the A65 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact SLR).
Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short highlight of how the A390 scores against the A65 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Sony A390 vs Sony A65 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 and Sony SLT-A65. The whole galleries are viewable at Sony A390 Gallery and Sony A65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Sony A65
| A390 | A65 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A65 over the Sony A390
| A65 | A390 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | November 2011 |  | July 2010 | Newer by 15 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Sony A390 and Sony A65
| A390 | A65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Sony A390 vs Sony A65 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Sony A390 features outside measurements of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") with a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs) and the Sony A65 has dimensions of 132mm x 97mm x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") and a weight of 622 grams (1.37 lbs).
See the Sony A390 vs Sony A65 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at the time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the A390 vs the A65.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the A390 and A65 is 66 and 64 respectively.
Sony A390 vs Sony A65 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions just by checking out technical specs. The picture below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the A390 and A65.
As you have seen, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Sony A65 to show extra detail with its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged A390 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Sony A390 vs Sony A65 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Sony A390 vs Sony A65 Specifications
| Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | Sony SLT-A65 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Sony | Sony |
| Model type | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | Sony SLT-A65 |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Launched | 2010-07-28 | 2011-11-15 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Bionz | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4592 x 3056 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 15 |
| Cross type focus points | - | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Sony/Minolta Alpha | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Amount of lenses | 143 | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.49x | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 10.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/160 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 549 grams (1.21 lb) | 622 grams (1.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") | 132 x 97 x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 66 | 74 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 22.5 | 23.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.5 | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light rating | 607 | 717 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 photographs | 560 photographs |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-FH50 | NP-FM500H |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $500 | $700 |