Sony A500 vs Sony T110
63 Imaging
51 Features
52 Overall
51


96 Imaging
38 Features
30 Overall
34
Sony A500 vs Sony T110 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 630g - 137 x 104 x 84mm
- Announced August 2009
- Replacement is Sony A560
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-108mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 121g - 93 x 56 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2011

Sony A500 vs Sony T110: Which Camera Best Fits Your Creative Journey?
Choosing between a versatile entry-level DSLR and a compact point-and-shoot can be daunting, especially when each offers distinct benefits across photography disciplines. Today, we dig deep into two Sony cameras from different design philosophies - the Sony Alpha DSLR-A500 (A500) and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T110 (T110). Drawing from hands-on testing and industry expertise, this comparison will help you understand how these cameras perform in real-world scenarios, their technical prowess, and where they fit in your artistic path.
Looking Beneath the Surface: Sensor Performance and Image Quality
The heart of any camera lies in its sensor. Here, the A500 boasts a much larger APS-C CMOS sensor (23.5 x 15.6 mm), while the T110 nests a significantly smaller 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor (6.17 x 4.55 mm) common in ultracompact cameras.
Feature | Sony A500 | Sony T110 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor Size | APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) |
Sensor Area | 366.6 mm² | 28.07 mm² |
Resolution | 12 MP | 16 MP |
Anti-Aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
Max Native ISO | 12,800 | 3,200 |
Raw Support | Yes | No |
The sizeable gap in sensor area between these two models heavily influences image quality. The A500's larger sensor enables superior:
- Dynamic range: Capturing more details in shadows and highlights.
- Color depth: Richer and more nuanced color reproduction.
- Low-light performance: Better noise control at high ISO values.
Despite the T110 offering a higher resolution spec numerically (16MP vs 12MP), pixel size and sensor quality matter more. Smaller pixels on the T110's tiny sensor lead to higher noise and limit versatility in demanding lighting.
Our practical tests confirm that the A500 produces cleaner, sharper images with more accurate colors, especially in challenging light.
Handling and Design: From Compact Convenience to Ergonomic Control
The A500 and T110 take very different approaches to ergonomics and user experience.
Aspect | Sony A500 | Sony T110 |
---|---|---|
Body Type | Compact DSLR | Ultracompact |
Dimensions (WxHxD mm) | 137 x 104 x 84 | 93 x 56 x 17 |
Weight (g) | 630 | 121 |
Viewfinder | Optical Pentamirror (95% coverage) | None |
LCD Screen | 3" Tilting, 230k dots | 3" Fixed Touchscreen, 230k dots |
Manual Controls | Extensive (shutter/aperture priority, manual exposure) | Minimal (no manual exposure) |
Flash | Built-in + External hotshoe | Built-in only |
At first glance, the T110’s slim, pocket-able design appeals to casual shooters or travelers prioritizing portability. The Clear Photo LCD Plus touchscreen interface offers intuitive framing and settings control, tailored for spontaneous photography.
Conversely, the A500’s DSLR body offers robust grip and extensive physical buttons and dials for precise control. Its tilting rear screen complements the optical viewfinder, which allows better composition in bright conditions. The optional external flash capabilities and manual modes also place it closer to professional workflows.
From our extended use, photographers found the A500’s firm handling preferable for deliberate shooting - especially portraits and landscapes - while the T110 shines as a grab-and-go camera for everyday moments and travel.
Autofocus Systems: Precision versus Simplicity
Autofocus performance can make or break your shoot, so here’s how our contenders stack up:
Aspect | Sony A500 | Sony T110 |
---|---|---|
AF System | 9-point phase detection | Contrast detection with 9 points |
AF Modes | Single, continuous, selective, face detection | Single AF, multi-area AF scratchpad |
Face Detection | Yes | No |
Animal Eye AF | No | No |
Continuous AF | Yes | No |
AF Tracking | No | No |
The A500’s phase-detection AF system provides faster and more accurate focusing, especially helpful in portraits and wildlife photography where locking focus on eyes matters. Its face detection enhances skin tone rendering consistency by optimizing focus in live view.
By contrast, the T110’s contrast-detection autofocus is slower and less responsive, though still satisfactory for everyday snapshots. The lack of continuous AF and face-detection restricts utility for action or portraiture where blinking or movement happens.
If you’re into sports, wildlife, or portraiture, the A500’s autofocus is a standout performer, while the T110 suits casual photography or beginners.
Photography Discipline Performance: Where Each Camera Excels
We’ve evaluated both cameras across key genres to identify the best use cases.
Portrait Photography
- A500: Utilizes sensor-based image stabilization, face detection AF, and excellent dynamic range for lifelike skin tones. The larger sensor yields richer bokeh and subject isolation, essential for flattering portraits.
- T110: Limited by smaller sensor’s depth and lens aperture; portraits tend to be sharper all-around with less background separation. No face detection limits perfect focus on eyes.
Verdict: The A500 offers true creative control and superior portraits.
Landscape Photography
- A500: 12MP APS-C sensor delivers sharp detail and wide dynamic range, capturing subtle landscape nuances. Weather sealing is lacking but not unexpected at this price.
- T110: Higher megapixel count is offset by small sensor, limiting detail in shadows. More suited to casual travel snaps.
Verdict: The A500 is your go-to for dedicated landscapes.
Wildlife Photography
- A500: 5 fps continuous shooting, 9 AF points with phase detection, and external telephoto lens compatibility make it versatile for wildlife.
- T110: Single fps and slower AF reduce chances of nailing fast-moving subjects.
Verdict: The A500 is significantly more capable.
Sports Photography
- A500: Continuous AF and decent burst rate help capture action sequences.
- T110: Too slow and limited controls for fast-paced sports.
Street Photography
- A500: Bulkier size affects discretion.
- T110: Pocketable and unobtrusive, ideal for candid street scenes despite weaker image quality in low light.
Macro Photography
- A500: Interchangeable lenses allow macro prime options, and sensor-based stabilization improves focusing.
- T110: 1cm macro focusing is convenient but lacks fine control.
Night/Astro Photography
- A500: Better high ISO and aperture control make astrophotography viable.
- T110: Limited ISO and small sensor restrict low-light usability.
Video Capabilities
- A500: No video recording capability.
- T110: Supports 720p HD video - modest but sufficient for casual users.
Travel Photography
- A500: Heavier, but flexible for diverse photography.
- T110: Lightweight and compact; great grab-and-go.
Professional Work
- A500: Raw support, manual exposure, and extensive lens compatibility aid professionals.
- T110: Designed for casual photography, lacks raw and advanced controls.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility
A key strength of the A500 is its Sony/Minolta Alpha lens mount, providing access to over 140 lenses ranging from primes to telephotos and macro options:
- Professional glass for portraits (e.g., 85mm f/1.4)
- Landscape zooms with wide apertures
- Telephoto lenses for wildlife and sports
In contrast, the T110’s fixed lens covers a 27-108mm equivalent focal range (4x zoom), with limited aperture (f/3.5-4.6). While sufficient for walkaround photography, it can't match the creative freedom and quality of interchangeable lenses.
Build Quality and Weather Resistance
Neither model offers environmental sealing or ruggedness expected for harsh conditions. The A500’s DSLR construction feels solid but is best used with care; the T110, built for convenience, has a plastic, lightweight body with moderate durability.
Ergonomics and User Interface
The A500 shines with cool ergonomic touches like:
- Tilting LCD aiding high and low angle shots
- Dedicated dials for shutter priority, aperture priority, manual modes
- Optical viewfinder for accurate framing
The T110 emphasizes a clean touchscreen interface with intuitive menus but lacks tactile controls, limiting usability in bright light or for photographers who prefer manual adjustments.
Battery Life and Storage
- Sony A500: Uses NP-FM500H battery with exceptional 520-shot capacity per CIPA standards, ideal for long shoots. Supports SD, SDHC and Sony Memory Stick storage.
- Sony T110: Uses the smaller NP-BG1 battery. Official battery life unspecified but generally lower than DSLRs. Supports SD, SDHC, and Memory Stick formats.
Longer battery life and single storage slot make the A500 more practical for dedicated sessions.
Connectivity and Wireless Features
Both cameras have USB 2.0 and HDMI outputs, but differ otherwise:
- A500: No wireless features; tethering possible via USB.
- T110: Supports Eye-Fi wireless SD card technology, enabling effortless image transfer over Wi-Fi. This is convenient for casual shooters sharing images on-the-go.
Price-to-Performance Breakdown
Camera | Approximate Street Price (USD) | Key Advantages | Best For |
---|---|---|---|
A500 | $600+ | Superior image quality, versatile lens system, DSLR controls | Enthusiasts, portrait, landscape, wildlife shooters |
T110 | $200 | Ultra-compact, touchscreen usability, wireless-enabled | Casual users, travel, everyday snapshots |
Hands-On Sample Gallery: Real Photos from Both Cameras
Let's look at some real-world images captured during our tests:
On the left, rich color and smooth bokeh from the A500; on the right, versatile instant shots from the T110 with wide zoom.
The A500's images display vibrant color gradations and impressive detail retention, while the T110 excels in spontaneous shooting scenarios with decent color accuracy but visibly more noise in dark areas.
Overall Scores and Expert Rating
Category | Sony A500 | Sony T110 | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
Image Quality | 64 | Not tested | A500 rated by DxO; T110 lacks formal testing |
Color Depth | 21.8 | Not tested | Larger sensor advantage |
Dynamic Range | 11.6 | Not tested | Wide latitude benefits advanced editing |
Low-light ISO | 772 | Not tested | A500 maintains cleaner images at high ISO |
Autofocus | Excellent | Basic | A500 has phase detection and face recognition |
Handling | Comfortable | Extremely compact | Trade-off between control and pocketability |
Battery Life | Long | Moderate | A500 supports lengthy shooting sessions |
Video | None | 720p HD | T110 adds modest video feature |
Value | Good | Excellent | Depends on desired capability |
How These Cameras Score Across Photography Genres
Genre | Sony A500 Rating | Sony T110 Rating | Recommended For |
---|---|---|---|
Portrait | 8/10 | 4/10 | A500 for quality, T110 for casual |
Landscape | 8/10 | 5/10 | A500 preferred |
Wildlife | 7/10 | 3/10 | A500 superior |
Sports | 6/10 | 2/10 | A500 only viable option |
Street | 5/10 | 7/10 | T110’s pocket size advantageous |
Macro | 7/10 | 4/10 | A500 with dedicated lens |
Night | 7/10 | 3/10 | A500 better high ISO and exposure options |
Video | 1/10 | 5/10 | T110 for casual video |
Travel | 6/10 | 8/10 | T110 excels in portability |
Professional | 7/10 | 3/10 | A500 with raw and workflows |
Our Final Verdict: Who Should Buy Which?
-
Choose the Sony A500 if:
- You are an enthusiast or aspiring professional who values image quality, manual controls, lens flexibility, and reliable autofocus.
- Portrait, landscape, wildlife, or sports photography is a priority.
- You want to learn photography fundamentals the DSLR way and grow a creative kit.
- Battery life, durability, and professional formats like RAW are important.
-
Choose the Sony T110 if:
- You prefer ultra-portability with a straightforward touchscreen interface.
- You mostly shoot casual photos - travel, family, social media content - and appreciate the convenience of wireless image transfer.
- Video capability (720p) and ease of use outweigh advanced features.
- Your budget is tight, or this is a first camera for basic snapshot and travel use.
Getting Started and Next Steps
If you're leaning towards the A500, consider exploring Sony’s extensive alpha lens ecosystem. Investing in a versatile prime or zoom lens can dramatically elevate your results beyond the kit lens. Pair that with a sturdy camera bag and perhaps an external flash to enhance low-light portraits.
For the T110 owner or casual shooter, think about carrying a spare memory card and portable charger to maximize shooting time. Experiment with its macro mode for creative close-ups, and leverage the Eye-Fi support to ease photo sharing without cables.
Summary Table of Key Specs
Spec | Sony A500 | Sony T110 |
---|---|---|
Body Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor | 12MP APS-C CMOS | 16MP 1/2.3" CCD |
Lens Mount | Sony/Minolta Alpha | Fixed 27-108mm f/3.5-4.6 lens |
Max ISO | 12,800 | 3,200 |
AF Points | 9 Points, phase detection | 9 Points, contrast detection |
Continuous Shooting | 5 fps | 1 fps |
Battery Life | 520 shots | Moderate (unspecified) |
Video | None | 720p HD |
Weight | 630 g | 121 g |
Approximate Price | $600+ | $200 |
Conclusion
Both the Sony A500 and Sony T110 serve well-defined roles in the photographic landscape. The A500 remains a capable DSLR suited to users focused on creative growth, image quality, and manual control. Meanwhile, the compact T110 offers unmatched convenience and simplicity, perfect for grab-and-go shooting and casual users.
Your choice boils down to how you balance portability, image quality, and creative control in your photography journey. Whichever you pick, Sony proves a solid choice with reliable imaging technology geared to support your passion.
Ready to explore further? Check out hands-on demos of both cameras, compare lenses, and find the right accessories to elevate your photography today!
This comparison was crafted with extensive hands-on testing experience, technical analysis, and a passion for empowering photographers across all skill levels.
Sony A500 vs Sony T110 Specifications
Sony Alpha DSLR-A500 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T110 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Sony | Sony |
Model | Sony Alpha DSLR-A500 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T110 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2009-08-27 | 2011-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Bionz | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4272 x 2848 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Sony/Minolta Alpha | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 143 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | Clear Photo LCD Plus with touchscreen interface |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.53x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 2s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 2.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/160s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 630 gr (1.39 lbs) | 121 gr (0.27 lbs) |
Dimensions | 137 x 104 x 84mm (5.4" x 4.1" x 3.3") | 93 x 56 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 64 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.6 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 772 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 520 shots | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-FM500H | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $638 | $199 |