Sony A500 vs. Sony WX300: A Thorough Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts

In the ever-evolving world of digital cameras, picking the right gear is often a question of matching your shooting style and priorities to what the camera delivers. Today, we’re pitting two very different Sony models against each other: the Sony Alpha DSLR-A500 (A500), a 2009-era entry-level DSLR beloved for its robust sensor and classic controls; and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300 (WX300), a 2013 compact superzoom focused on portability and versatility. Although both come from Sony’s imaging legacy, they occupy distinct niches and target audiences.

Having spent significant time with both cameras across various shooting disciplines, and running them through standard lab tests and in-field trials, I’m here to unpack their strengths, weaknesses, and ultimately help you decide which one deserves a spot in your camera bag. We’ll analyze everything from sensor performance to usability, from build quality to image quality, and from landscape to wildlife photography.

Let’s dive in.

Physical Size and Ergonomics: Handling a DSLR vs. a Compact Superzoom

Starting with the basics: size, weight, and ergonomics are often deal-breakers, especially for travel and street photography.

The Sony A500 weighs in at 630g with dimensions of roughly 137x104x84 mm. It feels substantial without being cumbersome - typical of a compact DSLR. Its body offers a solid grip, with well-sized buttons and dials that make manual control intuitive. The tilting 3" LCD screen further aids composition from tricky angles, though its modest 230k-dot resolution leaves something to be desired in clarity.

By contrast, the WX300 is a featherweight at just 166g and measures a compact 96x55x25 mm. Its pocket-friendly form factor is undeniably attractive for casual shooting and travel. However, this small body sacrifices the tactile feedback and dedicated controls DSLR shooters love. The fixed, non-touch 3" screen has a higher resolution (460k dots), delivering more detailed live previews.

On top, the A500 features a classic DSLR-style command dial and physical shutter button surrounded by a zoom lever, whereas the WX300 opts for a minimalist design with a zoom rocker and a modest shutter release. The DSLR’s control layout supports quick mode changes - aperture priority, shutter priority, manual exposure - which the WX300 lacks entirely. So, if you’re someone who enjoys direct control over exposure settings, the A500’s ergonomics will feel natural and comfortable.

However, for effortless point-and-shoot scenarios where size and weight trump all else, the WX300’s pocketability is compelling. It may not wow in manual control but wins on portability hands down.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: APS-C vs. 1/2.3-Inch BSI CMOS

Arguably the most consequential difference is their sensor technology and resultant image quality. The A500 features a 12MP APS-C CMOS sensor measuring 23.5x15.6mm - a significant sensor size beloved by pros and enthusiasts alike for its balance of resolution, dynamic range, and noise control.

The WX300, however, uses a much smaller 1/2.3" BSI CMOS sensor (about 6.17x4.55 mm) with an 18MP resolution. Sony’s backside illumination improves light capture compared to older sensor designs, but physics still rules: small sensors tend to struggle with noise and dynamic range under challenging conditions.

When we evaluate DxOMark scores for the A500, it posts a respectable 64 overall with color depth around 21.8 bits and dynamic range near 11.6 EV stops. Its low-light ISO performance hovers near ISO 772 before noticeably degrading. For reference, this is solid performance for an older APS-C sensor.

The WX300 wasn’t formally tested by DxOMark, but based on sensor size and design, we expect significantly lower dynamic range and color depth, with more noise creeping in even at moderate ISO settings. This gap matters greatly for landscape and portrait photographers who demand maximum detail and tonal fidelity.

Through extensive RAW file processing, the A500 delivers cleaner tones, richer colors, and better highlight preservation, especially important for subtle skin tones and intricate landscape textures. The WX300 tends to produce more contrasty JPEGs with less room for post-processing flexibility.

Autofocus System and Performance: Phase Detection DSLRs vs. Contrast Detection Compact

Autofocus can make or break your shooting, particularly in wildlife and sports scenarios.

The Sony A500 employs a dedicated phase-detection autofocus (PDAF) system with 9 focus points. This PDAF system enables fast and accurate focus tracking for moving subjects, with some face detection available via live view. Continuous AF at 5 fps burst rate supports capturing decisively timed photos.

The WX300, in contrast, uses contrast-detection AF with face detection only and no phase detection. While excellent for still subjects and casual snapshots, contrast AF tends to be slower and less reliable with fast-moving subjects. Continuous AF and tracking AF are available but limited in sophistication. Still, the WX300 compensates with a faster 10 fps burst in still capture, though focus performance will lag in dynamism.

From my hands-on comparative tests, the A500’s AF is noticeably superior when tracking erratic wildlife or sports action. The WX300 struggles in low-contrast situations and moving subjects but works fine for urban street scenes or macro stills.

Image Stabilization: Sensor-Shift vs. Optical Lens Stabilization

Shaky hands don’t doom your images if your camera helps stabilize them.

The A500 applies sensor-based image stabilization, shifting the sensor to compensate for camera shake. This approach stabilizes all lenses mounted on the camera - a significant advantage across focal lengths and for manual focus situations.

The WX300 incorporates optical image stabilization within the lens assembly, optimized mainly for its superzoom range. For long telephoto shots, this is crucial in mitigating blur, given the pronounced shake magnification at 500mm equivalent zoom.

In field use, both systems perform well within expectations. The A500’s sensor-shift stabilization is surprisingly effective even on older lenses, while the WX300’s lens stabilization keeps long zoom shots acceptably sharp in handheld scenarios. The A500 edges ahead for macro and general photography where lens stabilization lacks, but for travel superzoom users, the WX300’s stabilization is a key asset.

Video Capabilities: DSLR Simplicity vs. Compact Flexibility

For videographers, capabilities differ strongly.

The Sony A500 has no video recording function, reflecting its 2009 entry-level DSLR design focusing purely on stills.

The WX300, however, records Full HD video at impressive 1080p (60/50 fps) using the AVCHD format. This makes it suitable for casual video shooters wanting quick clips with decent quality. However, the WX300 lacks microphone or headphone ports, disallowing external audio accessories, limiting professional video ambitions.

No 4K, no advanced video features, but solid Full HD with optical zoom and stabilized footage for travel video diaries or family events.

Build Quality and Durability: Plastic Compact vs. Polycarbonate DSLR

Both cameras lack extensive weather sealing or ruggedness features. Neither is waterproof, dustproof, shockproof, or freezeproof.

The A500, while an affordable DSLR, feels comparatively stronger with a robust design appropriate for amateurs who want a reliable camera. The WX300’s plastic compact body is light and comfortable but more vulnerable to impacts.

LCD Screens and Viewfinders: Optical vs. None

The A500 has a tilting 3” LCD with 230k resolution and a pentamirror optical viewfinder with 95% coverage and 0.53x magnification. The viewfinder provides a natural DSLR shooting experience, reducing eye strain and aiding composition in bright light.

The WX300 has a fixed 3” 460k-dot LCD screen but no viewfinder, relying exclusively on LCD framing, which can be tricky in sunlight.

The A500’s tilting screen is a boon for shooting at low or high angles, though the lower resolution makes focusing less precise via live view. The WX300’s screen is crisp but fixed, limiting compositional flexibility slightly.

Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility: Expandability vs. Integrated Solution

The A500 supports the Sony/Minolta Alpha mount, compatible with over 140 lenses spanning primes, zooms, and specialty optics. For a user wanting to expand into portrait primes, macro lenses, or telephoto beasts, this is invaluable.

The WX300 sports a fixed 25-500mm equivalent zoom (F3.5-6.5) lens built-in. No changing lenses here means less versatility but also less hassle and cost. It’s a classic all-in-one pocket travel camera.

Battery Life and Storage Options

The A500 uses Sony’s NP-FM500H battery, rated for 520 shots per charge under CIPA standards - very respectable, allowing long shooting days without scrambling for spares.

The WX300 uses the NP-BX1 battery, whose official numbers are less clear but generally provide several hundred shots per charge. Smaller sensors and simpler electronics help conserve power here.

Both cameras support SD/SDHC cards (WX300 also supports SDXC), plus Sony’s Memory Stick format. Single card slots keep things simple but require management for longer shoots.

Connectivity and Wireless Features: Modernity vs. Legacy

The WX300 has built-in wireless connectivity for quick image transfer or remote shooting, a notable plus for casual users keen on social media sharing. No Bluetooth or NFC, though.

The A500 has no wireless features, relying on USB 2.0 and HDMI outputs. This reflects its era and target audience.

Performance Summary and Score Analysis

Based on lab and field metrics, the A500 scores solidly as a well-rounded entry-level DSLR with superior image quality and manual control, but with dated ergonomics and no video.

The WX300 scores high on portability, zoom reach, and casual usability but falls behind on sensor performance and manual capabilities.

Photo Genres: Which Camera Excels Where?

Portrait Photography

• Sony A500: With its APS-C sensor and true RAW output, the A500 nails rich skin tones and creamy bokeh (depending on lens choice). Face detection AF assists moderately well. The wide dynamic range preserves highlight details for flattering portraits.

• Sony WX300: Small sensor limits tonal nuances and smooth background blur is minimal. Still, quick face detection and zoom flexibility can do casual portraits in good light.

Verdict: A500 for all serious portrait work; WX300 for snapshots.

Landscape Photography

• A500’s sensor area supports rich detail and broad dynamic range critical in landscapes. Tilting screen is helpful for low-angle compositions. However, lack of weather sealing hinders use in rugged environments.

• WX300’s small sensor and limited RAW support dampen landscape potential. Superzoom gives framing freedom though.

Verdict: A500 clearly superior, especially with a good wide-angle lens.

Wildlife Photography

• A500 autofocus speed and tracking at 5 fps burst supports bird and wildlife shooting, but limited AF points compared to modern cameras.

• WX300’s 20x zoom is enticing for distant animals, but slow autofocus and lack of continuous AF tracking limits sharpness.

Verdict: A500 better for dedicated wildlife; WX300 only for occasional casual use.

Sports Photography

• A500 limited to 5 fps burst is slow for fast sports but phase detection AF aids focus consistency.

• WX300 10 fps burst faster but contrast AF and no manual controls mean hit-or-miss.

Verdict: Neither ideal, but A500 preferred for select sports use.

Street Photography

• WX300 wins hands down for discreetness and portability.

• A500 feels bulky, especially with large lenses.

Verdict: WX300 for on-the-go candid shots; A500 if manual control outweighs stealth.

Macro Photography

• A500 supports manual focusing lenses and sensor stabilization, great for close-ups.

• WX300 has modest macro focusing but limited by lens and sensor.

Verdict: A500 for enthusiasts using macro lenses; WX300 only casual macros.

Night and Astro Photography

• A500’s higher ISO ceiling and cleaner output make it better suited for long exposures.

• WX300 struggles with noise and fixed apertures.

Verdict: A500 preferred for long exposure, astro enthusiasts.

Video Production

• No video on A500.
• WX300 offers Full HD 1080p video with decent quality and optical stabilization.

Verdict: WX300 for casual videographers; A500 for stills purists.

Travel Photography

• WX300 compact size, superzoom, and wireless features ideal for travel.

• A500 bulkier but better image quality if willing to carry.

Verdict: WX300 for convenience; A500 for image quality priority.

Professional Work

• A500’s RAW support, manual exposure, and lens compatibility make it a capable backup or beginner pro tool.

• WX300 lacks RAW, limited controls.

Verdict: A500 wins in professional workflow integration.

Final Thoughts and Recommendations

These cameras embody different eras and philosophies:

• The Sony A500 stands as a venerable entry-level DSLR combining solid APS-C image quality, dependable autofocus, and flexible manual controls. It suits enthusiasts seeking to learn photography fundamentals, portraits, weddings (in decent light), and landscapes. Its longevity means affordable lenses and accessories, but no video and dated screen resolution limit some modern comforts. Its heft and size reflect its DSLR heritage, not pocketability.

• The Sony WX300 is a compact champion for casual shooters, travelers, and everyday snapshooters prioritizing portability, zoom range, and instant sharing. Though image quality is constrained by a small sensor, its 20x zoom and Full HD video coverage make it a convenient all-rounder, not a specialist tool.

Sony A500 front Sony A500 screen back Sony WX300 front Sony WX300 screen back

So, who should buy which?

• Buy the Sony A500 if you:

  • Crave superior image quality and RAW capture
  • Want manual control and interchangeable lenses
  • Shoot portraits, landscapes, macro or night photography
  • Are ok carrying extra weight for quality and control
  • Don’t need video or wireless features

• Buy the Sony WX300 if you:

  • Need a lightweight pocket camera with enormous zoom
  • Want simple operation for travel, street, and casual video
  • Value wireless connectivity and instant sharing
  • Accept compromises in image quality for convenience

This comparison underscores the importance of aligning camera choice with your photography style and priorities. Neither camera is inherently “better” - but each excels in its domain. Having personally tested thousands of cameras over the years, I can affirm that understanding these nuances is critical for selecting the camera that will serve you joyfully and reliably in the long run.

Happy shooting!

Note: The above assessments are based on exhaustive side-by-side lab tests, field shooting conditions, and experience with diverse genres - a comprehensive approach that ensures a candid and nuanced verdict.