From Legacy to Cutting Edge: Comparing the Sony A560 DSLR and Sony A6400 Mirrorless for Every Photographer’s Needs

In the continuously evolving arena of digital cameras, understanding the key differences between models released nearly a decade apart can be both fascinating and essential for making a smart purchase. Today, I’m diving deep into a direct showdown between two intriguing Sony APS-C cameras: the Sony Alpha DSLR-A560, a classic entry-level DSLR from 2010, and the more recent Sony Alpha a6400, released in early 2019 as an advanced mirrorless contender.

Both cameras carry the respected Sony Alpha lineage, but they cater to very different user profiles and utilize distinct design philosophies. Over my 15+ years testing cameras, I’ve seen firsthand how sensor tech, autofocus systems, and ergonomics have dramatically advanced. To give you a clear, no-nonsense picture, I’ll cover all the bases - portrait, landscape, wildlife, video, and more - while keeping an eye on price, real-world usability, and image quality.

Let’s unpack their specs, strengths, and tradeoffs so you can pick the perfect fit for your photographic journey.

Size & Handling: Classic DSLR Bulk vs Sleek Mirrorless Mobility

Ergonomics can make or break the shooting experience, especially if you spend hours in the field or on shoots.

The Sony A560 sports a compact SLR body that packs a traditional DSLR heft and chunkiness. Weighing in at 599g and measuring roughly 137 × 104 × 84 mm, it feels solid and well-balanced with most Sony/Minolta Alpha lenses. Its grip is comfortable, though its pentamirror viewfinder and slightly dated button layout give away its 2010 roots.

In contrast, the Sony A6400 is a rangefinder-style mirrorless camera, much smaller and lighter at 403g and a sleek 120 × 67 × 50 mm. The reduced size and weight make the A6400 excellent for travel and street photography where discretion and portability matter.

Both cameras feature tilting 3-inch LCDs, but the A6400’s touchscreen interface adds a modern convenience that the A560 lacks.

If you prize a camera that fits easily in a jacket pocket or small bag without dragging you down, the A6400 clearly has the edge. For users who prefer the heft and “clubs for thumbs” feel of a DSLR grip, the A560 remains appealing despite its size.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Quantum Leap in Resolution and Dynamic Range

Sensor performance is the heart of image quality, affecting everything from resolution and noise to color fidelity and dynamic range.

The A560 features a 14.2MP APS-C CMOS sensor - solid for its day but now firmly in the “legacy” camp. It includes a conventional anti-aliasing filter, slightly reducing sharpness but minimizing moiré. DxOMark scores reflect this modest performance: an overall score of 70, 22.5 bits color depth, 12.3 EV dynamic range, and low-light ISO performance around 800 native.

Contrast that with the A6400’s massively improved 24.2MP APS-C CMOS sensor with updated Bionz X processor and same 1.5x crop factor. The A6400 pushes image quality with superior specs: DxOMark overall score of 83, color depth at 24 bits, dynamic range soaring to 13.6 EV, and excellent low-light ability (ISO 1431 native, extendable). These translate to cleaner, more detailed images across shooting conditions.

If landscape or studio work with large prints or heavy cropping is your aim, the A6400’s sensor will deliver substantially richer files with less noise - important when pushing your shots in post.

The older A560, while serviceable and even enjoyable for casual shooting or web use, can start to show its age in demanding dynamic range or low light.

Autofocus & Speed: From Modest 15-Point AF to Lightning-Fast 425 Points with Animal Eye-Detection

Arguably the most remarkable jump between these two cameras is in autofocus functionality.

The A560 uses a 15-point phase-detection autofocus system with 3 cross-type points, adequate for basic tracking but lacking sophistication. It supports continuous AF and face detection but lacks tracking and eye/animal detection features. For fast action, focus accuracy can feel choppy.

The A6400 blows this out of the water - armed with 425 phase-detection points spread across the frame, 425 contrast-detection points, and upgraded AI-based real-time eye AF for humans and animals. This system produces incredibly fast, fluid, and reliable focusing, making it a top choice for sports, wildlife, and portrait photography. You can run 11fps continuous shooting with AF tracking, a boon for capturing sharp moments in dynamic scenes.

I’ve tested the A6400 extensively on birds in flight and sports, and its AF tracking actually rivals some professional-grade cameras costing much more.

The A560’s modest 5fps burst rate can struggle to keep up in fast scenarios, making it more suited for stills-based work.

Viewfinder & LCD: Optical Simplicity vs Sharp Electronic Preview with Touchscreen

The user interface is where the dichotomy between DSLR and mirrorless truly shows.

The A560 employs a conventional optical pentamirror viewfinder with roughly 95% coverage and 0.53x magnification. While it offers a natural, lag-free view, the coverage incomplete and image brightness lower than pentaprisms or EVFs.

By contrast, the A6400 uses a high-res 2359k-dot OLED electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 100% coverage and 0.7x magnification, giving photographers exact previews of exposure, color, and depth of field. This EVF also displays useful overlays like focus peaking and histograms in real time - a huge advantage for critical shooting.

Both feature a tilting rear LCD, but the A6400’s touchscreen is a significant UX upgrade, making menu navigation and focus selection more intuitive, especially in creative or run-and-gun situations.

For photographers used to DSLRs, moving to an EVF takes adjustment but offers undeniable benefits, especially in variable lighting.

Build & Weather Sealing: Robust Advanced Build of A6400 vs Basic Construction of A560

If you’re shooting outdoors or professionally on location, build quality and weather sealing are critical.

The A560 is a basic entry-level DSLR without any weather sealing or ruggedization features. Its plastic-heavy body and pentamirror viewfinder mean you need extra care in dusty or wet environments.

The A6400 takes a more robust approach, featuring magnesium alloy construction with environmental sealing (note: not fully waterproof, but splash and dust resistant). This makes it better suited for demanding outdoor shoots, landscapes, sports, and wildlife photography under real-world weather conditions.

Lens Ecosystem: Legacy Minolta Compatibility vs Modern E-Mount Flexibility

A critical factor for many photographers is the availability and variety of lenses.

The A560 uses the Sony/Minolta Alpha A-mount, boasting access to over 140 lenses including legacy Minolta primes and Sony’s DSLR range. This is a mature lineup but with some limitations on newer, compact lenses and third-party options.

The A6400’s Sony E-mount, while younger, supports a growing lineup of more than 120 native lenses made specifically for mirrorless setups. It also adapts A-mount lenses (with an adapter), plus cinema glass, and innovative stabilized primes, offering greater optical quality and variety optimized for the camera’s sensor and autofocus system.

For casual users or those on a budget, the A560’s used lens market might seem attractive. But for photographers seeking cutting-edge optics and autofocus synergy, the A6400 is a more future-proof choice.

Battery Life & Storage: DSLR Stamina vs Mirrorless Economy

Battery life often surprises mirrorless users when coming from DSLRs.

The A560 impresses with an estimated 1050 shots per charge, thanks to its traditional optical viewfinder and conservative electronics.

By comparison, the A6400 manages around 410 shots per battery, typical of mirrorless cameras with electronic viewfinders and more complex processors. You’ll likely want to carry extra batteries for long shoots or travel days.

Storage-wise, the A560 offers dual card slots, a notable advantage for professional backup and workflow security. The A6400 features a single SD card slot (UHS-I compatible), so backup has to be planned with external devices or quick card swaps.

Video Prowess: Full HD Legacy vs Contemporary 4K with Advanced Codec Options

Modern hybrid shooters often demand strong video capabilities alongside stills.

The A560 records video up to 1920×1080 pixels at 60fps in AVCHD and MPEG4 formats. It includes a built-in mic port, has sensor-based stabilization, and basic flash sync but lacks 4K or advanced codec support.

The A6400 is a real game-changer with 4K UHD capture at 30fps using full pixel readout without pixel binning, and supports XAVC S codec for better color grading in post. It features S-Log profiles, zebra patterns, focus peaking, and a mic port, although no headphone jack.

While neither camera has in-body image stabilization (IBIS), the A560’s sensor-based stabilization helps stills slightly, whereas video relies on lens stabilization or rig setups.

For content creators or videographers on a budget, the A6400 provides a far superior package for professional-quality video.

Real-World Performance in Photography Genres: The Ultimate Practical Test

Let’s translate spec sheets into photographic outcomes across popular genres.

Portrait Photography

• Sony A560: Face detection AF and tilting screen assist framing, but limited AF points and no eye detection hinder precise focus on eyes and subtle expressions. Sensor resolution (14MP) modest for large portraits.
• Sony A6400: Exceptional thanks to real-time eye and animal eye AF plus 24MP resolution. Produces creamy bokeh with mirrorless-optimized lenses. Tilting touchscreen perfect for creative angles.

Landscape Photography

• Sony A560: Moderate dynamic range and lower resolution limit large prints, but durable battery life and dual cards helpful on remote trips. No weather sealing is a drawback.
• Sony A6400: High dynamic range, 24MP sensor, environmental sealing, and advanced exposure bracketing make this an outstanding travel and landscape companion.

Sony A560 front Sony A560 screen back Sony A6400 front Sony A6400 screen back

Wildlife Photography

• Sony A560: 5fps shooting and 15-point AF make tracking fast wildlife tricky. No animal eye AF.
• Sony A6400: 11fps burst with continuous AF and animal eye detection is a standout feature for bird and animal photographers.

Sports Photography

• Sony A560: Basic AF limits usability for fast-paced sports.
• Sony A6400: Fast AF, large AF point coverage, and higher FPS deliver better hit rates on the field or the court.

Street Photography

• Sony A560: Bulkier DSLR size may intimidate or inconvenience. Optical viewfinder avoids EVF lag but slower AF.
• Sony A6400: Compact size, silent shooting options (with electronic shutter), and quick AF ideal for unobtrusive street shooting. Rear-facing screen flips for selfies or video.

Macro Photography

• Both cameras depend heavily on lenses, but the A6400’s better focusing system and higher resolution aid critical macro work.

Night & Astro Photography

• The A6400’s high ISO capabilities, superior dynamic range, and electronic shutter make it the better choice for astrophotography and low-light creative shoots.

Video

• Clear win to the A6400 with 4K capture and modern codecs, while the A560 is limited to full HD.

Travel Photography

• A6400’s lightweight build, weather sealing, and versatile autofocus make it the obvious pick for the traveler.
• A560’s longer battery life and dual slots may still appeal for long trips without ready charging.

Professional Work

• A6400 supports advanced workflows with better file quality, faster transfer (built-in Wi-Fi & Bluetooth), and superior reliability.
• A560 remains a budget-friendly, solid back-up or beginner platform.

Connectivity and Extras: 21st Century Wireless vs Early-Era Options

The A560’s wireless connectivity is limited to Eye-Fi cards, a technology now largely obsolete. No Bluetooth or NFC is present.

The A6400 comes with built-in Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and NFC, facilitating instant sharing and remote camera control, a huge convenience in today’s connected world.

Both have standard HDMI ports and microphone jacks but lack headphone outputs - a mild consumer-level limitation.

Price and Value for Money: Budget Beginner or Modern All-Rounder?

At a glance, the A560 is often found on the used market for around $300-$400, making it an economical entry point for aspiring photographers on a shoestring budget.

The A6400 retails new for about $900-$1000, a premium but competitive price reflecting its advanced features and contemporary sensor.

Is the upgrade worth the extra %. For most buyers seeking speed, image quality, and future-proofing, the A6400 delivers exceptional value that justifies its cost.

For those who need a simple starter DSLR or prefer a larger grip, however, the A560 remains a time-tested option.

Summary of Pros and Cons

Final Verdict: Who Should Buy Which?

Choose the Sony A560 if you:

• Are on a tight budget and want a full-fledged DSLR experience without breaking the bank.
• Prefer optical viewfinders and long battery life for extensive shoots.
• Already own A-mount lenses or want to explore legacy glass.
• Shoot mostly portraits, landscapes, or casual subjects where speed and video aren’t major concerns.
• Don’t mind older tech and can accept compromises in AF and ISO performance.

Go for the Sony A6400 if you:

• Want a highly versatile, future-ready hybrid camera that excels in stills and 4K video.
• Shoot fast action - sports, wildlife, street - requiring a blazing autofocus system and high frame rates.
• Need superb image quality with strong dynamic range and high ISO clarity.
• Value portability, touchscreen interface, and weather sealing for travel and outdoor photography.
• Use modern Sony E-mount lenses or plan to grow your kit with cutting-edge glass.
• Are a content creator who demands excellent video specs and wireless connectivity for streamlined workflows.

Wrapping Up My Hands-On Take

Having held and tested both cameras extensively (my thumb still remembers the crisp click of the A560’s mechanical shutter!), the contrast couldn’t be starker. The Sony A6400 represents nearly a decade of innovation squeezed into a svelte mirrorless powerhouse. The A560, while a nostalgic and capable tool, now feels like a relic best suited for enthusiasts happy to work within its limitations.

For most photographers in 2024 who want a balanced, capable camera that can handle a wide range of shooting scenarios with confidence, the A6400 is the winner hands down. It’s a testament to how far technology has come, offering user-friendly interfaces, rapid autofocus with AI smarts, robust video, and excellent image quality – all in a pint-sized body.

But if you’re a budget-conscious beginner or someone addicted to the DSLR feel, the A560 still deserves a second look as a no-frills entry ticket to serious photography.

Whichever you choose, Sony’s Alpha system continues to provide solid pathways for beginners and professionals alike.

Feel free to reach out if you want personalized advice on lenses or accessories to get the most out of your new camera. Happy shooting!

Images included:
size-comparison.jpg | top-view-compare.jpg | sensor-size-compare.jpg | back-screen.jpg | cameras-galley.jpg | camera-scores.jpg | photography-type-cameras-scores.jpg