Sony A560 vs Sony TX200V: A Hands-On Comparison for Enthusiasts and Professionals

When I first set out to compare the Sony Alpha DSLR-A560 and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V, I knew I was diving into two very different cameras from the same brand but targeting distinct types of photographers. Having tested thousands of cameras over the years, I appreciate how form factor, sensor technology, and feature sets directly shape a camera's practical usability - from studio portraits to casual travel snaps.

These cameras reflect divergent approaches: one is a traditional DSL (Sony A560), the other a sleek ultra-compact (Sony TX200V). Both have their quirks and charms, making the comparison less about one being “better” overall but more about which will serve you best in specific scenarios. In this comprehensive review, I share my detailed firsthand impressions, technical insights, and user-focused evaluations to help you decide which camera fits your creative ambitions.

Seeing Is Believing: Physical Size and Handling

My grip and tactile interface assessment is where preference often begins - especially if you’re shooting long sessions or need quick reflexes.

The Sony A560's compact SLR body measures a substantial 137 x 104 x 84 mm and weighs in at 599g. Holding it, I felt a reassuring heft and robust handgrip - a classic DSLR comfort that invites extended use without fatigue. The A560 sports a sturdy body with traditional buttons well-placed for quick access, though the plastic build reminded me of its Entry-Level class roots.

On the flip side, the TX200V blew me away with its ultra-slim, minimalist form factor (96 x 58 x 16 mm) weighing only 129g. Sliding it into a pocket was effortless - ideal for travel or street photographers who prize discretion. The tradeoff? It lacks the physical dials and buttons that DSLRs excel in, relying primarily on a touchscreen interface - a double-edged sword in fast-moving environments, as I'll address later.

In ergonomics terms: If you want a dependable, tool-like feel and solid control, the A560 wins. For portability and spontaneous shooting, the TX200V excels.

Control Surfaces and User Interface: Tweaking On The Fly

Practical photography demands responsive control over settings - how do these cameras keep up?

The A560’s control layout is a textbook DSLR - with dedicated dials, a mode dial, and well-marked buttons that felt intuitive during my studio sessions. The tilting 3-inch screen complements the optical pentamirror viewfinder (which covers 95% of the frame) and gives flexibility in awkward angles. However, the screen resolution of 922k dots, while solid in 2010, feels less sharp by today’s standards.

Conversely, the TX200V offers a 3.3-inch fixed OLED touchscreen boasting 1.23 million dots - a feast for visual feedback and menu navigation. Its interface was snappy and inviting, making quick adjustments a breeze when not in intense action. But the touchscreen is less responsive when your fingers or screen are wet, a limitation to consider.

Summary: For tactile photographers who value manual control, the A560 delivers. For those embracing touchscreen convenience and a bright high-res display, TX200V takes the lead here.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

After hundreds of shootouts under varied lighting, I always dig into sensor specs and testing data when evaluating image quality. Let's break down the core differences.

• Sony A560: Features a 14MP APS-C CMOS sensor (23.5 x 15.6 mm) with a traditional Bayer filter array and an anti-aliasing filter. This larger sensor size (366.6 mm²) offers superior light-gathering potential than compact cameras.
• Sony TX200V: Packs an 18MP backside-illuminated (BSI) CMOS sensor sized at 1/2.3” (6.17 x 4.55 mm; 28.07 mm²), with an anti-aliasing filter as well. Backside illumination boosts light sensitivity - helpful in low-light but limited by overall sensor size.

In practice, the A560 delivers cleaner images with richer detail and dynamic range (DXOmark’s measured dynamic range is a remarkable 12.3 EV). Its DxO color depth of 22.5 bits translates to accurate, nuanced skin tones and vibrant landscapes. The maximum native ISO of 12,800 (expandable to 25,600) gave me decent performance in dim situations with manageable noise.

The TX200V’s smaller sensor struggles more in low light, producing more noise and less fine detail beyond ISO 800. Its color rendering is crisp but less nuanced than the A560. Considering its sensor size, it surprisingly manages sharp images in bright daylight with 18MP resolution but can't match APS-C quality for large prints or pixel cropping.

I consistently found the A560 was my choice for demanding portrait or landscape work where image quality matters most. The TX200V is better as a capable everyday shooter prioritizing convenience over ultimate IQ.

Autofocus Systems: Precision vs Practicality

Autofocus is mission-critical, especially when shooting moving subjects such as wildlife or sports. Here’s what you can expect.

• The A560 uses a 15-point phase-detection autofocus system with 3 cross-type sensors. Coupled with Sony’s BIONZ processor, it offers reliable continuous autofocus at 5 frames per second. Eye-detection autofocus works well for portraits, enabling sharp focus on subjects' eyes - something I tested extensively using live models and found very effective in natural light.

• The TX200V relies on contrast-detection AF with 9 focus points and face detection. While swift in good light, it lacks phase detection and continuous AF tracking, limiting its utility on fast action. Touch-to-focus on the OLED screen is responsive for static scenes but lagged in busy street shooting.

Given these facts, for dynamic genres like wildlife and sports, A560’s AF system is noticeably more accurate and consistent. The TX200V suits candid, casual portraiture and travel photography where AF precision is less critical.

Versatility Across Photography Genres

Now I put both cameras through paces across major photography disciplines, drawing from weeks of real-world use.

Portrait Photography

The A560’s APS-C sensor, true optical viewfinder, and eye-af made it my go-to for portraits. Skin tones rendered naturally, and the ability to use fast prime lenses with wide apertures offers creamy bokeh and subject isolation. The tilting screen also helped compose shots from awkward angles for creative portraits.

The TX200V’s higher native resolution gave sharp images at arm’s length, and face detection worked well for casual snaps. However, the smaller sensor limited background blur and bokeh quality, which is more smartphone-like in essence.

Landscape Photography

Landscape demands dynamic range, resolution, and weather sealing. The A560 scored well with its rich dynamic range and 14MP detail. While lacking professional-grade sealing, it held up well in moderate conditions. Interchangeable lenses offered vast creative freedom - from ultrawides to telephotos.

The TX200V, with its compact form, could capture landscapes on the fly, but the small sensor and limited zoom range were bottlenecks for image quality and framing creativity. A plus was its fixed optical image stabilization, aiding handheld shots.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

Burst rate and AF tracking are key here. The A560’s 5 fps burst coupled with phase detection delivered usable sequences for birds in flight or children playing. The lens ecosystem allows telephoto options essential for wildlife.

The TX200V shot bursts at 10 fps but lacked continuous AF; many images missed sharp focus on moving subjects, leading to frustration. The fixed 28-140mm lens, though versatile, lacked reach and aperture speed needed for dimmer wildlife scenes.

Street and Travel Photography

The slim TX200V excels as a stealthy street camera - lightweight, quiet, and discrete, perfect for blending into urban scenes. Its touchscreen interface expedited quick snaps, while the GPS geotagging helped catalog locations effortlessly.

The A560, while larger and more conspicuous, provides more creative control for travel photographers who want image quality and versatility over compactness. Battery life on the A560 was fantastic with 1,050 shots per charge versus the TX200V’s 220, which is typical for compacts.

Macro and Night/Astro Photography

Neither camera is specialized macro gear, but:

• The TX200V offers 3cm close focus, convenient for casual macro shots.
• The A560’s lens interchangeability allows dedicated macro lenses for precise close-ups.

For night and astrophotography:

The A560 handles high-ISO better, with greater detail retention at ISO 12800, longer shutter speeds with manual exposure, and solid sensor stabilization, making it a better choice for low-light enthusiasts.

Video Capabilities: Cinematic Potential

• Both cameras record 1920 x 1080 Full HD video.
• The A560 supports AVCHD and MPEG-4 coded at 60p and 29.97 fps, with a microphone input - a significant advantage for sound quality control.
• The TX200V lacks an external mic port, limiting audio options and maxes out at 60 fps at 1080p as well.

Neither camera has 4K or professional video features, but the A560 is better suited to hobbyist videographers who want more manual exposure control and audio flexibility.

Build Quality, Weather Sealing, and Durability

The A560’s build felt robust but not weather-sealed - common for entry-level DSLRs. It negatives some durability confidence in harsh environments.

The TX200V features basic environmental sealing but is fragile due to its slim plastic shell.

Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility

This is a major boon for the A560 owners. The Sony/Minolta Alpha mount opens access to a large catalog of 143 lenses, from budget zooms to specialized primes. This ecosystem advantage means the camera grows with your ambitions.

The TX200V is limited to its fixed zoom with no interchangeable option - fine for casual usage but restrictive for professionals.

Battery Life and Storage Options

Battery endurance is a vital practical consideration.

• A560’s NP-FM500H battery delivered over 1,000 shots per charge, extremely generous and over twice the endurance of many competitors.
• TX200V’s NP-BN battery managed only around 220 shots, typical for compact cameras but inconvenient without spares.

Storage-wise, the A560 supports dual card slots (SD and Memory Stick), meaning backup and extended shooting - critical for pros.

The TX200V only has a single Memory Stick slot.

Connectivity Features

The A560 supports Eye-Fi wireless cards for image transfer and has USB 2.0 and HDMI ports.

The TX200V lacks wireless but embeds GPS, useful for travel logs.

Neither camera has Bluetooth or NFC, reflecting their generation.

Performance Scores at a Glance

The A560 scores strongly in image quality, autofocus, and battery life. The TX200V excels in portability and screen quality but scores lower on IQ and flexibility.

Specialty Genre Scores

Clear takeaways:

• Portrait, Landscape, Sports, Wildlife: A560 leads comfortably.
• Street, Travel, Macro: TX200V offers convenience and suitability.
• Video: Both are entry-level, but A560 edges out.
• Night/Astro: Again, A560 outperforms due to sensor size.

Real-World Sample Images

Looking at images from both cameras side by side reaffirmed my technical observations.

Sony A560 front Sony A560 screen back Sony TX200V front Sony TX200V screen back

Portraits from A560 rendered softer background separation and natural skin tones, while the TX200V delivered sharp but flatter images. Landscapes shot with A560 showed richer tonal gradations and less noise. The TX200V compensated with excellent saturation in daylight but fell short in shadows and low light.

Who Should Buy Which?

Choose the Sony A560 if you:

• Prioritize image quality, manual controls, and lens flexibility
• Shoot portraits, landscapes, wildlife, or sports
• Want long battery life for extended sessions
• Need external microphone support for video
• Prefer optical viewfinder and classic DSLR ergonomics
• Are comfortable carrying a larger camera

Choose the Sony TX200V if you:

• Need an ultra-compact camera for travel and street photography
• Value a bright, high-res OLED touchscreen
• Want a lightweight, discreet camera with GPS
• Prefer quick casual shooting over manual control
• Can accept some compromises in image quality and low-light performance

Final Thoughts and Recommendations

The Sony A560 remains an impressive entry-level DSLR for photographers aiming for growth and creative flexibility. Its larger APS-C sensor, reliable autofocus, and vast lens compatibility mean it holds up well even over a decade since release. I found it particularly strong for portraits, landscapes, and action shots thanks to its control precision and better image quality.

The Sony TX200V is an ultra-compact marvel with a vivid OLED touchscreen and surprisingly good image quality for its size and sensor constraints. It shines as a grab-and-go travel or street camera, perfect for photographers wanting quick snapshots with ease and geotagging, albeit at the cost of lower low-light IQ and limited manual controls.

From my extensive experience, neither truly replaces the other - they serve different shooting philosophies. The DSLR A560 suits photo enthusiasts stepping into more serious photography, while the TX200V is tailored for lifestyle users valuing portability with respectable quality.

If you’d like to see sample images from these cameras or dive into specific shooting scenarios that interest you, feel free to reach out - I’m always happy to offer detailed insights based on years of hands-on testing.

Disclosure: I am an independent reviewer with no affiliation to Sony or camera retailers. All opinions are based on personal testing over multiple shoots in varied conditions.

Happy shooting and exploring your photographic journey!

photography #SonyCameras #CameraReview #DSLRvsCompact