Sony NEX-3 vs Sony S2000
89 Imaging
54 Features
55 Overall
54
93 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Sony NEX-3 vs Sony S2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 297g - 117 x 62 x 33mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Successor is Sony NEX-C3
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Sony NEX-3 vs Sony S2000 Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Sony NEX-3 vs Sony S2000, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both designed by Sony. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the NEX-3 (14MP) and S2000 (10MP) and the NEX-3 (APS-C) and S2000 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe NEX-3 was launched 6 months after the S2000 so they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Sony NEX-3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony S2000 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short summation of how the NEX-3 matches up against the S2000 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Sony NEX-3 vs Sony S2000 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Sony Alpha NEX-3 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000. The complete galleries are provided at Sony NEX-3 Gallery & Sony S2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3 over the Sony S2000
| NEX-3 | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Sony NEX-3
| S2000 | NEX-3 |
|---|
Common features in the Sony NEX-3 and Sony S2000
| NEX-3 | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2010 |  | January 2010 | Same age |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Sony NEX-3 vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Sony NEX-3 has outer measurements of 117mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 297 grams (0.65 lbs) while the Sony S2000 has measurements of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Sony NEX-3 vs Sony S2000 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have during that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the NEX-3 compared to the S2000.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the NEX-3 and S2000 is 89 and 93 respectively.
Sony NEX-3 vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to see the gap in sensor sizes merely by checking out a spec sheet. The picture underneath will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the NEX-3 and S2000.
Clearly, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The NEX-3 due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Sony NEX-3 will show more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images more aggressively.
Sony NEX-3 vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Sony NEX-3 vs Sony S2000 Specifications
| Sony Alpha NEX-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Sony | Sony |
| Model type | Sony Alpha NEX-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-06-07 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Bionz | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.4 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 365.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4592 x 3056 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Sony E | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Total lenses | 121 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | TFT Xtra Fine LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 1s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1200s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m | 3.30 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/160s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 297 grams (0.65 lb) | 167 grams (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 117 x 62 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 68 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 22.1 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.0 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 830 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NPFW50 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $225 |