Sony a3500 vs Sony W330
69 Imaging
62 Features
54 Overall
58


96 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Sony a3500 vs Sony W330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 411g - 128 x 91 x 85mm
- Released March 2014
- Earlier Model is Sony A3000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 128g - 96 x 57 x 17mm
- Released January 2010

Sony a3500 vs Sony W330: A Deep Dive into Two Distinct Cameras for Your Photography Journey
Choosing a camera that fits your creative aspirations and practical needs involves balancing numerous factors. Today, we’re putting under the microscope two very different Sony models – the Sony Alpha a3500, an entry-level mirrorless camera, and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330, a compact point-and-shoot. Both come from Sony’s storied heritage but target contrasting user profiles with distinct design philosophies and capabilities.
We’ll break down their differences and strengths based on real-world performance, technology, and use cases across popular photography disciplines, helping you zero in on which may be your ideal next tool. Whether you’re a beginner photographer craving more control or a casual snapper wanting convenience, this guide will provide insights from hands-on testing and technical analysis.
First Impressions: Design and Handling in Your Hands
The Sony a3500 features an SLR-style mirrorless body with a traditional, ergonomic grip that suits extended shooting sessions and lends itself to stable handling, even with heavier lenses. By contrast, the Sony W330 embodies compact portability, fitting easily in a pocket or small bag.
- a3500 dimensions: 128 x 91 x 85 mm, weighing 411 g (with battery)
- W330 dimensions: 96 x 57 x 17 mm, weighing 128 g
The physical size difference is striking - more than double the volume for the a3500 - but this bulk buys superior manual control options and lens interchangeability. The W330 is tailored for grab-and-go simplicity, clearly aimed at casual users wanting snapshot convenience.
If you tend to shoot long sessions, value balance and control during framing, or plan to use multiple lenses, the a3500’s SLR-style mirrorless form factor is a clear winner ergonomically. However, if ultra-compact size and straightforward operation are your priorities - for example, street photography on the fly or vacation snaps - the W330 has the edge.
Control Layout and User Interface: How Intuitive Is Each Camera?
Diving deeper into user interaction, the a3500 sports a traditional layout with dials and buttons dedicated to shutter speed, aperture, exposure compensation, and mode selection. These external controls give photographers quick access to essential settings without diving into menus, a boon for learning and fast shooting.
Meanwhile, the W330 takes a minimalistic approach with fewer physical buttons, no manual exposure modes, and automatic scene modes dominating the interface.
- a3500 key controls:
- Shutter priority, aperture priority, and full manual exposure modes
- Exposure compensation dial
- Custom white balance
- Dedicated playback and menu buttons
- W330 key controls:
- Auto-focused exposure with no manual override
- Basic flash modes and zoom controls only
If you’re keen on mastering exposure settings or want the flexibility to make creative adjustments on the fly, the a3500 offers a far richer experience. For beginners or point-and-shoot enthusiasts, the W330’s simplicity may reduce intimidation but limits growth potential.
Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter - Sensors and Resolution
One of the starkest technical contrasts is the sensor size and technology, which directly impacts image quality potential.
Feature | Sony a3500 | Sony W330 |
---|---|---|
Sensor type | APS-C CMOS | 1/2.3" CCD |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6 mm | 6.17 x 4.55 mm |
Sensor area | 366.6 mm² | 28.07 mm² |
Resolution | 20 MP (5456 x 3632) | 14 MP (4320 x 3240) |
JPEG & RAW support | Yes (RAW & JPEG) | JPEG only |
Max ISO sensitivity | Up to 16000 | Up to 3200 |
Antialias filter | Yes | Yes |
The a3500’s APS-C sensor is significantly larger, over 13 times the surface area of the W330’s CCD sensor. This translates into:
- Improved light-gathering ability, resulting in better low-light performance and less noise at higher ISOs.
- Greater dynamic range to preserve details in shadows and highlights.
- Superior depth of field control, enabling creamy bokeh and subject isolation, a big plus for portrait and macro photography.
The W330’s small sensor restricts image quality, especially in challenging lighting. Its CCD also tends to have slower readout speeds and lower dynamic range compared to modern CMOS sensors.
If you want higher resolution, cracking photo quality, and professional-grade file options for editing, the a3500 stands out.
Viewfinding and LCD: Composing Your Shot
The a3500 boasts a 0.47x electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 100% coverage, addressing the needs of photographers who rely on eye-level composition and stability. The W330, a compact, lacks any viewfinder; you compose exclusively via the rear screen.
- The a3500 features a 3-inch fixed TFT LCD with 230k dots. While the resolution and color rendering is basic by today’s standard, it still excels due to the EVF option.
- The W330 also has a 3-inch 230k dot fixed LCD, but its small size and lack of EVF constrain precise framing, especially under bright light.
For outdoor use and disciplined composition, especially in bright sunlight or action, the a3500’s EVF is a major advantage. The W330’s LCD-only approach is sufficient for candid snapshots but less helpful in tricky lighting or when precise framing is needed.
Real-World Image Performance: What You Can Expect Across Genres
Examining photos snapped with both cameras across diverse situations reveals practical strengths and weaknesses that specs alone can’t.
-
Portraits: The a3500’s larger sensor and ability to use fast prime lenses yield portraits with smooth skin tones, natural color depth, and strong background separation. Its 25-point contrast-detection AF with face detection ensures well-focused eyes reliably. The W330 produces serviceable portraits but with less sharpness, flatter bokeh, and occasional focus misses due to its 9-point AF without face detection.
-
Landscapes: The a3500’s high resolution and dynamic range capture rich detail and tonal gradation in broad scenes. Via RAW files, you can recover shadows and highlights in post. The W330’s smaller sensor and limited dynamic range result in flatter images, and image noise can become noticeable with challenging light.
-
Wildlife and Sports: The a3500’s 4 fps burst and continuous autofocus tracking improve chances of crisp action shots. The W330’s 2 fps and single-shot AF suit casual, slow subjects but not fast movement. Neither camera excels for wildlife telephoto work, but the a3500 accepts long lenses with its E-mount.
-
Street Photography: The W330’s compact size, light weight, and quiet operation make it great for candid street shooting where discretion counts. The a3500’s bigger build is less stealthy but offers more creative control.
-
Macro: The a3500 paired with macro-capable lenses shines with critical focus and magnification options. The W330 offers a simple 4 cm macro mode but can’t match detailed close-ups.
-
Night/Astro: The a3500 handles high ISO cleanly, allowing nightscapes with less noise. The W330’s max ISO 3200 and smaller sensor limit night photography quality.
Performance and Responsiveness: How Do These Cameras Keep Up?
Speed and responsiveness impact your ability to capture moments effectively.
Performance Metric | Sony a3500 | Sony W330 |
---|---|---|
Continuous shooting | 4.0 fps | 2.0 fps |
Autofocus system | 25 contrast-detection points, face detection | 9 contrast-detection points without face detection |
Shutter speed range | 30s – 1/4000s | 2s – 1/1600s |
Startup time | Faster due to mirrorless design | Slower due to older processor |
Buffer depth | Moderate for JPEG/RAW | Limited burst |
The a3500 offers a substantial edge in speed and autofocus sophistication, making it more practical for creative and semi-professional applications.
Breaking It Down By Photography Genre: Which Camera Excels Where?
- Portraits: a3500 dominates due to sensor size, AF with eye detection, and bokeh capability.
- Landscape: a3500 preferred for detail, dynamic range, and RAW processing.
- Wildlife/Sports: a3500 better, though not a specialist; W330 suitable only for casual shots.
- Street: W330 shines for portability and discretion, a3500 less so.
- Macro: a3500 superior flexibility and precision.
- Night/Astro: a3500 far better IQ at high ISO.
- Video: a3500 offers Full HD at 1080p via AVCHD & H.264; W330 limited to VGA resolution.
- Travel: W330 favored for size, a3500 for versatility and image quality.
- Professional: a3500 the only viable option; W330 lacks manual and RAW.
Build Quality, Weather Sealing, and Reliability: Will Your Gear Endure?
Neither camera offers weather sealing or rugged features. The a3500, with its larger chassis and better construction, is more durable for regular use. The W330 is a lightweight compact, best treated gently.
For professional or extensive outdoor work, the a3500 provides a more usable platform though lacks advanced weatherproofing.
Lens Ecosystem and Expandability: How Far Can You Grow?
The Sony a3500 uses the Sony E-mount, granting access to over 120 compatible lenses including primes, zooms, and specialist optics for macro or telephoto work. This is a major plus for those wanting to experiment and upgrade.
The W330 features a fixed 26-105mm (4x zoom) lens built-in with no expansion options. Offering moderate versatility for casual shooting but never professional-grade optical performance.
If you want room to grow creatively with different lenses, the a3500 is the clear choice.
Battery Life and Storage Options: Shooting Time and Memory Flexibility
-
Sony a3500: Uses NP-FW50 lithium-ion battery, rated approximately 470 shots per charge. It employs a single SD/Memory Stick slot. USB 2.0 and HDMI ports facilitate tethering and external display.
-
Sony W330: Uses NP-BN1 battery with unspecified exact rating (typical for compacts is ~200-300 shots), single slot supporting SD/SDHC and Memory Stick. USB 2.0 only, no HDMI output.
Longer battery life benefits prolonged shooting sessions, making the a3500 more reliable for serious outings.
Connectivity and Multimedia Features: Staying Connected and Recording Video
Both models lack wireless features (Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC), limiting hassle-free image transfer. This reflects their age.
- The a3500 records Full HD 1080p videos in AVCHD/H.264 formats but lacks microphone and headphone jacks, limiting audio control.
- The W330 is limited to VGA quality video (640x480), adequate for basic clips.
For hybrid photo-video users, the a3500 clearly offers more capabilities.
Price-to-Performance Analysis: What Does Your Money Buy?
Camera | Launch Price (Approximate) | Intended User Level | Value Proposition |
---|---|---|---|
Sony a3500 | $398 | Entry-level enthusiasts | Strong manual control, APS-C quality sensor, lens system, Full HD video |
Sony W330 | $170 | Casual users | Ultra-compact, easy auto shooting, budget-friendly |
While pricier, the a3500 offers substantial value packed in a flexible system expandable over time. The W330 makes sense if you want straightforward operation and minimal investment.
Final Recommendations: Which Camera Fits Your Creative Goals?
-
Pick the Sony a3500 if you:
- Want a larger sensor with significantly better image quality.
- Value manual control and versatility to learn and grow your photography skills.
- Desire interchangeable lenses for diverse shooting scenarios.
- Shoot portraits, landscapes, macros, night or action photos semi-professionally or enthusiastically.
- Require Full HD video capability and an electronic viewfinder.
- Are willing to carry a larger camera and invest in accessories.
-
Choose the Sony W330 if you:
- Need a pocketable, lightweight camera for spontaneous everyday snapshots.
- Have limited budget or are a casual photographer.
- Prefer fully automatic operation without learning curve.
- Prioritize discretion for street or travel photography without carrying bulk.
- Do not require RAW or advanced settings or high-resolution video.
Getting Started: Your Next Steps in Photography
To get the most from the Sony a3500, consider pairing it with a fast prime lens (like the Sony 35mm f/1.8) to unlock stunning portraits and low-light capabilities. Experiment with manual modes to unleash creative freedom.
For the Sony W330, focus on mastering composition and timing. Explore its macro mode for detail shots and use scene modes to optimize exposure without complexity.
Ultimately, the best camera is one that encourages you to create and learn. Both these models have distinct advantages tailored to different levels and visions for photography.
Thank you for exploring this detailed Sony a3500 vs W330 comparison. We hope this equips you with clarity to choose your ideal camera companion. Remember, hands-on trials and seeing sample images in your own environment remain invaluable. Happy shooting!
Images referenced and contextualized in this article:
Explore more: Check out authorized Sony dealers to handle both cameras, and consider investing in complementary accessories like memory cards, extra batteries, and camera bags to enhance your shooting experience.
Happy creating!
Sony a3500 vs Sony W330 Specifications
Sony Alpha a3500 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Sony | Sony |
Model type | Sony Alpha a3500 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Released | 2014-03-21 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | BIONZ image | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5456 x 3632 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 16000 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Sony E | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.7-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | - | 4cm |
Number of lenses | 121 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 2s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.00 m (at ISO200 / 4m at ISO100) | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | Flash off, Auto flash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync. | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/160s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | AVCHD, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 411 gr (0.91 lbs) | 128 gr (0.28 lbs) |
Dimensions | 128 x 91 x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") | 96 x 57 x 17mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photographs | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-FW50 | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2-sec. or 10-sec. delay) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $398 | $170 |