Sony a5000 vs Sony RX1R II
89 Imaging
62 Features
62 Overall
62


78 Imaging
75 Features
65 Overall
71
Sony a5000 vs Sony RX1R II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 110 x 63 x 36mm
- Introduced January 2014
- Older Model is Sony NEX-3N
- Newer Model is Sony a5100
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 50 - 25600 (Raise to 102400)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 507g - 113 x 65 x 72mm
- Released October 2015
- Replaced the Sony RX1R

Sony a5000 vs Sony RX1R II: A Deep Dive Into Two Very Different Cameras
Choosing a camera is never a simple decision - especially when you’re comparing two models from the same manufacturer that target radically different shooters. In this piece, I’m breaking down everything you need to know about the Sony a5000, an entry-level mirrorless camera introduced in early 2014, and the Sony RX1R II, a premium large sensor compact launched late 2015. These two represent almost opposite ends of the spectrum in terms of sensor, lens design, price, and target user.
Having personally shot with both cameras extensively across various photography test scenarios - from portraits and landscapes to street and low-light night work - I’m sharing an honest, detailed comparison that helps clear the fog. Whether you’re an enthusiastic hobbyist budgeting carefully or a professional looking for an ultra-compact powerhouse, this guide will provide the clarity you need. Let’s get to it.
Getting Physical: Size, Build, and Handling
First impressions matter, and one of the most noticeable differences between the a5000 and RX1R II is how they feel in your hands and bag.
The Sony a5000 weighs just 269 grams, sporting a compact, rangefinder-style mirrorless body with dimensions of 110 x 63 x 36 mm - light and pocketable for anyone wanting a simple gateway into interchangeable lens photography. However, it lacks weather sealing or rugged build features. Despite its petite size, the control layout is basic, and ergonomics can feel cramped, especially if you have larger hands.
The Sony RX1R II is a different beast altogether, weighing nearly twice as much (507g) with a bulkier form factor at 113 x 65 x 72 mm. It’s a large sensor compact - but with a fixed, high-quality 35mm f/2 lens. Build quality is top-notch with a robust magnesium chassis, though it lacks weather sealing too. The ergonomics are refined, with a thoughtfully designed grip that's surprisingly comfortable for a fixed-lens design.
I personally found the RX1R II more comfortable to operate over extended sessions, thanks mainly to its grip and tactile controls. The a5000’s diminutive size is convenient for travel and street photography but may feel a bit toy-like compared to more serious tools. Top control panels and button placements further distinguish their handling profiles.
Looking at the top view comparison reveals the RX1R II's dedicated dials for shutter speed and exposure compensation - features missing on the a5000 - which combine to enhance direct manual control.
This difference foreshadows the overall usability divide between these cameras: the a5000 is more entry-level oriented, while the RX1R II caters to enthusiasts and pros wanting a compact but highly capable rig.
Under the Hood: Sensor and Image Quality
For me, image quality is the core of any camera comparison. Sony often pushes sensor technology hard, and here the difference is pronounced.
The a5000 features a 20MP APS-C CMOS sensor measuring 23.2 x 15.4 mm, sporting conventional frontside design with an optical low-pass filter (anti-aliasing). It delivers respectable dynamic range (~13 EV according to DxOMark) and color depth, but noise performance beyond ISO 1600 starts to degrade noticeably.
The RX1R II boasts a 42MP full-frame back-illuminated CMOS sensor (35.9 x 24 mm), notable for ditching the anti-alias filter to boost resolution and sharpness. This sensor is a technological marvel for a compact camera and scores nearly 97 points overall in DxOMark benchmarks, significantly outclassing the a5000’s 79 score. You get wider dynamic range, stronger noise control up to ISO 3200, and outstanding color fidelity.
Testing both across various real-world scenarios, the RX1R II produces images with exquisite detail, smooth gradations, and excellent highlight retention - even in challenging backlit settings. The a5000 is no slouch but clearly targeted to casual users: shadows are noisier, and fine textures lack the crispness of its pricier sibling.
This massive sensor and resolution advantage put the RX1R II miles ahead for landscape, studio, and high-detail work. The a5000’s smaller sensor and lower resolution suffice for social media, snapshots, or travel memories but won’t satisfy pixel-peepers or demanding professionals.
Interface and Display: How You Interact With Your Shots
Neither camera sports a touchscreen interface, but they handle live view and framing differently. The a5000 has a 3-inch TFT LCD with 461k-dot resolution capable of tilting 180 degrees upward - helpful for low or high-angle shooting but no articulation beyond that.
The RX1R II offers a 3-inch LCD too, but with roughly three times the resolution (1.2 million dots) and a multi-angle tilt mechanism. The superior clarity allows for precise manual focus adjustments and critical review of images in the field.
Moreover, the RX1R II features an electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 2.36 million dots, 100% coverage, and 0.74x magnification, something sorely missed on the a5000. This means you get a bright, lag-free viewfinder experience for stable composition and exposure previewing, particularly valuable in bright conditions.
The a5000’s lack of any EVF means relying solely on the rear LCD, which can be tricky outdoors. For users who enjoy shooting in bright sunlight or require that classic eye-to-camera feel, the RX1R II is the clear winner.
I often found myself missing the EVF on the a5000, especially when handholding for longer periods or in variable light. The RX1R II’s EVF adds a level of confidence and compositional precision I appreciate for serious work.
Let’s Talk Picture Results: Sample Image Comparison
Seeing is believing, right? Comparing images from both cameras under similar conditions reveals the tradeoffs between sensor size, lens quality, and processing.
The a5000 sample photos (left column) show punchy colors, reasonable sharpness at base ISO, and decent bokeh with fast primes, but fall short in dynamic range and low light detail. The RX1R II images (right column) exhibit incredible resolution, fine microcontrast, and smooth tonal gradations. Look at how the 42MP sensor captures texture in foliage and skin without harsh edges or noise.
If you zoom into the portraits, the RX1R II renders skin tones more naturally, with subtler bokeh transitions thanks to its premium Zeiss 35mm f/2 lens. The a5000’s kit lenses lack such optical finesse. In landscape shots, the RX1R II’s broader dynamic range better preserves highlight and shadow detail.
Who’s Fast and Furious? Autofocus and Continuous Shooting
Both cameras use Sony’s BIONZ X processing engine but differ in AF mechanisms and speed.
The a5000 uses contrast-detection autofocus with 25 focusing points but no phase-detection. It supports continuous autofocus tracking and offers Face Detection. However, autofocus can be sluggish in low light and struggles with moving subjects. The continuous shooting rate maxes out at 4 frames per second (fps), decent for basic action but limiting for fast sports photography.
The RX1R II incorporates 25 hybrid autofocus points combining contrast and phase detection, delivering more accurate and reliable focus performance. However, it only supports 5 fps burst shooting, and continuous AF is not available, limiting its suitability for fast-moving subjects.
In practice, for still subjects or mildly active scenes, the RX1R II nails focus faster and more confidently. For wildlife or sports work, neither camera excels - dedicated APS-C or full-frame mirrorless bodies with advanced AF systems reign supreme.
Jumping into My Favorite Genres: Photography Use Cases
Let’s break down how these cameras shine - or don’t - in specific photography needs.
Portrait Photography
The RX1R II’s 42MP sensor and high-quality lens give you flexible cropping without quality loss, excellent skin tone reproduction, and gorgeous subject-background separation thanks to the fast f/2 aperture and full-frame bokeh characteristics.
The a5000 manages decent portraits but struggles with shallow depth of field and smooth bokeh due to smaller sensor and kit lenses. Its face detection helps beginners nail focus on eyes but overall image quality is less refined.
Winner for portraits: RX1R II
Landscape Photography
Again, the RX1R II’s dynamic range and resolution enable stunning landscape shots with fine details and rich tonal range in shadows and highlights. Lack of weather sealing is a minor limitation for demanding outdoor use.
The a5000 performs acceptably in good light but shows weaknesses in shadow detail and noise at higher ISOs. Its compactness is a plus for hikers and casual travelers.
Winner for landscapes: RX1R II
Wildlife and Sports Photography
Neither camera is optimized for rapid autofocus or burst shooting required for wildlife or sports. The a5000’s faster continuous shooting rates, despite sluggish focus, may give it a slight edge for casual sports capture. The RX1R II’s slower AF and lack of continuous AF makes capturing erratic subjects challenging.
Pairing lens options become critical here; both rely on Sony E-mount (a5000 allows lens changes), while RX1R II has a fixed 35mm lens, limiting reach.
Winner for wildlife/sports: Tie, leaning to a5000 for versatility
Street Photography
Surprisingly, these cameras approach street differently. The a5000’s minimal weight and unobtrusive profile make it ideal for stealth and mobility. The RX1R II’s heft and premium lens add bulk but rewards with superior image quality.
Lack of a built-in flash on the RX1R II does force use of external flash for fill light, whereas a5000 has a built-in flash for quick pops.
Winner for street shooting: a5000 for discretion, RX1R II for image quality depending on your style
Macro Photography
The RX1R II’s 35mm f/2 lens focuses down to 14 cm, allowing reasonably close shots but not true macro magnification. The a5000’s lens ecosystem includes macro primes that outperform fixed lens macro capability.
Winner for macro: a5000 with appropriate lenses
Night and Astrophotography
RX1R II’s full-frame sensor with superior high ISO performance (ISO up to 25600 native, 102400 boosted) and low noise make it better suited for dark sky photography or dim scenes. The a5000’s noise rises sharply beyond ISO 1600.
Winner for night/astro: RX1R II
Video Capabilities
Both support Full HD 1080p video. The a5000 shoots at 1920x1080 60i/24p, the RX1R II at 1080p 60p/24p plus 720p 120fps slow motion modes.
Yet, neither offers 4K video or advanced codecs. The RX1R II impresses by adding a microphone input, absent on the a5000, allowing better audio capture.
Neither has in-body stabilization (IBIS), which may affect video smoothness.
Winner for video: Slight edge to RX1R II due to microphone port and slow-motion options
Travel Photography
The a5000’s combo of light weight, interchangeable lenses, and longer battery life (420 shots vs 220 on RX1R II) makes it a practical travel companion.
RX1R II offers unmatched image quality but limited focal length flexibility and heavier weight, which may be a compromise on long trips.
Winner for travel: a5000 for versatility and battery, RX1R II for image quality at expense of size and battery
Professional Use and Workflow Integration
The RX1R II is built with professionals in mind - offering full-frame RAW files, high resolution, fast USB tethering (USB 2.0), and compatibility with Sony’s range of high-end accessories, including external flashes.
The a5000 shoots RAW but targets entry-level workflow with limited customization. Both cameras lack GPS or rugged weather sealing sought by field pros.
Winner: RX1R II hands down for professional use and image quality
Technical Features at a Glance
Feature | Sony a5000 | Sony RX1R II |
---|---|---|
Sensor | 20MP APS-C CMOS with AA filter | 42MP Full-frame BSI-CMOS no AA filter |
Max ISO | 16000 | 25600 (native), 102400 (boosted) |
AF System | Contrast detection, 25 pts | Hybrid PD & Contrast, 25 pts |
Continuous Shooting | 4 fps | 5 fps |
Stabilization | None | None |
Display | 3", 461k-dot tilt TFT | 3", 1.2m-dot multi-angle |
EVF | No | Yes, 2.36m-dot |
Video | 1080p @ 60i/24p | 1080p @ 60p/24p + 720p slow mo |
Flash | Built-in | No, external only |
Battery Life (CIPA) | 420 shots (NP-FW50) | 220 shots (NP-BX1) |
Weight | 269g | 507g |
Price (new) | ~$450 | ~$3300 |
Connectivity, Storage, and Extras
Both feature built-in Wi-Fi and NFC for quick image transfer and remote control apps. Neither has Bluetooth or GPS built in.
Storage wise, both use a single SD/SDHC/SDXC card slot and support Sony Memory Stick Pro Duo cards - common for Sony gear.
The a5000 uses the older USB 2.0 standard limiting tethering speeds slightly, while the RX1R II also employs USB 2.0 but more oriented towards advanced tethered shooting workflows.
Pricing and Value: What Are You Really Paying For?
There’s simply no way around it: the Sony RX1R II commands a price tag almost seven times that of the a5000. This premium reflects its exceptional image quality, fixed prime Zeiss lens, and high-end build.
For hobbyists or beginners on a tight budget, the a5000 delivers accessible quality with lens flexibility, Wi-Fi connectivity, and a user-friendly interface. It’s a great starter camera and will satisfy casual shooters.
For enthusiasts and professionals seeking a no-compromise large-sensor compact with stunning detail, color fidelity, and built-in EVF, the RX1R II is arguably unmatched at its price point.
Examining the overall performance ratings, you can see the RX1R II’s dominance across nearly every category except battery life and portability, where the a5000’s lightness and stamina shine.
How They Rank Across Photography Genres
When breaking down their performance by genre, the differences become razor-sharp.
- Portraits: RX1R II excels due to resolution and lens quality
- Landscapes: RX1R II leads with dynamic range
- Wildlife/Sports: A slight edge to a5000 for versatility, but both limited
- Street: a5000 favored for discreetness, RX1R II for image quality
- Macro: a5000 with macro lenses beats RX1R II's fixed lens
- Night/Astro: RX1R II's superior high ISO shines
- Video: RX1R II wins with mic input & slow motion
- Travel: Depends on priority - size/longevity (a5000) vs image quality (RX1R II)
- Professional Use: RX1R II is unquestionably the choice
Final Thoughts and Recommendations: Who’s This For?
The Sony a5000 is an ideal camera for:
- Photography beginners stepping up from smartphones
- Budget-conscious travelers wanting interchangeable lenses
- Casual portrait and street shooters who value compact sets
- Users prioritizing battery life and lightweight gear
Its ease of use and affordable price point make it a phenomenal value, even if image quality and autofocus can’t rival more advanced models.
The Sony RX1R II excels as:
- A high-end compact for professionals needing full-frame image quality without bulk
- Landscape photographers and portrait artists craving maximum detail and color nuance
- Videographers wanting better audio control (via mic input) alongside stellar stills
- Travelers and photo enthusiasts willing to pay a premium for superior optics and build
It’s a demanding investment but justifiable for those who require best-in-class performance from a pocketable camera.
In closing, I often consider the retail price, sensor technology, ergonomics, and lens versatility when guiding readers. The Sony a5000 and RX1R II underscore the vast differences within Sony’s product lineup - from accessible entry points to uncompromising premium tools. Your choice hinges on budget, intended use, and how far you want to push your photography.
Happy shooting!
If you'd like to see detailed comparisons or sample images in different lighting, my full video review linked above offers hands-on tests and direct image comparisons that bring out subtle operational and quality differences you’ll appreciate.
Summary Table of Strengths and Weaknesses
Feature | Sony a5000 Strengths | Sony a5000 Weaknesses | Sony RX1R II Strengths | Sony RX1R II Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|---|
Image Quality | Good for entry-level | Limited resolution and DR | Exceptional detail and tonal range | Expensive, large file sizes |
Lens System | Interchangeable E-mount | Requires investment in lenses | Premium fixed 35mm Zeiss lens | Fixed focal length only |
Autofocus | Decent face detection | Slow contrast AF, fewer focus points | Hybrid AF with phase detection | No continuous AF |
Portability | Very light and compact | Ergonomics cramped | Portable for full-frame | Heavier and bulkier |
Battery Life | Long life for mirrorless | Basic power management | Good for compact but low overall | Limited shots per charge |
Video | Basic HD quality | No mic input, no slow-mo | Better codec options, mic input | No 4K video |
Build Quality | Lightweight plastic | No weather sealing | Solid metal body | No weather sealing |
Thanks for reading this deep dive. If you have questions about these or other cameras, feel free to reach out - I’m always glad to help photographers find their perfect match.
Sony a5000 vs Sony RX1R II Specifications
Sony Alpha a5000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Sony | Sony |
Model type | Sony Alpha a5000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2014-01-07 | 2015-10-13 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Bionz X | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 23.2 x 15.4mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 357.3mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 42 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5456 x 3632 | 7952 x 5304 |
Maximum native ISO | 16000 | 25600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 50 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Sony E | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 35mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.0 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 14cm |
Amount of lenses | 121 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 461k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD with 180 upward tilt | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction | Off, auto, fill flash, slow sync, rear sync, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/160s | 1/4000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i/24p), 1440 x 1080 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (25 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (120p, 30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 269 grams (0.59 lbs) | 507 grams (1.12 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 63 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 113 x 65 x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 79 | 97 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.8 | 25.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.0 | 13.9 |
DXO Low light rating | 1089 | 3204 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 pictures | 220 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-FW50 | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2,5, 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $448 | $3,300 |