Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90 vs DSC-W290: A Detailed Kamera Clash for Your Photographic Dollar

When it comes to choosing a trusty point-and-shoot camera that blends convenience with decent image quality, Sony’s Cyber-shot line-up has long been a staple for beginners and enthusiasts alike. Today, I’m diving deep into a head-to-head between two compact Sony models: the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90 (announced 2012) and the older Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290 (launched 2009). Both carry the budget-friendly banner but are aimed at slightly different photographic appetites.

Having put dozens of small sensor Sony compacts through their paces, I’ll break down their performance based on real-world usage, technical specs scrutiny, and value for your buck. Whether you’re a casual snapper, the occasional traveler, or an aspiring content creator on a budget, this must-know comparison will steer you right.

First Impressions: Design, Size, and Ergonomics

Sony’s penchant for clean, button-lite designs strikes again. The H90 and W290 both opt for ultra-compact builds, but there are some tactile and handling differences worth flagging.

• Size & Weight: The H90 measures 105x60x34 mm and weighs 222 g; the W290 is more petite at 98x57x23 mm and lighter at 167 g. If pocketability and barely-there heft win your heart, the W290 nudges ahead.
• Build & Grip: The H90 sports a chunkier, more robust feel with a textured grip that supports steadier handling - especially for zoomed shots. The W290 is slimmer but feels more toy-like and can be a bit slippery in hand. If you’re prone to clumsy thumb clubs, the H90’s grip is a far better friend.
• Control Layout: Buttons on both cameras avoid flashiness but differ in ergonomics. The H90 positions better-sized dials and dedicated exposure compensation buttons - something the W290 forgoes for a more pared-down interface.

Here’s a direct take from putting them side by side:

The H90’s top plate controls feel more mature and tailored for users wanting a little more manual finesse (even though it’s limited). Meanwhile, the W290 focuses on automatic ease - a typical point-and-shoot workflow.

Sensor and Image Quality: Punching Above the Sensor Size

Now onto the meat of things: image quality. Both cameras utilize a 1/2.3” CCD sensor, a common size for compacts but considerably smaller than APS-C or full frame sensors.

• Resolution: The H90 boasts 16 MP, while the W290 offers 12 MP. That extra megapixel in the H90 means slightly sharper images and more cropping flexibility, but don’t expect DSLR-level detail.
• Image Processing: Both rely on Sony's older CCD sensor tech and BIONZ processing (H90 specified), so images tend to have decent color rendition but limited dynamic range and noise handling.
• ISO Performance: Max ISO tops at 3200 for both, but noisier files start creeping around ISO 800 and up - expected given the sensor constraints.
• Raw Format: Neither camera supports RAW, limiting post-processing latitude and nudging them strictly into “JPEG territory.”
• Antialiasing Filter Presence: Both cameras include an anti-aliasing (AA) filter, which reduces moiré but slightly softens micro detail.

In practical use, the H90’s higher resolution sensor captures a bit more detail and smoother gradations, particularly in bright natural light. The W290’s images often look a shade less crisp, partly due to fewer megapixels and older processing. Both struggle with low light - expect grain and softening in shadows.

Display and Viewfinder: Eye Candy or Eye Strain?

Neither camera offers an electronic viewfinder, so composing via the rear screen is a must.

• Screen Resolution and Size: Both have 3” LCDs. The H90’s ClearPhoto TFT LCD clocks in at 461K dots, considerably sharper than the W290’s 230K dots. This clarity difference translates to easier focusing and better previewing on the H90.
• Screen Technology: The H90 uses ClearPhoto tech for vibrant colors and wider viewing angles, while the W290’s screen looks washed out in bright conditions.
• Touch Capability: Neither model features a touchscreen, so navigation relies on physical buttons.
• Live View Usage: Both support live view for framing, though the H90’s LCD offers a more responsive and pleasing experience.

For me, that higher-resolution screen alone makes the H90 far more satisfying to use in the field; the W290’s dimmer, coarser display can feel archaic by today’s standards.

Autofocus and Shooting Performance: Speed and Accuracy

If you’re the kind who likes capturing decisive moments, autofocus and burst shooting matter a lot.

• Autofocus: Both cameras implement contrast-detection AF systems. The H90 supports face detection and tracking, which improves compositional flexibility. The W290 has 9 AF points but lacks face detection.
• AF Speed & Tracking: The H90’s autofocus is noticeably quicker and more dependable in good lighting. The W290 is slower and prone to hunt, which can cause missed shots especially on moving subjects.
• Continuous Shooting: The W290 slightly edges the H90 with a 2 fps burst rate versus 1 fps, though neither is suited for sports or wildlife action photography.
• Manual Focus: The H90 forsakes manual focus option, while the W290 includes it - a plus if you like tweaking focus for macro or creative shots.
• Focus Lock Modes: The H90 supports single and tracking modes, W290 limited to single.

Bottom line: If shooting fast-paced stuff like kids or pets, the H90’s autofocus system, particularly face detection, offers a smoother experience. The W290 is best for deliberate, static shots.

Lens and Zoom: Reach and Flexibility Counts

Let’s talk glass: the fixed lenses on both cameras define their zoom range and aperture.

Sony H90 front Sony H90 screen back Sony W290 front Sony W290 screen back

• Focal Length Range: The H90 rocks a 24-384 mm equivalent (16x optical zoom), substantially longer than the W290’s 28-140 mm (5x zoom). If wildlife or distant subjects intrigue you, the H90’s pronouncement is a major selling point.
• Max Aperture: Both lenses max out aperture around F3.3 at wide angle, but the H90 narrows down to F5.9 at telephoto versus the W290 at F5.2. The H90 loses a bit of light when zoomed all the way out.
• Macro Capability: The H90 allows focusing as close as 5 cm, better suited for close-ups than the W290’s 10 cm limit.
• Image Stabilization: Both benefit from Optical SteadyShot stabilization, vital for avoiding blurry shots at long zoom or slow shutter speeds.

Testing these lenses outside in sunlight and indoors, the H90’s long reach and better macro combo afford much more versatility - a big plus for travel and nature photography on a budget. The W290 shines when you want a nice compact with straightforward walking-around zoom.

Flash and Low-Light Performance: Not Designed for Night Owls

Both cameras come with built-in pop-up flashes, suitable for fill-in light but with limitations.

• Flash Range: W290 offers a slightly longer flash range (3.9 m) than H90 (3.7 m), but in practice, this difference is negligible.
• Flash Modes: W290 adds Red-Eye Reduction and Slow Sync modes missing on the H90. For festive or indoor portraits, the W290 might preserve more natural eye detail.
• Max Shutter Speeds: Both max out at 1/1600 sec, though neither supports a silent shutter mode.
• Low Light ISO: With small sensors and modest apertures, expect noise above ISO 400 and grainy images once you zoom or shoot indoors.

If night or dim light photography is key, neither camera will set your world on fire. However, the W290’s additional flash modes give it a slight edge for party snaps, while the H90 fares better in daylight.

Video Capabilities: Basic Vlogging Possible but No Frills

Both deliver HD video recording but are clearly entry-level:

• Video Resolution: 1280 x 720 at 30 fps max - no Full HD (1080p) or 4K here.
• Formats: MPEG-4 recordings, easily playable on most devices.
• Audio: No external microphone or headphone jacks; audio quality is basic.
• Stabilization: Optical stabilizer helps reduce handheld shake but isn’t failproof.
• Extras: No slow-motion, no time-lapse, no advanced exposure control in video mode.

Given these limitations, I’d say if video is a casual bonus, either camera suffices, but serious video work calls for something more modern.

Battery Life and Storage: How Long Will You Shoot?

• Battery: The H90 uses NP-BG1 packs rated for ~290 shots - not stellar but serviceable. The W290’s battery spec is undocumented; expect similar or somewhat shorter life given smaller frame.
• Storage: Both accept SD/SDHC/SDXC cards; however, the W290 also supports older Memory Stick Duo formats. The H90 boasts broader modern card support, a plus for future-proofing.
• Charging: Neither camera has USB charging; dedicated chargers are required.

For travel or remote shoots, the H90’s better battery info and card compatibility ease logistics a bit.

Connectivity and Extras: No Wireless, No Frills

Both models come from pre-wifi explosion years:

• Wireless: Neither has WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, or GPS.
• Ports: Both include USB 2.0; the W290 has HDMI out, missing on the H90.
• Self-timer: Both have 2 or 10 sec options; H90 also has a portrait timer mode.

In a world where even cheap cameras lean wireless, these two cameras feel a bit old-school, but if you don’t plan to upload directly from camera, this is no dealbreaker.

Overall Performance Ratings and Genre Suitability

Let me give you a quick rundown on how these cameras stack up across various photography genres and use cases based on my shooting experience.

Who Should Buy the Sony DSC-H90?

If you’re a cheapskate like me who wants zoom reach, a crisp 16 MP sensor, and some manual control without breaking the bank or lugging heavy gear, the H90 is your best bet. It’s well suited for:

• Casual wildlife spotting and nature trips
• Travel shooting with close-up and telephoto needs
• Portraits where face detection helps
• Situations demanding better on-screen clarity and control ergonomics

It’s not going to knock out a professional DSLR, but it punches well above its weight in the compact superzoom niche.

Who Should Lean Toward the Sony DSC-W290?

If sheer portability and pocket-friendliness are your top priorities, and you don’t mind a shorter zoom or slightly softer images, the W290 holds value as a grab-and-go casual cam. It fits well for:

• Street photography needing discretion
• Quick snaps at parties or social events (with extra flash modes)
• Users who want a manual focus option for creative control
• A basic video shooter looking for HDMI out to share files easily

Just temper expectations with image quality and AF speed on busy days.

Final Verdict: Which Sony Compact Reigns?

Both cameras are relics from an era before 4K, Wi-Fi, and mirrorless boomed, but they still have charm for tight budgets and specialist uses.

If forced to pick a winner, the Sony DSC-H90 claims the crown for value, versatility, and image quality - especially if you want more zoom and a better screen. The W290 is a fair choice for minimalists prioritizing size and HDMI output but comes with heavier tradeoffs.

Closing Thoughts: What I Would Do

Having tested both extensively, I’d personally reach for the H90 for most photographic outings. Its superior zoom, sharper images, and improved UI elevate it beyond a mere snapshot camera. Meanwhile, the W290 serves niche roles like casual social shooters or those who prize ultraportability.

If you’re entering the world of photography or need a commuter camera that’s budget-friendly yet capable, these Sony compacts remain respectable options - so long as you manage expectations around low light, video, and autofocus speed.

In 2024, these are definitely backup or beginner cameras, but hey, not everyone needs to spend a grand to capture life’s moments. For seasoned veterans looking to expand their shooter lineup, pocket-friendly shooters like these offer a sweet spot between point-and-shoot convenience and optical zoom fun.

Here’s to smart choices and happy shooting!

• Your friendly camera tester with thumb scars from button battles past.