Sony HX200V vs Sony W310
66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
96 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Sony HX200V vs Sony W310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Revealed May 2012
- Succeeded the Sony HX100V
- Replacement is Sony HX300
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-112mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 137g - 95 x 55 x 19mm
- Released January 2010
Sony HX200V vs Sony W310 Overview
Following is a detailed comparison of the Sony HX200V vs Sony W310, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact and both of them are manufactured by Sony. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the HX200V (18MP) and W310 (12MP) but they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe HX200V was unveiled 2 years after the W310 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sony W310 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick overview of how the HX200V grades versus the W310 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sony HX200V vs Sony W310 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310. The full galleries are viewable at Sony HX200V Gallery & Sony W310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Sony W310
HX200V | W310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2012 | January 2010 | More modern by 29 months | |
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 230k | Sharper screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W310 over the Sony HX200V
W310 | HX200V |
---|
Common features in the Sony HX200V and Sony W310
HX200V | W310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Sony HX200V vs Sony W310 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Sony HX200V provides outer dimensions of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") and a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs) while the Sony W310 has specifications of 95mm x 55mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs).
Analyze the Sony HX200V vs Sony W310 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the HX200V against the W310.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the HX200V and W310 is 66 and 96 respectively.
Sony HX200V vs Sony W310 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizes only by viewing a spec sheet. The image underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the HX200V and W310.
Clearly, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Sony HX200V to provide you with greater detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The newer HX200V provides an edge in sensor tech.
Sony HX200V vs Sony W310 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sony HX200V vs Sony W310 Specifications
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Sony | Sony |
Model type | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2012-05-11 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | BIONZ | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4896 x 3672 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 27-810mm (30.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.0-5.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 922 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30s | 1s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.40 m | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 583 gr (1.29 lb) | 137 gr (0.30 lb) |
Dimensions | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") | 95 x 55 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 450 images | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-FH50 | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $480 | $150 |