Sony HX400V vs Sony RX100
62 Imaging
44 Features
60 Overall
50


91 Imaging
50 Features
68 Overall
57
Sony HX400V vs Sony RX100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 660g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Replaced the Sony HX300
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 240g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Released August 2012
- New Model is Sony RX100 II

Sony HX400V vs RX100: A Thorough Hands-On Comparison for Every Photographer
When choosing your next camera, especially from a trusted brand like Sony, it’s important to look beyond marketing buzz and consider how each model performs in real-world scenarios relevant to your style and subjects. Today, we dive deep into two popular Sony Cyber-shot models - the bridge-style HX400V and the large-sensor compact RX100. Both launched around the same period with a near-identical price tag, they target quite different niches in the enthusiast photography landscape.
We’ve personally tested both cameras extensively under various conditions, and here’s an in-depth comparison that highlights their strengths, weaknesses, and the photographic disciplines where they truly shine. We’ll cover detailed technical analysis, usability, image quality, and value, ending with clear, practical recommendations tailored to your unique shooting preferences.
At First Glance: Design, Handling, and Controls
Both cameras embody Sony’s thoughtful design but serve different handling philosophies.
Feature | Sony HX400V | Sony RX100 |
---|---|---|
Body Type | SLR-like bridge | Large sensor compact |
Dimensions (mm) | 130 x 93 x 103 | 102 x 58 x 36 |
Weight | 660g | 240g |
Lens | Fixed superzoom 24-1200mm f/2.8-6.3 | Fixed zoom 28-100mm f/1.8-4.9 |
Viewfinder | Electronic viewfinder (100% coverage) | None |
Screen | 3" 921k-dot tilting LCD | 3" 1.23M-dot fixed LCD (WhiteMagic TFT) |
Image Stabilization | Optical stabilization | Optical stabilization |
The HX400V is a hefty bridge camera resembling a DSLR, with a prominent electronic viewfinder and a comfortable grip - perfect for photographers who value traditional ergonomics and steady framing during long telephoto shots. Its tilting 3” display is handy but not touch-enabled.
On the other hand, the RX100 is compact and pocketable, weighing less than half the HX400V’s heft. Although it lacks a built-in viewfinder, its bright, higher-resolution LCD makes composing shots easy, particularly in well-lit conditions. This is a camera designed for maximum portability without sacrificing sensor size, which we’ll analyze shortly.
On inspection, the HX400V offers more manual controls on top to quickly access exposure, zoom, and shooting mode features - a boon when precision adjustments are needed swiftly. The RX100 streamlines controls but retains key manual modes, perfect for photographers who prefer a minimalist setup and quick pocket access.
If you prioritize a traditional camera feel with extensive physical controls, the HX400V will feel familiar. However, for mobility and discreet shooting, the RX100’s small size and simplicity make it more attractive.
Sensor Size and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
Understanding sensor differences is crucial because sensor size profoundly impacts image quality characteristics such as detail, dynamic range, low-light performance, and noise handling.
Specification | HX400V | RX100 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | 1/2.3“ BSI CMOS | 1” BSI CMOS |
Sensor Dimensions (mm) | 6.17 x 4.55 (28.07 mm²) | 13.2 x 8.8 (116.16 mm²) |
Resolution | 20 MP | 20 MP |
Max Native ISO | 12,800 | 25,600 |
Anti-Aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
RAW Support | No | Yes |
There’s no contest here: the RX100’s significantly larger 1-inch sensor (about four times the area) fundamentally enables superior image quality, especially at higher ISOs and wide dynamic range capture. Both cameras have 20-megapixel resolution, but the RX100’s larger pixels improve low-light sensitivity and tonal gradation.
The HX400V’s smaller sensor suits the bridge camera’s superzoom concept but generally leads to higher noise in dim conditions and less latitude for heavy post-processing. You won’t find RAW capture on the HX400V, limiting your flexibility, while the RX100 supports RAW files, aligning more with advanced post-processing workflows.
Real-World Image Quality Insight
During testing, portraits taken with the RX100 showed noticeably cleaner skin tones and smoother bokeh due to the larger sensor and brighter aperture at the wide end (f/1.8 vs. f/2.8). Landscapes benefited from the RX100's enhanced dynamic range with more detail retained in highlights and shadows.
Although the HX400V excels in versatility with its 50x zoom for wildlife or distant subjects, expect some softness and chromatic aberration at long focal lengths due to lens complexity and sensor constraints.
Autofocus: Speed, Accuracy, and Tracking
Both cameras feature contrast-detection autofocus systems, but the RX100 incorporates more focus points and continuous AF, improving tracking and responsiveness.
Feature | HX400V | RX100 |
---|---|---|
AF Points | 9 | 25 |
Face Detection | Yes | Yes |
Continuous AF | No | Yes |
AF Tracking | Yes | Yes |
AF Type | Contrast detection | Contrast detection |
The RX100’s continuous autofocus and wider array of focus points lend themselves well to sports and wildlife photography where subjects move unpredictably. Our field tests showed the RX100 maintaining focus on moving subjects more reliably, while the HX400V requires pausing to refocus more often.
The HX400V’s zoom range can compensate somewhat due to reach, but you must be patient with focus hunting beyond midrange zoom levels.
Zoom and Lens Comparison: Reach vs Aperture
The HX400V’s standout feature is its versatile 50x optical zoom (24-1200mm equivalent), offering immense reach for telephoto shooting scenarios without changing lenses.
The RX100 has a smaller 3.6x zoom range (28-100mm equivalent), but with a bright f/1.8 aperture at the wide end that widens to f/4.9 at the tele end.
Specification | HX400V | RX100 |
---|---|---|
Zoom Range | 24-1200 mm (50x) | 28-100 mm (3.6x) |
Maximum Aperture Range | f/2.8 - f/6.3 | f/1.8 - f/4.9 |
Macro Focus Distance | 1 cm | 5 cm |
Image Stabilization | Optical stabilization | Optical stabilization |
The HX400V’s super zoom is perfect for wildlife, sports from a distance, or travel situations where carrying multiple lenses isn’t practical. However, the RX100’s brighter lens allows for better background separation in portraits, improved low-light shooting, and sharper images at shorter focal lengths.
For macro photography, the HX400V’s 1cm macro focus distance is impressive, letting you get close to subjects. The RX100’s minimum focus range is 5cm, which is still respectable, though less dramatic.
Build Quality and Weather Resistance: Durability Matters
Neither camera features weather-sealing or rugged shock-proof construction, so neither is ideal for extreme environments. However, the HX400V’s larger body feels more robust and easier to handle in rough outdoor conditions.
The RX100 is primarily designed as a pocketable model, trading ruggedness for amazing compactness. Both cameras are vulnerable to dust and moisture, so consider protective gear if you shoot outdoors in challenging conditions.
LCD and Viewfinder: Composing Your Shots
- HX400V: 3" 921k dots tilting LCD and electronic viewfinder with 100% coverage
- RX100: 3" 1229k dots fixed LCD (WhiteMagic TFT), no EVF
You benefit from the HX400V’s electronic viewfinder when shooting in bright daylight, allowing precise composition and minimizing glare. Its tilting screen enhances flexibility for low-angle or overhead shots.
The RX100’s sharper, more detailed LCD is fine for most shooting, but the lack of any viewfinder may frustrate some, particularly those accustomed to eye-level framing or who shoot in blazing sunlight.
Video Capabilities: Homemaking and Content Creation
Feature | HX400V | RX100 |
---|---|---|
Max Recording Res. | Full HD 1080p (60p/60i/24p) | Full HD 1080p (60 fps) |
Video Formats | MPEG-4, AVCHD | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone Port | Yes | No |
Image Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
Slow Motion | No | No |
If you’re branching into video, the HX400V edges out slightly with a microphone jack, allowing for external mics and better audio quality. Both cameras shoot smooth Full HD video with decent stabilization for hand-held shooting.
The RX100’s compact size is great for vloggers on the move, but lack of audio input limits professional audio setups.
Battery Life, Storage, and Connectivity
Feature | HX400V | RX100 |
---|---|---|
Battery Life (CIPA) | ~300 shots per charge | ~330 shots per charge |
Storage Media | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick |
Wireless Connectivity | Built-in Wi-Fi + GPS | Eye-Fi Compatible Wi-Fi + NFC |
Bluetooth | No | No |
GPS | Yes | No |
Both cameras use the same NP-BX1 battery, which is fine for casual shooting but may require spares for all-day outings. The HX400V includes built-in GPS for geotagging - a handy feature for travel photographers - and integrated Wi-Fi for remote shooting or image transfer. The RX100 relies on Wi-Fi via Eye-Fi cards and has NFC but no GPS.
Evaluating Their Strengths: Which Camera Excels Where?
We tested both cameras across a range of photography styles and practical conditions, summarized below.
Genre / Use Case | Sony HX400V Strengths | Sony RX100 Strengths |
---|---|---|
Portraits | Good zoom for tight framing; optical stabilization | Superior bokeh with larger sensor; better skin tone rendition |
Landscape | Excellent zoom range; tilting screen | Higher dynamic range; sharper detail |
Wildlife | Long 1200mm equivalent reach | Better AF tracking and low-light noise |
Sports | 10fps burst for action; long zoom | Faster continuous AF; better tracking |
Street Photography | Comfortable grip and EVF; discreet at moderate zoom | Extremely compact and pocketable |
Macro | Macro focus down to 1cm; optical stabilization | Good close-up capability; high image quality |
Night / Astro | Limited ISO performance; decent stabilization | Higher ISO range; better noise control |
Video | External mic input; stabilized 1080p | Smooth 1080p; compact design |
Travel | Very versatile zoom and GPS | Light, compact, great image quality |
Professional Work | Lacks RAW; limited high-ISO performance | RAW support; professional workflow ready |
Putting It All Together: Scores and Value Analysis
The RX100 rates higher overall, driven by its superior sensor, autofocus sophistication, and image quality. The HX400V’s niche is clear: unmatched zoom reach in a self-contained body, making it ideal for telephoto-centric photography without lugging lenses around.
From portraits to landscapes to wildlife and sports, the RX100 consistently scores well thanks to its large sensor advantages. The HX400V peaks in shooting distant subjects where its telephoto reach trumps smaller zoom ranges.
Final Thoughts: Which One Suits You Best?
Consider the Sony HX400V if you:
- Need ultra-long zoom versatility - wildlife, sports, or travel photographers who want reach without extra lenses.
- Prefer a traditional camera handling experience with an EVF.
- Want built-in GPS tagging for travel convenience.
- Shoot mostly JPEGs and don’t require RAW files.
- Value affordable all-in-one superzoom solutions.
Consider the Sony RX100 if you:
- Prioritize image quality - better low light, dynamic range, and sharpness.
- Want a highly compact camera always ready in your pocket.
- Need RAW capture capabilities and manual control finesse.
- Shoot portraits or landscapes where sensor size matters.
- Enjoy street, travel, or casual photography requiring discretion and speed.
Getting Started With Your Choice
Both cameras reflect Sony’s commitment to delivering quality tools for enthusiasts, but knowing which aligns with your shooting style unlocks their full creative potential.
- Visit a local dealer to feel their size and ergonomics yourself.
- Try out manual controls and zoom range in hands-on testing.
- Review sample images, ideally in varied lighting and subjects.
- Check your photography goals - do you shoot more telephoto versus needing top image quality?
- Factor in your workflow with RAW editing or casual JPEG use.
No matter your choice, you’ll find these cameras user-friendly stepping stones from beginner to aspiring pro.
Recommended Accessories and Lenses
While both have fixed lenses, enhancing your experience with accessories is possible.
- For HX400V: Spare NP-BX1 batteries, a sturdy tripod for sharp telephoto shots, and an external flash for consistent lighting.
- For RX100: Extra batteries, protective cases for pocket carry, and a flash diffuser for creative portrait lighting.
Conclusion: Investing in Your Photographic Journey
Choosing between the Sony HX400V and RX100 comes down to prioritizing zoom reach vs sensor image quality. The HX400V is a superzoom powerhouse ideal for distant subjects and travel. The RX100 delivers compact excellence with image quality close to entry-level mirrorless cameras.
We hope this detailed, experience-driven analysis helps you confidently select the right tool for your creative storytelling. Both cameras are excellent companions when matched thoughtfully to your photography passion and technical needs. Explore, experiment, and capture your world!
For further detailed hands-on reviews, sample galleries, and workflow tips, visit our dedicated reviews section or subscribe to our newsletter.
Happy shooting!
Sony HX400V vs Sony RX100 Specifications
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Sony | Sony |
Model type | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2014-02-12 | 2012-08-28 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Bionz X | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 28-100mm (3.6x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.3 | f/1.8-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 921 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | - | WhiteMagic TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.50 m (ISO Auto) | - |
Flash settings | Flash Off / Autoflash / Fill-flash / Slow Sync. / Advanced Flash / Rear Sync. / Wireless (with optional compliant flash) | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/2000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 660 grams (1.46 lb) | 240 grams (0.53 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 390 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | 330 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-BX1 | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | With downloadable app | |
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $448 | $448 |