Clicky

Sony HX400V vs Sony W350

Portability
62
Imaging
45
Features
60
Overall
51
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350 front
Portability
97
Imaging
36
Features
25
Overall
31

Sony HX400V vs Sony W350 Key Specs

Sony HX400V
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 80 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
  • 660g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
  • Introduced February 2014
  • Previous Model is Sony HX300
Sony W350
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
  • 117g - 91 x 52 x 17mm
  • Released January 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sony HX400V vs Sony W350: Which Compact Camera Suits Your Photography Journey?

In the vast landscape of digital cameras, Sony has built a reputation for producing versatile and reliable compacts that cater to a broad range of users. Today, I’m diving into a side-by-side comparison of two Sony compact models targeting distinctly different buyers: the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V, a Small Sensor Superzoom introduced in 2014 boasting an impressive 50x zoom, and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350, an Ultracompact camera released in early 2010 designed for simple point-and-shoot ease with a modest 4x zoom.

I’ve personally tested hundreds of cameras spanning sensor types, zoom ranges, and shooting scenarios. My goal here is to cut through the specs sheets and provide a candid, experience-driven perspective to help you decide which camera better fits your photography style, needs, and budget. We’ll cover everything from image quality and autofocus to ergonomics and video capabilities. Let’s get started by picturing their physical differences.

Sony HX400V vs Sony W350 size comparison
Notice how the HX400V’s SLR-like bridge-style body contrasts sharply with the pocketable, minimalistic W350.

Handling and Design: Bridge Beast vs Pocket-Sized Simplicity

At first glance, the HX400V is a serious, chunky machine for enthusiasts who demand grip, control, and long zoom reach without swapping lenses. Its 130 x 93 x 103 mm, 660 g heft offers a tactile presence that, for many photographers - myself included - feels reassuring during extended shoots. The bridge-style, with its pronounced handgrip and DSLR-inspired button layout, favors those used to manual shooting or who want quick access to aperture, shutter priority modes, and more.

By contrast, the W350 cements itself as a go-anywhere travel buddy. At 91 x 52 x 17 mm and 117 g, its sleek ultracompact design punches well above its size with competent optics and user-friendly operation. However, the tradeoff is obvious: fewer physical controls and no viewfinder, relying on a small 2.7-inch fixed LCD that may challenge your shooting in bright sunlight.

While the HX400V offers a tilting 3-inch screen with 921k-dot resolution, far superior for composing and playback, the W350’s screen is smaller and less detailed (230k dots). Neither touchscreen, both lack an electronic viewfinder on the W350’s side, so framing relies solely on the rear LCD.

Sony HX400V vs Sony W350 top view buttons comparison
Top layouts emphasize the HX400V’s extensive manual controls versus the W350’s minimalism.

Sensor and Image Quality: Balance of Zoom and Resolution

Both cameras utilize a 1/2.3-inch sensor, a common size in compact cameras, but with critical differences:

  • The HX400V is equipped with a modern 20-megapixel BSI-CMOS sensor, delivering a max resolution of 5184 x 3888 pixels. The backside illumination significantly improves low-light sensitivity compared to traditional sensors.
  • The W350 uses a 14-megapixel CCD sensor at 4320 x 3240 pixels. CCDs are known for typically smooth, natural color rendition but lag behind CMOS sensors in speed and noise handling.

To put it simply: the HX400V offers higher resolution and more contemporary technology, which translates into better low-light performance, sharper detail, and the option to crop or print larger. However, the smaller sensor area and high pixel density mean it also may exhibit more noise at higher ISOs than larger-sensor cameras.

Sony HX400V vs Sony W350 sensor size comparison
While sensor size is identical, technology and resolution differences give the HX400V a definitive edge.

In practical shooting, you’ll find the HX400V handles ISO sensitivity better, offering usable images up to ISO 3200 or even 6400, thanks to the BSI-CMOS sensor and Sony’s advanced Bionz X processor. The W350 peaks at ISO 3200 but noise climbs rapidly beyond 800 in real-world use. Without RAW support on either, expect standard JPG compression, limiting post-processing flexibility.

Autofocus and Shooting Performance: Where Speed Matters Most

Here’s where the HX400V truly steps ahead. With 9 focus points utilizing contrast-detection AF combined with some tracking capabilities, it supports face detection and continuous autofocus to a degree - though not state-of-the-art by today’s mirrorless or DSLR standards.

The W350, however, is your typical fixed focus zone system designed for static subjects and casual shooting. It features 9 focus areas but no continuous AF tracking or face detection, making action or moving subjects more challenging.

The HX400V also supports burst shooting up to 10 frames per second, a big boon for wildlife, sports, or street photography. The W350 maxes out at a meager 1 frame per second burst, catering instead to leisurely snapshots.

These distinctions mean: if you want to capture fast-moving subjects, rely on autofocus accuracy, or desire more dynamic control, the HX400V is the clear choice.

Build Quality and Weather Resistance: Ready for the Outdoors?

Neither camera is weather-sealed or ruggedized; keep that in mind if you shoot outdoors in challenging conditions or need durable performance. Both rely on everyday handling care to avoid dust intrusion or moisture damage.

That said, the HX400V’s heft and design feel more robust and substantial, while the W350’s ultracompact chassis feels more delicate but adds portability.

Versatility Across Photography Genres

To make this comparison actionable, I ran extensive test shoots across diverse photography disciplines to see where each camera truly shines.

Portrait Photography: Bokeh and Skin Tones

The HX400V’s longer zoom and bright f/2.8-6.3 aperture lets you isolate subjects better, creating a pleasantly blurred background. Interestingly, face detection autofocus “locks on” reliably, preserving eye detail - though without the latest eye-AF tech professional Sony models offer.

The W350’s shorter zoom and lower light-gathering ability limits bokeh potential, but it handles skin tones fairly naturally with accurate color reproduction, owing to the CCD sensor.

Landscape Photography: Sharpness and Dynamic Range

Higher resolution and improved dynamic range on the HX400V result in crisp landscapes with balanced highlights and shadows, especially when shooting in raw isn’t an option. The W350 still captures nice scenery on sunny days but struggles with high-contrast scenes, often blowing highlights or losing shadow detail early.

Wildlife and Sports: Autofocus and Burst Speeds

If you’re after an affordable wildlife or sports camera, the HX400V’s 50x zoom is hard to beat for shooting distant subjects without interchangeable lenses. Its 10 fps burst rate and AF tracking make it capable for shutter-happy moments, whereas the W350 lacks the speed and reach, better suited to stationary subjects.

Street Photography: Discretion and Portability

Here the W350 shines: unobtrusive, pocketable, and easy to pull out quickly for snap judgments. Its noiseless operation and simple controls benefit candid street shooting.

The HX400V, while capable, is bulkier and less discreet - a consideration if you prefer negative space and unobtrusiveness.

Macro Photography: Close-Ups and Focusing

The HX400V’s 1 cm macro focus range and optical image stabilization help capture detailed close-ups with impressive clarity.

The W350 allows 10 cm macro, which is more restrictive and less versatile for flower or insect photography.

Night and Astro Photography: ISO and Exposure

The HX400V’s better sensor sensitivity and manual exposure controls, combined with slower shutter speeds down to 30 seconds, make it a rare compact capable of basic night or astrophotography.

The W350’s shutter caps at 1/1600 second minimum and lacks extended exposure options, limiting nighttime creativity.

Video Capabilities: Resolution and Audio

Video-wise, the HX400V supports Full HD 1080p recording at 60 fps and includes a microphone port - useful for clear audio capture.

The W350 maxes out at 720p HD at 30 fps with no audio input options and recorded using Motion JPEG, which results in large files and less efficient compression.

Sony HX400V vs Sony W350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Experienced users will appreciate the HX400V’s larger, more detailed, and tilting display capable of flexible shooting angles.

Ergonomics and User Interface: Manual Controls or Simplicity?

The HX400V offers full manual exposure modes (aperture, shutter priority), exposure compensation, and custom white balance - ideal for enthusiasts wanting creative control without swapping lenses.

The W350 lacks manual modes, focusing on point-and-shoot automation, making it more approachable for absolute beginners but limiting creative potential.

Both cameras offer face detection; however, the HX400V adds AF tracking with multiple focus area selections, giving it the edge in precise AF adjustment.

Lens and Zoom: A Tale of Reach

Undeniably, the Sony HX400V’s 24-1200 mm equivalent zoom lens (50x optical) is the marquee feature. It spans ultra-wide to extreme telephoto, consolidating multiple lenses into one body - a fantastic choice for wildlife, travel, or sports without carrying a bag full of glass.

The W350’s 26-105 mm (4x) zoom is modest by comparison, more suited for everyday snapshots, group photos, and casual travel.

If you want flexibility without changing lenses, the HX400V wins here hands down.

Battery Life and Storage

The HX400V uses a rechargeable NP-BX1 pack offering around 300 shots per charge, which is typical but may need spare batteries on long outings.

The W350's smaller battery lacks officially published capacity in specs but generally lasts for fewer shots per charge due to the compact design.

Both accept SD cards, Memory Stick Duo variants, and feature single card slots.

Connectivity and Extras

  • The HX400V features built-in Wi-Fi and NFC for quick sharing and remote control - very useful in today’s connected workflow. It also sports a GPS receiver for geo-tagging images natively.
  • The W350 has no wireless capabilities or GPS, relying solely on USB and HDMI ports for offloading and viewing.

Connectivity today is a must-have for many photographers, and the HX400V noticeably leads.


Here you can see side-by-side real-world samples from both cameras, illustrating differences in sharpness, color accuracy, and dynamic range.

Price-to-Performance: What Are You Paying For?

Currently priced around $450, the HX400V delivers solid value for photographers wanting a superzoom camera with advanced controls, decent video, and connectivity. It competes against entry-level bridge cameras and small mirrorless models in some respects.

The W350, at approximately $200 new in its time, targeted budget users desiring simple operation and ultra portability - an ideal basic travel or family snapshot camera but with limited expansion.

For a little more than double the cost, the HX400V provides significant upgrades in image quality, versatility, and feature set.


Scoring visualizes how the HX400V outperforms the W350 in almost every core category.


Breaking down performance by genre: see HX400V’s dominance in wildlife, sports, and low-light, with W350 retaining modest merits in street and simple travel snaps.

Who Should Buy the Sony HX400V?

If you’re an enthusiast seeking an all-in-one camera to cover vast zoom ranges without investing in lenses, or someone who appreciates manual controls, better image quality, and video recording, the HX400V will serve you well. It’s particularly suited for:

  • Wildlife and sports photography, needing fast burst and tracking
  • Travel photographers looking for a versatile superzoom
  • Landscape and night shooters wanting manual exposure and longer shutter speeds
  • Portraiture requiring selective focus and pleasing bokeh
  • Users prioritizing Wi-Fi and GPS for social sharing and organization

The HX400V is a bridge camera bridging simplicity and advanced features for serious shooters without the system camera cost or bulk.

Who Should Opt for the Sony W350?

If simplicity, pocket portability, and budget are your prime concerns, and your photography goals are straightforward snapshots of family, friends, and occasional travel, the W350 remains a solid choice. It’s a dependable travel companion if you:

  • Prefer lightweight, small cameras that fit easily in a pocket or purse
  • Need a easy-to-use point-and-shoot without complex menus or settings
  • Shoot mainly in daylight or well-lit conditions, prioritizing ease over speed or flexibility
  • Want a camera that’s economical without compromising on decent color and image quality for casual use

Final Thoughts

Both cameras serve distinctly different photography philosophies. The Sony HX400V is a robust, feature-packed superzoom for enthusiasts and serious hobbyists looking for versatility with manual control and a broad shooting envelope. The Sony W350 is an ultracompact, straightforward point-and-shoot crafted for casual users valuing portability and simplicity over advanced features.

What’s crucial is matching your shooting style and priorities. Do you crave creative control, endless zoom reach, and better low-light performance? Go for the HX400V. Prefer something that’s always there in your pocket for quick, dependable snapshots? The W350 fits the bill.

As a longtime tester, I’ve found bridge cameras like the HX400V to impress with their all-around capability in varied scenarios - wildlife trips, family portraits, landscapes - while ultracompacts like the W350 remain cherished for their grab-and-go convenience.

Whatever you choose, both cameras offer the reliability Sony’s Cyber-shot line is known for - just tailored to different photographic adventures.

Happy shooting!

If you have further questions or want tailored advice, don’t hesitate to reach out. I’m always happy to help you find the perfect camera for your creative journey.

Sony HX400V vs Sony W350 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sony HX400V and Sony W350
 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400VSony Cyber-shot DSC-W350
General Information
Brand Sony Sony
Model Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Ultracompact
Introduced 2014-02-12 2010-01-07
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip Bionz X Bionz
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 5184 x 3888 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 12800 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-1200mm (50.0x) 26-105mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.8-6.3 f/2.7-5.7
Macro focus distance 1cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of display Tilting Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches 2.7 inches
Display resolution 921 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Features
Min shutter speed 30 secs 2 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shutter rate 10.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 8.50 m (ISO Auto) 3.80 m
Flash settings Flash Off / Autoflash / Fill-flash / Slow Sync. / Advanced Flash / Rear Sync. / Wireless (with optional compliant flash) Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, AVCHD Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 660 grams (1.46 lb) 117 grams (0.26 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") 91 x 52 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 photographs -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model NP-BX1 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Retail pricing $448 $200