Sony HX5 vs Sony W610
92 Imaging
33 Features
30 Overall
31


97 Imaging
37 Features
20 Overall
30
Sony HX5 vs Sony W610 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 200g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Released June 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 113g - 93 x 52 x 19mm
- Released January 2012

Sony HX5 vs Sony W610: A Hands-On Comparison of Two Compact Cyber-shot Cameras
Having personally tested thousands of cameras over my photography career, I understand how challenging it can be to parse out the real-world differences between similar-looking compact models - especially within the vast Sony Cyber-shot lineup. The Sony HX5 and W610, though modest by today’s standards, represent distinctive design philosophies and feature sets targeted at casual photographers seeking portability and ease of use.
In this detailed comparison, I'll break down every meaningful aspect - from sensor technology to ergonomics, from photo quality to video capabilities - based on extended hands-on testing in everyday shooting scenarios. By the end, you’ll have a clear sense of which model aligns with your photographic priorities, whether you're an enthusiast wanting pocketable convenience or a traveler craving versatile image performance.
Feeling the Cameras: Design, Size, and Ergonomics
Starting from the outside, these two compacts look similar but offer divergent handling experiences. The HX5 is noticeably chunkier yet solidly built, measuring 102×58×29 mm and weighing 200 grams. The W610 weighs just 113 grams, with slimmer dimensions of 93×52×19 mm, making it truly pocket-friendly.
In my experience, the HX5’s heft translates into a more confident grip and less shake during shooting, especially in outdoor or uneven environments. The deeper hand grip and more substantial button layout feel purposeful for longer shooting sessions. The W610’s slim profile favors quick grab-and-go scenarios - like street snaps or casual travel - but can feel a bit delicate in the hand over extended use.
Looking from above, the control layout tells a similar story:
The HX5 offers more dedicated buttons and a mode dial lending manual control options, while the W610 keeps things minimalistic, aimed at simplicity over flexibility. For users valuing direct access to exposure compensation or manual shutter priority, the HX5 wins hands down.
Ergonomic takeaway: If you prefer compactness and ultra-lightweight for easy carry, the W610 excels. If you want comfortable handling with more tactile feedback and physical controls, the HX5 is the better choice.
Under the Hood: Sensor and Image Quality Insights
Sensor size and technology have profound influence on image quality, affecting everything from noise levels to dynamic range. Both cameras use relatively small sensors - common in point-and-shoots - but with notable differences:
- Sony HX5: 1/2.4" BSI-CMOS sensor, 10MP
- Sony W610: Slightly larger 1/2.3" CCD sensor, 14MP
The HX5’s BSI-CMOS sensor design inherently offers better light-gathering efficiency and improved low-light performance over the W610’s CCD sensor despite the latter’s higher megapixel count. In real-world testing, I observed the HX5 delivering cleaner images at ISO 800 and beyond, with more usable detail retained in shadow areas. The W610’s higher resolution sensor can provide slightly sharper images in well-lit conditions but tends to show noise and detail loss when light levels drop.
Both cameras have an anti-aliasing filter, which slightly softens fine details but reduces moiré artifacts - a common trade-off on compact models. The HX5’s sensor area clocks in almost the same size as the W610’s, but BSI technology means it’s optimized better for noise reduction.
For landscape and detailed portraits, I found the W610’s greater pixel count beneficial only in bright conditions or when cropping. However, when shooting indoors or at dusk, the HX5 created images with more natural colors and less degradation. Sony’s BIONZ processor in both models handles basic noise suppression, but the HX5 edges out thanks to its sensor design.
Viewing and Composing: Screen and Interface
Neither camera offers an electronic viewfinder, a concession common in compacts, but the LCD display quality and size affect framing and reviewing images:
The HX5 sports a 3-inch, fixed, 230k-dot screen, while the W610 uses a slightly smaller 2.7-inch Clear Photo TFT LCD with the same resolution. In daylight, I noted that the HX5’s screen showed better contrast and visibility, thanks to its marginally larger size and higher brightness. The W610’s screen, while adequate indoors, struggled in direct sunlight making composition trickier.
Menu navigation and button responsiveness favored the HX5 as well. Its BIONZ processor coupled with a more comprehensive manual mode makes it easier for advanced users to tweak settings without fumbling. The W610’s interface is more streamlined and simpler, appealing to beginners but frustrating for experienced users trying to access creative controls.
Real-World Shooting: Autofocus and Burst Performance
Autofocus systems can make or break a camera’s usability for active shooting situations. Both cameras lack phase-detection AF, relying solely on contrast detection which is slower, especially in low light.
- Sony HX5 offers 9 contrast-detection AF points with center-weighted single-point focusing.
- Sony W610 has unknown number of AF points, likely fewer, also contrast-detection only.
In practice, I found the HX5’s AF noticeably quicker and more reliable to lock focus on stationary subjects, thanks to wider AF point coverage and stronger processing. Continuous autofocus is unavailable on both, limiting tracking capabilities for moving subjects.
Burst shooting speed starkly contrasts between models:
- HX5 delivers 10 fps continuous shooting, a remarkable speed for a camera of its era, ideal for capturing fleeting expressions or wildlife moments.
- W610 manages only 1 fps, frustratingly slow for sports or action.
This difference greatly impacts usability for dynamic photography. I tested both models on fast-paced street scenes and the HX5 was a clear winner in reliably capturing sharp images amidst movement.
Lens & Zoom: Versatility in Framing
Both cameras have fixed zoom lenses but differ in focal range and aperture:
- Sony HX5: 25-250mm equivalent (10x zoom), f/3.5-5.5
- Sony W610: 26-105mm equivalent (4x zoom), f/2.8-5.9
The HX5’s telephoto reach is a significant advantage for wildlife or distant landscape details. Couple this with optical image stabilization and you’re enabled to shoot handheld longer without blur.
The W610’s aperture advantage at wide angle (f/2.8 vs f/3.5) helps in low light or indoor environments by letting in more light at short focal lengths. It’s beneficial for quick snapshots where you want to avoid flash.
In macro shooting, both cameras get impressively close - 5cm on the HX5 and 4cm on the W610 - with decent detail capture. However, the HX5’s optical stabilization again aids in steadier close-up shots.
Image Stabilization & Flash: Handling Low Light and Movement
The HX5 boasts optical image stabilization (OIS) built-in, a crucial feature that sharply reduces blur from hand shake during longer exposures or zoomed shots. I could confidently shoot handheld at slower shutter speeds than usual, an absolute boon for candid portraits or twilight landscapes.
The W610 lacks any form of image stabilization, greatly limiting handheld low-light usability and telephoto sharpness without a tripod.
Both cameras feature built-in flash units with similar range (~3.5-3.8 meters) and modes including Auto, On, Off, and Slow Sync. The HX5 additionally has a Slow Sync option designed to balance flash with ambient light better for natural-looking images.
Video Recording: Capabilities for Casual Filmmakers
Here the differences become pronounced:
- Sony HX5 supports up to Full HD 1920x1080 video at 60 fps in AVCHD format, delivering smooth, detailed footage.
- Sony W610 maxes out at VGA 640x480 video at 30 fps in Motion JPEG, by comparison quite basic and outdated.
The HX5’s video quality and frame rate support make it suitable for casual video projects or travel vlogs, though lacking external microphone inputs limits audio quality control. The W610’s video is more of a “throwaway” feature for quick clips, with low resolution and quality.
Neither camera offers 4K or advanced video stabilization technologies, so video enthusiasts should temper expectations accordingly.
Battery Life, Storage, and Connectivity
Battery usage is a crucial practical factor:
- HX5 uses NP-BG1 battery, rated for unknown shots officially, but in my tests provided moderate endurance.
- W610 uses NP-BN battery with approximately 250 shots per charge, though lightweight use can stretch this.
The W610’s fewer features and smaller screen likely contribute to longer battery life in casual use.
Regarding storage, the HX5 offers flexible media support including Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo and optional SD/SDHC cards, while the W610 supports a wider range including microSD variants, beneficial for users who already have microSD cards on hand.
Connectivity options are limited on both - no Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or NFC - but the HX5 has HDMI output for direct TV playback, which is absent on the W610.
Durability and Weather Resistance
Neither model offers environmental sealing, waterproofing, or shockproof features. Both are designed as regular compact cameras suitable for everyday casual use rather than rugged outdoor adventures.
Putting It All Together: My Recommendations by Photography Type
To cement these technical insights in practical terms, I used the cameras in different genre scenarios:
Portrait Photography
- HX5: Offers better color reproduction and stable handheld framing with OIS; however, lack of face detection limits AF assistance for ideal focus on eyes.
- W610: Good for casual portraits in bright light, but slower AF and no stabilization can cause missed shots.
Landscape Photography
- HX5: Stronger zoom, better image quality at base ISO, and stable handling make it more versatile here.
- W610: Higher pixels help in daylight, but noisier in shadows.
Wildlife Photography
- HX5: 10x zoom and fast 10fps burst are decisive - essential for animals at a distance and action shots.
- W610: Limited zoom and 1fps burst hinder dynamic wildlife photography.
Sports Photography
- HX5: Quick burst and better AF speed give it a clear edge.
- W610: Not suitable.
Street Photography
- W610: Lightweight and discreet favored for urban snapshots.
- HX5: Bulkier but refined controls help for those who prioritize image quality over invisibility.
Macro Photography
- Both perform similarly at close distances, though stabilized HX5 edges better handheld sharpness.
Night / Astro Photography
- HX5: CMOS sensor and OIS deliver cleaner low-light shots.
- W610: Limited due to noisier CCD sensor and no stabilization.
Video
- HX5: Full HD capabilities suitable for casual projects.
- W610: Basic VGA video, mainly for memories rather than serious use.
Travel Photography
- W610: Ultra-lightweight and compact, ideal for long treks when packing light.
- HX5: Offers more versatility but at added weight/size cost.
Professional Workflows
- Both lack RAW support and advanced connectivity, falling short of pro standards.
Final Verdict With Performance Scores
In my comprehensive testing, the Sony HX5 emerges as the clear winner for enthusiasts needing better control, superior image quality, and more versatile zoom/video capabilities. Its optical stabilization, robust burst shooting, and Full HD video firmly place it ahead.
The Sony W610, while noticeably cheaper and more pocketable, suffers from major compromises - slow burst, no OIS, modest video, and less refined handling - but its small size and simplicity will appeal to casual users wanting an ultra-lightweight point-and-shoot.
Summary: Which Sony Compact Suits You?
User Type | Recommended Model | Reasoning |
---|---|---|
Casual snapshooters | Sony W610 | Light, simple to use, extremely portable |
Travel enthusiasts | Either, based on trade-off - W610 for size, HX5 for performance | |
Beginners wanting simplicity | Sony W610 | Intuitive controls and straightforward menus |
Enthusiasts wanting control | Sony HX5 | Manual modes, faster shooting, better zoom, image stabilization |
Videographers (basic needs) | Sony HX5 | Full HD video capture |
Wildlife and sports shooters | Sony HX5 | Fast burst rate and extended zoom |
Low-light photographers | Sony HX5 | Better sensor and stabilization |
Professional photographers | Neither, consider higher-end models with RAW support and bigger sensors |
In conclusion, these compact Cyber-shot cameras represent two different philosophies: the Sony HX5 is a performance-oriented small camera with better image quality, controls, and features, while the Sony W610 is a budget-friendly pocket companion for casual, sunny-day snapshots. I always encourage buyers to focus on what matters most for their shooting style and prioritize features accordingly.
I’ve thoroughly enjoyed photographing with both models under varied conditions - the difference in photographic potential is substantial given their modest price range and release dates. For those who prefer a no-fuss straightforward camera and ultra-lightweight, the W610 fits nicely. But if you crave more creative control, faster operation, and enhanced image quality, the HX5 remains a compelling choice even years after launch.
If you have questions about how these cameras might suit your niche or want to discuss workflows and techniques with these models, feel free to reach out. Happy shooting!
Image Credits
All photos are from my personal test sessions and sample galleries captured with the Sony HX5 and W610.
Sony HX5 vs Sony W610 Specifications
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W610 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Sony | Sony |
Model | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W610 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-06-16 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Bionz | BIONZ |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.4" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.104 x 4.578mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 4cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | Clear Photo TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 1 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.80 m | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | AVCHD | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 200 grams (0.44 pounds) | 113 grams (0.25 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 93 x 52 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 250 shots |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-BG1 | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1/portrait2) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo/ PRO HG-Duo, optional SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD/micro SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $275 | $200 |