Sony T900 vs Sony A58
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
68 Imaging
62 Features
72 Overall
66
Sony T900 vs Sony A58 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Launched February 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 16000 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 492g - 129 x 95 x 78mm
- Launched November 2013
- Previous Model is Sony A57
Sony T900 vs Sony A58 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Sony T900 versus Sony A58, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR and both of them are offered by Sony. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the T900 (12MP) and A58 (20MP) and the T900 (1/2.3") and A58 (APS-C) offer different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe T900 was released 5 years prior to the A58 which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A58 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the T900 scores against the A58 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sony T900 vs Sony A58 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 and Sony SLT-A58. The complete galleries are provided at Sony T900 Gallery and Sony A58 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Sony A58
T900 | A58 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 460k | Sharper screen (+462k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A58 over the Sony T900
A58 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | November 2013 | February 2009 | Newer by 58 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Sony T900 and Sony A58
T900 | A58 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Sony T900 vs Sony A58 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Sony T900 comes with physical dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs) and the Sony A58 has dimensions of 129mm x 95mm x 78mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.1") having a weight of 492 grams (1.08 lbs).
Examine the Sony T900 versus Sony A58 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using during that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the T900 compared to the A58.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the T900 and A58 is 96 and 68 respectively.
Sony T900 vs Sony A58 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reading through specifications. The image underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the T900 and A58.
Plainly, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The T900 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Sony A58 will resolve more detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged T900 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Sony T900 vs Sony A58 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sony T900 vs Sony A58 Specifications
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | Sony SLT-A58 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Sony | Sony |
Model type | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | Sony SLT-A58 |
Class | Ultracompact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2009-02-17 | 2013-11-27 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.2 x 15.4mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 357.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5456 x 3632 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 16000 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 15 |
Cross type focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 35-140mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-10.0 | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.6 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 922k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.65x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 2s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) | 10.00 m (@ ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 143 grams (0.32 lb) | 492 grams (1.08 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 129 x 95 x 78mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 74 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 753 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 690 pictures |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $300 | $645 |