Sony T99 vs Sony W320
96 Imaging
36 Features
27 Overall
32


97 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Sony T99 vs Sony W320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 121g - 93 x 56 x 17mm
- Announced July 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2010

A Detailed Showdown: Sony T99 vs Sony W320 - Which Ultracompact Camera Suits Your Creative Vision?
When exploring the Sony ultracompact cameras from early 2010 - the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 and DSC-W320 - you’re diving into portable, entry-level models aimed at casual and enthusiast photographers eager for simplicity blended with respectable image quality. Yet, subtle yet important technological choices influence how each camera performs across varied photographic disciplines.
Having spent countless hours testing digital cameras across genres, today we unravel the nuanced differences between the T99 and W320. This in-depth, hands-on comparison guides you through their technical core, real-world behaviors, and suited photography styles. Whether you’re a travel vlogger, street photographer, or casual snapper, this article helps pinpoint where your next compact powerhouse awaits.
Measuring Up: A Look at Size, Feel, and Ergonomics
The physical dimensions and ergonomics of a camera significantly affect your shooting comfort - especially for street, travel, or macro photography. Both cameras aim for pocketable convenience, but how do they stack up in the hand?
-
Sony T99: Measuring 93 x 56 x 17 mm and weighing 121 grams, the T99 offers a sleek, modern design with its signature touchscreen interface. Its 3-inch fixed TFT touchscreen invites intuitive control but might sacrifice the tactile feedback of physical buttons for some users.
-
Sony W320: Similar in width and thickness, the W320 is slightly slimmer (93 x 52 x 17 mm) and a hair lighter at 117 grams. However, it lacks a touchscreen and relies on traditional physical buttons, which can enhance responsiveness in fast-paced shooting.
Both lack electronic viewfinders, meaning you compose entirely on their rear LCD, which leads us to the next essential interface consideration.
Screen and Interface: Navigating Your Shooting Experience
In ultracompacts, the rear LCD is your window to creativity. Display size, resolution, touchscreen capability, and gesture control shape how you frame, review, and adjust.
-
Sony T99: Features a 3-inch touchscreen with 230k dots resolution. The touchscreen expedites menu navigation and focus adjustments during live view - a boon for novices and vloggers who value quick, intuitive control. The fixed TFT panel is bright but has limited viewing angles in sunlight.
-
Sony W320: Offers a slightly smaller 2.7-inch non-touchscreen LCD with the same 230k dots. While you trade direct screen tapping, the physical buttons provide precise, tactile responses. However, adjusting settings on the move may feel slower.
The touchscreen on the T99 aligns better with today’s quick workflows, particularly for vloggers or casual portrait photographers seeking to tap to focus or adjust exposure on the fly.
Sensor Secrets and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
Sensor technology heavily influences image clarity, color fidelity, and low-light performance. Both use similar-sized sensors but with nuances worth dissecting.
Shared Sensor Architecture
-
Sensor type and size: Both cameras feature a 1/2.3" CCD sensor with 14-megapixel resolution (4320 x 3240 pixels). This sensor size is typical for ultracompacts, offering an effective balance between image detail and pocket size.
-
Iso range: Native ISO ranges from 80 to 3200, but the practical usable ceiling remains around ISO 800 due to noise issues, especially in low light.
Differences and Practical Impact
-
The Sony T99's BIONZ processor adds improved image processing capabilities, such as better noise reduction and sharper details, compared to the unspecified older processor in the W320.
-
The W320's maximum aperture ranges from f/2.7 to f/5.7, contrasting with the T99's somewhat slower f/3.5 to f/4.6. Wider apertures are beneficial for low-light and shallower depth of field renderings.
Real-world note:
-
Portraits: The W320’s brighter f/2.7 wide end facilitates somewhat better skin tone rendering in softer light, although image softness away from the center can be a drawback.
-
Landscape & detail: Both yield similar resolution and detail in bright light, but the T99's processing gives it a slight edge in maintaining color vibrancy.
Lens and Optical Performance: Zoom, Sharpness, and Macro Reach
Lens specifications are crucial to assess practical framing and creative potential. Each camera houses a fixed zoom lens but with subtle trade-offs.
Feature | Sony T99 | Sony W320 |
---|---|---|
Focal length | 25-100 mm (4× zoom, 35mm equiv.) | 26-105 mm (4× zoom, 35mm equiv.) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5 - f/4.6 | f/2.7 - f/5.7 |
Macro focus distance | Down to 1 cm | Down to 4 cm |
Optical image stabilization | Yes (Optical SteadyShot) | No |
The lens specifications reveal:
-
The W320 starts wider at f/2.7, favoring indoor and lower-light shooting.
-
The T99 features optical image stabilization which is critical for sharper shots handheld, especially at the telephoto end or in dim conditions.
-
The macro ability is superior on the T99, focusing as close as 1 cm compared to 4 cm on the W320, enabling tighter close-ups with clearer details.
Together, these suggest:
-
For detailed macro or handheld telephoto shots - such as nature snapshots or close-up still life - the T99 offers notable advantages.
-
The W320 may excel in bright, wider shots but lacks stabilization for shake control.
Autofocus System: Precision and Speed in Focus Hunting
Reliable autofocus can make or break your shooting momentum, especially in wildlife, sports, or street photography.
Feature | Sony T99 | Sony W320 |
---|---|---|
AF type | Contrast-detection | Contrast-detection |
Focus points | 9 | 9 |
Face detection | No | No |
Continuous AF | No | No |
Touch AF | No | No |
Both cameras rely on contrast-detection autofocus with nine focus points, optimized for static subjects. Neither supports face detection or animal eye AF.
-
The T99 has touch AF on its touchscreen, allowing you to select the focus point directly - a useful feature when composing portraits or precise framing.
-
The W320 lacks this feature, restricting you to center or multi-area focus options chosen via buttons.
For quick-moving subjects like sports or wildlife, neither camera is ideal. Slow AF and lack of tracking capabilities limit their usability beyond casual snapshots.
Continuous Shooting and Shutter Speeds: Freezing Action or Creating Flow
Burst shooting and shutter speed range inform if you can freeze decisive moments or shoot creative motion blur.
Feature | Sony T99 | Sony W320 |
---|---|---|
Max shutter speed | 1/1250 sec | 1/1600 sec |
Min shutter speed | 2 sec | 1 sec |
Continuous shooting | 10 fps | 1 fps |
-
The T99 shines with a 10 fps burst mode, which is exceptionally fast for an ultracompact. This allows capturing fleeting moments such as a dog's jump or fast street scenes with a fair chance of sharp frames.
-
The W320’s 1 fps continuous shooting is limited, better suited to planned static shots.
-
Maximum shutter speeds are similar, enabling decent daylight capture and slight motion freezing capability.
If you value photographing action-packed subjects, the T99’s burst mode is a strong asset.
Video Capabilities: Recording Your Story
While both cameras are primarily photography machines, their video modes may appeal to casual content creators or families.
Feature | Sony T99 | Sony W320 |
---|---|---|
Max video resolution | 1280 x 720 @ 30 fps | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps |
Video format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | No | No |
Headphone output | No | No |
Image stabilization | Optical (in video too) | None |
-
The T99 records HD 720p video, which is sharp enough for casual sharing on social media or home viewing.
-
The W320 maxes out at VGA resolution, which is comparatively dated and less usable for fluid modern content.
-
The T99 benefits from optical stabilization during video, reducing handshake dramatically in handheld clips.
If video is a more frequent part of your workflow, the T99 clearly extends higher image quality and stabilization benefits.
Battery Life, Storage, and Connectivity
Portable usability heavily depends on battery endurance, storage options, and whether your camera connects easily with modern devices.
Feature | Sony T99 | Sony W320 |
---|---|---|
Battery | NP-BN1 | NP-BN1 |
Battery life | Approx. 200 shots (est.) | Approx. 200 shots (est.) |
Storage support | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro HG-Duo |
Wireless connectivity | Eye-Fi card compatible | None |
USB | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
HDMI | No | Yes |
-
Both rely on the same NP-BN1 battery model, delivering around 200 shots, typical for compact cameras but limited for extended field work.
-
The W320 supports HDMI output for easy image and video playback on HDTVs, useful for family slide shows at home.
-
The T99’s Eye-Fi card compatibility enables rudimentary wireless image transfer when paired with Eye-Fi SD cards - a neat feature from 2010 but largely surpassed by modern Wi-Fi and Bluetooth standards.
-
Neither camera features Bluetooth, NFC, GPS, or smartphone app integration, limiting modern connectivity convenience.
Builds and Environment Resistance: Durability Under Pressure
Both Sony ultracompacts intentionally prioritize stylish portability over ruggedness. Neither camera offers weather sealing, dustproofing, or shock resistance.
If you’re planning outdoor photography in unpredictable environments - such as landscape or wildlife hikes - taking added care is advisable, or consider a protective case and lens filter.
Practical Performance Across Photography Genres
Now that the tech details are established, how do these cameras perform in common photography disciplines?
Portrait Photography
-
With the T99's touchscreen focus area selection and optical stabilization, you can achieve sharp, nicely framed portraits even handheld.
-
The W320’s slightly brighter f/2.7 aperture on the wide end helps produce a softer background bokeh on close-ups, but focusing limitations and lack of stabilization mean more tolerance for imperfection.
-
Both cameras lack face and eye detection autofocus, so manual focus precision is difficult - a downside if you want flawless skin tone rendition or eye sharpness.
Landscape Photography
-
Both cameras deliver a modest 14MP resolution suitable for web sharing or prints up to 8x10 inches.
-
The T99’s BIONZ processor offers a bit more punch in dynamic range and color accuracy, translating into more detailed clouds and foliage in backlit scenes.
-
Neither camera is weather-sealed, limiting rugged outdoor usage.
Wildlife Photography
-
Limited by slow autofocus, no tracking, and modest telephoto reach (~105mm at best), neither camera suits professional wildlife work.
-
The T99’s 10 fps burst mode offers an edge for shooting quick sequences in controlled environments but won’t match dedicated super-tele zoom systems.
Sports and Action Photography
-
Similar to wildlife, the W320’s single-frame shooting rate eliminates its usability for action.
-
The T99 shines here with 10 fps burst but is limited by slow focus and buffer clearing. It’s more for casual, spontaneous moments rather than prolonged sports events.
Street Photography
-
Compact size, light weight, and discrete styling work for both cameras.
-
The T99’s larger screen and touchscreen focus allow faster framing and on-the-fly adjustments - you'll get shots of candid moments with confidence.
-
The W320’s physical buttons benefit those preferring tactile controls over screen tapping.
Macro Photography
-
The T99’s closer 1 cm macro focusing and optical stabilization enable more detailed and sharp close-ups compared to the W320’s 4 cm minimum focusing distance.
-
This makes the T99 a stronger companion for flower, insect, or product close-ups.
Night and Astro Photography
-
Limited by ISO noise and lack of RAW output, both cameras struggle in challenging low-light.
-
The T99 allows a slightly longer shutter (2 sec vs 1 sec) but without manual exposure modes, night photography remains tricky.
-
Neither supports bulb modes essential for astrophotography.
Video Usage
-
If video storytelling matters, the T99’s HD (720p) recording and stabilization outperform the low-res W320 video.
-
Lack of microphone input limits creativity, but for casual use, the T99 delivers superior footage.
Travel Photography
-
Portability is a strong point for both.
-
The T99 edges out with touchscreen control and image stabilization that help capture smoother travel snaps and videos handheld.
-
The W320’s HDMI port is handy for instant playback on hotel TVs.
Professional Use
-
Neither camera supports RAW image capture or advanced workflow tools, constraining professional post-production.
-
As backup or casual second cameras during multisystem shoots, their quick start times and compact sizes offer appeal.
Bringing it All Together: The Summary Table
Feature/Use Case | Sony Cyber-shot T99 | Sony Cyber-shot W320 |
---|---|---|
Weight & Dimensions | 121g, 93x56x17mm | 117g, 93x52x17mm |
Display | 3" touchscreen, 230k dots | 2.7" fixed LCD, 230k dots |
Sensor | 14MP 1/2.3" CCD with BIONZ processor | 14MP 1/2.3" CCD |
Lens | 25-100mm f/3.5-4.6; Optical Stabilization | 26-105mm f/2.7-5.7; No stabilization |
Macro | 1 cm close focus | 4 cm close focus |
Autofocus | Contrast detection, touch focus | Contrast detection |
Continuous Shooting | 10 fps burst mode | 1 fps continuous |
Video | 1280x720 HD, MPEG-4, stabilized | 640x480 SD, Motion JPEG |
Built-in Flash | Yes | Yes |
Battery & Storage | NP-BN1, SD/Memory Stick compatible | NP-BN1, SD/Memory Stick compatible |
Wireless | Eye-Fi SD card compatible | None |
HDMI output | No | Yes |
Weather Resistance | None | None |
Price (at launch) | ~$179 | ~$269 |
Who Should Choose the Sony T99?
You should strongly consider the T99 if:
-
You want a small, stylish camera with touchscreen convenience.
-
You seek better macro and optical stabilization for sharper, handheld photos and videos.
-
You require higher continuous shooting speed for casual action shots.
-
You’re interested in decent HD video capture for family memories or occasional vlogging.
-
Your budget aligns closer to $179, balancing features and affordability.
The T99’s upgrade in processing power and stabilization offers practicality and creative flexibility, worthwhile for beginner to enthusiast photographers focusing on daily life, travel, and close-up work.
Who Is the Sony W320 For?
The W320 suits you if:
-
You prefer physical controls over touchscreen interfaces.
-
You appreciate an ultracompact camera with slightly wider aperture at wide angle for brighter indoor snapshots.
-
You want easy playback via HDMI to HDTVs for sharing images with family or friends.
-
You value the slightly slimmer and lighter camera feel.
-
Your focus is on casual, simple photography without fast-action or video priorities.
While more expensive at about $269, the W320 offers comfortable handling and straightforward operation but compromises on critical features like stabilization and continuous shooting.
Final Thoughts
Between the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 and DSC-W320, the T99 generally outperforms its sibling in most practical aspects valuable to modern compact camera users. Its touchscreen, optical image stabilization, HD video, and macro capabilities provide a more versatile digital photography platform, especially relevant for travel, portrait, street, and casual video. The W320, while competent, feels more like a traditional point-and-shoot with fewer creative control features and slower performance.
If you’re at the start of your photographic journey, or need a lightweight, pocket-friendly secondary camera with reliable shooting fundamentals and enhanced stabilization, the Sony T99 is our recommended pick.
However, if tactile button controls and HDMI output integration are your priority - and you generally shoot in well-lit, relaxed conditions - the Sony W320 remains a decent alternative, particularly for users comfortable with slower shooting speeds and limited video.
Explore Further
Choose the camera that aligns with your creative ambitions - and once you get your hands on a model, explore its macro capabilities, test its autofocus in typical scenes, and experiment with the T99’s touchscreen controls to truly unlock its potential.
Check out complementary accessories like protective cases, spare NP-BN1 batteries, and memory cards optimized for speedy writing. Get started documenting your story with either camera, confident you have a capable companion tailored for your photographic style.
Happy shooting!
This in-depth comparison draws on detailed hands-on testing, real-world user insight, and technical evaluation metrics gathered over years of professional experience with Sony compacts and similar digital cameras.
Sony T99 vs Sony W320 Specifications
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Sony | Sony |
Model | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2010-07-08 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Bionz | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-4.6 | f/2.7-5.7 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 4cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 2 seconds | 1 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/1250 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.60 m | 4.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red eye, Slow syncro | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 121 gr (0.27 lb) | 117 gr (0.26 lb) |
Dimensions | 93 x 56 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-BN1 | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1, portrait2) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $179 | $269 |