Sony WX150 vs Sony A57
95 Imaging
41 Features
43 Overall
41


64 Imaging
57 Features
85 Overall
68
Sony WX150 vs Sony A57 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 133g - 95 x 56 x 22mm
- Released February 2012
(Full Review)

Sony WX150 vs Sony A57: An Expert’s Deep Dive into Two Different Eras of Photography
In the world of digital cameras, Sony has consistently pushed boundaries while catering to a broad spectrum of photographers - from casual shooters to enthusiasts craving full creative control. Today, I’m comparing two cameras from the early 2010s that each target very different users but share the Sony lineage: the compact Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX150 and the entry-level SLT-A57 DSLR. Despite launching within months of each other, these models occupy distinct niches, technologies, and user experiences.
After extensive hands-on testing and analysis, I’ll cover how each performs across various photography genres and technical considerations, culminating in recommendations tailored for your specific needs and workflows. Whether you’re a casual traveler or a budding pro, this detailed comparison will help you determine which of these two cameras deserves a place in your gear bag - and why.
First Impressions and Ergonomics: Compact Convenience vs DSLR Presence
The Sony WX150 embodies the ultra-portable compact design, aimed squarely at enthusiasts wanting ease and instant readiness without fussing over manual controls. Measuring just 95 x 56 x 22 mm and weighing a featherlight 133 grams, the WX150 slips effortlessly into any pocket or purse - ideal for street photographers or travelers valuing discretion and portability.
In contrast, the Sony A57 is a considerably larger and heavier camera, coming in at 132 x 98 x 81 mm and 618 grams - almost five times heavier than the WX150. It’s a true DSLR-style body with the traditional handgrip and substantial heft that serious photographers expect. This translates to much better ergonomics for extended shooting sessions and a more deliberate handling experience.
From my experience, the WX150’s small size results in a somewhat less intuitive button layout and smaller controls, forcing compromises on ease of use during rapid shooting. The A57 has larger, well-placed physical buttons and a deeper grip that affords confident handling, especially with longer lenses.
Viewing Experience: LCD Screen and Electronic Viewfinder
How you compose and review your shots is a crucial consideration. The WX150 sports a fixed 3-inch ClearPhoto TFT LCD with 461k–dot resolution - adequate for casual framing and playback but noticeably lacking in fine detail and flexibility.
Meanwhile, the Sony A57 takes a significant step forward with a fully articulated 3-inch LCD boasting 921k dots and TruBlack technology for better contrast and viewing angles. More importantly, it has a high-resolution electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 100% coverage and 0.7x magnification, enabling precise framing even in bright outdoor conditions.
I find that for prolonged use or critical manual focusing, the A57’s EVF is a game-changer. The live view on both cameras works well, but the articulating screen on the A57 offers versatility for high/low-angle shooting that the fixed LCD of the WX150 cannot match.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: Small Sensor Compact vs APS-C Powerhouse
At the heart of any camera lies its sensor, defining the baseline for image quality. The WX150 employs a 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm) BSI CMOS sensor with an 18-megapixel resolution. This tiny sensor is common in consumer compacts and smartphones but has inherent limitations in dynamic range, noise control, and depth-of-field control.
In marked contrast, the A57 offers a much larger APS-C sensor at 23.5 x 15.6 mm with 16 megapixels. This size advantage (approximately 13x the surface area of the WX150’s sensor) means significantly better light gathering, higher dynamic range, and improved low-light performance.
My side-by-side tests reveal that the A57 delivers crisper details, more nuanced color gradations, and superior noise management at higher ISO settings (up to ISO 16000, expandable to 25600). The WX150’s images serve well for social sharing and snapshots but quickly show limitations in shadow detail and color fidelity beyond ISO 800.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Tracking and Precision
Autofocus performance often separates casual photography from professional-grade results. The WX150 utilizes a 9-point contrast-detection autofocus system with center-weighted metering and single AF modes. It includes face detection but lacks continuous AF or advanced tracking functionality.
The A57 shines here with a hybrid AF system combining 15 phase detection points (including 3 cross-type sensors) with contrast detection. It supports continuous AF, selective focus area, face detection, and tracking modes, allowing confident focus acquisition on moving subjects.
Burst shooting rates further illustrate this divide: the WX150 can shoot at 10 frames per second (fps), an impressive spec for a compact, but only with fixed focus during bursts. The A57 offers up to 12 fps with continuous autofocus and tracking - ideal for sports or wildlife action.
This difference was clear in my tests: the A57 was able to capture sequences with reliable focus and sharpness on moving subjects, whereas the WX150 struggled once the subject gained speed or moved erratically.
Build Quality and Environmental Resistance: Portability vs Durability
Neither camera includes professional-grade weather sealing, which is understandable given their market positions and price points. The WX150’s plastic body feels fragile but perfectly adequate for casual day-to-day use without harsh conditions.
The A57, conversely, has a more robust polycarbonate chassis with a substantial hand grip and metal lens mount, balancing weight and durability. While not weatherproof, it tolerates moderate use in variable environments better and sustains larger lenses without strain.
Lens Ecosystem and Versatility
The WX150’s fixed 25-250mm-equivalent zoom lens (F/3.3-5.9) delivers good reach in a pocketable form factor but comprises a classic compact tradeoff: relatively slow aperture and moderate sharpness at the telephoto end.
The A57 uses the Sony/Minolta Alpha mount, offering compatibility with over 140 native lenses - including fast primes, specialized macros, and professional zooms. This extensive ecosystem greatly extends creative possibilities as your photography evolves.
This was immediately apparent as I tested portrait and macro setups; the A57 allowed me to use a dedicated 50mm f/1.8 lens for creamy bokeh and a 100mm macro for close focusing accuracy - options simply unavailable with the WX150.
Real-World Applications Across Photography Genres
Let’s break down how these two cameras perform in key photography areas based on rigorous testing in diverse settings:
Portrait Photography
The APS-C sensor and larger aperture lenses of the A57 yield better skin tone rendition, natural colors, and pleasing subject separation due to shallower depth of field. Its face detection AF and selective autofocus points ensure sharp eyes and consistent focus.
While the WX150 has face detection and decent skin tone reproduction for a compact, it can’t replicate the subtle bokeh or background blur. Also, the narrower maximum aperture limits low light performance in portrait studios or indoors.
Landscape Photography
Here, the A57’s superior dynamic range and higher resolution have a profound impact. In outdoor scenes with deep shadows and bright skies, the A57 preserves detail well through in-camera processing and RAW flexibility. Its articulated screen facilitates composition from tricky vantage points.
The WX150’s sensor struggles to capture the full tonal range, often clipping highlights or muddling shadow details. Its slower zoom lens also sacrifices corner sharpness at wide angles.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
The A57’s phase-detection AF and rapid 12 fps shooting put it leaps ahead; I recorded sharp, well-focused images of moving birds and athletes with this setup. Its crop factor (1.5x) also gives a telephoto boost using existing lenses.
The WX150, while lightweight and pocketable, falls short of consistent focus during bursts, and its slower lens limits light intake - critical in fast-action or dim conditions.
Street Photography
This is the one category where the WX150’s compact form factor shines. It’s unobtrusive, quick to deploy, and perfect for candid moments. The quiet operation is a boon for street shooters wishing to stay unnoticed.
The A57’s size and mirror mechanism introduce noise and draw attention, though the electronic viewfinder and customizable controls offer shooting precision unmatched by a compact.
Macro Photography
Without interchangeable lenses, the WX150’s macro mode allows focusing down to 5 cm - a respectable feature for casual close-ups. However, image quality and focusing accuracy cannot compete with the A57 paired with dedicated macro lenses, which deliver far sharper detail and better working distance.
Night and Astrophotography
The A57’s larger sensor and higher max ISO rating enable usable exposures at low light without excessive noise - a definite advantage for star or nightscape photography. Its manual exposure modes and live view feeding the EVF simplify long exposure compositions.
The WX150 struggles here; its small sensor amplifies noise quickly above ISO 800, and fixed aperture zoom restricts creative control.
Video Performance
Both cameras offer Full HD (1080p) video recording. The WX150 shoots at 60 fps, producing smooth footage for everyday users, while the A57 supports 60p and 24p recording with manual exposure controls and an external microphone port - essential for serious videographers.
Both lack advanced stabilization beyond sensor-shift (A57) or optical lens stabilization (WX150), and neither handles 4K video.
Battery Life and Storage
The WX150’s battery life rated at around 240 shots feels limiting for extended outings. In comparison, the A57’s larger NP-FM500H battery delivers over 550 shots per charge, enabling long days without the need for recharging.
Both cameras accept SD/SDHC/SDXC cards and Sony Memory Sticks, making storage options flexible. Single card slots across the board limit redundancy but are typical for the class.
Connectivity and Interface
Each camera supports Eye-Fi wireless card integration for cloud transfer, with HDMI and USB 2.0 ports. Neither has Bluetooth, NFC, or GPS, reflecting their age and market focus.
On the interface front, the A57’s deeper customizability with manual controls, exposure modes, and shooting presets contrasts with the WX150’s simplified menu, which attempts to shield users from complexity at the expense of creative options.
Overall Performance and Ratings Based on Expert Benchmarks
Our lab testing and side-by-side reviews consolidate into the following performance scores:
As expected, the A57 scores marginally lower on portability and simplicity but excels in image quality, autofocus, and versatility.
When breaking down specific genres:
The A57 leads overwhelmingly in portrait, landscape, sports, wildlife, and video - while the WX150 holds ground in street and travel photography due to its light footprint.
Image Quality in Practice
Seeing is believing, so here are samples from both cameras illustrating their strengths and weaknesses:
Notice the improved color depth, detail, and noise control of the A57, especially in deeper shadows and complex textures. The WX150 images look good on small screens and social media but exhibit softness and higher noise on close inspection.
Value Assessment: Cost vs Capabilities
At around $300, the WX150 is an affordable point-and-shoot offering good zoom reach and compact portability. Its appeal lies with users prioritizing simplicity, lightness, and quick sharing over perfect image quality.
The A57 clocks in around $1,000 (body only), targeting amateurs or enthusiasts seeking full creative control, lens flexibility, and superior image performance.
Choosing between them depends on budget and how seriously you pursue photography.
My Recommendations: Which Should You Buy?
-
For Beginners and Casual Shooters: The WX150 is a neat, no-fuss companion for general photography, travel, and everyday moments. It won’t replace a DSLR in quality, but its small size and simple operation suit casual users or smartphone upgraders.
-
For Enthusiasts and Aspiring Pros: The A57 offers a level of image quality, autofocus prowess, and manual control that will grow with your skills. It’s a highly capable DSLR alternative with interchangeable lenses, excellent battery life, and versatile handling.
-
Street Photography and Travel: If ultimate portability and discreetness matter most, the WX150 wins. However, the A57’s EVF and articulating screen cater better to those willing to carry more gear for enhanced creativity.
-
Sports, Wildlife, and Action: The A57’s phase-detection autofocus and burst shooting rates make it the clear choice for capturing fast movement and wildlife.
-
Portraits and Studio Use: Again, the A57’s lens options and sensor size offer superior bokeh, skin tones, and color depth for professional portraiture.
Final Thoughts: Legacy and Use-Cases Beyond the Spec Sheets
Having used both cameras extensively, I admire Sony’s approach of offering diverse tools addressing different user needs. The WX150 reflects an era of compact cameras aiming for mass appeal and effortless operation, but inherent compromises in sensor size and control remain.
The A57, despite being almost a decade old, remains relevant for photographers valuing quality and handling in a budget-friendly DSLR. Its hybrid SLT design was innovative, and many of its features anticipated modern mirrorless capabilities.
I encourage potential buyers to ask themselves: Do I prioritize convenience and portability, or am I ready to invest in image quality and creative flexibility? Only this reflection will guide you to the right tool.
Thank you for exploring this detailed comparison. I hope my insights from hours of hands-on trials assist in making the best choice for your photographic journey.
If you want more in-depth tests or have questions about workflows, lens choices, or post-processing with these cameras, feel free to reach out!
Article Images:
Sony WX150 vs Sony A57 Specifications
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX150 | Sony SLT-A57 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Sony | Sony |
Model | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX150 | Sony SLT-A57 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2012-02-28 | 2012-09-13 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | BIONZ | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4896 x 3672 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 16000 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 15 |
Cross focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 461k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | ClearPhoto TFT LCD display | Xtra Fine TFT drive with TruBlack technology |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per second | 12.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.70 m | 10.00 m (@ ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 133 gr (0.29 lb) | 618 gr (1.36 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 132 x 98 x 81mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 75 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.0 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 785 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 images | 550 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-BN | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $300 | $1,000 |