Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Samsung WB210
Portability
93 Imaging
36 Features
41 Overall
38
93 Imaging
36 Features
41 Overall
38
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
Canon ELPH 510 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.9) lens
- 206g - 99 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched March 2012
- Alternate Name is IXUS 1100 HS
Samsung WB210
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Samsung WB210 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Canon ELPH 510 HS versus Samsung WB210, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Canon and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the ELPH 510 HS (12MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is relatively close and both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe ELPH 510 HS was brought out 8 months after the WB210 and they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick view of how the ELPH 510 HS grades vs the WB210 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon ELPH 510 HS & Samsung WB210. The entire galleries are available at Canon ELPH 510 HS Gallery & Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 510 HS over the Samsung WB210
| ELPH 510 HS | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | March 2012 |  | July 2011 | More modern by 8 months |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 1k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Canon ELPH 510 HS
| WB210 | ELPH 510 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3.2" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Canon ELPH 510 HS and Samsung WB210
| ELPH 510 HS | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Canon ELPH 510 HS enjoys external measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB210 has measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Analyze the Canon ELPH 510 HS versus Samsung WB210 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at the time. Below is a front view size comparison of the ELPH 510 HS compared to the WB210.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the ELPH 510 HS and WB210 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to envision the gap in sensor sizes merely by looking through a spec sheet. The image below will provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the ELPH 510 HS and WB210.
Clearly, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Samsung WB210 to render greater detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The younger ELPH 510 HS will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon ELPH 510 HS as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung WB210 as a Portrait photography camera
offers face detect autofocus
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
supports face detect focus
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Canon ELPH 510 HS as a Street photography camera
Samsung WB210 as a Street photography camera
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides touch to focus
lighter than competitors in class (206g)
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
image stabilization (Optical)
provides focus via touch
lighter than average in class (174g)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Canon ELPH 510 HS Sports photography details
Samsung WB210 Sports photography details
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers tracking focus
continuous shooting slow (3.0 fps)
no shutter priority
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsTravel Comparison
Canon ELPH 510 HS Travel photography advice
Samsung WB210 Travel photography advice
lighter than competitors in class (206g)
provides touch to focus
has built in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
very long zoom (336mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
lighter than average in class (174g)
provides focus via touch
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
long zoom (288mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Canon ELPH 510 HS Landscape photography factors
Samsung WB210 Landscape photography factors
relatively wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3.2 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
lack of manual exposure
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
focusing manually
pretty wide (24mm)
bigger than average screen (3.5 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
manual mode not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
missing Time Lapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Canon ELPH 510 HS Vlogging highlights
Samsung WB210 Vlogging highlights
relatively wide (28mm)
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors in class (206g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
display isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have mic socket
pretty wide (24mm)
built-in touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect focus
lighter than average in class (174g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing mic port
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon ELPH 510 HS vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Canon ELPH 510 HS | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Samsung |
| Model | Canon ELPH 510 HS | Samsung WB210 |
| Also Known as | IXUS 1100 HS | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2012-03-01 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.9 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.2 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 1k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | PureColor II TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206 gr (0.45 pounds) | 174 gr (0.38 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NB-9L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $200 | $279 |
