Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Kodak M320
96 Imaging
34 Features
33 Overall
33
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Kodak M320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 155g - 87 x 54 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
- Other Name is IXUS 500 HS
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Announced January 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Kodak M320 Overview
Here is a in-depth analysis of the Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Kodak M320, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands Canon and Kodak. The resolution of the ELPH 520 HS (10MP) and the M320 (9MP) is relatively well matched but the ELPH 520 HS (1/2.3") and M320 (1/2.5") provide totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe ELPH 520 HS was revealed 3 years later than the M320 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple summary of how the ELPH 520 HS grades against the M320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Kodak M320 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon ELPH 520 HS and Kodak EasyShare M320. The full galleries are available at Canon ELPH 520 HS Gallery and Kodak M320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 520 HS over the Kodak M320
| ELPH 520 HS | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 37 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Canon ELPH 520 HS
| M320 | ELPH 520 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon ELPH 520 HS and Kodak M320
| ELPH 520 HS | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Canon ELPH 520 HS has exterior dimensions of 87mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Kodak M320 has sizing of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Contrast the Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Kodak M320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the ELPH 520 HS compared to the M320.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the ELPH 520 HS and M320 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizing only by looking at a spec sheet. The visual underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the ELPH 520 HS and M320.
Clearly, both of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The ELPH 520 HS having a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Canon ELPH 520 HS will give extra detail because of its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The fresher ELPH 520 HS is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Kodak M320 Specifications
| Canon ELPH 520 HS | Kodak EasyShare M320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Kodak |
| Model type | Canon ELPH 520 HS | Kodak EasyShare M320 |
| Other name | IXUS 500 HS | - |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2012-01-09 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | DIGIC 5 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 9MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3472 x 2604 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 34-102mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/2.8-5.1 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | PureColor II G TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1400s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.50 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155 gr (0.34 lb) | 155 gr (0.34 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 87 x 54 x 19mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 190 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-9L | KLIC-7001 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $279 | $39 |