Canon 1200D vs Canon 77D: An In-Depth DSLR Comparison for the Discerning Photographer

When diving into DSLR cameras, especially those aiming for versatility at approachable price points, Canon’s 1200D and 77D often emerge as compelling contenders. Both hail from Canon’s popular APS-C lineups but represent significantly different stages in technology and design philosophy. Drawing on hands-on experience from extensive field testing and technical benchmarks accumulated over years, I want to take you through an authoritative, no-nonsense comparison of these two models to help you decide which suits your style and workflow best.

Let’s dissect these cameras through the lenses of sensor tech, ergonomics, autofocus performance, image quality, and their capacities across various photographic disciplines from portraits to astrophotography. Along the way, I’ll pepper in practical insights and real-world anecdotes from my numerous shoots with them.

Getting a Feel: Size, Handling, and Ergonomics

First impressions are lasting, and the tactile experience can make or break an enthusiastic photography session. Canon’s DSLR lineage is known for its comfortable handling, but the 1200D and 77D bring different approaches driven by their release years and market positioning.

Starting with dimensions, the Canon 1200D is a compact SLR measuring 130x100x78 mm and weighing 480 grams, making it relatively light and a manageable entry-level DSLR. The 77D, although only slightly bigger at 131x100x76 mm and 540 grams, feels noticeably more substantial in the hand thanks to its denser build and refined grip contours. While neither achieves the weather-sealing toughness of professional bodies, the 77D’s plastic and metal composite provide better durability and a reassuring heft.

The 1200D’s design prioritizes simplicity - ideal for novices easing into DSLR territory. Physical controls are minimal and straightforward, which reduces intimidation but sacrifices some speed of access. In contrast, the 77D features more comprehensive control placement - aided by a top status LCD panel unique in this class - and a refined grip that folds nicely under fingers for extended handheld shoots.

This additional control real estate on the 77D allows quicker adjustments on the fly, such as ISO, white balance, and shooting modes, elevating its appeal to enthusiasts who demand more manual control without plunging into full pro-level gear. The 1200D’s controls, though clear, require more menu diving, which slows down shooting pace and may frustrate users stepping up from smartphones or mirrorless cameras instantly familiar with touch-based interfaces.

Speaking of which, the 77D embraces a fully articulating touchscreen - a feature that opens creative shooting angles and interactive focus selection. The 1200D’s 3-inch fixed LCD, with only 460k dots resolution, pales in comparison to the 77D’s 1040k-dot, fully articulated screen with touch response. This difference is substantial in live-view mode and video shooting, where flexibility and screen clarity significantly impact composition and focus precision.

Under the Hood: Sensor and Image Quality Analysis

Both cameras sport Canon’s venerable APS-C sensors measuring 22.3 x 14.9 mm, but the similarities largely end there.

The 1200D houses an 18-megapixel CMOS sensor powered by the older DIGIC 4 processor. While respectable during its 2014 debut, it’s now somewhat dated. The resulting files offer decent resolution up to 5184 x 3456 pixels but are limited by modest dynamic range (~11.3 EV) and color depth (21.9 bits). The max ISO tops at 6400 (expandable to 12800), but noise tends to be intrusive beyond ISO 1600.

By contrast, the Canon 77D introduces a newer 24.2-megapixel sensor plus the more advanced DIGIC 7 image processor. This leads to a substantial uplift in image quality metrics - including improved dynamic range at 13.3 EV and superior color depth at 23.6 bits per channel. The native ISO range extends to 25600 (boostable to 51200), and the noise performance at high ISOs is appreciably cleaner.

From pixel-peeping landscapes to low-light events, the 77D’s sensor delivers more latitude and finer gradation in shadows. It also benefits from better micro-contrast, helping textures pop in portraits and nature scenes alike. Meanwhile, the 1200D still admirably captures sharp daylight images but struggles under challenging lighting or when heavily post-processed.

Autofocus: A Marked Leap Forward

Autofocus (AF) is often a dealbreaker when it comes to DSLR usability, especially for action, wildlife, and street photographers who need quick, decisive focus acquisition.

Here, the 77D clearly outperforms the humble 9-point AF system on the 1200D with its advanced 45-point all cross-type AF system. With more focus points spread across the frame, the 77D offers precise tracking, especially combined with Canon’s Dual Pixel CMOS AF technology during live view. The 77D also supports continuous AF (AF-C), face detection, and subject tracking modes - features well beyond the 1200D’s limited live view contrast-detect AF.

This technical leap translates into real-world confidence: for example, wildlife photographers told me that the 77D locks on fast-moving birds reliably, while the 1200D struggles to maintain sharp focus unless the subject is relatively static or framed dead center.

Even in challenging sports scenarios, the ability to track passing players with better AF coverage enhances keeper rates. While 3 fps burst on the 1200D is adequate for casual shooting, the 77D doubles that at 6 fps, further bolstering its candid shooting credentials.

Versatility Across Photography Genres

Let’s traverse the most popular photographic genres and map out how each camera fares.

Portrait Photography

Skin tone rendition benefits greatly from sensor and processor quality. The 77D’s richer color depth and dynamic range yield smoother gradations in skin hues and better handling of highlight clipping on cheeks or foreheads in bright conditions.

Moreover, the 77D’s wider and more sensitive AF points improve eye detection in live view, a boon when shooting wide aperture lenses to maximize bokeh. The 1200D performs adequately for portraits but requires more deliberate focusing technique to get crisp eyes, and the limited AF coverage means recomposing focus after lock.

The 77D’s articulated touch screen aids framing shots in tricky angles or on tripods, while the 1200D’s fixed screen feels restrictive.

Landscape Photography

For landscapes, dynamic range and resolution reign supreme. Here, the 77D shines with its 24-megapixel sensor and extended ISO latitude, allowing fine detail capture and recovery of shadows in post.

Neither camera comes with weather sealing, so outdoor enthusiasts must be cautious with their gear under adverse conditions. Battery longevity, however, favors the 77D’s 600 shots per charge over the 1200D’s 500, useful for extended wilderness shoots.

Wildlife Photography

As touched on earlier, autofocus speed and accuracy make a meaningful difference here. The 77D’s sophisticated 45-point AF system and faster burst rates outperform the 1200D significantly. However, both rely on third-party telephoto lenses for optimal reach.

Another limitation is the lack of in-body stabilization on either, making lens-based IS essential for handheld wildlife photography.

Sports Photography

The 77D’s 6 fps and AF tracking capabilities afford an edge in capturing decisive sporting moments compared to the 1200D’s slower 3 fps and basic AF. Low-light ISO gains also favor the 77D in dusk or indoor arenas.

Street Photography

Portability and discretion are prized in street photography. The 1200D’s lighter weight and smaller footprint make it less intimidating and more pocketable, though it lacks silent shooting and quick autofocus. The 77D’s bigger size could draw more attention but compensates with better low-light capability and faster AF, crucial for spontaneous moments.

Macro Photography

While neither camera specializes in macro, the 77D’s better live view focus aids and articulated touchscreen help nail critical focus when using extension tubes or macro lenses. The 1200D’s fixed screen requires more guesswork or tethered shooting assistance.

Night and Astro Photography

This specialty relies heavily on high ISO performance and long exposure capabilities. The 77D’s cleaner noise profile and extended ISO range provide usability in darker skies with manageable post-processing noise.

The 1200D can deliver usable images at night but requires lower ISO settings and longer tripod exposures, limiting flexibility.

Video Capabilities

Video shooters will find the 77D superior with full HD recording at 60p 60 Mbps, enabling smoother motion capture. It also features a microphone input for better audio quality.

The 1200D is limited to 30p at lower bitrates and lacks external audio support - enough for casual video but not for serious filmmaking.

Both cameras have HDMI outputs and USB 2.0, but the 77D’s built-in wireless and Bluetooth add a layer of convenience for remote shooting and image transfers.

Travel Photography

Evaluating the package holistically, the 1200D’s lighter weight and simplicity make it a less intimidating travel companion for beginners, especially when paired with compact lenses.

However, for travelers prioritizing image quality and versatility, the 77D’s improved sensor, dynamic controls, articulating screen, and wireless features justify the marginal bump in weight and complexity.

Professional Use

Neither camera targets pro demands like weather sealing or advanced tethering protocols, but the 77D’s raw file quality, autofocus sophistication, and exposure control offer an entry-level DSLR for semi-pro shoots. The 1200D serves more as a learning tool or casual backup.

Durability, Connectivity, and Storage

Both cameras rely on SD/SDHC/SDXC cards with a single slot. Storage speed hasn’t improved wildly, but the 77D supports UHS-I cards, potentially speeding data transfer.

Neither body is sealed against dust or moisture, so photographers should invest in protective bags and lens coatings if shooting outdoors often.

Connectivity is where the 77D pulls significantly ahead. It offers built-in Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and NFC for quick image sharing or remote operation via Canon’s mobile apps - which the 1200D lacks entirely.

Battery life favors the 77D with approximately 600 shots per charge (CIPA standardized), compared to 1200D’s 500 shots.

Image Gallery and Sample Shots

I tested both cameras with the Canon 50mm f/1.8 STM lens under controlled and natural conditions. I aimed to capture portraits, landscapes, and street scenes for practical comparison.

Canon 1200D screen back Canon 77D front Canon 77D screen back

The 77D consistently rendered images with richer tones and finer shadow detail, especially in challenging high-contrast scenes. The 1200D images, while respectable, tend toward flatter and less vibrant presentations requiring heavier post-processing.

Summary Scores and Performance Ratings

The latest DxOMark scores summarize the differences succinctly:

The 77D’s 78 overall score versus 1200D’s 63 highlights superior sensor specs and processing.

Genre-Specific Strengths and Weaknesses

Breaking down performance by photography category further clarifies choices.

The 77D leads in nearly all categories with particular excellence in sports, wildlife, and video. The 1200D remains relevant on a budget for casual portraits and landscape beginners.

Who Should Buy Which Camera?

Choose the Canon 1200D If:

• You’re a beginner photographer entering the DSLR world.
• You need a simple, lightweight camera without overwhelming controls.
• Budget constraints are strict (used prices are very attractive).
• Video is a minor consideration, and you shoot mostly in good light.

Choose the Canon 77D If:

• You want a versatile, enthusiast-grade DSLR with better image quality.
• You shoot action, wildlife, or events demanding fast, reliable AF.
• Video is important, with 60p HD and external mic support.
• You value wireless features for instant sharing or remote control.
• You’re seeking a long-term upgrade path with better manual control and interface.

Final Thoughts

Testing both cameras side by side reveals the natural evolution of DSLR technology within Canon’s APS-C ecosystem. The 1200D is a solid, straightforward camera fulfilling the role of a budget-friendly gateway. Meanwhile, the 77D steps firmly into the enthusiast space, offering a well-rounded, capable package that anticipates the needs of more demanding users while maintaining user-friendly touches.

Neither is without compromise - the 77D’s lack of weather sealing or 4K video might disappoint tech aficionados, and the 1200D’s dated sensor and limited AF restrict its appeal beyond beginners. But within their respective niches, these cameras shine.

If you’re weighing buying new from a retailer or diving into the used market, allow your photographic ambitions to guide you. For photographers craving sharper images, greater flexibility, and more creative control, the Canon 77D is hard to beat. But for those prioritizing ease of use and a wallet-friendly entry, the Canon 1200D remains a worthy choice.

I hope this comprehensive comparison helps you navigate your next camera purchase with confidence. If you have questions or need further angle-specific advice, feel free to reach out - I’m always eager to share insights from the trenches.