Canon 1D X III vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C
50 Imaging
73 Features
85 Overall
77


60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
Canon 1D X III vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 102400 (Raise to 819200)
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 5472 x 2886 video
- Canon EF Mount
- 1440g - 158 x 168 x 83mm
- Released January 2020
- Replaced the Canon 1D X II
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Launched June 2019
- Replaced the Hasselblad X1D
- Refreshed by Hasselblad X2D

Canon 1D X III vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Canon 1D X III vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C, former is a Pro DSLR while the other is a Pro Mirrorless by rivals Canon and Hasselblad. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the 1D X III (20MP) and X1D II 50C (51MP) and the 1D X III (Full frame) and X1D II 50C (Medium format) come with different sensor dimensions.

The 1D X III was unveiled 7 months after the X1D II 50C and they are of a similar age. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Canon 1D X III being a Large SLR camera and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple summary of how the 1D X III scores against the X1D II 50C in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Canon 1D X III vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon EOS-1D X Mark III & Hasselblad X1D II 50C. The full galleries are viewable at Canon 1D X III Gallery & Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon 1D X III over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
1D X III | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2020 | ![]() | June 2019 | Newer by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Canon 1D X III
X1D II 50C | 1D X III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3.60" | ![]() | 3.2" | Larger display (+0.4") |
Display resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 2100k | Crisper display (+260k dot) |
Common features in the Canon 1D X III and Hasselblad X1D II 50C
1D X III | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Canon 1D X III vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Canon 1D X III has physical measurements of 158mm x 168mm x 83mm (6.2" x 6.6" x 3.3") having a weight of 1440 grams (3.17 lbs) whilst the Hasselblad X1D II 50C has measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs).
Contrast the Canon 1D X III vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the 1D X III compared to the X1D II 50C.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the 1D X III and X1D II 50C is 50 and 60 respectively.

Canon 1D X III vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by seeing specifications. The image below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the 1D X III and X1D II 50C.
To sum up, each of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The 1D X III using its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field harder and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will provide greater detail having an extra 31 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos far more aggressively. The newer 1D X III should have an edge in sensor technology.

Canon 1D X III vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Canon 1D X III vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Specifications
Canon EOS-1D X Mark III | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Hasselblad |
Model | Canon EOS-1D X Mark III | Hasselblad X1D II 50C |
Category | Pro DSLR | Pro Mirrorless |
Released | 2020-01-07 | 2019-06-19 |
Body design | Large SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Digic X | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Medium format |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 44 x 33mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 1,452.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 51 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1 and 4:3 |
Max resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 8272 x 6200 |
Max native ISO | 102400 | 25600 |
Max enhanced ISO | 819200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 50 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 191 | 117 |
Cross focus points | 155 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Canon EF | Hasselblad X |
Total lenses | 250 | 13 |
Crop factor | 1 | 0.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3.2 inch | 3.60 inch |
Resolution of display | 2,100k dot | 2,360k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 3,690k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.76x | 0.87x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/10000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 20.0fps | 2.7fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/2000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 5472 X 2886 (60p, 30p, 25p, 24p, 23.98p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 50p, 25p, 24p, 23.98p) | 2720 x 1530 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 5472x2886 | 2720x1530 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 1440 gr (3.17 lb) | 725 gr (1.60 lb) |
Dimensions | 158 x 168 x 83mm (6.2" x 6.6" x 3.3") | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 102 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 26.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 4489 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 2850 images | - |
Battery form | Built-in | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual CFexpress type B | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Storage slots | Two | Two |
Price at release | $6,499 | $5,750 |