Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86e58/86e58dbdc1df53889f3e4aef4918a9ae36fe6ab0" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ front Olympus SP-800 UZ front"
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Launched May 2013
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Raise to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Launched February 2010
- Replacement is Olympus SP-810 UZ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus SP-800 UZ, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both offered by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-PM2 (16MP) and the SP-800 UZ (14MP) is fairly similar but the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-PM2 was manufactured 3 years after the SP-800 UZ which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the E-PM2 grades against the SP-800 UZ with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Olympus SP-800 UZ. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
E-PM2 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2013 | ![]() | February 2010 | Newer by 41 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Olympus E-PM2
SP-800 UZ | E-PM2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus SP-800 UZ
E-PM2 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-PM2 comes with outer measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-800 UZ has specifications of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") and a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus SP-800 UZ in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the E-PM2 vs the SP-800 UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bdb1/1bdb147fa97681ff6a9e31b3b6c1d5054187034f" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PM2 and SP-800 UZ is 89 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/56d39/56d397808a8c9620a2bd7a1b324a337e8839bc11" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to see the difference between sensor dimensions purely by going over specifications. The pic below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PM2 and SP-800 UZ.
To sum up, both cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-PM2 featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-PM2 will offer more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images far more aggressively. The more recent E-PM2 will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a691/0a69166b708604cc293c51e5834710df056c94b2" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/673ab/673abd996d7b14b4da4e4bee8d8646fb66772154" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus SP-800 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus SP-800 UZ |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2013-05-21 | 2010-02-02 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 1000 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 12 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 3.10 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 269 grams (0.59 lb) | 455 grams (1.00 lb) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photographs | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $448 | $270 |