Canon 1Ds Mark II vs Canon EOS R8: An Expert’s Hands-On Comparison in 2024

Choosing between a legendary pro DSLR from the mid-2000s and a cutting-edge mirrorless marvel of 2023 may seem like comparing apples and oranges. But nestled within these two cameras - Canon’s EOS-1Ds Mark II and the EOS R8 - are features and performance traits that yield fascinating insights about the pace of camera evolution and what really matters to photographers today. Having personally tested thousands of cameras over 15 years, I’m here to guide you through this head-to-head comparison with clarity, technical depth, and practical advice so you can pick the right tool for your imaging ambitions.

Before we dig in, let’s set the scene visually and ergonomically:

Size, Build, and Handling: Old School Bulk vs. Modern Compact

There’s no denying the Canon 1Ds Mark II makes a statement with its beefy build. Weighing in at 1,565 grams and measuring 156x158x80 mm, it’s a giant of a DSLR designed for professionals accustomed to rugged reliability and a BIG grip for those clubs-for-thumbs photographers with larger hands or who rock heavy telephotos.

Contrast that with the sleek, light-as-a-feather (by comparison) Canon EOS R8 mirrorless at 461 grams and 133x86x70 mm. This camera fits comfortably in one hand and slips easily into a modest-day bag or travel pack - a godsend if you’re juggling lenses or hopping on a plane.

The R8’s fully articulated 3” touchscreen (1620k dots) makes framing and reviewing shots intuitive and flexible, a far cry from the 2” fixed, lower-resolution 230k-dot LCD display on the 1Ds Mark II. Also, the R8’s electronic OLED viewfinder at 2360k dots and 0.76x magnification offers a crisp framing experience compared to the 1Ds Mark II’s pentaprism optical viewfinder with 0.7x magnification.

While the 1Ds Mark II’s control layout is classic Canon DSLR territory (bulky buttons, dedicated dials, no touchscreen), the R8 offers a modern blend of tactile dials and touchscreen controls - streamlining the user interface for both veterans and novices alike.

Build and weather-sealing? Both cameras hold up well under daily pro use, with some form of environmental sealing. However, the 1Ds Mark II’s bulk offers a tactile sense of durability, while the R8 relies on modern materials to protect its more compact body.

Sensor and Image Quality: Bringing It Home with Resolution and Dynamic Range

Sensor tech is where the two diverge significantly given the nearly two decades between launches.

• Canon 1Ds Mark II: 17 MP Full Frame CMOS sensor (36x24 mm), native ISO 100-3200.
• Canon EOS R8: 24 MP Full Frame CMOS sensor (36x24 mm), native ISO 100-102,400, expandable to 204,800.

While 17 megapixels may seem laughably low nowadays, the 1Ds Mark II was revolutionary in its era, delivering crisp 4992x3328 images with notable color depth and tonal gradation. According to DxOMark, it scores 23.3 bits color depth and 11.3 EV dynamic range - respectable and still serviceable for print and studio work if you want that classic digital look.

The R8 is a beast in comparison with 24 MP resolution at 6000x4000 pixels and scores an impressive 24.5 bits color depth and 14.5 EV dynamic range. This translates to richer image data for shadows and highlights, giving you better HDR latitude especially for contrast-heavy scenes like landscapes.

On the ISO front, the R8’s sensor thrives in low light, boasting a DxO low-light ISO score of 3295 versus the 1Ds Mark II’s 1480. Evening events, astrophotos, and indoor sports shoots benefit hugely here.

Sampling some side-by-side image pairs clearly shows the R8’s sharper details, less noise at higher ISOs, and more vibrant color palette.

Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Precision and Speed for Modern Demands

The autofocus system reveals the biggest leaps in technology.

• Canon 1Ds Mark II: 45 autofocus points, all phase-detection, no live view AF, no face or eye detection. Continuous shooting at 4 fps.
• Canon EOS R8: An astounding 1053 AF points with dual-pixel CMOS AF II, face and eye detection for humans and animals, live view AF, continuous 6 fps mechanical shutter, and 40 fps silent electronic shutter burst mode.

This reveals the stark reality: If you’re shooting wildlife, sports, or fast-moving subjects, the R8 demolishes the 1Ds Mark II. Its AI-driven focus tracking and massive AF point coverage practically guarantee keepers in fast action.

Even for portrait work, the R8’s eye detection works wonders when locking tight focus on irises, a crucial advantage over the 1Ds Mark II’s manual AF and limited point arrangement.

Image Stabilization and Video: The R8’s Modern Edge

Neither camera sports in-body stabilization, though the R8 can take advantage of lens-based IS with RF lenses.

On videography, the gap is vast:

• The 1Ds Mark II has no video capabilities - it’s purely a stills camera.
• The R8 shoots 4K at up to 60p, with advanced codec support (H.264, H.265), slow motion Full HD at 120p, and professional audio inputs including mic and headphone jacks.

For content creators and hybrid shooters, the R8 is a no-brainer, seamlessly integrating pro-level stills and robust video in one package.

Real-World Tests Across Photography Genres

Let me walk you through how each camera performs across key use cases, based on rigorous, hands-on field tests and lab evaluations.

Portrait Photography

• 1Ds Mark II: Its 17 MP sensor delivers beautiful skin tones and supplies physically pleasing bokeh thanks to Canon EF prime lenses. However, focusing demands more skill and patience - no face or eye detect AF means manually choosing ops.
• R8: Face and eye tracking is fast and reliable, and the higher resolution sensor subtly enhances detail and skin texture rendition. Articulated screen eases creative angles and vlogging-style work.

Verdict: For portrait pros wanting ultimate control or larger prints, the 1Ds Mark II still serves. For everyday portraiture with speed, ease, and some video, the R8 outclasses it.

Landscape Photography

• 1Ds Mark II: Its dynamic range and resolution hold up well; plus, its solid weather-sealed body reassures in misty or windy conditions. The limited ISO range isn’t an issue in well-lit landscapes.
• R8: Superior dynamic range lets shadows and highlights breathe. Compact build and versatile aspect ratios (1:1, 4:3, 3:2, 16:9) enhance composition variety.

Verdict: The R8 edges out due to versatility and dynamic range, but both cameras can produce breathtaking landscapes.

Wildlife Photography

• 1Ds Mark II: 4 fps and modest AF number are outdated. Tracking small animals in the bush would be a chore.
• R8: Eye AF for animals enables sharp focus on birds and mammals. 40 fps silent shooting lets you capture bursts without disturbing subjects.

Verdict: No contest - the R8 wins outright here.

Sports Photography

• Same as wildlife: the R8’s faster burst and AF tracking far surpass the 1Ds Mark II.

Street Photography

• 1Ds Mark II: Large size and weight plus noisier shutter make it less discreet.
• R8: Compactness, near-silent electronic shutter, and effective low-light ISO make it perfect for candid street shots.

Macro Photography

• Neither has specific macro perks, but the 1Ds Mark II’s classic lenses pair well if you have dedicated macro optics.
• The R8 benefits from enhanced live view magnification and focus peaking for critical manual focus.

Night and Astrophotography

• The R8’s high native and expanded ISO range plus dynamic range wins hands down here.
• The 1Ds Mark II can manage long exposures but comes with more noise and limited high ISO usability.

Video Capabilities

As mentioned, the 1Ds Mark II offers none, whereas the R8 is a serious contender for hybrid imaging - 4K 60p with good rolling shutter control and mic/headphone jacks for monitoring.

Travel Photography

• The R8’s compact size and lower weight, plus battery life around 290 shots, rival many prosumer cameras, making it ideal for travel.
• The 1Ds Mark II is a bulkier companion, better for planned shoots than backpacking trips.

Professional Workflows

• The 1Ds Mark II supports CF and SD cards with dual slots, shoots robust RAW files compatible with professional workflows, yet uses older USB 1.0.
• The R8 supports UHS-II SD cards (single slot) and modern USB 3.2 Gen 2 for fast file transfer and tethering.

User Interface and Workflow

The 1Ds Mark II feels like an old-school manual typewriter compared to the touchscreen-empowered, custom-button-friendly R8. Custom white balances, exposure bracketing, and multimode metering are all more flexible on the R8 with upgraded meters and processing.

Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility

• The 1Ds Mark II uses Canon EF mount lenses, with 250+ options - a mature ecosystem of classic primes and pro zooms.
• The R8 uses the newer Canon RF mount, currently with 37 native lenses but compatible with EF lenses via adapter (albeit bulkier). RF lenses offer optical improvements and electronic advantages.

If you have a vast EF glass collection, the 1Ds Mark II maximizes native compatibility. Newbies or RF lens owners will appreciate the R8’s focus on innovation.

Storage, Connectivity, and Battery Life

• The 1Ds Mark II uses dual CompactFlash or SD cards, a pro-level redundancy feature.
• The R8 has a single UHS-II SD slot but adds Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, HDMI, and much faster USB 3.2 connection.

Battery life heavily favors the 1Ds Mark II traditionally, but modern R8 batteries with 290 shot capacity (CIPA) are fairly standard for mirrorless, and spare batteries are affordable and small.

Overall Performance Ratings Summary

Here’s how both cameras rate side by side on DxOMark’s comprehensive testing factors and other lab benchmarks:

Additionally, when broken down by photographic genres:

Sample Images from Both Cameras

Let’s appreciate the direct visual side-by-side samples, showcasing portraits, landscapes, and wildlife - all highlighting the expected generational leap.

Canon 1Ds MII screen back Canon R8 front Canon R8 screen back

Pros and Cons Quick Summary

Canon 1Ds Mark II

Pros:

• Robust pro build with environmental sealing
• Classic full-frame 17 MP sensor with pleasing color depth
• Compatible with vast EF lens collection
• Dual storage slots for data redundancy
• Timeless DSLR reliability and ergonomics for studio/still shooting

Cons:

• Bulky and heavy for travel/street
• No video or live view AF
• Lower resolution and dynamic range vs modern standards
• Slower autofocus and burst speeds
• Antiquated connectivity (USB 1.0)
• Expensive considering age and competition

Canon EOS R8

Pros:

• Compact, lightweight body with pro-grade weather sealing
• 24 MP sensor with excellent dynamic range and high ISO performance
• Outstanding autofocus with face/eye/animal detection
• Hybrid stills and 4K video in a pocketable form factor
• Modern connectivity: Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, USB 3.2, HDMI
• User-friendly fully articulating touchscreen
• More affordable (~$1500) than many prosumer cameras

Cons:

• Single card slot (no backup slot)
• Smaller native lens ecosystem but expanding RF lineup
• Battery life moderate (typical mirrorless)
• Limited mechanical shutter burst speed compared to flagship sports cameras

Final Thoughts: Which Camera Fits Your Needs Today?

I appreciate why many pros held the Canon 1Ds Mark II in high regard - it was a trailblazer in its time. However, as a practical tool today, it feels more like a retro piece or a backup camera for classic Canon shooters deeply invested in EF lenses and DSLR ergonomics.

The Canon EOS R8, on the other hand, represents the current state of the art in a remarkably compact package, offering versatility, speed, and image quality to suit almost all photography styles from portraits and landscapes to wildlife and vlogging. Its accessible price for an advanced full-frame mirrorless makes it a compelling choice for enthusiasts stepping up or professionals looking for a lightweight second body.

If you’re a studio pro who shoots primarily stills with legacy EF glass and values robust build, the 1Ds Mark II still delivers respectable image quality. But for 99% of photographers and content creators in 2024, the R8 steals the show from every angle: modern sensor, snappy autofocus, rich video features, and user-friendly handling - without breaking the bank.

My Buy Recommendation at a Glance:

Wrapping Up

At the intersection of legacy and innovation, the Canon 1Ds Mark II and EOS R8 provide stunning contrasts. Having put both cameras through their paces in studio, nature, and street settings, my advice is straightforward: go with the EOS R8 unless you have a very specific vintage DSLR niche or EF glass collection that you don’t want to leave behind. The R8 gives you far more confidence, speed, and creative freedom in almost all practical shooting scenarios.

Let me know in the comments what you’d pick and why - I’m always up for a good camera gear debate!

Happy shooting, friends!

END