Canon 20D vs Pentax K-30
59 Imaging
45 Features
39 Overall
42


63 Imaging
57 Features
66 Overall
60
Canon 20D vs Pentax K-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 650g - 130 x 97 x 71mm
- Launched October 2012
- Refreshed by Pentax K-50

Canon 20D vs Pentax K-30: A Hands-On Comparison for Enthusiasts and Pros
Picking a camera is rarely straightforward, especially when you’re weighing two shooters separated by nearly a decade, each with its own strengths and quirks. Today, I’m diving deep into the Canon EOS 20D (2004) and the Pentax K-30 (2012) - both mid-size DSLRs that still hold relevance for enthusiasts and budget-conscious pros. I’ve put these two through their paces, testing everything from autofocus nitpicks to sensor performance and ergonomics, so you get the full story on how they stack up in today’s diverse photography genres.
Let’s get started digging into what makes these cameras tick, where they shine, and crucially, where compromises creep in. I’ll also pepper in practical takeaways to help you pick the camera that meshes best with your photography style and wallet.
First Impressions: Size, Weight, and Handling
If you’re someone who enjoys cradling a camera that feels like an extension of your hands, this side-by-side is eye-opening.
The Canon 20D is a bit chunkier and heavier at 770g compared to the Pentax K-30’s 650g. Its dimensions (144x106x72 mm) give it a commanding grip, but it also means it occupies more real estate in your bag. Notably, it features a pronounced handgrip that many pros favor during extended shoots, especially with heavy lenses. This heft feels solid - it’s a classic DSLR club for those thumbs.
Conversely, the Pentax K-30 comes in noticeably more compact (130x97x71 mm) and lighter. That 120-gram savings doesn’t sound like much, but over a full day of shooting - say when hiking in landscapes or strolling for street photography - it matters. The K-30’s more restrained ergonomics are well thought out, though the grip is less bulbous, and some may find it a bit less “sticky” when pairing with larger telephoto lenses without an added grip.
Both models lack mirrorless-style compactness, but for DSLRs, their sizes are fairly standard for their generation. If portability is a priority, K-30 nudges ahead here without sacrificing too much control comfort.
Controls and User Interface: The Buttons You Use Most
Let’s flip these cameras on and see how they talk back to you during shooting.
The Canon 20D leans heavily on simplicity, with fewer dedicated buttons but solid exposure dial controls. It incorporates the usual exposure modes like Shutter Priority (Tv) and Aperture Priority (Av), but with no manual exposure mode - which may feel restrictive for those who like spearheading every setting. Its top LCD is a nice legacy bonus, showing key exposure data at a glance.
The Pentax K-30 steps up that control game with every major exposure mode: shutter priority, aperture priority, and full manual. You get better exposure compensation control and versatile flash modes, including slow sync and trailing curtain flash - useful for creative lighting. The K-30’s lack of illuminated buttons - all control labels are traditional - means low-light button hunting can be a challenge, though it features a brighter LCD screen (3” with 921k dots vs Canon’s 1.8” fixed, 118k dots). The back screen makes reviewing images a way better experience, which is no small deal for traveling or teaching gear.
These control differences come down to shooter goals: if you want more manual flexibility and toggles on the fly, the K-30 feels more modern and responsive; if you prefer fewer distractions and a straightforward shooting flow, the 20D’s controls aren’t shabby.
Sensor Technology: The Heart of Image Quality
Let’s talk pixels and quality because that’s where cameras earn their keep.
Canon’s 20D packs an APS-C sized 8 megapixel CMOS sensor (22.5x15 mm). Back in 2004, that was impressive and produced clean images by day, but ISO sensitivity tops out at 1600 (expandable to 3200 with noise compromises). Its DxOMark overall score clocks in at 62, with color depth of 21.9 bits and dynamic range at 11 stops - not bad but showing its age, especially in shadow detail or when pushing exposure correction.
In contrast, the Pentax K-30’s sensor is a more contemporary 16MP APS-C CMOS (23.7x15.7 mm), yielding higher spatial resolution (4928x3264 max size) and a slightly larger sensor surface area, which helps with subtle tonal gradations. The K-30’s sensor supports native ISO 100-12800 (expandable to 25600), giving you much more latitude for high-ISO shooting. DxOMark gives it a 79 overall score, with color depth at 23.7 bits and a dynamic range bump to 13 stops - distinctly better for landscape photographers and those needing rich RAW files.
In practical terms:
-
For portraits, Canon’s lower megapixel count means less crop or poster-size print ability but still respectable skin tones given the age of its sensor.
-
For landscape buffs, the Pentax’s dynamic range and resolution deliver richer files capable of heavy edits.
-
Night or astro shooters will appreciate Pentax’s better low-light ISO handling.
One caveat: both cameras incorporate an anti-aliasing filter, slightly softening images to avoid moiré, but this can reduce ultimate pixel-level sharpness.
Autofocus Systems: Lock and Load
Autofocus is often make-or-break, especially when timing is everything.
The Canon 20D sports a 9-point phase-detection autofocus system but lacks cross-type designation, which means its AF points respond mostly along one directional plane. It has single and continuous AF modes but no advanced tracking or face detection features. This is enough for casual shooting including portraits and landscapes, but you’ll struggle in complex fast-moving subjects - think wildlife or sports.
Pentax boldly pushes the envelope with its 11-point AF system, including 9 cross-type sensors, plus center point sensitivity for better precision. The K-30 supports continuous AF tracking and face detection in live view mode (a feature absent in the Canon). This translates to more reliable focus acquisition when shooting kids, sports, or unpredictable critters.
Shooting bursts, the K-30 pulls ahead with 6 fps versus Canon’s 5 fps, and faster shutter speed options (max 6000 vs 8000 shutter speed on 20D, though the latter has a marginal advantage here).
In real-world testing, the Pentax delivered more confidence in autofocus accuracy and speed across various lighting, owing to its hybrid focus approach (phase and contrast detection in live view).
Durability and Weather Sealing
Tough gear matters to pros and rugged travelers.
The Canon 20D, at launch, boasted solid build quality but lacks environmental sealing. No dust, moisture, or freezeproof assurances here, so extra caution is needed in punishing conditions.
The Pentax K-30, meanwhile, is weather-sealed, designed for moderate dust and moisture resistance - a major plus when shooting landscapes, adventure, or travel photography. This body protection aligns well with Pentax’s tradition of rugged cameras, a selling point especially when shooting off the beaten path.
Viewing and Image Review Experience
The Canon 20D features a traditional optical pentaprism viewfinder with 95% coverage and 0.56x magnification. Not the brightest or most accurate for framing but typical for DSLRs of its time.
The Pentax K-30 offers a 100% viewfinder coverage and slight bump in magnification (0.61x), providing more faithful framing - which means fewer surprises in composition.
The K-30’s rear LCD is huge leap compared to the 20D’s tiny 1.8” low-res screen. With 921k dot resolution, bright TFT tech, and anti-reflective coatings, reviewing images in the field or adjusting settings is easier and faster.
Lens Ecosystem: What Glass Can You Mount?
Long-term value often hinges on compatible lenses.
Canon’s 20D uses the venerable Canon EF and EF-S mount, giving access to hundreds of lenses - from affordable third-party primes to professional L-series zooms. The ecosystem is mature and broadest in the DSLR world. The 1.6x crop factor means lenses act a little “longer" than their native focal lengths, great for wildlife or sports telephoto reach.
Pentax’s K-30 relies on the Pentax KAF2 mount, supporting modern autofocus lenses and older manual focus glass. Its 1.5x crop factor is closer to true focal length, a nuance that matters for tight compositions. Pentax lenses are generally more limited in number (around 151 modern AF lenses by launch), but the build quality is great, often weather-sealed, and the brand supports adapters well for legacy optics.
If you already possess a system investment, this is a huge factor.
Video and Live View Capabilities
One clear modern advantage for the Pentax K-30 is its live view function and video recording.
-
The 20D has no video and no live view - it’s strictly a stills camera.
-
The K-30 supports full HD (1920x1080) video at 30 fps, and a variety of resolutions down to 640x424, plus live view for easier focus in tricky shooting angles.
Neither camera sports microphone or headphone jacks for audio control, so video work here is somewhat amateur level. Still, the Pentax’s inclusion of video and live view is a meaningful edge for vloggers or casual content creators.
Battery Life and Storage
Battery life can easily be overlooked but greatly affects shooting.
Pentax’s battery pack (D-LI109) and the option to power from 4 x AA batteries offer flexibility in the field, with around 410 shots per charge - respectable for an APS-C DSLR. The Canon’s battery data is less documented but typically, DSLRs from that era offer similar shot counts (approx 400-500). Given Canon’s age and battery type, users often find lenses influence their endurance more.
For storage:
-
Canon 20D relies on Compact Flash cards (Type I or II), older but still reliable media that may require extra adapters and new cards can be pricey.
-
Pentax K-30 opts for the more ubiquitous SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, easier to source, cheaper, and faster in newer variants.
Storage-wise, K-30 is more convenient for today’s users.
Real-World Use Across Photography Genres
Having bench tested these cameras over weeks with subject variety, here’s what to expect:
Portrait Photography
The 20D’s lower resolution and less sophisticated AF mean flattering but less detailed portraits than the K-30’s 16MP sensor and face detection AF. Canon skin tones remain pleasant, though dynamic range limits shadow recovery. K-30’s image stabilization - sensor-based - helps keep handheld shots sharper, better bokeh from higher resolution glass, and superior focusing on eyes.
Landscape Photography
Pentax dominates here with enhanced dynamic range, resolution, and durable build. Weather sealing means you can shoot comfortably in rain or dust. The extra resolution allows large prints without pixelation. Canon’s color depth is respectable but shadows tend to clip more often.
Wildlife Photography
Pentax’s faster AF system with more cross-type points and slightly higher fps burst stands out. The 1.6x crop factor of Canon’s 20D slightly extends reach but focusing lag and less refined tracking remove some advantage. Pentax’s stabilization and weather sealing also help in the field.
Sports Photography
Similar story to wildlife. Canon is the older runner here; its AF struggles with tracking fast subjects. Pentax’s continuous AF and tracking improve keeper rates. Faster continuous shooting aids action bursts, but neither offers pro-grade sports speeds found in newer cameras.
Street Photography
Despite its age, Canon’s larger build could be a drawback for street shooters wanting discretion. The Pentax K-30’s lighter frame and quieter shutter make it better suited for candid moments. Both perform reasonably well in varied light but the Pentax’s better ISO performance helps in low-light street scenes.
Macro Photography
While neither camera sports macro-specific features, Pentax’s in-body image stabilization helps nail sharper handheld macros. Both rely heavily on lens choice here. The K-30’s better resolution ensures finer detail capture.
Night / Astro Photography
Here sensor noise matters most. The Pentax’s better low light ISO score and dynamic range make it the clear choice for night sky shooters, who need clean results at high ISOs and ability to recover subtle star details. Canon’s 20D is a bit noisy at ISO 1600, limiting creative freedom in the dark.
Video Capabilities
Pentax K-30 wins hands down with HD video, live view autofocus, and adjustable frame rates. Canon’s 20D does not offer video, which will be a dealbreaker for multimedia creators.
Travel Photography
Pentax’s lighter size, weather sealing, longer battery life, and lighter memory cards make it the better travel companion. Canon’s 20D remains reliable but bulkier and less versatile.
Professional Use
Both cameras are older, so professional workflows requiring high-res files or modern connectivity suffer. Canon’s broad lens support remains an asset, and robust JPEG/RAW compatibility is solid. Pentax provides more modern flexibility in exposure modes and IS, but limited wireless/connectivity options on both.
Technical Summary and Value Judgment
Below is a summary scorecard from extensive DxOMark and our hands-on testing:
For genre-specific insights:
Canon 20D pros:
- Solid build with classic DSLR feel
- Wide lens compatibility (Canon EF/EF-S)
- Straightforward controls for beginners
- Slightly longer max shutter speed (1/8000 sec)
Canon 20D cons:
- Low resolution by today’s standards (8MP)
- No live view or video
- No weather sealing
- Outdated ISO range and AF system
- Smaller, low-res LCD screen
Pentax K-30 pros:
- Higher resolution sensor (16MP)
- Superior dynamic range and low light performance
- Weather sealed body
- In-body image stabilization
- Live view and Full HD video recording
- Better AF system with face and tracking detection
- More exposure modes including manual
Pentax K-30 cons:
- Smaller lens ecosystem
- Heavier reliance on AA batteries if not using proprietary pack
- No mic or headphone jacks for video audio monitoring
- No wireless connectivity
Final Verdict: Which One Should You Buy?
If you’re a cheapskate looking for durable entry-level DSLR experience, Canon 20D still shoots nice images, pairs with a wide variety of lenses, and offers nostalgia with classic controls. It’s a worthy pick for budget shooters focusing on stills, particularly portraits and casual landscapes where heavy cropping or video isn’t vital.
For anyone wanting a more modern, flexible camera with a solid future, the Pentax K-30 is an excellent buy. Its weather sealing alone makes it worth considering for outdoor photographers, while the higher resolution sensor and live view/video capabilities serve both pros and enthusiasts well. Its sensor-based image stabilization is a nice touch, especially in macro, travel, or low-light situations.
The Pentax K-30 earns my practical recommendation for most users who can stretch the budget to around $525. It strikes a rare balance between ruggedness, versatility, and image quality that beats the older Canon in nearly every shooting discipline save perhaps the sheer lens selection advantage of Canon’s mount system.
Recommendations Based on Photographer Type
- Portrait photographers: Pentax K-30 for sharper, higher-res images and eye detection AF.
- Landscape enthusiasts: Pentax K-30 for better dynamic range and weather sealing.
- Wildlife/sports: Pentax K-30 for improved AF tracking and faster shooting.
- Street photographers: Pentax K-30 for portability, stealth, and better low light control.
- Macro shooters: Pentax K-30 for sensor IS benefits.
- Night/astro: Pentax K-30’s superior ISO performance wins.
- Video creators: Pentax K-30 only.
- Travel photographers: Pentax K-30 for lighter weight and durability.
- Professionals requiring robust lenses: Canon 20D if brand lens legacy critical, but only with workflow tolerance for older tech.
Wrapping Up
While vintage cameras like the Canon 20D exude charm and work well with modest demands, the Pentax K-30 bridges yesterday and today with features that truly enhance image quality and usability across photography genres. If I were building a kit from scratch around these models, the K-30 would be my go-to, offering longevity, flexibility, and image quality that stands up in current shooting environments.
Whichever you choose, remember that lenses, technique, and how you shoot will always be far more critical than megapixels or specs. Both cameras reward those who know their gear - and that’s ultimately where the magic lies.
Happy shooting!
Canon 20D vs Pentax K-30 Specifications
Canon EOS 20D | Pentax K-30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Pentax |
Model type | Canon EOS 20D | Pentax K-30 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2004-11-03 | 2012-10-29 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Prime M |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 22.5 x 15mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 337.5mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3504 x 2336 | 4928 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Canon EF/EF-S | Pentax KAF2 |
Amount of lenses | 326 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 118k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD monitor with brightness/color adjustment and AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.56x | 0.61x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (ISO 100) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Red-eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye,Slow Sync, Slow Sync+ Redeye, Trailing Curtain Sync, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30,25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60,50,30,25,24 fps), 640 x 424 (30,25,24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 770 gr (1.70 pounds) | 650 gr (1.43 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 144 x 106 x 72mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 2.8") | 130 x 97 x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 62 | 79 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.9 | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.0 | 13.0 |
DXO Low light rating | 721 | 1129 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 410 shots |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI109,4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (10 sec (2 sec with mirror lock-up)) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $1,300 | $525 |