Canon 50D vs Sony A850
57 Imaging
53 Features
65 Overall
57
54 Imaging
67 Features
60 Overall
64
Canon 50D vs Sony A850 Key Specs
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
- Announced April 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon EOS 50D vs Sony Alpha DSLR-A850: Getting Hands-On with Two DSLR Classics
Over my two decades of hands-on camera testing, I've found that cameras are never just about specs. It’s about how those specs translate into actual moments - the way a camera feels in your hands during a golden hour portrait session, how it chases birds in flight on a misty morning, or captures endless detail in a sprawling landscape hike. In this detailed head-to-head comparison, I take the Canon 50D and Sony A850 - two mid-size DSLRs from the late 2000s and early 2010s - and break down their real-world strengths and limitations across multiple photography genres. These are cameras that still circulate in enthusiast and professional circles due to their solid build and imaging quality.
I personally subjected both cameras to extensive field tests and studio shoots, examining them under typical situations that many photographers face, including portraits, wildlife, landscapes, action, and macro photography. Alongside, I dive deep into their technical underpinnings to provide you not only with data but practical takeaways to help select which one might suit your style and budget best.
Let’s start by getting a feel for their build and design.
Feel and Ergonomics: Size, Weight, and Handling
One of the first things I notice when switching between these two cameras is the physical presence and ergonomics - something you directly interact with, dozens to hundreds of times in a shoot.
The Canon EOS 50D is a relatively compact APS-C DSLR with a solid mid-size SLR body. Weighing in at approximately 822 grams and measuring 146x108x74 mm, it feels balanced in my hands without being bulky. The Canon design provides intuitive control layouts backed by the reputable Digic 4 processor interface - responsive, straightforward, and durable. The screen is a fixed 3-inch TFT LCD with 920k dots; not a touch interface but bright and clear.
Compared to the Canon, the Sony A850 is noticeably larger and heavier - 895 grams and dimensions of 156x117x82 mm - reflecting its full-frame sensor heritage. The heft is immediately perceptible, which can be a plus for those who value stability when shooting with bigger lenses, but potentially a drawback for travel or lightweight setups.

From top view, both have typical pentaprism optical viewfinders and similar button configurations, though the Sony’s control dials feel a bit more substantial, befitting its flagship aspirations at the time. The Sony features a slightly better viewfinder coverage and magnification (98% coverage, 0.74x magnification) compared to Canon’s 95% and 0.6x, enhancing the framing experience during composition.

Ergonomically, the Canon 50D offers profound comfort for fast-moving shooting scenarios thanks to its grip size and button accessibility. Meanwhile, the A850 commands a solid, reassuring heft beneficial for those who use telephoto lenses extensively.
Sensor Tech and Image Quality: APS-C Meets Full Frame
Sensor size often dictates the core imaging performance of a camera. The Canon 50D utilizes a 15MP APS-C CMOS sensor measuring 22.3 x 14.9 mm, delivering a sensible balance of resolution, noise control, and price-affordability. The Canon’s sensor is paired with a Digic 4 processor, notable at its launch for relatively fast processing and respectable low-light handling for that era.
In contrast, Sony’s A850 boasts a full-frame 25MP CMOS sensor measuring 35.9 x 24 mm. This larger sensor allows more light capture per pixel and inherently better dynamic range, color depth, and low-noise performance. The sensor is paired with Sony’s Bionz processor, designed for handling the elevated demands of full-frame data throughput.

DxO Mark’s scores support these observations: the A850 scores an overall 79 points with color depth of 23.8 bits, dynamic range of 12.2 EV, and low-light ISO performance reaching ISO 1415. The 50D sits at a respectable 63 overall with 21.8 bits color depth and 11.4 EV dynamic range but noticeably lags in high ISO performance.
In practical terms, I found the Canon 50D's APS-C sensor provides sharp, punchy images with excellent color fidelity across ISO 100–800. However, noise becomes more evident beyond ISO 1600, potentially limiting low light use. The A850’s full frame sensor shines for detailed landscape shots, astro photography, and portraits where subtle tonal gradations and high dynamic range are vital. Shadow recovery and highlight retention are also noticeably stronger.
The Canon’s anti-aliasing filter helps prevent moiré but slightly softens fine detail, while Sony’s filter offers a delicate balance - ensuring sharpness without undue artifacts.
Display and Viewfinding: Visual Feedback When It Matters Most
Both cameras feature fixed 3-inch LCD screens - the Canon’s at 920k dots and Sony’s slightly higher resolution 922k dots with Sony’s “Xtra Fine” TFT technology. Both provide accurate color representation suitable for reviewing images on the spot.

However, the Canon 50D offers live view functionality, allowing precise composition for macro or still life photography by zooming in on the LCD. The Sony A850 lacks live view entirely, reflecting its design focus towards professionals accustomed to optical viewfinding and traditional DSLR shooting rhythms.
The optical pentaprism viewfinders deliver clear, bright real-time scenes, essential for rapid shooting styles. The Sony’s viewfinder edges slightly ahead with nearly full coverage and higher magnification, aiding composition accuracy for critical framing.
Autofocus: Precision and Speed in the Moment
Both cameras use a 9-point autofocus system with phase detection. The Canon 50D supports face detection and live view contrast detection AF, which can be helpful for portraits and studio work. The Sony A850 lacks face detection but has similar multi-area AF coverage.
In continuous shooting tests, the Canon 50D can shoot at 6.3 frames per second - a remarkable speed for its class - great for capturing fleeting expressions or action. The Sony A850 maxes out at 3 frames per second, better suited to deliberate shooting but less ideal for busy sports or wildlife bursts.
Though not cutting-edge by today’s autofocus standards, both offer reliable focus acquisition in good light. However, in low-light or fast-moving subjects, the Canon’s live view and face detection give it an edge, especially for less experienced users.
Build Quality and Environmental Resistance: Weathering the Elements
Both cameras exhibit robust mid-size DSLR chassis construction typical of enthusiast-level bodies. Metal and quality polycarbonate frames translate to durable handling in everyday scenarios.
I took both cameras out on a drizzly forest hike and found their weather sealing sufficient to fend off light moisture, though neither is rated waterproof or freeze-proof. They require care in harsh conditions but will stand up to moderate outdoor challenges.
The Canon 50D explicitly features environmental sealing to protect against dust and moisture - essential for landscape and wildlife photographers who venture into unpredictable situations. The Sony A850, while rugged, is less emphatic on this feature, reflecting different marketing focuses.
Lens Ecosystem: Compatibility and Versatility in the Field
When choosing a DSLR, the lens ecosystem is paramount. The Canon EOS 50D uses the widely available Canon EF and EF-S mounts, giving access to over 326 lenses - from affordable primes to professional-level L-series lenses, and a strong selection of macro and telephoto glass.
Sony’s A850 relies on the Sony/Minolta Alpha mount, supporting approximately 143 lenses. This is fewer than Canon but includes excellent Zeiss optics and high-quality Sony G lenses. Furthermore, adapters exist to expand lens compatibility, though autofocus performance may vary.
For photographers already invested in Canon gear or who prioritize lens availability, the EOS 50D ecosystem is a clear advantage. The A850 offers excellent glass options but with fewer native lenses overall.
Battery Life and Storage: Keeping You Shooting Longer
Battery life is a practical concern, especially for travel and event photography. The Canon 50D employs the BP-511A battery, with a rated 800 exposures per charge. The Sony A850 uses the NP-FM500H, rated for around 880 shots.
In real shooting conditions, the Sony’s slight edge in endurance was appreciable - helpful for long landscape sessions or weddings where recharging opportunities are limited.
On storage, the Canon features a single Compact Flash slot supporting UDMA for fast writes. The Sony doubles down with two slots supporting both Compact Flash and Sony’s Memory Stick formats - offering more versatile storage options and redundancy useful for professional work.
Video and Connectivity: A Different Era's Capabilities
Neither camera supports video recording - a limitation by today’s standards, but typical of DSLRs in their era. This is an important consideration if multimedia versatility is a priority.
Connectivity-wise, both cameras include USB 2.0 and HDMI outputs for tethering and image review. However, neither offers Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or GPS - features common in modern DSLRs and mirrorless cameras.
Genre-Specific Performance: Which Camera Excels Where?
To provide clarity on where these cameras truly shine, I ran them through extensive genre-specific tests, summarizing:
Portrait Photography
- Canon 50D: Face detection live view aids focusing on eyes. APS-C crop factor intensifies background blur with fast lenses, good color output producing pleasing skin tones.
- Sony A850: Full-frame sensor delivers creamy bokeh and excellent tonal gradations but lacks face detection. Requires skilled manual focusing.
Winner: Slight edge to Sony for image quality; Canon for ease-of-use.
Landscape Photography
- Sony A850: Higher resolution and dynamic range excel in capturing fine detail and shadow recovery.
- Canon 50D: Good but limited by smaller sensor and dynamic range.
Winner: Sony A850.
Wildlife Photography
- Canon 50D: Faster burst rate and live view focusing help chase wildlife.
- Sony A850: Full frame advantage in resolution but slower 3 fps limits action shots.
Winner: Canon 50D.
Sports Photography
- Canon 50D: Superior frame rates and robust AF perform better for tracking fast-moving subjects.
- Sony A850: Slower continuous shooting hampers performance.
Winner: Canon 50D.
Street Photography
- Canon 50D: Smaller size and discreet operation fit street shooting.
- Sony A850: Larger and heavier, less portable.
Winner: Canon 50D.
Macro Photography
- Canon 50D: Live view and face detection assist critical focusing.
- Sony A850: High-res sensor benefits detail but focusing can be tricky.
Winner: Canon 50D for practicality; Sony for image quality.
Night/Astro Photography
- Sony A850: Superior ISO performance and dynamic range for star fields.
- Canon 50D: Noise limits long exposure quality.
Winner: Sony A850.
Travel Photography
- Canon 50D: Lighter weight and compactness advantageous.
- Sony A850: Full frame benefits in landscape but bulk may be an issue.
Winner: Canon 50D.
Professional Work
- Sony A850: Dual card slots, full-frame sensor, build quality align with pro needs.
- Canon 50D: Strong but APS-C limitations exist.
Winner: Sony A850.
Real-World Shots: Visual Evidence Worth a Thousand Words
Here are side-by-side samples from both cameras - encompassing urban portraits, landscapes at dusk, macro flowers, and sports action.
Observe the increased detail and smoother tonal transitions in the Sony images, with richer dynamic range in the shadows and highlights. The Canon’s images are more punchy but show earlier noise onset at higher ISO.
Overall Scores and Value: Number Crunching Meets Practicality
DxO Mark scores and field test data synthesized into a final performance rating reveal:
The Sony A850 emerges as a higher performer overall thanks to its full-frame sensor and professional features, but the Canon 50D holds its own with faster shooting, lighter body, and superior autofocus aids.
In terms of price and value: the Canon 50D often appears in used markets around $500–800 USD, while the A850 commands a higher price bracket due to its sensor and build.
Who Should Choose Which?
Consider the Canon EOS 50D if you:
- Prioritize fast continuous shooting for sports or wildlife
- Need a lighter, more compact APS-C body for travel or street
- Want live view and face detection for easier portraits
- Have or want access to Canon’s extensive and affordable lens lineup
- Are budget-conscious, seeking a capable enthusiast DSLR
Consider the Sony Alpha A850 if you:
- Require the image quality benefits of a full-frame sensor
- Work professionally and need dual card slots for backup
- Focus heavily on landscape, portraits, or astro photography
- Prefer a robust body with slightly better battery life
- Can accommodate the extra weight and slower burst speed
- Have or plan to invest in Sony Alpha mount lenses or Zeiss glass
Final Thoughts from the Field
Despite being over a decade old, both Canon’s 50D and Sony’s A850 still provide compelling options for specific photography needs thanks to their enduring build quality and solid imaging pipelines.
From my direct shooting experience, the Sony A850 is the more capable sensor platform - ideal for those who value maximum image fidelity and pro-level workflow features. Meanwhile, the Canon 50D offers faster operation, excellent lens flexibility, and user-friendly features that lower the learning curve, making it a versatile all-rounder.
Ultimately, your choice depends on prioritizing shooting speed, portability, and autofocus aids (Canon 50D) versus sensor size, image quality, and professional features (Sony A850).
Updating your toolkit with either can yield rewarding photographic experiences - as long as you align the camera’s strengths with your creative ambitions.
Disclosure: I have no affiliation with Canon or Sony. All testing was personally conducted using production units on various assignments spanning portraits, wildlife, and landscapes over multiple years.
Thank you for reading. I hope this comprehensive comparison helps you find the best DSLR companion for your photography journey!
Canon 50D vs Sony A850 Specifications
| Canon EOS 50D | Sony Alpha DSLR-A850 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Sony |
| Model | Canon EOS 50D | Sony Alpha DSLR-A850 |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
| Released | 2008-10-30 | 2010-04-15 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 4 | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Full frame |
| Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
| Sensor area | 332.3mm² | 861.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 15 megapixels | 25 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4752 x 3168 | 6048 x 4032 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Canon EF/EF-S | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Number of lenses | 326 | 143 |
| Crop factor | 1.6 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 920k dot | 922k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | TFT liquid-crystal color LCD | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 98 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.6x | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/8000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 6.3 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 13.00 m (ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/250s | 1/250s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Max video resolution | None | None |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 822 grams (1.81 pounds) | 895 grams (1.97 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 146 x 108 x 74mm (5.7" x 4.3" x 2.9") | 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 63 | 79 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.8 | 23.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.4 | 12.2 |
| DXO Low light score | 696 | 1415 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 800 photographs | 880 photographs |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BP-511A | NP-FM500H |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), UDMA | Compact Flash (Type I or II), UDMA, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo |
| Storage slots | One | Two |
| Pricing at launch | $996 | $0 |