Canon EOS 550D vs Sony SLT-A55: A Detailed Comparison from an Experienced Photographer

In the ever-evolving world of DSLR cameras, models released around 2010 like the Canon EOS 550D (Rebel T2i) and the Sony SLT-A55 occupy a fascinating crossroad. These entry-level DSLRs sought to democratize advanced imaging with new technologies, while maintaining relative affordability. Having personally tested both cameras extensively over the years, I've developed a nuanced understanding of their strengths and limitations across multiple genres - from landscape to wildlife, and casual travel to professional workflows.

Today, I’ll guide you through a comprehensive side-by-side comparison of these two cameras, drawing on my experience and performance evaluations. This will help you make an informed decision based on your unique shooting style and priorities.

In-Depth Body and Handling Comparison: Size, Ergonomics, and Controls

A camera's physical heft, grip, and button layout directly influence how effortlessly you can operate it during shoots. The Canon 550D feels like an old friend: a compact SLR body at 129x98x62mm and approximately 530 grams (without lenses). The Canon's prominent grip and balanced weight distribution lend confidence for handheld shooting over extended periods.

Sony’s A55, on the other hand, is slightly smaller (124x92x85mm) and lighter at roughly 500 grams. Interestingly, the A55 has a thicker profile (depth) yet trims down width and height slightly. The fully articulated 3" screen (more on that soon) influences body design, contributing to this depth. Thanks to an electronic viewfinder (EVF) nudging the viewfinder hump height, this difference becomes apparent.

On top, Canon sticks to a traditional DSLR approach - dedicated dials and a sizeable mode selector cluster. Canon’s layout favors the photographer who appreciates tactile control and rapid setting adjustments without menu diving.

Sony A55 integrates fewer physical dials but offers a multi-function joystick, which was rare at the time. Its silent electronic shutter, paired with the translucent mirror design, enables the higher continuous shooting rate, which you can quickly engage.

Both cameras offer intuitive layouts, but Canon feels a bit more vintage DSLR, while Sony adopts a modern blend of DSLR and mirrorless ergonomics, serving those craving tech-forward features.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: More Than Just Megapixels

The heart of any camera is its sensor. Canon’s 550D features an 18MP APS-C CMOS sensor sized 22.3x14.9mm, paired with Canon’s DIGIC 4 processor. The sensor employs a traditional Bayer color filter pattern with an optical anti-aliasing filter to reduce moiré, albeit at a slight cost to perceived sharpness.

Sony’s A55 sports a 16MP APS-C CMOS sensor (23.5x15.6mm), slightly larger in dimensions, and powered by the Bionz processor. Notably, Sony takes advantage of its back-illuminated (Exmor) sensor technology, which gives it a leg up in low-light performance and dynamic range.

From my controlled lab tests and field usage:

• Canon 550D showed excellent color reproduction and clean tones at base ISO (100), with impressive dynamic range for an entry-level DSLR from 2010, especially in daylight landscapes.
• Sony A55 edged ahead in dynamic range and low-light capability, boasting a higher max native ISO of 12800 (versus Canon’s 6400) with cleaner noise handling. This makes it more forgiving when pushing exposure in challenging lighting.

DxOMark’s measurements echo this: Canon scores 66 overall versus Sony’s 73. The Sony unit has superior color depth (23.0 bits vs 22.0) and dynamic range (~12.4 stops vs 11.6), which may translate to better highlight and shadow retention in real-world shooting.

Interacting with the Camera: Screen and Viewfinder Realities

Nothing defines your day-to-day photo experience more than the rear screen and viewfinder vis-à-vis usability.

Canon 550D sports a fixed 3-inch TFT LCD with 1040k dots. The display is sharp and bright but lacks articulation or touch capabilities - common for cameras of its era. It remains reliable for image review, menu navigation, and live view focusing.

Sony’s A55 introduces a 3-inch fully articulated screen with 921k dot resolution, which, while slightly less crisp on paper, gives you flexibility to shoot at odd angles - think low to the ground macros or elevated street shots - without suffering an awkward body twist.

The more significant difference lies in the viewfinder. Canon uses an optical pentamirror offering 95% coverage and ~0.55x magnification. While clarity is naturally excellent through the glass, coverage reveals about 5% of the frame outside the viewfinder boundaries, requiring some mental correction.

Sony’s electronic viewfinder is an OLED panel with 1150k-dot resolution and 100% coverage. This digital view adds the ability to preview exposure, white balance, and focus peaking live - a boon for precision, especially in manual modes or video.

Between OVF and EVF, it boils down to preference. I enjoy Canon’s optical path for its immediacy and no electronic lag, but Sony’s EVF leans towards future-proof tech, particularly for hybrid shooters who value exposure previews and overlays.

Autofocus and Burst Rate: Speed Matters in Action and Wildlife

In practical shooting scenarios, autofocus responsiveness and frame rate often differentiate a keep shot from a missed opportunity.

The Canon 550D offers a 9-point phase-detection AF system with all points cross-type capable for decent focusing precision in daylight. While satisfactory for portraits and general photography, it can struggle to track fast-moving subjects reliably - the AF system lacks dedicated subject tracking and eye-detection modes.

Sony’s A55 presents a 15-point AF array, with three cross-type points enhancing center accuracy. More importantly, Sony’s patented translucent mirror technology enables phase detection AF in both viewfinder and live view modes without interruption. This allows continuous autofocus at burst rates up to 10 frames per second (fps), a remarkable feat for a DSLR at this level.

Canon maxes out at 4 fps with AF between shots, but it momentarily pauses the mirror during exposure sequences. The A55’s uninterrupted mirror allows seamless continuous AF during bursts.

From hands-on wildlife and sports sessions, the A55’s burst and AF combo translates to higher keeper rates on dynamic subjects such as birds in flight or children at play, where timing is paramount.

Build Quality and Weather Sealing: Durability in the Field

Neither camera offers professional-grade weather sealing, which restricts them from heavy-duty use in harsh environments. Both are constructed predominantly from polycarbonate with metal chassis components.

The Canon 550D, with its traditional DSLR build, feels robust and can withstand typical field abuse - lucky for enthusiasts hiking or traveling in dry conditions.

Sony A55, despite its innovative mirror system, is comparably solid but slightly more vulnerable due to its electronic viewfinder housing and more complex internal mirror assembly.

Both lack freeze-proof, dustproof, or shockproof certifications. Users considering adverse weather shooting should lean on protective covers and sensible handling.

Lens Ecosystem: Glass and Compatibility Counts

Canon possesses one of the largest lens lineups in the photography world: 326 EF/EF-S lenses giving staggering variety in focal lengths, apertures, and price points.

Sony’s Alpha mount, stemming from Minolta heritage, offers fewer native lenses - about 143 - and while solid, lacks depth compared to Canon’s ecosystem. Third-party support is also thinner, especially for specialized lenses.

For photographers investing long-term, Canon’s lens-index is an undeniable advantage, offering everything from affordable kit lenses to L-series pro-grade optics, plus extensive aftermarket options.

Sony A55 users typically rely on mid-range primes and zooms or adapt legacy glass with varying success. However, sensor-based stabilization on the A55 compensates somewhat for lens limitations, improving handheld sharpness in lower light.

Image Stabilization and Low-Light Usability: Getting Steady and Clean Shots

Canon 550D lacks in-body image stabilization (IBIS), so users rely on lens stabilization where available. Considering its launch timing, many EF/EF-S lenses do have optical IS, but older or budget lenses don't.

Sony’s A55 incorporates full sensor-shift stabilization, which steadies all lenses mounted. I've observed this making a tangible difference for handheld shooting at slower shutter speeds or when using non-stabilized glass.

For night, indoor, or astro photography, this added stabilization can reduce blur without cranking ISO to uncomfortable levels. That said, the sensor’s higher native ISO ceiling and lower noise of the A55 also support better low-light use overall.

Video Capabilities: Seeing Beyond Stills

Both cameras marked early attempts to bring quality video to traditional DSLRs, but with clear contrasts in approach.

Canon 550D shoots full HD 1080p at 30/25/24fps, employing H.264 compression. Video quality is excellent for 2010 - clean detail, good color, and DSLR-style depth of field. Microphone input enables external audio sources, but no headphone jack is available for monitoring.

Sony A55 pushes video to 1080p at up to 60fps and records in multiple formats including AVCHD and MPEG-4. The key advantage is the continuous phase-detection AF during filming, which yields smooth and reliable autofocus transitions - a huge plus for run-and-gun videographers.

A fully articulated screen on the A55 also boosts flexibility for video composition in tight spaces or vlogging.

Battery Life and Storage: Longevity Matters

Canon’s LP-E8 battery delivers approximately 470 shots per charge under CIPA standards, above average for its class. This makes it reliable for day-long excursions without frequent swaps.

Sony’s NP-FW50 powers about 380 shots per charge, slightly lower, likely affected by the power demands of the EVF and sensor stabilization. That said, given proper power management (e.g., disabling EVF when possible), endurance is adequate for most casual use.

Both cameras take SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, with Sony also supporting Memory Stick Duo/Pro for flexibility. A single card slot limits on-the-fly backup but was normative for this class and time.

Connectivity and Extras: What About Wireless and GPS?

Both models support Eye-Fi wireless memory cards for image transfer without cables, a novel feature for their generation. No Bluetooth or NFC support exists, naturally.

Notably, the Sony A55 adds built-in GPS, an unusual inclusion in 2010 for entry-level DSLRs. For travel photographers wanting geotagging without additional gadgets, this is an often overlooked bonus.

Physical ports include micro-HDMI and USB 2.0 for tethering and output on both cameras.

Performance Summary Across Photography Genres

Let’s frame each camera’s usability by genre to illuminate their domain strengths:

• Portraits: Canon's higher resolution sensor and excellent color depth support flattering skin tones. Sony’s sensor stabilization is helpful, but lower megapixels and EVF may affect viewing preferences. Both offer face-detection AF, but neither has advanced eye AF.

• Landscapes: Sony’s broader dynamic range and sensor size edges out Canon in capturing rich scene detail and shadow recovery. The articulated screen assists low-angle composition.

• Wildlife: Sony’s faster burst (10fps vs 4fps) and more AF points deliver more keepers on action sequences. Canon’s lens lineup depth trumps here, especially with super-tele lenses.

• Sports: Similar to wildlife, Sony’s continuous AF and frame rate advantages provide better tracking potential. Canon may fall behind in fast-paced environments.

• Street: Canon’s discrete optical viewfinder offers a traditional approach. Size difference is minor; Sony's articulating screen lets you shoot inconspicuously from hip-level angles.

• Macro: Sensor stabilization on Sony aids handholding tight compositions. Canon benefits from more macro lens options.

• Night/Astro: Sony’s higher ISO ceiling and lower noise are advantageous. Canon struggles beyond ISO 6400. Sensor shift stabilization also helps.

• Video: Sony leads with smoother AF, more frame rates, and flexible recording formats.

• Travel: Canon enjoys longer battery life; Sony favors size, flexibility, and GPS geotagging.

• Professional Workflow: Canon’s broader industry acceptance, wider lens ecosystem, and mature raw file support weigh in its favor.

Real-World Sample Gallery: Shooting with Both Cameras

Canon 550D front Canon 550D screen back Sony A55 front Sony A55 screen back

To truly appreciate image quality beyond specs, I conducted diverse shoots under varying light and movement conditions. Both cameras shine in sharpness and color fidelity at base ISO, but Sony’s advantage in noise control and dynamic range is evident in shadow detail and high-contrast settings.

Overall Scores from Independent Benchmarks

DxOMark’s numbers reinforce real-world observations: the Sony A55 gains higher marks for sensor performance and image quality, while Canon holds strong with its versatility and lens options.

Final Verdict: Which One Should You Choose?

Summarizing:

• Choose the Canon EOS 550D if:

  • You want a reliable, traditional DSLR experience with intuitive controls.
  • Lens variety and future upgrades matter to you.
  • You prioritize high-resolution images with excellent color reproduction.
  • Battery life and viewfinder fidelity are critical.
  • Your budget is tighter (~$600 new-equivalent), or you prefer a larger community and support.

• Choose the Sony SLT-A55 if:

  • You value cutting-edge features like sensor-based stabilization and high fps continuous shooting.
  • You appreciate an articulated screen and electronic viewfinder with exposure previews.
  • Plan to shoot fast action, wildlife, or video with continuous autofocus priority.
  • Native ISO performance is key, and you want GPS tagging built-in.
  • Willing to invest a bit more (~$800) for these pros.

Each camera occupies a unique niche despite similar pricing and release dates. Neither is flawless; Canon’s AF can feel dated today, and Sony’s smaller lens selection and battery life might pose a compromise. But both set foundations for solid imaging for hobbyists and those learning the ropes.

Closing Thoughts

As someone who has tested thousands of cameras, I find the Canon 550D and Sony A55 each offer compelling entry points into DSLR photography, albeit with different philosophies. Canon maintains dependable consistency, while Sony pushes innovation within the same class.

If I had to keep one on my shoulder today for travel and casual shooting, I might lean slightly toward the 550D for its pragmatic design and better battery, paired with Canon’s unbeatable lens lineup. For sports or video-heavy enthusiasts, the A55’s tech-forward design still holds surprising value.

Whichever route you choose, understanding these nuances ensures your camera works as your trusted creative ally, not a source of hassle or missed moments.

Happy shooting!

-

[Canon EOS 550D vs Sony SLT-A55: The Detailed Photo Gear Comparison You Needed]