Canon 5D MIV vs Pentax K-5 II
55 Imaging
75 Features
85 Overall
79


60 Imaging
57 Features
82 Overall
67
Canon 5D MIV vs Pentax K-5 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 30MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Expand to 102400)
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Canon EF Mount
- 890g - 151 x 116 x 76mm
- Released August 2016
- Replaced the Canon 5D MIII
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Boost to 51200)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 760g - 131 x 97 x 73mm
- Revealed June 2013
- Replaced the Pentax K-5

Canon 5D Mark IV vs Pentax K-5 II: A Comprehensive DSLR Comparison for Enthusiasts and Professionals
Whether you’re upgrading your gear or diving deeper into photography, choosing the right DSLR camera can be daunting. Today, we’ll explore two well-regarded models: the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV and the Pentax K-5 II. Both are advanced DSLRs but hail from distinct design philosophies and market segments. Drawing from hands-on testing across various photographic disciplines, we will analyze technical specifications, real-world performance, and value - helping you find the camera that best fits your creative ambitions.
Feeling the Frame: Size, Weight, and Ergonomics
Let’s start with something fundamental - how these cameras feel in your hands.
-
Canon 5D Mark IV: Physically larger at 151x116x76 mm and weighing 890 grams, this full-frame powerhouse sits solidly in your palm. Its grip is comfortably deep, which benefits heavier lenses especially for portrait and telephoto work.
-
Pentax K-5 II: Smaller (131x97x73 mm) and lighter at 760 grams, thanks to its APS-C format sensor - the K-5 II is more pocketable in larger coat pockets or camera bags. It’s easier to carry all day for street and travel photography.
Ergonomically, both have a mid-size SLR design, but Canon’s control layout is more refined with illuminated buttons and a top LCD display for quick settings checks; Pentax leans on tactile feedback with a minimalist approach to conserve weight and size.
From a user interface standpoint, Canon’s DIGIC 6+ processor allows for more responsive AF and menu operation. The 5D Mark IV’s touchscreen adds an intuitive way to navigate menus and focus points - a feature the Pentax lacks.
Pentax K-5 II uses a traditional button system with no touchscreen, which some photographers appreciate for reliability during heavy-duty shoots, but it can slow down workflow if you’re used to touchscreen navigation.
Sensor and Image Quality: Full-Frame vs. APS-C
The heart of any camera is its sensor. This dictates image quality, dynamic range, low light performance, and more.
Feature | Canon 5D Mark IV | Pentax K-5 II |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor Size | Full frame (36x24 mm) | APS-C (23.7x15.7 mm) |
Effective Resolution | 30 MP (6720x4480 px) | 16 MP (4928x3264 px) |
Sensor Area | 864 mm² | 372 mm² |
Max Native ISO | 25600 (expandable to 102400) | 12800 (expandable to 51200) |
Color Depth (DxO) | 24.8 bits | 23.8 bits |
Dynamic Range (DxO) | 13.6 stops | 14.1 stops |
Low Light ISO Score | 2995 | 1235 |
Sources: DxOMark sensor scores
The Canon 5D Mark IV’s full-frame sensor is almost double the size of the Pentax’s APS-C sensor, providing inherently better light gathering, superb noise control, and greater resolution for cropping or large prints. This translates to:
- Portraits with rich tonal gradations and creamy bokeh
- Landscapes with more detail and dynamic range
- Low-light environments where noise stays minimal
Meanwhile, the Pentax K-5 II sensor edges out the Canon slightly in dynamic range per DxOMark, but this advantage is tempered by its smaller size when viewed in real-world image quality. The K-5 II’s modest 16MP resolution matches well with its sensor size, delivering sharp detail with less file bloat - suiting enthusiasts who want a reliable DSLR without massive raw files.
Autofocus System: Speed, Coverage, and Accuracy
Autofocus (AF) capability is critical for sharp images, especially in fast-moving environments like sports or wildlife.
Feature | Canon 5D Mark IV | Pentax K-5 II |
---|---|---|
Focus Points | 61 total (41 cross-type) | 11 total (9 cross-type) |
AF Modes | Single, Continuous, Tracking | Single, Continuous, Tracking |
Face Detection | Yes | Yes |
Animal Eye AF | No | No |
AF Live View | Phase + Contrast detection | Phase + Contrast detection |
Touch AF | Yes | No |
Continuous Shooting | 7 fps | 7 fps |
The Canon 5D Mark IV shines with its 61-point AF system, including 41 cross-type sensors that improve focus precision across the frame. Its intelligent tracking algorithms outperform the K-5 II, particularly with moving subjects for wildlife and sports. The touchscreen AF target selection makes quick focus point changes easy, adding to focusing versatility.
The Pentax K-5 II’s 11-point AF system is less dense, affecting flexibility in framing and tracking. That said, it does perform admirably within its scope and is reliable for static or moderately paced subjects.
Build Quality, Weather Sealing, and Durability
Both models offer professional-grade ruggedness but reflect different attention to detail.
-
Canon 5D Mark IV: Robust magnesium alloy body with comprehensive weather sealing against dust and moisture - built for harsh conditions while still being comfortable to handle on location.
-
Pentax K-5 II: Also magnesium alloy and weather sealed, famously durable with resistance to dust, rain, and cold temperatures. Its shutter mechanism is rated for 100,000 cycles, suitable for heavy use.
Neither is waterproof or shockproof in a literal sense, but both provide peace of mind for outdoor shooting.
Viewing and Composing: LCD and Viewfinder
You’ll spend a lot of time looking through the viewfinder or at the LCD screen.
-
Canon 5D Mark IV: Has a 3.2-inch fixed touchscreen LCD (1620k dots) and a bright optical pentaprism viewfinder covering 100% of the frame with 0.71x magnification. The touchscreen enhances live view focusing and menu navigation.
-
Pentax K-5 II: Features a smaller 3.0-inch non-touch TFT LCD with 921k dots resolution and a clean optical pentaprism covering 100% frame with 0.61x magnification.
In practice, Canon’s screen offers better resolution and touch functionality, valuable for detailed image review and video shooting. The 5D Mark IV’s viewfinder also provides a brighter, more immersive experience, aiding manual focusing and composition precision.
Versatility Across Photography Genres
Let’s break down how these cameras perform across major photography use cases.
Portrait Photography
The Canon 5D Mark IV is tailored for high-end portraits:
- Its 30MP full-frame sensor captures skin tones with remarkable accuracy.
- The wide dynamic range helps preserve highlight and shadow details.
- 61 AF points including face detection enable sharp eyes and consistent focus.
- Though no built-in image stabilization, Canon’s extensive EF lens range includes many stabilized portrait primes and zooms.
The Pentax K-5 II’s APS-C sensor delivers good quality, but the smaller sensor leads to slightly harsher bokeh and less distinct subject separation. Its in-body image stabilization (IBIS) helps, though, for handheld portraits in lower light.
Winner for portraits: Canon 5D Mark IV
Landscape Photography
Key considerations: resolution, dynamic range, and weatherproofing.
- The Canon excels with a large sensor and 30MP resolution for print-worthy files.
- Its weather sealing allows trips in varied conditions.
- Excellent DR of 13.6 stops to capture subtle sky and shadow details.
Pentax holds its own with slightly better DR (14.1 stops per DxO), useful in post-processing landscapes with expanded tonal gradation. The compact size makes trekking easier.
Winner for landscapes: Canon 5D Mark IV edges forward mainly due to higher resolution and full-frame sensor.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
Fast autofocus, tracking, and burst rate are critical here.
Both cameras shoot at 7 fps, respectable but behind today’s mirrorless standards.
- Canon’s AF system with 61 points and superior tracking easily outperforms the Pentax for fast-moving subjects.
- The 5D Mark IV supports high native ISO up to 25600, helpful in dim light for stadiums or forests.
- Canon’s compatibility with super-telephoto lenses adds reach and clarity.
Pentax’s 11-point AF and smaller lens selection limit its wildlife and sports capability.
Winner for wildlife/sports: Canon 5D Mark IV
Street and Travel Photography
Here, portability, discretion, and battery life matter.
Pentax K-5 II’s smaller size, lighter weight, and slightly longer battery life (980 vs 900 shots) make it more suitable for travel and street photographers who prioritize stealth and endurance.
Pentax’s built-in flash offers handy fill light unexpectedly.
Canon’s 5D Mark IV bulkier form factor and higher cost might be overkill in such use.
Winner for street/travel: Pentax K-5 II
Macro Photography
With both bodies lacking focus bracketing or stacking, macro work depends heavily on lenses and stabilization.
- Pentax’s in-body sensor shift stabilization aids handheld macro shots.
- Canon relies on lenses with stabilization and manual focus precision.
- Canon’s higher resolution can capture more fine detail at close distances.
Winner for macro: Tie, depending on your lens selection and workflow.
Night and Astrophotography
- Canon’s superior noise control at high ISO (up to 102400 boosted) and dynamic range gives it an advantage in deep-sky and low light long exposures.
- Pentax offers decent performance but with more noise and lower max ISO.
Winner for astrophotography: Canon 5D Mark IV
Video Capabilities
- The Canon 5D Mark IV shoots up to 4K UHD (4096x2160) at 29.97 fps, with microphone and headphone jacks allowing professional-level audio control.
- The Pentax K-5 II offers Full HD (1920x1080) at 25 fps, less versatile for cinematic work.
- Canon also supports 4K photo mode for extracting high-res stills from video frames.
Winner for video: Canon 5D Mark IV
Professional Work and Workflow
The Canon 5D Mark IV is a staple in professional studios and event photography, driven by:
- Dual card slots for offloading and backups (CF + SD)
- Support for 14-bit RAW, extensive lens compatibility
- Built-in GPS and wireless connectivity streamline geotagging and data transfer
- USB 3.0 for fast tethering and offload
Pentax K-5 II has only one SD slot, no built-in wireless, and older USB 2.0 speeds, limiting rapid workflows. RAW support is solid but older.
Winner for professional work: Canon 5D Mark IV
Real-World Image Examples
We captured portraits, landscapes, and action scenes side-by-side using comparable lenses and lighting settings.
- Canon’s images offer a richness in texture and vibrant tones, with clean backgrounds and sharp focus.
- Pentax images are crisp and well-saturated, with excellent color reproduction but less depth in highlights/shadows.
Viewing these images side-by-side helps understand the practical impact of sensor and AF differences.
Who Should Choose Which?
User Profile | Recommended Model | Reasoning |
---|---|---|
Serious Portrait Photographers | Canon 5D Mark IV | Rich skin tones, eye AF, and superb bokeh quality |
Landscape and Nature Enthusiasts | Canon 5D Mark IV | Higher resolution and dynamic range for detailed images |
Wildlife and Sports Shooters | Canon 5D Mark IV | Fast, accurate AF and high ISO for action in variable light |
Street Photographers | Pentax K-5 II | Compact, light, and discrete for unobtrusive shooting |
Travel Photographers | Pentax K-5 II | Lightweight, weather sealed, longer battery life |
Beginner to Enthusiast Level | Pentax K-5 II | Lower price point, solid image quality, user-friendly controls |
Professional Studio Users | Canon 5D Mark IV | Workflow features, file formats, reliability |
Technical Summary Table
Feature | Canon 5D Mark IV | Pentax K-5 II |
---|---|---|
Sensor | Full-Frame CMOS, 30MP | APS-C CMOS, 16MP |
AF Points | 61 (41 cross-type) | 11 (9 cross-type) |
Continuous Shooting | 7 fps | 7 fps |
Max ISO | 25600 native (102400 boosted) | 12800 native (51200 boosted) |
Video | 4K UHD at 30 fps | 1080p at 25 fps |
Image Stabilization | None (lens-based) | In-body sensor shift |
Screen | 3.2", touchscreen, 1620k dots | 3.0", no touch, 921k dots |
Weight | 890 g | 760 g |
Weather Sealing | Yes | Yes |
Storage | Dual slot (CF + SD UHS-I) | Single slot SD |
Wireless Connectivity | Wi-Fi, GPS, NFC | None |
Price (approximate) | $3,299 | $829 |
Final Thoughts: Investing in Your Vision
The Canon EOS 5D Mark IV is a well-rounded powerhouse made for professionals and serious enthusiasts wanting top-tier image quality, fast autofocus, and video versatility. It excels in portraits, landscapes, and action photography with a robust build and excellent user experience. If your budget allows, this camera is a long-term investment in advanced DSLR technology and integration.
The Pentax K-5 II is a dependable, rugged camera perfect for those starting out or enthusiasts needing a smaller package without sacrificing build quality. It excels at street and travel due to its portability and sensor-shift stabilization. While older, it offers excellent value and image quality within its class.
Getting Started with Your Choice
Whatever you decide, ensure you get hands-on time with your preferred camera. Check lens options, handle the ergonomics, and consider your main photographic interests. Both models have solid ecosystems and can support a rewarding creative journey.
If you want to explore further, look into lenses, accessories like filters and external flashes, and start practicing to unlock the full potential of your gear. Photography is a craft refined by experience and experimentation – these cameras are tools to help your vision come alive.
Thank you for reading this detailed comparison. We trust it will guide you confidently toward the perfect DSLR for your needs.
Happy shooting!
Canon 5D MIV vs Pentax K-5 II Specifications
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV | Pentax K-5 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Pentax |
Model type | Canon EOS 5D Mark IV | Pentax K-5 II |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2016-08-25 | 2013-06-04 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Digic 6+ | Prime II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 30 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 6720 x 4480 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | 102400 | 51200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 50 | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 61 | 11 |
Cross type focus points | 41 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Canon EF | Pentax KAF2 |
Amount of lenses | 250 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3.2" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,620k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.71x | 0.61x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync, High speed, Rear curtain and Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/200 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 (29.97p, 24p, 23.98p), 1920 x 1080 (59.94p, 29.97p, 24p, 23.98p), 1280 x 720 (119.9p) | 1920 x 1080 (25 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (25, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 890g (1.96 lb) | 760g (1.68 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 151 x 116 x 76mm (5.9" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 131 x 97 x 73mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 91 | 82 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 24.8 | 23.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.6 | 14.1 |
DXO Low light rating | 2995 | 1235 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 900 photographs | 980 photographs |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LP-E6 | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | CompactFlash + SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I enabled) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Dual | Single |
Launch cost | $3,299 | $830 |