Canon 650D vs Sony A450: An Experienced Photographer’s Deep Dive into These Entry-Level DSLRs

Choosing an entry-level DSLR that feels right in hand, delivers stellar images, and suits your style can sometimes be like walking through a camera aisle wearing foggy glasses - the specs blur, the marketing samba confuses, and you’re left wondering what really matters. Today, I'm unpacking two cameras from a roughly similar era (but quite different lineages) - the 2012 Canon EOS 650D and the 2010 Sony Alpha A450. Both aimed to be approachable and versatile entry points into DSLR photography, but which one delivers more bang for your buck and experience?

I’ve hands-on tested these cameras extensively, often under identical shooting conditions and across multiple photography disciplines - from landscapes to wildlife, portraits to street photography. What follows is an honest, detail-rich comparison that doesn’t just parrot specs but distills what you’ll truly gain (or miss) with either body.

Getting a Feel for It: Size, Build, and Ergonomics

Before diving into megapixels, autofocus, and video, let’s talk heft, grip, and controls - those tactile details that shape your experience from hour one.

The Canon 650D is a compact SLR, measuring 133 x 100 x 79 mm and weighing around 575g (body only). The Sony A450 clocks in slightly larger (137 x 104 x 81 mm) but noticeably lighter at about 560g. Don’t let the specs fool you here - the 650D feels just a tad more solid in the hand, likely thanks to Canon’s meticulous design around ergonomics and button placement.

Canon’s grip is more pronounced, offering a confident hold, especially for those with larger hands. The Sony feels a bit “flatter” and doesn’t inspire the same immediate confidence, though it’s still comfortable. Overall, the 650D’s contour and button layout just work better for long shooting sessions.

Looking at controls from above confirms Canon’s attention to user interface. Buttons and dials sit logically, with the Live View toggle, mode dial, and shutter release all intuitively spaced.

Sony leans toward simplicity with fewer dedicated controls, which some beginners may prefer, but the lack of direct exposure compensation dial and fewer custom buttons might frustrate enthusiast shooters craving quick access.

Bottom line on ergonomics: Canon 650D is the more comfortable, user-friendly camera for extended shoots.

Sensor Tech, Resolution, and Image Quality - The Heartbeat of Any Camera

Both cameras sport APS-C sized sensors, but there are some key differences that impact image quality, color depth, and dynamic range.

Sony’s A450 features a slightly larger APS-C sensor at 23.4 x 15.6 mm (sensor area 365.04 mm²) with a 14.2MP resolution. Canon’s EOS 650D sticks to a slightly smaller 22.3 x 14.9 mm sensor (332.27 mm²) but pushes 18MP resolution.

At face value, Canon’s higher megapixels promise more detailed images, especially appealing to landscape and studio photographers who crave crispness and the possibility of large prints. However, more megapixels on a smaller sensor means smaller individual pixel sizes, potentially impacting low-light performance and noise levels.

DXO Mark scores back this up: Canon 650D scores an overall 62, with color depth at 21.7 bits, dynamic range at 11.2 EV, and low-light ISO performance scoring 722. Sony’s A450 scores slightly better overall at 66, with a tiny edge in color depth (21.8 bits), dynamic range (11.8 EV), and low-light ISO (769).

In practical terms, this means Sony’s sensor produces marginally cleaner images in shadow-y conditions and handles bright scenes with more latitude - excellent if you shoot landscapes or any scene with challenging lighting. Canon, on the other hand, wins in resolution and delivers punchy, sharp details, but noise can creep in at ISO 1600 and above.

Shutter and Autofocus Battle: Precision, Speed, and Reliability

Nothing kills a wildlife or sports shot faster than a sluggish autofocus performance or slow burst rate - let’s see which camera has you covered here.

Sony’s A450 boasts a 7 frames per second (fps) continuous shooting speed, bordering on professional high-speed territory for an entry-level DSLR. That’s impressive! Canon's 650D offers a more conservative 5 fps, still quite respectable for most amateurs but potentially limiting for fast action shooters.

Looking at autofocus, both cameras rely on 9-focus points with phase detection systems. Canon's Dual Pixel CMOS AF hadn’t been invented yet, but its hybrid touch and phase-detection autofocus in live view mode was cutting-edge in 2012.

Sony’s autofocus focuses well in bright light but struggles in live view mode (which it actually just barely offers, and without contrast detection AF). Canon’s 650D shines with face detection AF, touchscreen AF point selection, and continuous AF during video.

From personal testing, Canon’s autofocus feels more reliable for tracking moving subjects - critical if you shoot sports or wildlife. Sony’s tracking is less effective, and the lack of animal eye AF or advanced face detection features means more missed shots on unpredictable subjects.

The Viewfinder and Rear Screen: Your Visual Windows to Creativity

A good optical viewfinder and responsive rear display can transform your shooting experience.

Both cameras use pentamirror optical viewfinders (opting for cost over pentaprism), covering approximately 95% of the scene with 0.53x magnification. Neither has electronic viewfinders, which limits features like live histograms in the OVF but keeps battery consumption lower.

Canon edges out in the live view department with its fully articulated 3-inch Clear View II touchscreen LCD, boasting 1,040k dots resolution. This gives you versatile shooting angles (hello, low down or overhead perspectives) and intuitive tap-to-focus.

Sony falls behind with a fixed 2.7-inch TFT Clear Photo Color LCD screen at a much lower 230k dot resolution and no touchscreen. If you like composing at odd angles or using touch focus, that's a dealbreaker.

Interface-wise, Canon’s DIGIC 5 processor keeps the menus fluid and responsive, while Sony’s Bionz engine, though competent, feels clunkier navigating exposure and menu options.

Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility: Opening the Door to Creativity

Canon’s EF/EF-S mount boasts an enormous catalog of over 300 lenses, from kit zooms to exotic primes, specialized macros, and pro-grade telephoto beasts. This lens ecosystem advantage cannot be overstated.

Sony’s A450 uses the Sony/Minolta Alpha mount with roughly 143 native lenses available during its prime. While respectable, it’s notably lacking compared to Canon’s Hollywood-like lens lineup. Third-party lens support is thinner as well.

If you prioritize lens options - say for macro, wildlife telephotos, or professional-level portrait primes - Canon’s system will serve you better long-term.

Burst Shooting and Buffer: Speed vs. Capacity

Burst speed is nothing without adequate buffer to sustain the rate. Sony offers a 7 fps burst, but it backs off quickly due to smaller buffer capacity handling JPEGs and minimal RAW frames. Canon’s 5 fps is a more consistent performer, especially shooting in RAW.

For sports and action shooters contemplating this category, Canon’s buffer combined with more reliable autofocus equals better real-world shooting flow, despite the slower fps figure.

Video Capabilities: A Decade Ago, Video DSLRs Were Still Finding Their Feet

The Canon 650D was one of the early DSLRs to seriously cater to videographers with continuous autofocus during video, touch-focused live view, and full HD 1080p recording at 30, 25, and 24 fps. It also offers 720p at 60 fps for slow-motion-esque effects.

Sony's A450, meanwhile, disappointingly offers no video recording at all. In today’s world, where hybrid photo-video capture is expected even in entry-level models, this restriction is a glaring limitation.

Canon also includes a microphone port for external audio capture, though no headphone jack for monitoring audio. Sony offers none.

Battery Life and Storage: Should You Carry Spares?

Sony’s A450 has a famed battery life of up to 1050 shots per charge - impressive and among the best in its class. The Canon 650D, by comparison, manages about 440 shots, roughly half.

If long hikes or extended shoots without charging are on your agenda, Sony wins here. Canon’s articulated screen and touchscreen, combined with constant sensor use in live view and video, drain power faster.

Both support SD/SDHC/SDXC cards. Sony uniquely also supports Memory Stick Pro Duo formats, though SD is now the universal standard.

Clean and Functional Build - No Weather Sealing Here

Both cameras lack environmental sealing, dustproofing, or waterproofing, so be cautious shooting in rain or dusty conditions.

Canon’s well-engineered body withstands typical abuse better, with robust external flash integration and a hot shoe ready for manual and wireless flashes. Sony also features a built-in flash but with fewer flash modes, less flexible sync options, and not as flash-happy.

Putting It All Together - Sample Images and Lens Options in Action

Let's take a quick eyeball test with real-world samples to see how these specs translate into pictures.

Canon 650D screen back Sony A450 screen back

Successful portrait photographers will appreciate Canon’s higher resolution helping deliver finely textured skin tones and smoother bokeh, courtesy of larger lens options paired with a 1.6x crop factor. Canon’s face detection AF truly helps nail sharp eyes in portraiture.

Landscape shooters benefit from Sony’s slightly broader dynamic range capturing shadows and highlights with less clipping - perfect for dramatic skies and deep forest scenes. Canon’s images are still excellent, just marginally more contrast-heavy.

For wildlife and sports, Canon’s more dependable AF and burst buffer clinch the deal, despite Sony’s burst rate edge.

Street photographers valuing discretion might lean slightly towards Canon’s articulated screen, allowing covert low- or high-angle shooting without raising suspicion.

Macro enthusiasts find Canon’s vast lens options a boon, though neither camera offers autofocus fine-tuning or focus stacking native features.

Nighttime shooters will find Sony’s sensor better at handling noise, but Canon’s ability to shoot video and track AF during low-light video is an extra kicker.

Genre-Specific Ratings: Which Camera Masters Which Craft?

Let's look at how both perform across major photography sub-genres, based on testing and technical data.

• Portrait: Canon 650D leads due to higher resolution and face AF.
• Landscape: Sony A450 slightly ahead on dynamic range handling.
• Wildlife: Canon wins with better AF tracking and burst buffer.
• Sports: Edging Canon with more reliable AF, but Sony’s faster burst frame rate is a wild card.
• Street Photography: Canon’s discreet touchscreen and articulating screen tip the scale.
• Macro: Canon again due to ecosystem breadth.
• Night/Astro: Sony’s cleaner sensor edges out here.
• Video: Canon 650D dominates, support for Full HD and autofocus.
• Travel: Balanced, slight edge to Canon for versatility.
• Professional Use: Canon favored for workflow integration and lens availability.

The Verdict: Who Should Buy Each Camera?

Canon EOS 650D - The All-Rounder with Creative Flexibility

If you want a camera that feels great in hand, offers excellent image detail, intuitive touchscreen controls, great video capabilities, and a lens ecosystem that grows with you - the Canon 650D remains a solid choice for enthusiasts starting out or pros wanting a capable backup.

Ideal for:

• Portrait photographers who want face detection and detailed images
• Videographers seeking hybrid shooting ability
• Wildlife and sports shooters needing reliable autofocus
• Travel photographers valuing ergonomic comforts and video tools

Sony Alpha A450 - Strong Sensor and Battery Life for Still Shooters on a Budget

If you’re a still-focused photographer who prioritizes battery endurance, want superior noise performance, and are fine with a less feature-rich interface or lack of video - Sony’s A450 provides a surprisingly capable DSLR at a potentially lower entry cost. However, be aware the lens ecosystem is smaller, video is non-existent, and ergonomics aren’t as polished.

Ideal for:

• Landscape and night photographers valuing dynamic range and low-light performance
• Beginners looking for extended shooting sessions without frequent battery swaps
• Those with existing Sony/Minolta Alpha lenses or invested in Memory Stick media

Final Performance Scores and Price Considerations

Both cameras represent different philosophies respective to their times and markets. Here’s a side-by-side comparison of overall performance ratings.

Price-wise, Canon 650D bodies hover near $500 new (or less for used/demos), whereas Sony A450 currently commands a surprisingly steep $1,241 brand new - mostly due to scarcity and market shifts.

In a strictly value perspective, Canon clearly offers more features and up-to-date capabilities at a lower price point, making it the more practical buy today.

In Conclusion - The Shootout Summed Up

Reflecting on thousands of cameras tested, the Canon 650D strikes me as the smarter, more versatile entry-level DSLR overall, especially when balanced for real-world demands of both photography and video. The touchscreen interface is a refreshing touch, and the autofocus system’s reliability is a confidence booster.

Sony’s A450, while boasting arguably stronger sensor specs and battery longevity, feels more like a stills-only specialist camera with some ergonomic compromises and a diminished lens ecosystem. For pure still photography in controlled environments, it can certainly hold its own.

I encourage anyone hunting for these models (or their secondhand equivalents) to consider their shooting style seriously: crave more video and versatility? Canon 650D. Prioritize battery and raw image purity? Sony A450.

Either way, these cameras offer solid foundations on which to build your photographic journey - just remember, it’s the photographer who truly makes the magic, not the gear alone.

Happy shooting!

Images in this article:

• 
• 
• 
• 
• Canon 650D screen back Sony A450 screen back