Canon 750D vs FujiFilm JX350
66 Imaging
65 Features
76 Overall
69


95 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Canon 750D vs FujiFilm JX350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Canon EF/EF-S Mount
- 555g - 132 x 101 x 78mm
- Launched February 2015
- Other Name is EOS 750D / Kiss X8i
- Replaced the Canon 700D
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.6-6.2) lens
- 130g - 94 x 56 x 24mm
- Launched January 2011
- Additionally referred to as FinePix JX355

Canon EOS 750D vs FujiFilm FinePix JX350: A Practical Photography Equipment Showdown
Choosing the right camera can feel like navigating a jungle of specs, marketing jargon, and sometimes bewildering price tags. In my 15+ years of hands-on camera testing, what truly matters is how these specs translate into real-world performance and photographic enjoyment. Today, I’m putting the 2015 Canon EOS 750D - a competent entry-level DSLR - head-to-head against the FujiFilm FinePix JX350, a compact point-and-shoot from 2011. Two radically different cameras, serving varied photographic goals and budgets.
Let’s explore how each device stacks up across key domains: handling and ergonomics, image quality, autofocus performance, build, versatility across photography disciplines, and value proposition. Expect candid assessments sprinkled with technical nuance, practical usability, and, of course, real-world usage insight. Buckle up; this dog is a good boy.
Handling and Ergonomics: DSLR Presence vs Pocketable Simplicity
First impressions matter, and size plus controls form a large part of a photographer’s tactile bond with their camera. The Canon 750D commands a traditional DSLR footprint - moderate but weighty - versus FujiFilm’s ultra-compact pocket camera.
The Canon 750D stands noticeably larger at 132x101x78 mm and weighs 555g (with battery and card). This bulk allows for a deep, comfortable grip that suits extended shooting sessions. Its fully articulated 3" touchscreen (1040k dots) enhances framing versatility from overhead or low angles, critical for live view shooting and vlogging alike.
Conversely, the FujiFilm JX350 measures a mere 94x56x24 mm and weighs just 130g. Truly pocketable, it fits unobtrusively in one hand or jacket pocket. But with size comes compromise: no viewfinder, a fixed non-touch 2.7" screen with a downright anemic 230k-dot resolution, and limited physical controls. The Fuji trades manual command for grab-and-go simplicity.
Here’s a look at the top control layout contrast:
The Canon 750D’s top plate sports dedicated dials for exposure modes, ISO, and a shutter button with tactile feedback, empowering photographers to shift settings fluidly on the fly. Its external hot shoe invites advanced flash options, a boon for portrait and event shooters.
The Fuji, on the other hand, keeps it minimal with just a mode dial and shutter release. Beginners or snapshot shooters might appreciate this simplified interface, but it lacks the precision control and customization enthusiasts crave.
Bottom line: The Canon offers a photographer-centric grip and controls primed for layered learning and manual intervention. The Fuji prioritizes ultra-portability and ease but at the expense of interaction richness.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: APS-C Muscle vs Small Sensor Compromise
Sensor tech essentially spells the difference between beautiful photos and “meh” snapshots. I’ve tested countless APS-C cameras and can attest to the Canon 750D’s reputable sensor delivering satisfying results for enthusiasts.
The Canon 750D’s 22.3x14.9 mm APS-C CMOS sensor - embedded with Canon’s DIGIC 6 processor - boasts a native resolution of 24 megapixels. This sensor size and resolution combo offers excellent detail retention, broad dynamic range (rated at 12 EV per DxO Mark), and credible color depth (22.7 bits). The max ISO of 12,800 (expandable to 25,600) performs admirably up to ISO 1600-3200, allowing usable images in most indoor and low-light situations.
In contrast, the FujiFilm JX350’s 1/2.3" (6.17x4.55 mm) CCD sensor maxes out at 16 megapixels and struggles in low light. The tiny surface area severely limits dynamic range and noise control, making images noisy beyond ISO 400. Additionally, this sensor’s amplification characteristics mean that colors can sometimes lack pop and highlight roll-off can be abrupt in contrasty scenes.
I took both cameras to a shaded park and an urban night street walk. The Canon’s files exhibited richer tonal gradations, better highlight preservation, and notably less noise under dim conditions. Fuji’s images, while acceptable in bright sunlight, became unusable once shadows deepened.
Autofocus and Shooting Performance: Precision and Speed vs Basic Autofocus
Speed and accuracy in focus systems critically influence your ability to capture fleeting moments, be it wildlife, sports, or candid portraits. The Canon 750D comes equipped with a hybrid AF system comprising 19 cross-type phase-detection points visible through the optical viewfinder, supplemented by contrast-detection in live view. This dual-mode autofocus offers reliable, swift focus acquisition.
The FujiFilm JX350, by contrast, relies on a basic contrast-detection AF only, lacking phase detection or autofocus tracking sophistication. The maximum continuous shooting speed is a paltry single frame per second, limiting freeze-frame capabilities in fast scenarios.
With Canon’s 750D, I successfully tested tracking focus in bird-in-flight and urban sports shoots. Its eye-detection AF in live view enhances portrait sharpness precision - a welcome feature for aspiring portraitists. Fuji’s camera often hunts slowly in low contrast or dim settings, frequently failing to lock focus on fast-moving subjects, which disrupts the shooting flow.
Build Quality and Weather Resistance: DSLR Ruggedness vs Casual Use
Canon’s 750D sports a polycarbonate resin body with a metal chassis inside, promising decent durability for an entry-level DSLR. It lacks weather sealing though, so caution is needed in rain or dusty environments. The FujiFilm JX350 is a typical thin plastic compact without any sealing, designed for casual daylight use only.
For travel or outdoor landscape shooters considering durability, the Canon’s robust chassis and better ergonomics make it more dependable on rough assignments. Fuji’s minimalistic build encourages protected, occasional shooting only.
User Interface and Display Experience
Both cameras use LCDs for framing and menu navigation, but differ vastly in user comfort and feedback.
The Canon’s 3" fully articulating touchscreen is a highlight for vlogging, awkward angle shooting, and intuitive menu navigation. The touch interface supports AF point selection and image playback zoom with ease.
Fuji’s 2.7" fixed LCD has low resolution, no touchscreen, and a narrow color gamut resulting in duller previews. This makes critical image assessment frustrating in the field, especially in bright sunlight.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility
One of Canon’s biggest assets is its vast EF and EF-S lens ecosystem with over 300 lenses available, from affordable primes to pro-level telephotos and macros. This versatility allows photographers to grow their kit tailored to any genre: wildlife (via telephoto zooms), macro, landscape, or portrait.
In stark contrast, FujiFilm JX350’s fixed 28-140 mm equivalent zoom (f/2.6-6.2) limits compositional freedom and optical quality. No lens swaps are possible, and the slow variable aperture curbs creativity in shallow depth-of-field and low light.
Battery Life and Storage
The Canon 750D’s LP-E17 battery delivers around 440 shots per charge based on CIPA testing, which aligns with my real-world shooting that comfortably spans a day of intensive use. Fuji’s smaller NP-45A battery lasts a mere 180 shots, requiring frequent replacements or charging - an inconvenience during extended outings.
Both rely on SD/SDHC/SDXC cards. Canon supports faster UHS-I cards, beneficial when writing large RAW files or continuous shooting bursts. Fuji’s slower storage speed reflects its more casual design intent.
Connectivity and Wireless Capabilities
Canon 750D includes built-in Wi-Fi and NFC for remote shooting and quick image transfers - valuable tools for social shooters and on-location workflows. USB 2.0 and mini-HDMI ports add wired connectivity options.
FujiFilm JX350 lacks any wireless features or HDMI output, restricting its integration into modern sharing workflows. USB 2.0 remains its sole interface.
Real-World Performance Across Photography Genres
Let’s step through diverse photographic use cases and evaluate how these two cameras measure up.
Portrait Photography: Skin Tones, Bokeh, and Eye Detection
Portraits thrive on accurate skin tones and smooth background separation. Canon’s APS-C sensor and compatible bright lenses deliver creamy, attractive bokeh. The EOS 750D’s eye-detection AF in live view enhances face sharpness - a blessing for portrait shooters wanting crisp eyes.
Fuji’s small sensor and slow variable aperture hinder bokeh creation. Forced to rely on digital stretching, portraits often have flat backgrounds. Skin tone rendition is decent in good light but can shift to a dull palette indoors.
Landscape Photography: Dynamic Range, Resolution, Weather Sealing
With 24 MP and excellent dynamic range, the Canon can capture sweeping detail and subtle tonal gradients. Coupled with quality EF-S lenses, it performs admirably in scenic shoots. The lack of weather sealing is a slight drawback for rugged fieldwork but manageable with care.
Fuji’s smaller sensor means lower resolution and limited highlight/shadow recovery. Landscape scenes sometimes appear chemically flat, and exposure latitude is tighter. Still, it provides a usable casual landscape experience.
Wildlife and Sports Photography: Autofocus Speed, Burst Rates, Telephoto Reach
Canon’s 5 fps burst and 19 cross-type AF points provide a competent platform for amateur wildlife and sports. Combined with its vast telephoto lenses and reliable AF tracking, the 750D can nail fast action under various conditions.
The Fuji flies solo here. Its 1 fps, slow AF, and modest zoom limit its use to static or slow subjects in bright daylight.
Street Photography: Discreetness, Low Light, Portability
Fuji’s compact size shines in street shooting for its stealthiness - less conspicuous than a DSLR’s bulk and noise. However, its modest low-light capacity and slow AF can slow down rapid candid capture.
Canon’s larger form draws more attention, but improved low-light performance and manual controls give more creative latitude for street storytelling.
Macro Photography: Magnification, Focus Precision, Stabilization
Canon’s lens range includes many specialized macro primes and zooms offering high magnifications and sharp optics. Its touch AF and manual focus aids improve close-up shooting precision.
Fuji’s fixed lens caps macro capability due to limited close-focusing distance and no stabilization.
Night and Astro Photography: High ISO Performance, Exposure Modes
Canon’s good high ISO capacity and RAW output flexibility open doors for nightscapes and astrophotography with longer exposures and noise control.
Fuji’s small sensor struggles significantly under dim conditions, unleashing noise and limiting utility for night work.
Video Capabilities: A Basic DSLR vs Modest Compact
Canon 750D records Full HD 1080p video at 30fps with H.264 compression. The articulated touchscreen and microphone input add versatility for casual filmmakers and vlogs. It lacks 4K, but output quality and focusing make it serviceable.
Fuji’s video tops out at HD 720p 30fps, stored in Motion JPEG format, lacking external mic and advanced controls. It’s fine for casual clips but not serious video work.
Price-to-Performance Ratio: Investment Worth or Snapshot Convenience?
At time of release, Canon 750D carried an MSRP around $749. Its sophisticated sensor, lens interchangeability, and versatility justify this for enthusiasts climbing the learning curve or dabbling seriously.
FujiFilm JX350 sells near $200 new, targeting entry-level consumers prioritizing simplicity and ultra-portability without demanding image quality or control.
Overall Performance and User Recommendations
Breaking it down by photographic disciplines:
- Enthusiast Photographers: Canon 750D is a clear winner. Its superior sensor, robust AF, extensive system, and manual control support learning and creative growth.
- Casual Snapshooters: FujiFilm JX350 offers budget-friendly ease and small size for those craving simple point-and-shoot usage without fuss or investment.
- Travel Photographers: The Canon’s versatility, coupled with lens options and decent battery life, deliver value but require careful packing due to size. Fuji’s pocketability is unbeatable but at image quality cost.
- Portrait and Event Shooters: Canon’s eye detection and flash options offer professional potential; Fuji’s limited flash, slow AF, and sensor size constrain results.
- Outdoor and Wildlife: Canon’s autofocus system and telephoto support make it a good intro tool; Fuji’s design renders it unsuitable.
- Video Users: Basic vlogging possible with Canon; Fuji lacks features for meaningful video capture.
In Summary: Distinct Tools for Distinct Photographers
The Canon EOS 750D, despite its 2015 vintage, remains a compelling gateway into DSLR photography. It provides hands-on physical controls, advanced autofocus, an excellent APS-C sensor, and a lens ecosystem that encourages photographic exploration and growth. For photographers who value image quality, manual creativity, and are willing to invest in lenses and accessories, this is a solid, well-rounded choice.
The FujiFilm FinePix JX350, in contrast, is a lightweight, ultra-portable snapshot camera optimized for users who want point-and-shoot convenience at minimal cost. It’s best suited for bright outdoor casual photography with an emphasis on pocketability rather than image excellence or control.
Making a leap from a small sensor compact like the Fuji to a DSLR such as the Canon is significant both financially and in learning curve terms. However, the rewards in control, quality, and versatility are substantial.
In closing, if you see photography as more than a fleeting hobby, crave manual involvement, and prioritize image quality across genres, the Canon 750D remains a very respectable, budget-conscious pathway. If, however, your goal is quick snapshots with minimal setup in well-lit scenes, the FujiFilm JX350 modestly suffices.
This juxtaposition underscores a fundamental truth I’ve witnessed and tested repeatedly: the best camera is the one that fits your photographic ambitions and operational preferences. Hopefully, this analysis helps you find your precise match.
Happy shooting!
If you want the detailed specs to glance back at, let’s wrap with a quick top-level chart of features:
Feature | Canon EOS 750D | FujiFilm FinePix JX350 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Size | 22.3 x 14.9 mm (APS-C CMOS) | 6.17 x 4.55 mm (1/2.3" CCD) |
Resolution | 24 MP | 16 MP |
Max ISO | 12,800 (25,600 boost) | 1,600 (3,200 boost) |
Autofocus | 19 cross-type phase + contrast | Contrast only |
Continuous Shooting | 5 fps | 1 fps |
Lens System | Interchangeable EF/EF-S | Fixed Zoom 28-140 mm equiv. |
Screen | 3" fully articulating touch | 2.7" fixed, no touch |
Video | 1080p30 (H.264) | 720p30 MJPEG |
Weight | 555g | 130g |
Price (Launch) | ~$749 | ~$200 |
Engage with me in the comments below if you want insight on upgrading lenses for the 750D, or best ways to extract maximum quality from compact cameras. I’m always eager to share field-tested tips and nuanced camera wisdom.
Until next time!
Canon 750D vs FujiFilm JX350 Specifications
Canon EOS 750d | FujiFilm FinePix JX350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | FujiFilm |
Model | Canon EOS 750d | FujiFilm FinePix JX350 |
Also called | EOS 750D / Kiss X8i | FinePix JX355 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2015-02-06 | 2011-01-05 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | DIGIC 6 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3440 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 19 | - |
Cross focus points | 19 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Canon EF/EF-S | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.6-6.2 |
Available lenses | 326 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.51x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1800s |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 555g (1.22 lbs) | 130g (0.29 lbs) |
Dimensions | 132 x 101 x 78mm (5.2" x 4.0" x 3.1") | 94 x 56 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 71 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.0 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 919 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 440 images | 180 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LP-E17 | NP-45A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I compatible) | SD / SDHC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $749 | $200 |