Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 5010
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9e45/e9e457397531c200c69a31ad07004097ef5a77b7" alt="Olympus Stylus 5010 front Olympus Stylus 5010 front"
96 Imaging
36 Features
27 Overall
32
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 5010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 126g - 95 x 56 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Additionally referred to as mju 5010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 5010 Overview
The following is a extensive review of the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 5010, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact and they are both sold by Olympus. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and 5010 (14MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and 5010 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-M1 II was launched 6 years after the 5010 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 5010 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-M1 II scores vs the 5010 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 5010 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Olympus Stylus 5010. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Olympus 5010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus 5010
E-M1 II | 5010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | ![]() | January 2010 | Newer by 82 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 5010 over the Olympus E-M1 II
5010 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus 5010
E-M1 II | 5010 |
---|
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 5010 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II features outer dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Olympus 5010 has measurements of 95mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 5010 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M1 II against the 5010.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a094/1a094eb280f8ce110a80cc226de3a8061a08899a" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 5010 size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 5010 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and 5010 is 68 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9eccc/9eccc041ba71fb3520825ef80e8724843f5d071f" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 5010 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 5010 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 5010 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to picture the gap between sensor dimensions merely by checking specs. The pic below will provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and 5010.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will give you greater detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1456c/1456ceb32f5bd0a08b4b4c91adef79b97def60d2" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 5010 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 5010 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 5010 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a39b/4a39bb0d2de9d29278c0223e5d785871c2597de8" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 5010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 5010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 5010 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus Stylus 5010 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus Stylus 5010 |
Also Known as | - | mju 5010 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 7cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lbs) | 126 grams (0.28 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 95 x 56 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLH-1 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Two | 1 |
Retail pricing | $1,700 | $150 |