Canon 80D vs Panasonic LZ30: A Hands-On Expert Comparison for Serious Photography Buyers

Choosing between the Canon EOS 80D and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ30 boils down to your photography ambitions, budget, and how you like to work. Both cameras share an SLR-style shape, but that’s truly where the similarity ends. One is a serious mid-level DSLR packed with professional features, the other a budget-friendly bridge camera geared toward casual shooters and cheapskates alike.

I’ve spent years testing both DSLRs and compact superzooms, so let’s cut through the specs sheet and marketing fluff. I’ll walk you through everything that really matters: sensor performance, autofocus chops, build quality, shooting versatility, and real-world image results. By the end, you’ll know exactly which one suits your style - or if there’s a better camera you should consider instead.

Putting Size and Ergonomics Under The Microscope

First impressions matter hugely when holding a camera, and the Canon 80D and Panasonic LZ30 couldn’t be more different beasts in the hand. The 80D is a traditional DSLR with a solid, mid-size body crafted for serious shooters who value a tactile, well-laid-out interface. In contrast, the LZ30 is a bridge-style camera with a fixed ultra-zoom lens - lighter, smaller, but far less refined as a tool.

Check out the physical proportion differences here:

The Canon’s hefty 730g frame (batteries included) feels like it’s built to last, sporting deep grip clubs for your right thumb and fingers, making it comfortable for long shooting sessions. The Panasonic, at 552g, is more pocketable but chunkier around the lens barrel. Ergonomically, there’s no contest: the 80D’s thoughtfully placed dials and buttons (yes, illuminated!) let you shoot intuitively without diving into menus, whereas the LZ30 offers minimal direct control, emphasizing simplicity over speed.

If you value physical control - especially in fast-paced environments like events or wildlife - the Canon’s design will cause you to breathe easier, metaphorically and literally. The Panasonic is likely a no-frills "point and shoot with zoom" for casual snaps and travel, but you won’t appreciate it during extended use or demanding shoots.

A Tale of Two Sensors: Image Quality Fundamentals

The Canon 80D sports a true photographic workhorse: an APS-C sized CMOS sensor measuring 22.5mm by 15mm - roughly 337.5 mm². It boasts 24 megapixels, delivering crisp, detailed shots with plenty of room to crop and print large. Dual DIGIC 6 processors ensure fast image handling and respectable noise control.

In contrast, the Panasonic LZ30 uses a tiny 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor (6.17 x 4.55 mm, or about 28 mm²) with 16 megapixels. Although it sounds tempting at face value, this tiny sensor is a huge bottleneck for image quality, especially in low light or large prints.

To visualize the sensor gulf:

Technical tests and my own experience confirm the Canon’s superior color depth (23.6 bits vs. untested but known limited on the LZ30), dynamic range (13.2 EV), and ISO sensitivity (native max ISO 16,000 with extension settings to 25,600) versus the Panasonic’s max 6,400 native ISO. The 80D’s sensor design benefits from modern CMOS technology with an optical low-pass filter to reduce moiré, while the LZ30’s CCD is a relic by comparison, struggling with noise and banding once you hit anything above ISO 400.

If you prioritize image quality, especially for portraits, landscapes, or any creative work where detail and color fidelity matter, the Canon wins hands down. The Panasonic’s sensor is fine for snapshots, but you’ll be limited to web-sized images and well-lit scenes.

Viewing and Interface: How You Frame Your Shot

The Canon 80D’s optical pentaprism viewfinder provides a bright, 100% field-of-view experience, letting you compose shots with precision and immediacy - something still many shooters prefer over electronic displays for action photography or sunny conditions. Its 3" fully articulated touchscreen LCD (1040k dots resolution) adds versatility for live view shooting and menu navigation.

Meanwhile, the Panasonic LZ30 skips any finder and offers only a fixed 3" TFT LCD with a mere 460k dot resolution - about half the Canon’s sharpness and no touch functionality. Its fixed position means awkward angles for waist-level or overhead shooting.

See how the back-screen experience stacks up:

Real-world testing confirms the 80D’s viewfinder and screen combo provide much better framing flexibility, especially in bright daylight or when using live view for macros and video. The LZ30’s screen fades in bright outdoor environments, forcing you to guess framing or blindly adjust.

For photographers who want to tinker, rely on rapid settings tweaks, or shoot in challenging lighting, the Canon’s interface is the clearer winner - both ergonomically and in sheer functionality.

Autofocus and Burst Shooting: Speed and Accuracy in Action

Autofocus is where the Canon 80D shines among mid-tier DSLRs. Equipped with 45 cross-type phase-detection AF points distributed across the frame, it offers quick, reliable focus acquisition with excellent tracking accuracy, including face detection and continuous AF modes for fast-moving subjects. The AF system also performs well in low-light (down to -3 EV), essential for indoor events or night shoots.

The Panasonic LZ30 uses contrast-detection autofocus only, lacks phase detection, and provides no dedicated face or eye tracking. This results in sluggish focus acquisition, especially on fast or moving subjects, and hunting indoors or in dimmer conditions. The single-frame continuous shooting at 1 fps is also a big limitation for capturing action or decisive moments.

Here’s a graphical recap of autofocus and speed performance:

In my hands-on field tests with wildlife and sports subjects, the Canon 80D consistently nails focus tracking and sustainment, while the LZ30 often lagged, producing blurry or missed shots. Moreover, Canon’s 7 fps burst is perfect for capturing fleeting expressions in portraits or fast plays in sports, compared to Panasonic’s crawl at 1 fps.

If your work demands speed and accuracy - animal photography, street, or sports - the 80D is the no-brainer. The LZ30 works only for stationary, leisurely subjects.

Lens Ecosystem and Versatility: Openness vs Built-in Fixed Lens

One of the biggest advantages to owning a DSLR like the Canon 80D is Canon’s extensive lens ecosystem. With compatibility for over 300 Canon EF and EF-S lenses - including fast primes, professional telephotos, tilt-shifts, and macro glass - you can assemble exactly the kit your style demands. Whether you're chasing butterflies or shooting weddings, the right lens will make or break your work.

The Panasonic LZ30 comes with a fixed built-in 25-875mm (35mm equiv.) F3.0-5.9 lens that is versatile zoom-wise but optically compromises sharpness and bokeh quality. The zoom’s 35x reach is impressive on paper but sacrifices brightness and clarity at telephoto lengths.

Having personally tested bird photography with both cameras, I can attest that the Canon’s pro lenses render superior sharpness and background separation, vital for nature and portrait shooters. The Panasonic’s lens is fine for travel snapshots but lacks crispness and artistic control at wide apertures.

For lens lovers and travelers craving flexibility, Canon’s open mount ecosystem is a major win. Casual users wanting the simplest all-in-one solution might appreciate the Panasonic’s fixed zoom, but with significant quality tradeoffs.

Durability, Weather Sealing, and Build Longevity

If you shoot outdoors or in rough conditions, body durability is paramount. The Canon 80D offers environmental sealing against dust and moisture, built from a robust magnesium alloy/chassis blend. It’s designed to withstand field use through heat, humidity, and slight drizzle.

The Panasonic LZ30 lacks any weather sealing or rugged construction - made mostly from lightweight plastics to hit a budget price point. If you get caught above treeline or in light rain, you’ll want to be very careful.

Pro photographers looking for long-term dependability will find the 80D far better in this regard. Casual shooters who stay mostly indoors or in predictable weather can risk the Panasonic but should handle it more gently.

Battery Life and Storage Options: Staying Power in the Field

Canon’s use of a rechargeable LP-E6N lithium-ion battery grants around 960 shots per charge (CIPA rating), which translates to all-day shooting in most conditions with spare batteries for safety. Dual SD card support is absent, but the one slot supports UHS-I cards for quick write speeds.

The Panasonic LZ30, surprisingly, runs on 4x AA batteries - cheap and easy to swap anywhere, but also inconvenient if you shoot a lot or travel far without spares. It only manages about 380 shots per battery load and saves images to one slot supporting SD and internal memory.

For heavy users or professionals, Canon’s lithium system is faster, more economical over time, and less bulky. The LZ30’s AA dependency can be handy in emergencies but feels old-fashioned and less reliable for serious shoots.

Video and Multimedia: Moving Image Capabilities

Video performance is often overlooked but increasingly important. The Canon 80D shoots Full HD 1080p video up to 60fps with clean H.264 compression and offers a microphone and headphone jack for sound quality control - a boon for serious vloggers and hybrid shooters.

The Panasonic LZ30 can only shoot HD 720p video at 30fps in Motion JPEG format with no mic input or stabilization beyond lens-based Optical IS (which helps hand shake). This is pretty minimal by modern standards.

If you want to create polished video content for clients or social media, the Canon is a worthy tool. The Panasonic video is about as basic as it gets - sufficient for casual home movies or quick clips.

Specialty Photography: A Quick Rundown

Let’s touch briefly on how these cameras fare across popular photography styles:

• Portraits: Canon’s larger sensor, 45-point AF, and lens choices yield beautiful skin tones and creamy bokeh. Panasonic struggles with focus and background blur.

• Landscapes: Canon’s resolution and dynamic range capture nuanced scenes and skies. Panasonics’s small sensor is noisy with limited dynamic range.

• Wildlife: Canon’s fast tracking and burst rate combined with telephotos deliver critical sharp wildlife shots. Panasonic’s fixed lens and slow AF disappoint here.

• Sports: 80D’s 7 fps and phase-detect AF with continuous tracking easily beat the LZ30’s 1 fps and contrast-only AF.

• Street: If discreetness is key, the LZ30’s compact zoom body can be less conspicuous, but autofocusing fast urban subjects is a pain.

• Macro: Canon’s focusing precision and lens options give it a clear edge over the focusing-limited LZ30.

• Night/Astro: Canon’s low-light ISO and noise control make astrophotography possible. Panasonic’s sensor noise limits low-light credibility.

• Travel: Panasonic’s all-in-one zoom and lightweight appeal to travelers on a budget. Canon’s versatility and image quality come at slightly heavier bulk and higher cost.

• Professional Work: The Canon 80D is the only candidate here with professional reliability, true RAW support, and advanced features that integrate into serious workflows.

Here’s a visual comparison of performance by genre:

Real-Life Sample Image Comparison

After putting both cameras through paces on the same shoots, the image samples are telling: the Canon 80D photos show greater detail, cleaner colors, and better highlight retention, even in challenging light. Faces rendered naturally with convincing skin tones and well-separated backgrounds.

The Panasonic LZ30 images look softer, more prone to noise, and sometimes suffer from blur or focus misses. It’s definitely more snapshot and beginner level.

Here’s a side-by-side example from a controlled shoot:

Canon 80D front Canon 80D screen back Panasonic LZ30 front Panasonic LZ30 screen back

Value for Money: What Are You Really Getting?

At the time of this review:

• Canon EOS 80D body only goes for about $1,200
• Panasonic LZ30 costs roughly $230

That’s a huge price gap, and rightly so. The Canon is a fully-fledged, advanced DSLR with pro features, while the Panasonic is an entry-level budget camera with basic specs.

If you’re a photography enthusiast or professional, the $1,200 investment for Canon is justified considering build quality, sensor performance, autofocus system, and lens options. You get a camera that can handle bookings, artistic projects, and a variety of shooting conditions.

If you want a casual, easy, affordable camera for family photos, vacations, and amateur fun without fuss, the Panasonic could be fine - but don’t expect professional results or quick focus.

Conclusion: Which Camera Wins for You?

To summarize my hands-on experience after rigorous testing and side-by-side comparison:

Canon EOS 80D:

Pros:

• Large, high-quality APS-C sensor, excellent image detail and dynamic range
• Robust, weather-sealed body with comfortable ergonomics and intuitive controls
• Fast, accurate 45-point phase-detection autofocus with excellent tracking
• Versatile lens mount with access to a vast Canon lens ecosystem
• Full HD video with professional audio input options
• Long battery life, advanced connectivity (WiFi, NFC)

Cons:

• Heavier and bulkier than budget compacts
• More expensive upfront cost and additional investment in lenses

Panasonic Lumix LZ30:

Pros:

• Affordable, all-in-one super zoom lens with wide telephoto reach
• Compact and lightweight compared to full DSLRs
• Simple operation geared to casual users
• Optical image stabilization helps steady shots

Cons:

• Tiny sensor severely limits image quality and noise handling
• Slow contrast-detection autofocus, no face or eye detection
• Fixed lens limits creative flexibility
• No viewfinder or touchscreen, basic controls
• Limited video capabilities

Who Should Buy the Canon 80D?

• Serious hobbyists and professionals looking for a durable, versatile camera body
• Photographers seeking high-quality images in all lighting conditions
• Those who want future-proof lenses and advanced features for portraits, sports, wildlife, and landscapes
• Content creators who want good video capabilities and audio control

Who Might Consider the Panasonic LZ30?

• Beginners or cheapskates wanting a simple point-and-shoot with extreme zoom range
• Travelers on a tight budget who want lightweight gear
• Casual shooters not concerned about image quality or autofocus speed

Final Word:
The Canon EOS 80D and Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ30 live in wildly different camera universes. The 80D is a serious tool for photographers who are committed to craft and quality. The LZ30 is a fun, affordable start to snap happy for those who want minimal fuss. This isn’t a choice just about specs; it’s about your photographic goals, how much you want to invest in the craft, and the kinds of images you want to create.

If you can stretch your budget and want future-proof capability, the Canon 80D remains a standout choice in the mid-level DSLR market. If you want cheap and cheerful with zoom-for-days, the Panasonic LZ30 does have its modest appeal - just temper your expectations.

Happy shooting!

Image Asset Recap Used In This Review:

• 
• 
• 
• Canon 80D front Canon 80D screen back Panasonic LZ30 front Panasonic LZ30 screen back
•